PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K A Haig

Publications and source records attributed to K A Haig.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Experience during suckling alters later spatial learning.

These experiments explore the role of preweaning experience in learning during the juvenile period. Pups that had been reared with many nipples available reached criterion on an 8-arm radial maze in a few trials; conversely, pups reared with only a few nipples required 3 times the number of trials to reach criterion (Experiment 1). Pups that had been reared with relatively few nipples available rarely nipple-shifted, while those that had been reared with a particularly high density of nipples shifted more frequently (Expt 2). A rearing procedure was devised that allowed precise experimental control of all phases of the suckling experience (Expt 3). Allowing or preventing a single behavior, nipple-shifting, while holding all other variables constant, was sufficient to affect acquisition of the maze task. In Experiment 4, the specificity of the early experience for later tasks was explored using a variety of nonspatial, lever-pressing operants. Rearing condition did not affect acquisition of a lever-pressing operant or of a visual discrimination task. However, pups reared with a high density of nipples responded at higher rates to a variable interval schedule and were more resistant to extinction. The possibility that strategy, rather than learning ability, was affected by rearing condition was assessed using a 2-arm maze task that was structured to present an optimal strategy of either win-shift or win-stay (Expt 5). The ease with which rats acquired the win-stay task was unaffected by rearing condition; all groups performed at about chance levels. However, pups reared with many nipples more readily acquired the win-shift task.

Animals↗

Weight and balance of a new telephone handset.

Several identical prototype shells of a new telephone handset design were weighed in different ways to produce five different overall weights, ranging from 130 to 340 g, and three different balance conditions: transmitter-heavy, receiver-heavy, and balanced. Fifty-two subjects drawn from working people of both sexes and a range of ages participated in pair-comparison tests in which each subject gave a preference judgment for one handset over another for all possible pairs of handsets. They also rated each handset as acceptable or unacceptable. The best overall handset weighed 176 g with the weight equally distributed between transmitter and receiver. The lightest handset (130 g, balanced) was actually preferred by a majority of people over the balanced 176-gram set but twice as many people rated it unacceptable (31% vs 14%). All handsets weighing 176 g or less and the balanced handset weighing 224 g were rated as acceptable by at least two-thirds of the subjects. It is recommended that designs aim at a balanced handset weighing approximately 176 g. It would not be worthwhile to add weight to an unbalanced 176-gram set to bring it into balance.

Journal Article↗