Biomedical subjects

K Alo

Publications and source records attributed to K Alo.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

[CT-controlled percutaneous lumbar discectomy in therapy of radicular pain].

Percutaneous disc decompression using the Decompressor system is another treatment option for patients suffering from chronic discogenic leg pain. This is the first report on a patient undergoing this procedure under CT-control. A 49 year old man with radicular leg pain showed significant pain reduction after percutaneus decompression of a discal herniation at the L4/5 level. The new system enables qualitative and quantitative measures of the removed disc material. CT-control ensures exact positioning of the device.

Decompression, Surgical↗

PubMed2003

Role of postoperative computed tomography in patients with severe liver injury.

BACKGROUND: The role of postoperative computed tomography (CT) in asymptomatic patients with severe liver injury has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the nature and incidence of significant liver-related abnormalities detected by postoperative CT in asymptomatic patients with severe liver injury. METHODS: This was a prospective study of survivors with severe liver injury (grades III-V) who were treated surgically. The patients underwent CT to evaluate the liver after operation, irrespective of symptoms. RESULTS: During the study interval there were 181 patients with severe liver injury, of whom 49 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. The overall incidence of liver-related complications detected by CT was 49 per cent (necrotic areas in the liver in seven patients, seven bilomas, four abscesses, three perihepatic collections and three false aneurysms). In the subgroup of 17 asymptomatic patients CT revealed four abnormalities: two large bilomas, one false aneurysm and one fluid collection. Two of these patients required therapeutic intervention and the other two remained under observation. CONCLUSION: In view of the incidence of asymptomatic significant liver abnormalities following operative management of severe liver injury, it is recommended that these patients undergo routine postoperative CT.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Effect on outcome of early intensive management of geriatric trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant injuries elderly patients (aged 70 years or more) often do not exhibit any of the standard physiological criteria for trauma team activation (TTA), i.e. hypotension, tachycardia or unresponsiveness to pain. As a result of these findings the authors' TTA criteria were modified to include age 70 years or more, and a protocol of early aggressive monitoring and resuscitation was introduced. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of the new policy on outcome. METHODS: This trauma registry study included patients aged 70 years or more with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 15 who were admitted over a period of 8 years and 8 months. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included patients admitted before age 70 years and above became a TTA criterion and group 2 included patients admitted during the period when age 70 years or more was a TTA criterion and the new management protocol was in place. The two groups were compared with regard to survival, functional status on discharge and hospital charges. RESULTS: There were 336 trauma patients who met the criteria, 260 in group 1 and 76 in group 2. The two groups were similar with respect to mechanism of injury, age, gender, ISS and body area Abbreviated Injury Score. The mortality rate in group 1 was 53.8 per cent and that in group 2 was 34.2 per cent (P = 0.003) (relative risk (RR) 1.57 (95 per cent confidence interval 1.13 to 2.19)). The incidence of permanent disability in the two groups was 16.7 and 12.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.49) (RR 1.39 (0.59 to 3.25)). In subgroups of patients with an ISS of more than 20 the mortality rate was 68.4 and 46.9 per cent in groups 1 and 2 respectively (P = 0.01) (RR 1.46 (1.06 to 2.00)); 12 of 49 survivors in group 1 and two of 26 in group 2 suffered permanent disability (P = 0.12) (RR 3.18 (0.77 to 13.20)). CONCLUSION: Activation of the trauma team and early intensive monitoring, evaluation and resuscitation of geriatric trauma patients improves survival.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Penetrating trauma in patients older than 55 years: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have compared young and elderly blunt trauma patients, and concluded that, because elderly patients have outcomes similar to young patients, aggressive resuscitation should be offered regardless of age. Similar data on penetrating trauma patients are limited. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective review, 79 patients with penetrating injuries and age > or =55 were blindly matched for Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) with 79 penetrating trauma patients aged 15-35 years, who were admitted to the hospital over the same 4 year period (June 1994-June 1998). Mortality rates and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the hospital were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average ISS for all patients was 12 (range 1-75) and identical for both groups. Both groups had similar injuries and were evaluated by an equal number and type of diagnostic studies. The mean ISS was not different between severely injured older and younger patients who required ICU admission or died. Among 32 nonsurvivors (18 older and 14 younger), older patients were more likely than younger patients to present with normal vital signs, although the comparison did not reach statistical significance (50% vs. 13%, P=0.25). There was a clinically significant trend for longer ICU (15+/-30 vs. 3+/-2 days, P=0.096) and hospital stay (10+/-18 vs. 6+/-8 days, P=0.08) among older patients, but mortality rates were similar (23% in older vs. 18% in younger, P=NS). Furthermore, these outcome parameters showed no difference when both groups were classified according to severity of injury or physiologic response. CONCLUSIONS: Following penetrating trauma, older patients arriving alive and admitted to the hospital are as likely to survive as younger patients who have injuries of similar severity, but at the expense of longer ICU and hospital stays.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Selective nonoperative management in 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of a policy of selective nonoperative management (SNOM) in patients with abdominal gunshot wounds. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Selective nonoperative management is practiced extensively in stab wounds and blunt abdominal trauma, but routine laparotomy is still the standard of care in abdominal gunshot wounds. METHODS: The authors reviewed the medical records of 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds (1,405 anterior, 451 posterior) admitted during an 8-year period in a busy academic level 1 trauma center and managed by SNOM. According to this policy, patients who did not have peritonitis, were hemodynamically stable, and had a reliable clinical examination were observed. RESULTS: Initially, 792 (42%) patients (34% of patients with anterior and 68% with posterior abdominal gunshot wounds) were selected for nonoperative management. During observation 80 (4%) patients developed symptoms and required a delayed laparotomy, which revealed organ injuries requiring repair in 57. Five (0.3%) patients suffered complications potentially related to the delay in laparotomy, which were managed successfully. Seven hundred twelve (38%) patients were successfully managed without an operation. The rate of unnecessary laparotomy was 14% among operated patients (or 9% among all patients). If patients were managed by routine laparotomy, the unnecessary laparotomy rate would have been 47% (39% for anterior and 74% for posterior abdominal gunshot wounds). Compared with patients with unnecessary laparotomy, patients managed without surgery had significantly shorter hospital stays and lower hospital charges. By maintaining a policy of SNOM instead of routine laparotomy, a total of 3,560 hospital days and $9,555,752 in hospital charges were saved over the period of the study. CONCLUSION: Selective nonoperative management is a safe method for managing patients with abdominal gunshot wounds in a level 1 trauma center with an in-house trauma team. It reduces significantly the rate of unnecessary laparotomy and hospital charges.

Abdominal Injuries↗

PubMed2001

Penetrating esophageal injuries: multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the period of time after which delays in management incurred by investigations cause increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome study is intended to correlate time with death from esophageal causes, overall complications, esophageal related complications, and surgical intensive care unit length of stay. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 34 trauma centers in the United States, under the auspices of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-institutional Trials Committee over a span of 10.5 years. Patients surviving to reach the operating room (OR) were divided into two groups: those that underwent diagnostic studies to identify their injuries (preoperative evaluation group) and those that went immediately to the OR (no preoperative evaluation group). Statistical methods included Fisher's exact test, Student's T test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study involved 405 patients: 355 male patients (86.5%) and 50 female patients (13.5%). The mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.3, the mean Injury Severity Score was 28, and the mean time interval to the OR was 6.5 hours. There were associated injuries in 356 patients (88%), and an overall complication rate of 53.5%. Overall mortality was 78 of 405 (19%). Three hundred forty-six patients survived to reach the OR: 171 in the preoperative evaluation group and 175 in the no preoperative evaluation group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the two groups in the following parameters: number of patients, age, Injury Severity Score, admission blood pressure, anatomic location of injury (cervical or thoracic), surgical management (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, resection and diversion, flaps), number of associated injuries, and mortality. Average length of time to the OR was 13 hours in the preoperative evaluation group versus 1 hour in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 134 in the preoperative evaluation group versus 87 in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001), and 74 (41%) esophageal related complications occurred in the preoperative evaluation group versus 32 (19%) in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.003). Mean surgical intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days in the preoperative evaluation group versus 7 days in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for the development of esophageal related complications included time delays in preoperative evaluation (odds ratio, 3.13), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade >2 (odds ratio, 2.62), and resection and diversion (odds ratio, 4.47). CONCLUSION: Esophageal injuries carry a high morbidity and mortality. Increased esophageal related morbidity occurs with the diagnostic workup and its inherent delay in operative repair of these injuries. For centers practicing selective management of penetrating neck injuries and transmediastinal gunshot wounds, rapid diagnosis and definitive repair should be made a high priority.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Old age as a criterion for trauma team activation.

BACKGROUND: Elderly trauma patients have been shown to have a worse prognosis than young patients. Age alone is not a criterion for trauma team activation (TTA). In the present study, we evaluated the role of age > or = 70 years as a criterion for TTA. METHODS: The present study was a trauma registry study that included injured patients 70 years of age or older. Patients who died in hospital, were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 hours, or had a non-orthopedic operation were assumed to benefit from TTA. RESULTS: During a 7.5-year period, 883 elderly (> or = 70 years) trauma patients meeting trauma center criteria were admitted to our center. Overall, 223 patients (25%) met at least one of the standard TTA criteria. The mortality in this group was 50%, the ICU admission rate was 39%, and a non-orthopedic operation was required in 35%. The remaining 660 patients (75%) did not meet standard TTA criteria. The mortality was 16%, the need for ICU admission was 24%, and non-orthopedic operations were required in 19%. Sixty-three percent of patients with severe injuries (Injury Severity Score > 15) and 25% of patients with critical injuries (Injury Severity Score > 30) did not have any of the standard hemodynamic criteria for TTA. CONCLUSION: Elderly trauma patients have a high mortality, even with fairly minor or moderately severe injuries. A significant number of elderly patients with severe injuries do not meet the standard criteria for TTA. It is suggested that age > or = 70 years alone should be a criterion for TTA.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2001

Aerodigestive injuries of the neck.

Cervical aerodigestive trauma is rare and most centers have a limited experience with its management. The purpose of this review was to study the epidemiology, diagnosis, and problems related to the early evaluation and management of these injuries. This was a retrospective study based on trauma registry and on chart, operative, radiological, and endoscopic reports. There were 1560 admissions with blunt or penetrating trauma to the neck. The overall incidence of aerodigestive trauma was 4.9 per cent (10.2% for gunshot wounds, 4.6% for stab wounds, and 1.2% for blunt trauma). All patients with aerodigestive trauma had suspicious signs or symptoms on admission. The most common life-threatening problem in the emergency room and directly related to the aerodigestive trauma was airway compromise. Twenty-nine per cent of patients with laryngotracheal trauma required an emergency room airway establishment because of threatened airway loss. Although rapid sequence induction was successful in the majority of cases, in 11.9 per cent there was loss of airway and a cricothyroidotomy was necessary. Overall, 9 per cent of cases with aerodigestive injuries were successfully treated nonoperatively. Thirty-six per cent of patients with laryngotracheal trauma and surgical repair were successfully treated without a protective tracheostomy. There was no mortality due to the aerodigestive injuries. Cervical aerodigestive trauma is rare. In conclusion, all patients with significant aerodigestive injuries requiring treatment had suspicious signs and symptoms. Airway compromise was a common problem in the emergency room. Loss of airway after rapid sequence induction is a potentially lethal complication and the trauma team should be ready for a surgical airway. Repair of laryngotracheal injuries without a protective tracheostomy is safe in selected cases.

Airway Obstruction↗

PubMed2000

Nonskeletal cervical spine injuries: epidemiology and diagnostic pitfalls.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries are the most commonly missed severe injuries with serious implications for the patient and physician. The diagnosis of subluxations or spinal cord injuries in the absence of vertebral fractures, especially in unevaluable patients, poses a major challenge. The objective of this study was to study the incidence and type of cervical spine trauma according to mechanism of injury; identify problems and pitfalls in the diagnosis of nonskeletal cervical spine injuries. METHODS: Retrospective study of all C-spine injuries caused by traffic accidents or falls admitted over a 5-year period at a large Level I trauma center. Data were obtained from the trauma registry, review of patient charts, and radiology reports. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 14,755 admissions due to traffic injuries or falls who met trauma center criteria. There were 292 patients with C-spine injuries, for an overall incidence of 2.0% (3.4% in car occupants, 2.8% for pedestrians, 1.9% for motorcycle riders, and 0.9% for falls). The incidence of C-spine injuries in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 was 1.4%, 9 to 12 was 6.8%, and in < or =8 was 10.2% (p < 0.05). Of C-spine injuries, 85.6% (250 patients) were a vertebral fracture, 10.6% of the injuries (31 patients) were subluxation without fractures, and 3.8% (11 patients) were an isolated spinal cord injury without fracture or subluxation. Of the 31 patients with isolated subluxations, one-third required an early endotracheal intubation before clinical evaluation of the spine, because of associated severe head injury or hypotension. Adequate lateral C-spine films diagnosed or suspected 30 of the 31 subluxations (96.8%). The combination of plain films and computed tomographic (CT) scan diagnosed or suspected all injuries. Of the 11 patients with isolated cord injury, 27.3% required early intubation before clinical evaluation of the spine. The diagnosis of cord injury was made on admission in only five patients (45.5%). In three patients, the neurologic examination on admission was normal and neurologic deficits appeared a few hours later. In the remaining three patients (two intubated, one intoxicated), the diagnosis was missed clinically and radiologically. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated nonskeletal C-spine injuries are rare but potentially catastrophic because of the high incidence of neurologic deficits and missed diagnosis. In subluxations, the combination of an adequate lateral film and CT scan was reliable in diagnosing or highly suspecting the injury. A large prospective study is needed to confirm these findings, before a recommendation is made to remove the cervical collar if the findings of these investigations are normal. However, in isolated cord injuries, the diagnosis was often missed because of associated severe head trauma and the low sensitivity of the plain films and CT scans.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2000

Pediatric falls: is height a predictor of injury and outcome?

Falls account for a significant proportion of pediatric injuries and deaths. A retrospective review of pediatric patients (age 0-14 years) was performed to determine whether patterns of injuries and outcomes could be predicted on the basis of the height of the fall. In addition we evaluated the triage criterion "fall greater than 15 feet" for transport of patients to a trauma center. Patients were stratified by the height of the fall: greater than or less than 15 feet. The end points for analysis were the associated injuries and survival. Patients who fell less than 15 feet had a higher incidence of intracranial injuries (and fewer extremity fractures than patients who fell more than 15 feet). Skull fractures were the most frequent injury and were associated with an increase in intracranial injuries in both subgroups. In conclusion low-level falls are associated with significant intracranial injuries. The evaluation of patients sustaining low-level falls should not be limited on the basis of the height of the fall. Using falls of greater than 15 feet as a triage criterion for transport to a trauma center needs to be prospectively evaluated to ensure that critically injured patients are triaged appropriately.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed1999

The effect of a quality improvement program on paramedic on-scene times for patients with penetrating trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To decrease paramedic on-scene times (OSTs) for major trauma patients through a focused quality improvement (QI) program. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from 1993 through 1997 to determine the impact of a QI program on paramedic OSTs. All penetrating trauma patients transported by paramedics to Los Angeles County/USC Medical Center, a Level-1 trauma center, were included, and all cases with OSTs > 20 minutes were reviewed in detail for extenuating circumstances. Cases including multiple victims or unsecured scenes were considered "acceptable deviations." All others were considered "fallouts," which prompted extensive review with the paramedics and their field supervisors. RESULTS: Prior to the inception of the QI project there was a 4.1% fallout rate of penetrating trauma patients with OSTs > 20 minutes. This fallout rate fell to 1.5% in 1997 (p < 0.01). Mortality rates among these fallouts decreased from 5.1% to 0.8% during the study period (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: An intensive QI program can have a significant, positive impact on paramedic OSTs among patients with penetrating trauma.

Emergency Medical Services↗

PubMed1998

Routine helical computed tomographic evaluation of the mediastinum in high-risk blunt trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: The indications and method of evaluation of the mediastinum in blunt deceleration trauma are controversial and vary among centers. Most centers practice a policy of angiographic evaluation only in the presence of an abnormal mediastinum on chest radiography. Routine aortography in the absence of any mediastinal abnormality is not widely practiced. Helical computed tomographic (CT) scan has been successfully used in recent studies in the evaluation of the thoracic aorta. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of routine helical CT scan evaluation of the mediastinum in patients involved in high-speed deceleration injuries, irrespective of chest radiographic findings. DESIGN: A prospective study over a 1-year period. Included in the study were patients with high-speed deceleration injuries who required CT evaluation of the head or abdomen. This group of patients underwent routine helical CT evaluation of the mediastinum irrespective of chest radiographic findings. SETTING: Large, urban, academic level I trauma center. RESULTS: A total of 112 trauma patients fulfilled the criteria for study inclusion. Overall, there were 9 patients (8.0%) with aortic rupture. Four (44.4%) of these patients had a normal mediastinum on the initial chest x-ray film and the diagnosis was made by CT scan. The CT scan was diagnostic in 8 of the aortic ruptures (intimal tear or pseudoaneurysm) and was suggestive of aortic injury but not diagnostic in 1 patient with brachiocephalic artery injury. In 42 patients (37.5%), there was a widened mediastinum: an aortic rupture was diagnosed in 5 of them (11.9%) and a spinal fracture in 9 (21.4%). One patient had both aortic rupture and spinal injury. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of aortic injury in patients with high-speed deceleration injury is high. A significant proportion of patients with aortic injury have a normal mediastinum on the initial chest radiograph. There is a high incidence of spinal injuries in the presence of a widened mediastinum. We recommend that all trauma patients with high-risk deceleration injuries undergo routine helical CT evaluation of the mediastinum irrespective of chest radiographic findings.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed1996

Paramedic vs private transportation of trauma patients. Effect on outcome.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) play a major role in any trauma system. However, there is very little information regarding the role of prehospital emergency care in trauma. To investigate this issue, we compared the outcome of severely injured patients transported by paramedics (EMS group) with the outcome of those transported by friends, relatives, bystanders, or police (non-EMS group). DESIGN: We compared 4856 EMS patients with 926 non-EMS patients. General linear model analysis was performed to test the hypothesis that hospital mortality is the same in EMS and non-EMS cases, controlling for the following confounding factors, which are not affected by mode of transportation: age, gender, mechanism of injury, cause of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and severe head injury. Crude, specific, and adjusted mortality rates and relative risks were also derived for the EMS and non-EMS groups. SETTING: Large, urban, academic level I trauma center. PATIENTS: All patients meeting the criteria for major trauma. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with regard to mechanism of injury and the need for surgery or intensive care unit admission. The crude mortality rate was 9.3% in the EMS group and 4.0% in the non-EMS group (relative risk, 2.32; P < .001). After adjustment for ISS, the relative risk was 1.60 (P = .002). Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with ISS greater than 15, those in the EMS group had a mortality rate twice that of those in the non-EMS group (28.8% vs 14.1%). After controlling for confounding factors, the adjusted mortality among patients with ISS greater than 15 was 28.2% for the EMS group and 17.9% for the non-EMS group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe trauma transported by private means in this setting have better survival than those transported via the EMS system. Large prospective studies are needed to identify the factors responsible for this difference.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

The impact of a dedicated trauma program on outcome in severely injured patients.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, many trauma centers have been closing or scaling down their operations because of financial losses and lack of commitment by the relevant authorities. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of commitment to trauma and the establishment of a dedicated trauma program on injury outcome. DESIGN: In 1992, a well-funded dedicated trauma program was implemented at the Los Angeles County--University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles. We analyzed the outcome in severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > 15) before and after implementation of the program (1991 and 1993). SETTING: Large, urban, level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients with trauma and an ISS higher than 15. RESULTS: There were 737 patients with an ISS higher than 15 in 1991 and 812 patients with an ISS higher than 15 in 1993. The overall mortality rate was 30% in 1991 and 24.5% in 1993 (P = .018), which is a reduction by 18.3%. In patients with blunt trauma and an ISS higher than 15, mortality was reduced by 33% (mortality rate of 31.1% in 1991 vs 20.8% in 1993) (P < .002). Mortality in patients with penetrating trauma and an ISS higher than 30 was reduced by 42.7% (mortality rate of 59.3% in 1991 vs 34% in 1993) (P = .019). There was also a trend toward lower permanent disabilities among survivors with an ISS higher than 15 (14.7% in 1991 vs 11.3% in 1993). CONCLUSION: Commitment of financial and human resources for the establishment of a dedicated trauma program is a sound investment in terms of improved survival and fewer permanent disabilities in critically injured patients.

Accidents, Traffic↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The Trauma Program Manager role: a current examination.

PURPOSE: To describe the history and define current application of the Trauma Program Manger (TPM) role. To suggest that a professional networking group can assist a TPM to accomplish the significant demands of the role. SIGNIFICANCE TO CARE: Improved understanding of the current role. Enhanced effectiveness in fulfilling the current functions of the TPM role through networking. DESIGN: Literature review on the role of the TPM, discussing the growth, development and progression to its current form. Evaluation of one professional group of TPMs and how it aided members in accomplishing the significant demands of the role. METHODS OF EVALUATION: A 6-year retrospective review of the administrative records for a professional networking group of TPMs was conducted. Meeting content was sorted and tabulated into the 10 functional requirements of the TPM role. TPMs who were members of the group during the same 6-year period were surveyed regarding the perceived value of group participation relative to accomplishing each of the TPM role functions. CONCLUSIONS: The current form of the TPM role is significant and encompasses at least 10 distinct functions. A professional group of TPMs is a useful tool to aid individuals in fulfilling their TPM roles. This may be true for both novice and experienced TPMs. The professional group may serve as an adjunct to obtaining formal role education.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗