PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K B Landorf

Publications and source records attributed to K B Landorf.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Does stretching increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Many lower limb disorders are related to calf muscle tightness and reduced dorsiflexion of the ankle. To treat such disorders, stretches of the calf muscles are commonly prescribed to increase available dorsiflexion of the ankle joint. HYPOTHESIS: To determine the effect of static calf muscle stretching on ankle joint dorsiflexion range of motion. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analyses. METHODS: A systematic review of randomised trials examining static calf muscle stretches compared with no stretching. Trials were identified by searching Cinahl, Embase, Medline, SportDiscus, and Central and by recursive checking of bibliographies. Data were extracted from trial publications, and meta-analyses performed that calculated a weighted mean difference (WMD) for the continuous outcome of ankle dorsiflexion. Sensitivity analyses excluded poorer quality trials. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the quantity I2. RESULTS: Five trials met inclusion criteria and reported sufficient data on ankle dorsiflexion to be included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analyses showed that calf muscle stretching increases ankle dorsiflexion after stretching for < or = 15 minutes (WMD 2.07 degrees; 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 3.27), > 15-30 minutes (WMD 3.03 degrees; 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 5.75), and > 30 minutes (WMD 2.49 degrees; 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 4.82). There was a very low to moderate statistical heterogeneity between trials. The meta-analysis results for < or = 15 minutes and > 15-30 minutes of stretching were considered robust when compared with sensitivity analyses that excluded lower quality trials. CONCLUSIONS: Calf muscle stretching provides a small and statistically significant increase in ankle dorsiflexion. However, it is unclear whether the change is clinically important.

Ankle Joint↗

Efficacy of foot orthoses. What does the literature tell us?

This paper reviews the literature relating to foot orthoses, in particular foot orthoses that attempt to alter biomechanical function. Whilst few well-controlled studies have been performed, the findings from the available literature are generally positive. The authors provide an overview of this literature and then summarise the findings. The literature is categorised into six research outcome areas: (i) patient satisfaction, (ii) pain and deformity, (iii) plantar pressures, (iv) position and motion, (v) muscle activity, and (vi) oxygen consumption. In addition, the difficulties associated with researching foot orthoses are discussed.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Clarifying proximal diaphyseal fifth metatarsal fractures. The acute fracture versus the stress fracture.

This article discusses the classification and treatment of proximal diaphyseal fifth metatarsal fractures. There are two types of proximal diaphyseal fracture of the fifth metatarsal: the acute proximal diaphyseal fracture and the proximal diaphyseal stress fracture. Confusion between the two types of fractures is probably due to their similar location and the historical practice of referring to all fractures in this location as Jones fractures. Both fractures are prone to delayed union and require long periods of nonweightbearing immobilization or internal fixation for healing. However, because the mechanism of injury is different for each fracture, the treatment plan may need to be tailored to the particular type of fracture.

Acute Disease↗