PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

K Bares

Publications and source records attributed to K Bares.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

[New aspects of diagnostic criteria in BERA tests].

The purpose of the presented work was to investigate the relationship between the length of I-III and I-V intervals during BERA examinations on the intensity of the stimulus in healthy subjects. Furthermore to assess the normal range of the maximum length of I-III and I-V intervals. Twenty-seven subjects aged 15-57 years, incl. 10 men, were examined. The stimuli were 100 us clicks, the repeating rate was 30/s, the stimulation intensity 0-85 dB nHL. The examination was made after administration of diazepam or rohypnol. TDH 49 earphones were used. Into the external auditory meatus on the examined side an electrode of the authors' own design in the shape of an open tube was introduced. The length of I-III and I-V intervals depended on the intensity of stimulation. The differences of mean values of the length intervals at stimulation intensities of 65 dB nHL and 45 dB nHL were statistically significant: p less than 0.02 for interval I-III and p less than 0.0001 for interval I-V. We take as the upper borderline of the normal length of intervals I-III approximately 2.8 ms and of intervals I-V 4.7 ms, if the latency of wave I is smaller than 2.5 ms. When the latency of wave I is greater, even longer I-III and I-V intervals may be still normal.

Acoustic Stimulation

[The importance of auditory canal electrodes for improving BERA recording].

During BERA examinations using common surface leads (forehead, mastoid process or ear lobe) wave I is not always distinct. Contrary to hitherto used methods (needle electrodes, small electrodes fixed by means of a cross-bar), the authors recommend to make wave I more distinct by use a surface electrode with a larger area (78 sq.mm). It is an open silver tube which, if necessary, is fixed in the osseous portion of the external auditory meatus by a PVC tube. Examination of 50 subjects revealed that the amplitude of wave I increased by using the electrode on an average more than four times, the thresholds of wave I in healthy subjects are practically identical as the thresholds of the V wave. The authors did not observe any effect on the thresholds and latencies of the V wave. The examined subjects tolerated the electrode well.

Audiometry, Evoked Response