PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Brensing

Publications and source records attributed to K Brensing.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics. A double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the beneficial effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on the portal hypertensive state have been demonstrated in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. However, it is not known whether UDCA has direct or indirect effects on the vascular smooth muscles in humans, thereby leading to a change in splanchnic or systemic hemodynamics. AIMS: We therefore evaluated the hemodynamic effects of UDCA as to its established effect on gallbladder motility under fasting and postprandial conditions in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In a double-blind, cross-over study of 20 healthy volunteers, placebo or UDCA (750 mg/d) were randomly administered over 4 weeks with an interim 4-week washout period. Portal blood flow, cardiac output and gallbladder motility were measured using echo-Doppler and b-mode sonography before and after placebo and verum, respectively. ECG, blood pressure, heart rate and blood chemistry were also measured. RESULTS: UDCA did not significantly change fasting portal flow or meal-induced portal hyperemia. Both fasting and postprandial gallbladder volumes increased (26.5 +/- 6.0 vs. 40.7 +/- 13.8 ml, p < 0.05, and 11.2 +/- 6.2 vs. 14.8 +/- 6.7 ml, p < 0.05). Diastolic blood pressure decreased under UDCA (71.2 +/- 8.7 vs. 66.5 +/- 6.5 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Serum levels of chloride and gamma-glutamyltransferase decreased slightly, while alkaline phosphatase increased. CONCLUSIONS: UDCA affected systemic but not portal hemodynamics. The increase in gallbladder volume is obviously mediated by factors that do not influence the splanchnic vascular bed.

Adult↗

Propranolol stereoisomer plasma concentrations and portal haemodynamic response in patients with liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The haemodynamic effect of propranolol on portal pressure in patients with portal hypertension is highly variable and does not correlate with propranolol racemate plasma concentrations. AIM: To investigate the stereoselective metabolism of the propranolol enantiomers and its impact on portal haemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis since only S-propranolol is haemodynamically active. METHODS: Twenty patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension received 40 mg propranolol orally. Portal blood velocity (PBV) and propranolol stereoisomer plasma concentrations were determined. RESULTS: During the 4 h examination period we observed a significant reduction in PBV (18.3 +/- 2.2%, P < 0.0001) vs. baseline. The area under the curve (AUC) during the study period was significantly different for the two isomers (S-propranolol 1217.0 +/- 118.5 nmol.h/L; R-propranolol 728.8 +/- 103.8 nmol.h/L, P < 0.0001). Seven patients (35%) were portal haemodynamic non-responders to propranolol. Propranolol stereoisomer AUC values were no different between responders (S-propranolol 1133. 3 +/- 132.0 nmol.h/L; R-propranolol 718.0 +/- 129.7 nmol.h/L) and non-responders (S-propranolol 1371.8 +/- 250.5 nmol.h/L; R-propranolol 746.9 +/- 200.3 nmol.h/L); neither was there a correlation between propranolol enantiomer plasma concentrations and the portal haemodynamic effect. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate a stereoselective metabolism of propranolol enantiomers in liver cirrhosis. However, following oral propranolol administration, stereoisomer plasma concentrations do not predict the portal haemodynamic effect.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗