PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Chadda

Publications and source records attributed to K Chadda.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Glucocorticoid treatment in patients with septic shock: effects on vasopressor use and mortality.

Corticosteroids were proposed for the treatment of sepsis as early as 1940. Several RCTs cast serious doubts on the usefulness of high dose corticosteroids and doubt still persists regarding the efficacy of replacement therapy. Adrenal insufficiency (non-responders to the 250 microg corticotropin test: increase in cortisol < 9 microg/dl) is present in about half of patients with septic shock and is associated with higher rates of refractory hypotension and mortality. Peripheral glucocorticoid resistance, which may even occur more frequently, can be easily assessed at bedside using skin tests. Cortisol antagonizes the migration of inflammatory cells, the synthesis or action of virtually all proinflammatory mediators, promotes virtually all anti-inflammatory components and enhances humoral immunity by means of transcriptional interference between its receptor and both AP-1 and NF-kappaB. Cortisol mediates cardiovascular tolerance to endotoxin and the maintenance of vascular sensitivity to catecholamines. Low doses (about 300 mg daily for 5 days or more) of hydrocortisone increase vasoconstrictor response to catecholamines in animals, in healthy volunteers challenged with LPS and in several RCTs. Hydrocortisone also increases arterial pressure and decreases the duration of shock. A meta-analysis of all available clinical controlled studies showed a reduction in 28 days, all-cause mortality with glucocorticoids (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78 - 1.00; p = 0.04). However, there was a significant heterogeneity across the trials (p = 0.006). On the other hand, analysis of studies where low doses of glucocorticoids were given for prolonged periods showed a 24% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality at 28 days in treated patients (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64 - 0.90; p = 0.002) without heterogeneity across the trials (p = 0.28). In conclusion, in severe sepsis, high doses of corticosteroids should not be given. Septic shock should be treated with a replacement dose of hydrocortisone.

Apoptosis↗

Effect of propranolol after acute myocardial infarction in patients with congestive heart failure.

The incidence of congestive heart failure was studied in the Beta Blocker Heart Attack Trial in which postmyocardial infarction patients between the ages of 30 and 69 years, with no contraindication to propranolol, were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 1921) or propranolol 180 or 240 mg daily (n = 1916) 5 to 21 days after admission to the hospital for the event. Survivors of acute myocardial infarction with compensated or mild congestive heart failure, including those on digitalis and diuretics, were included in the study. A history of congestive heart failure before randomization characterized 710 (18.5%) patients: 345 (18.0%) in the propranolol group and 365 (19.0%) in the placebo group. The incidence of definite congestive heart failure after randomization and during the study was 6.7% in both groups. In patients with a history of congestive heart failure before randomization, 51 of 345 (14.8%) in the propranolol group and 46 of 365 (12.6%) in the placebo group developed congestive heart failure during an average 25 month follow-up. In the patients with no history of congestive heart failure, 5% in the propranolol group developed congestive heart failure and 5.3% in the placebo group developed congestive heart failure. Baseline characteristics predictive of the occurrence of congestive heart failure by multivariate analyses included an increased cardiothoracic ratio, diabetes, increased heart rate, low baseline weight, prior myocardial infarction, age, and more than 10 ventricular premature beats per hour.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Heart Failure↗

Efficacy and safety of esmolol vs propranolol in the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: a multicenter double-blind clinical trial.

The efficacy and safety of intravenous esmolol infusion was compared to that of intravenous propranolol injection in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) in a multicenter double-blind parallel study. A total of 127 patients were randomized to either the esmolol (n = 64) or propranolol (n = 63) group. Therapeutic response was achieved in 72% of esmolol and 69% of propranolol patients (p = NS). The average dose of esmolol in responders was 115 +/- 11 micrograms/kg/min. Therapeutic response was sustained in the 4-hour maintenance period in 67% of esmolol and 58% of propranolol patients (p = NS). Rate of conversion to normal sinus rhythm was similar in the two treatment groups. After discontinuation, rapid recovery from beta blockade (decrease in heart rate reduction) was observed in esmolol patients (within 10 minutes) compared to propranolol patients (no change in heart rate up to 4.3 hours). The principal adverse effect was hypotension, reported in 23 esmolol (asymptomatic in 19) and four propranolol (asymptomatic in three) patients. In the majority of esmolol patients, hypotension resolved quickly (within 30 minutes) after esmolol was discontinued. It was concluded that esmolol was comparable in efficacy and safety to propranolol in the treatment of patients with SVT. Unlike propranolol, because of the short half-life of esmolol, rapid control of beta blockade is possible with esmolol in clinical conditions when required.

Acute Disease↗