PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Dickstein

Publications and source records attributed to K Dickstein.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

[Are emergency admissions to medical departments dependent on weather?].

BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that patients are more frequently admitted to hospital in bad weather. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated all 15,060 emergency admissions to the Medical Department of Rogaland Central Hospital during a 17-month period and compared this material with meteorological data. RESULTS: We found no correlation between the number of admissions and "good weather" (as defined by the amount of cloud cover), but we found a significant difference of about two more patients (6.6%) being admitted on days with rain and snow. There was no correlation between the amount of precipitation and the number of admitted patients, but a small, significant inverse relation between temperature and admissions. We have also demonstrated a considerable difference in the number of admissions on the different weekdays, with the highest number on Mondays and the lowest on Saturdays. INTERPRETATION: Both the incidence of disease and doctor availability may partially explain the influence of weather and the daily variation in emergency admissions to hospital.

Emergencies↗
PubMed2000

The effects of chronic, sustained-release moxonidine therapy on clinical and neurohumoral status in patients with heart failure.

AIMS: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is characterized by elevated plasma norepinephrine (PNE) associated with a poor prognosis. Moxonidine selectively stimulates medullary imidazoline receptors which centrally inhibit sympathetic outflow and potently suppress levels of circulating PNE. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of central sympathetic inhibition on clinical and neurohumoral status in patients with CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study evaluated 25 patients (age=69+/-7 years, 20 males) with symptomatic CHF (NYHA II-III), stabilized on standard therapy. The mean ejection fraction was 28+/-7% at baseline. Patients were titrated in a double-blind fashion to 11 weeks of oral therapy with placebo (n=9) or sustained-release (SR) moxonidine 0.9 mg bid (n=16). Clinical and neurohumoral status were evaluated at baseline, on chronic therapy at the target dose, and during cessation of therapy. All patients completed the trial and reached the target dose. Dry mouth, symptomatic hypotension, and asthenia were more frequent in the moxonidine SR-treated group. PNE was substantially reduced after 6 weeks at the maximum dose (0.9 mg bid) by 50% vs. placebo (P<0. 0005). A reduction in 24-h mean heart rate (P<0.01) was correlated to the reduction in PNE (r=0.70, P<0.05). A 36% increase in the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) was observed in the moxonidine SR group vs. a 2% decrease for placebo (P=0.06); for the root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD), there was a 21% increase for moxonidine SR vs. a 19% decrease for placebo (P<0.05). Abrupt cessation of chronic therapy resulted in substantial increases in PNE, blood pressure, and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic therapy with a sustained-release formulation of moxonidine in patients with CHF was well tolerated, with substantial and sustained reductions in PNE. The tachyarrhythmias were attenuated, with evidence of improved autonomic tone. Due to the observed effects following moxonidine discontinuation, tapering of therapy is recommended.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2000

Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial--the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II.

BACKGROUND: The ELITE study showed an association between the angiotensin II antagonist losartan and an unexpected survival benefit in elderly heart-failure patients, compared with captopril, an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. We did the ELITE II Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study to confirm whether losartan is superior to captopril in improving survival and is better tolerated. METHODS: We undertook a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial of 3,152 patients aged 60 years or older with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure and ejection fraction of 40% or less. Patients, stratified for beta-blocker use, were randomly assigned losartan (n=1,578) titrated to 50 mg once daily or captopril (n=1,574) titrated to 50 mg three times daily. The primary and secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, and sudden death or resuscitated arrest. We assessed safety and tolerability. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Median follow-up was 555 days. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (11.7 vs 10.4% average annual mortality rate) or sudden death or resuscitated arrests (9.0 vs 7.3%) between the two treatment groups (hazard ratios 1.13 [95.7% CI 0.95-1.35], p=0.16 and 1.25 [95% CI 0.98-1.60], p=0.08). Significantly fewer patients in the losartan group (excluding those who died) discontinued study treatment because of adverse effects (9.7 vs 14.7%, p<0.001), including cough (0.3 vs 2.7%).

Aged↗
PubMed2000

[Use of angiotensin II receptor blockaders in heart failure].

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and diuretics represent the first line of therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Inhibition of angiotensin II production is, however, incomplete with ACE inhibitors, due to non-ACE dependent conversion pathways. Moreover, some patients are intolerant to ACE inhibitors due to side effects or renal insufficiency. Angiotensin II receptor blockers may be an alternative to, or an additional treatment in heart failure. Preliminary studies comparing the angiotensin II receptor blocker losartan with placebo have demonstrated improved haemodynamic parameters, reduced hospitalisation and mortality in patients with heart failure. Reduced morbidity and mortality have also been found with losartan treatment, as compared to the ACE inhibitor captopril. This paper discusses the role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of heart failure. Some results from published studies and a short description of ongoing trials are presented.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2000

The effects of moxonidine, a novel imidazoline, on plasma norepinephrine in patients with congestive heart failure. Moxonidine Investigators.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dose response relationship of moxonidine on plasma concentration of norepinephrine during acute and chronic administration in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Sympathetic activation is increased in heart failure. Moxonidine is an imidazoline ligand acting on the central nervous system (CNS) receptors to decrease sympathetic activation. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with heart failure and New York Heart Association class II-III symptoms and ejection fraction <40% were randomized to placebo or one of three target doses of moxonidine, 0.1, 0.2 or 0.3 mg administered twice daily. An initial dose of moxonidine 0.1 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) was followed by weekly increments of 0.1 mg b.i.d. until target dose. The second and third study days occurred after four weeks (at target dose) and after 12 weeks, respectively. At each study day, repeated blood samples were drawn. RESULTS: There was a significant dose-related decrease of systolic blood pressure across all three study days. Heart rate decreased significantly on study day 3 in a dose-related manner. The acute 2 h decrease in plasma norepinephrine in response to all three doses of moxonidine was significantly different compared with placebo after four and 12 weeks. There was a significant linear relation between dose and plasma norepinephrine after four and 12 weeks in both 2 h peak and the time averaged effect (>8 h). The number of adverse events was similar in the moxonidine and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: The increased sympathetic activation in CHF can be reduced by moxonidine through CNS inhibition.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacotherapy following myocardial infarction--a review of current treatment practices.

Modern treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including thrombolysis and early interventional strategies, has reduced mortality rates but increased the number of patients requiring medical treatment. Post infarction treatment with aspirin, statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has improved morbidity and mortality and is cost-effective. The major successes of secondary prevention have been seen in the prevention of reinfarction, recurrent ischaemia and the development of heart failure. However, in spite of recent advances and increasing knowledge, the mortality rates remain high, partly due to the under use of the established and documented medical strategies. Implementation of the current treatment strategies into general practice remains a challenge. The field is undergoing rapid change due to the increasing use of early invasive strategies. The primary objective should remain the prevention of underlying aetiology: coronary artery disease (CAD). Secondary prevention following myocardial infarction (MI) will remain a major challenge in clinical practice within the foreseeable future.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

[Chronic heart failure--suggestion to a management program].

In 1994, a Norwegian programme for diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure was published. Recently the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the Task Force on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology have published similar guidelines. In this article, the Working Group on Heart Failure of the Norwegian Society of Cardiology presents an updated programme for evaluation and management of patients with chronic heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Acute hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of moxonidine in congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Elevated plasma norepinephrine (PNE) has been shown to be an important predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Moxonidine selectively stimulates imidazoline receptors located in the medulla, which centrally inhibit sympathetic outflow. PNE is suppressed and peripheral vasodilation reduces systemic blood pressure. This study evaluated the acute neurohumoral and hemodynamic effects of a single dose of oral moxonidine in 32 patients (22 men, mean +/- SD age 66 +/- 10 years) with CHF. All patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III and stabilized on chronic therapy with diuretics, digitalis, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The mean PNE concentration was 509 +/- 304 pg/ml at baseline. Patients underwent invasive hemodynamic monitoring after double-blind randomization to either placebo (n = 12), moxonidine 0.4 mg (n = 9), or moxonidine 0.6 mg (n = 11). Moxonidine produced a dose-dependent, vasodilator response compared with placebo. Analysis of the time-averaged change from baseline over 6 hours demonstrated that moxonidine 0.6 mg caused significant reductions in mean systemic arterial pressure (p <0.0001), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p <0.005), systemic vascular resistance (p <0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance (p <0.01), and heart rate (p <0.05). Stroke volume was unchanged. PNE was reduced substantially (-180 pg/ml at 4 hours, p <0.005) and the reduction was highly correlated with the baseline level (r = -0.968). Moxonidine was well tolerated in this single-dose study and resulted in a modest, dose-dependent, vasodilator response, with substantial reductions in systemic and pulmonary arterial blood pressure. Trials designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of chronic moxonidine therapy in CHF added to conventional therapy would be appropriate.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of the effects of losartan and captopril on mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL trial design. Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and evidence of heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction during the acute phase have an excessive mortality risk. Therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors attenuates the detrimental effects of angiotensin II and has been shown to substantially reduce morbidity and mortality in this population. Selective, angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism with losartan, which inhibits the effects of angiotensin II regardless of its source at the receptor level, may provide more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. The Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (OPTIMAAL) study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, captopril-controlled trial. The primary hypothesis is that, compared with captopril, losartan will decrease the risk for all-cause mortality by 20% in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction. The study population will consist of 5,000 patients, > or = 50 years of age, with heart failure during the acute phase or with a new Q-wave anterior infarction or reinfarction. Patients will be randomized to treatment with either losartan or captopril. All patients will be followed until 937 deaths occur (event-driven). The primary end point is total mortality (all-cause mortality). The secondary and tertiary end points are sudden death (and/or resuscitated cardiac death) and fatal/nonfatal reinfarction. Based on the assumed event rate, treatment effect and a 95% power to detect a 20% reduction in all-cause mortality at the 4.3% significance level (2-sided, adjusted for 2 interim analyses), the trial will enroll at least 5,004 patients and continue until a total number of 937 events has been reached (intention-to-treat analysis).

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1999

Effects of losartan versus captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of patients in the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study--ELITE II.

BACKGROUND: In the Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) heart failure study, a survival benefit (primarily because of a reduction in sudden deaths) was observed in symptomatic patients treated with losartan compared with captopril. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study--ELITE II (currently ongoing) is a double-blind, randomized clinical trial being conducted in 45 countries at 288 sites. ELITE II formally tests the hypotheses that losartan, compared with captopril, will reduce all-cause mortality (primary end point) and sudden cardiac death and/or resuscitated cardiac arrest (secondary end point). In addition, all-cause mortality and/or hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality and/or hospitalizations will be evaluated. The trial has 90% power to detect a 25% treatment difference in all-cause mortality (event driven, 510 deaths). Substudies are examining quality of life, health care resource utilization, and mechanisms related to the reduction in sudden death. During recruitment (June 1997 to May 1998), 3,152 patients aged 60 years or older (mean age, 71.6 years), with New York Heart Association classes II (51%), III (44%), and IV (5%), and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less (mean, 31%) were randomized to receive either 12.5 mg of losartan, titrated as tolerated to 50 mg once daily, or 12.5 mg of captopril, titrated as tolerated to 50 mg thrice daily. Randomization was stratified by clinical site and for baseline beta-blocker use. CONCLUSION: The ELITE II study will further define the role of losartan in the treatment of patients with symptomatic heart failure relative to the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril, an agent from a class currently considered standard treatment for this disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Plasma N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide predicts hospitalization in patients with heart failure.

The plasma concentration of N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (N-ANP) has been shown to be predictive of both clinical status and survival in patients with heart failure. In this analysis the relationship between N-ANP, morbidity and hospitalization time was evaluated in 417 patients with stable, congestive heart failure recruited from an active, outpatient heart failure registry. Hospital admissions along with the duration of stay occurring after the initial N-ANP sampling during the period of data collection were recorded. A total of 755 admissions occurred, accounting for 7917 days' hospitalization. Relative hospitalization times (in-hospital days/observation period) per N-ANP quartiles I-IV were: 1.2 (+/- 2.7)%, 5.5 (+/- 12.2)%, 10.0 (+/- 21.5)% and 20.8 (+/- 34.3)%, respectively. Although N-ANP levels were correlated with age (r = 0.234, p < 0.0001), division by age quartiles did not significantly predict relative hospitalization times. These data indicate that the degree of cardiac endocrine activation and subsequent N-ANP release is related to morbidity in patients with heart failure and that moderate elevation in N-ANP levels is associated with a substantially increased hospitalization time. N-ANP sampling should be of value as a supplement to clinical evaluation in the assessment of the individual patient with this common syndrome.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Losartan: a selective angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist for the treatment of heart failure.

Losartan (COZAAR) is the prototype of a new class of potent and selective angiotensin II (AII) type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists with the largest published preclinical and clinical data base. Since all of the AII antagonists are selective for the AT(1) receptor, these drugs should exhibit similar cardiovascular effects. However, since the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of these agents and their degree of affinity for the AT(1) receptor differ, it is likely that differences in clinical profiles between these drugs exist and will require investigation. Losartan (parent compound), has moderate affinity for the AT(1) receptor (competitive inhibition). Losartan is well-absorbed orally as an active drug and is rapidly converted via oxidation in the human liver to a more potent metabolite (designated E3174) with an affinity 20- to 30-times greater for the AT(1) receptor (non-competitive inhibition). E3174 has a half-life of 6 - 9 h; elimination is via renal and hepatic routes. Antihypertensive and, in heart failure patients, haemodynamic activity is observed over a 24 h period with once daily dosing. Over 6 million patients have been treated for hypertension with continued excellent tolerability. Clinical experience in heart failure is growing, and recent data suggest an improved survival with losartan versus captopril, a drug from the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor class with proven benefit in this population. The current comprehensive losartan clinical end-point programme (4 large scale morbidity/mortality trials) should provide evidence regarding the efficacy of direct blockade of the AT(1) receptor with losartan compared to standard therapy: 1) The Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study - ELITE II, 2) The Losartan Post-Myocardial Infarction Survival Study - OPTIMAAL, 3) The Losartan Hypertension Survival Study - LIFE and 4) The Losartan Renal Protection Study - RENAAL.

Journal Article↗