PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Dinas

Publications and source records attributed to K Dinas.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Endometrial lesions causing uterine bleeding in postmenopausal women receiving raloxifene.

It is generally accepted, that raloxifene administration does not have adverse effects on the uterus. We report the cases of two relatively young postmenopausal patients, who presented with vaginal bleeding, due to endometrial pathology, approximately 1 year after the initiation of raloxifene administration. The women were 43 and 44 years old, and received 60 mg/day of oral raloxifene for 11.5 and 10.5 months, respectively. In both cases, raloxifene was given for osteoporosis prevention in the absence of vasomotor symptoms. The first patient underwent Pipelle-biopsy and hysteroscopy with histopathology revealing simple endometrial hyperplasia. The second patient underwent hysteroscopy with removal of an endometrial polyp, with no histopathological signs of malignancy. Continuation of raloxifene administration was decided in both cases, and follow-up did not reveal any sign of recurrence. Uterine bleeding may rarely occur in postmenopausal women under raloxifene therapy. Patients should be encouraged to report bleeding or spotting and appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic management should follow as in any other case.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Human papillomavirus testing for primary screening in women at low risk of developing cervical cancer. The Greek experience.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection against routine Papanicolaou smear for the detection of low- and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a low-risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed involving 1296 women attending six outpatient clinics in Northern Greece (Thessaloniki, Thermi, Mihaniona, Corfu, Veria, and Serres). Women underwent a gynecological examination, including collection of exfoliated cervical cells for Papanicolaou cytology and HPV DNA detection. Cytology was processed according the conventional routine manner, and HPV DNA was determined using the polymerase chain reaction technique. In positive cases of either method, a complete colposcopic evaluation was performed with directed biopsies. Tests (HPV DNA, cytology, and colposcopy) performance characteristics were determined using the histopathologic diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: HPV DNA testing showed a significantly better sensitivity than the Papanicolaou smear in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (75% versus 50% for high-grade lesions and 81.2% versus 50% for lesions of any grade, respectively). Specificity, and positive and negative predictive values did not significantly differ. Even after dividing women in younger or older than 30 years, the sensitivity of the HPV DNA test was greater than cytology (100% and 70% versus 50% for cytology in both groups, respectively), with a 6.3% loss in specificity when performed in women younger than 30 years. CONCLUSION: HPV testing could be useful in screening women at low risk for cervical cancer, either as an adjunct tool to augment existing cytology programs or as a unique test of its own.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Self-sampling versus physician-sampling for human papillomavirus testing.

We evaluated the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection using two sampling methods of cervical exfoliated cells, consisting of self-sampling of vaginal cells and cervical sampling performed by the physician. Women included were 379 patients of the general population attending outpatient clinics in Northern Greece for routine cytological cervical dysplasia screening. HPV DNA detection was similar with both sampling techniques. The HPV prevalences in self-collected samples were 4.7% and 3.7% in the physician-collected samples (P>0.05). The Kappa statistic for HPV DNA agreement between the two methods was 0.54 (95% Confidence interval = 0.33-0.75). Self-sampling of cervico-vaginal exfoliated cells could be used as an alternative option to test for HPV infection.

Cervix Uteri↗
PubMed2004

Cervical human papillomavirus infection in women attending gynaecological outpatient clinics in northern Greece.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the necessary cause for the development of invasive cervical cancer. Identification of HPV determinants may contribute to the targeting of high-risk groups for cervical cancer. The study was aimed at estimating HPV prevalence and its determinants among 1296 women attending six gynaecological outpatient clinics in northern Greece. Information was available through personal interview and the study of cervical exfoliated cells. HPV DNA was detected by reverse line-blot polymerase chain reaction using the L1 primers PGMY09/11. The overall HPV prevalence was 2.5%. After controlling for potential confounders, the two independent risk factors associated with an increased prevalence were young age and parity. The prevalence odds ratio (POR) for those younger than 27 years against those older than 42 years was 5.31 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.53-18.44) and the POR for nulliparous women compared with women with two or more children was 4.15 (95% CI=1.35-12.76). HPV was present in 10 of 12 women with low-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN) (83.3%) and in 3 of 4 with high-grade CIN (75%). The prevalence of genital HPV infections in the study population was among the lowest ever reported internationally.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

To peritonealize or not to peritonealize? A randomized trial at abdominal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to determine whether nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum alters the intraoperative or postoperative course at abdominal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: The setting was a gynecology unit in a university teaching hospital. A parallel-group, single-blind randomized controlled trial was performed on 144 women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. Seventy-six women were allocated to the control "closed" group and 68 women to the study "open" group. The main outcome measures were operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain assessed by visual analog scale, and amount of postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: The mean operative time was shorter by 10 minutes (p < 0.001) and there was a 45 ml reduction of estimated blood loss in the nonclosure group (p=0.03). There were no differences in postoperative pain in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal closure at abdominal hysterectomy provides no immediate postoperative benefits while unnecessarily lengthening surgical time and anesthesia exposure. We suggest that the traditional practice of visceral and parietal peritoneal closure be abolished at abdominal hysterectomy.

Adult↗