PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K F Neale

Publications and source records attributed to K F Neale.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Evidence for genetic predisposition to desmoid tumours in familial adenomatous polyposis independent of the germline APC mutation.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) die from desmoid tumours which can arise spontaneously but often appear to be surgically induced by prophylactic colectomy. FAP results from germline adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene mutations and desmoids arise following biallelic APC mutation, with one change usually occurring distal to the second beta-catenin binding/degradation repeat of the gene (3' to codon 1399). We have suggested that because families with germline mutations in this region already have the requisite change, they are more likely to develop desmoids. However, there are families with 5' germline mutations where desmoids are common. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined desmoid risk dependent on germline APC mutation, sex, history of abdominal surgery, and family history in FAP patients from the St Mark's Hospital Polyposis Registry. RESULTS: Overall desmoid prevalence was 15%. Desmoids tended to cluster in susceptible individuals, irrespective of the germline APC mutation. Independent predictors of increased desmoid risk were: germline mutation distal to codon 1399; any family history of disease; and a strong family history of desmoids. A family history of multiple desmoids (>1) increased an individual's own risk of multiplicity. Females had twice the odds of developing desmoids compared with males. There was no significant interaction between any of the three explanatory variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the influence of unknown genetic factors independent of APC in susceptibility to desmoid tumours in FAP. The data have implications in terms of clinical management of FAP patients and assessing the balance between chemoprevention and prophylactic colectomy.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Desmoid tumours complicating familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Desmoid tumours are one of the most important and intriguing extracolonic manifestations of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). They have been studied only in small numbers of patients. METHODS: Patients with FAP who also had desmoid tumour were identified from a polyposis registry database and their hospital notes were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 166 desmoids in 88 patients (median age 32 (interquartile range 22-38) years; 51 (58 per cent) female); 83 tumours (50 per cent) were within the abdomen and 80 (48 per cent) were in the abdominal wall. All but 16 individuals (18 per cent) had already undergone abdominal surgery, which was significantly more recent in women (P = 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). Intra-abdominal desmoids caused small bowel and ureteric obstruction and resulted in ten deaths; survival was significantly poorer than in patients with abdominal wall desmoid alone (chi2 = 3. 93, 1 d.f., P = 0.047, log rank test), and eight of 22 patients who underwent resection of intra-abdominal desmoid died in the perioperative period. CONCLUSION: Abdominal wall desmoids caused no deaths or significant morbidity; although recurrence was common after excision, the treatment was safe. Intra-abdominal desmoids can cause serious complications and treatment is often unsuccessful; in particular, surgery for desmoids at this site is hazardous.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

A survey of phenotypic features in juvenile polyposis.

Solitary juvenile polyps are quite frequent in children, but juvenile polyposis (JP) is a rare autosomal dominant trait characterised by the occurrence of numerous polyps in the gastrointestinal tract. Extracolonic phenotypic abnormalities are well documented in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and can allow a clinical diagnosis to be made before the bowel pathology becomes available. Though described, characteristic extracolonic abnormalities have not been clearly defined in juvenile polyposis. We sought to determine whether there are consistent extracolonic phenotypic abnormalities in JP patients and how frequently this would allow diagnosis of one of the genetic syndromes known to be associated with juvenile polyposis. Twenty-two JP patients underwent clinical examination and data from one patient were obtained from case notes. Those consenting to further investigations had x rays of the skull, chest, and hands and an echocardiogram if clinically indicated. Significant extracolonic phenotypic abnormalities were present in 18 patients (14 male and four female), and included dermatological (13), skeletal (16), neurological (5), cardiopulmonary (4), gastrointestinal (3), genitourinary (4), and ocular (1) features. In five patients the diagnosis of a genetic syndrome was possible: two had Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome, two had Gorlin syndrome, and one had hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, also known as Osler-Rendu-Weber syndrome). Other patients had some features of these conditions and of Cowden and Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndromes, but these were not sufficient to allow a definitive diagnosis.

Adult↗

Juvenile polyposis.

Juvenile polyposis is an uncommon condition characterized by the development of multiple juvenile polyps, predominantly in the colon but also in the rest of the gastrointestinal tract. The condition usually presents in childhood; only 15 per cent of patients present as adults. The rarer and often fatal form, namely, juvenile polyposis of infancy, is typified by diarrhoea, protein-losing enteropathy, bleeding and rectal prolapse. The more common form of juvenile polyposis (affecting the colon, stomach and small bowel) occurs in the first or second decade with rectal bleeding and anaemia. A family history of the condition is found in 20-50 per cent of patients with apparently an autosomal dominant trait. The gene for juvenile polyposis has not yet been identified. Epithelial dysplasia is common and the cumulative risk of colorectal cancer is > 50 per cent. Various extracolonic abnormalities may also occur. Most patients are treated surgically for colonic polyps, although endoscopic polypectomy is also an option. The rest of the gastrointestinal tract should be screened as should asymptomatic first-degree relatives.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Comparison of morbidity and function after colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal reservoir (RPC) should prevent colorectal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Until this is confirmed its role compared with total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) will depend on the relative morbidity and postoperative bowel function after the two procedures. This was analysed in 99 patients (37 RPC, 62 IRA) operated on between 1977 and 1989. Morbidity was greater after RPC with subsequent ileostomy closure (median hospital stay, 24 versus 11 days; complications, 60 versus 21 per cent; reoperation, 29 versus 3 per cent; return to normal activity; 31 versus 14 weeks). There was little difference in bowel function; after IRA median frequency was 3/24 h and urgency (unable to wait 15 min) occurred in 50 per cent, compared with 4.5/24h and 17 per cent after RPC. Night evacuation occurred in 10 and 43 per cent respectively. IRA was performed in younger patients (median 19 versus 31 years) who had fewer bowel motions before operation (2 versus 5/24 h). The greater morbidity of RPC suggests that it should be restricted to patients at higher risk of developing later rectal cancer, including those unavailable for follow-up and those with large or confluent rectal polyps or with curable colon cancer at the initial colectomy.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗