Normalization of faecal calprotectin: a predictor of mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to K Grzyb.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is a common and troublesome condition in patients operated on with ileal-pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA). A disturbed mucosal perfusion in the pouch has been suggested as a possible cause. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has been used successfully to measure gastric and colonic mucosal perfusion in humans. In a previous study, we demonstrated a reduced mucosal perfusion in the distal part of the pouch, during probiotic intervention, examined by LDF measurement. The aim of the present study was to confirm our previous results in a much larger material, and to compare the results of LDF measurements and inflammatory activity in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with those in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients. METHODS: Five hundred millilitres of a fermented milk product (Cultura), containing live lactobacilli (La-5) and bifidobacteria (Bb-12), was given daily for 4 weeks to 41 UC and 10 patients with FAP, operated on with IPAA. Mucosal perfusion was measured with LDF and the degree of inflammation was examined at predefined levels of the distal bowel by histology and faecal calprotectin measurements both before and after intervention. We also evaluated the applicability of a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). RESULTS: The LDF measurements were reproducible in the pelvic pouch at each of the predefined levels, but did not change during intervention. Mucosal perfusion was significantly reduced in the distal compared to the proximal part of the pouch in the UC group (P < 0.05). The perfusion levels were higher in the FAP patients compared to the UC patientsat all predefined levels (P < 0.05). Calprotectin levels and histological score did not change significantlyafter intervention in any of the groups. The calprotectin level was significantly lower in the FAP compared to the UC group both before and after intervention. The PDAI decreased in both groups from alevel considered diagnostic for pouchitis to a level considered as not active pouchitis. The decreasewas significant for the UC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results did not demonstrate an effect of probiotics on histology, although a significant effect on the PDAI was achieved, which concurs with the previously reported effect on symptoms and endoscopic score. The significantly reduced blood flow in the UC group compared to the FAP group, operated on with the same procedure, and the significantly increased calprotectin levels in the UC group, are original findings. Both findings may be related to an increased risk for pouchitis among UC patients. The lack of effect of intervention on mucosal perfusion does not exclude a role for reduced circulation as a cause of pouchitis based on the reduced LDF measurements in the distal part of the pouch.
BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is a common and troublesome condition, and a disturbed microbiological flora and mucosal blood flow in the pouch have been suggested as possible causes. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has been used successfully to measure gastric and colonic mucosal perfusion in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intervention with probiotics on ileal pouch inflammation and perfusion in the pouch, assessed by endoscopy, histology, fecal calprotectin and LDF. METHODS: A fermented milk product (Cultura; 500 ml) containing live lactobacilli (La-5) and bifidobacteria (Bb-12) was given daily for 4 weeks to 10 patients operated with ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Mucosal perfusion was measured with LDF and the degree of inflammation was examined at predefined levels of the distal bowel by endoscopy and histology. Stool samples were cultured for lactobacilli and bifidobacteria and calprotectin were measured before and after intervention. RESULTS: The LDF measurements were reproducible in the pelvic pouch at each of the predefined levels, but did not change after intervention. The mucosal perfusion was reduced in the distal compared to the proximal part of the pouch. Calprotectin levels did not change significantly after intervention. The median endoscopic score for inflammation was significantly reduced by 50% after intervention, whereas the histological score did not change significantly. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that probiotics primarily act superficially, with change of gross appearance of the mucosa at endoscopy, but without significant effect on histological picture, mucosal perfusion or faecal calprotectin, during a relatively short period of 4 weeks.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.