PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Gunnarsson

Publications and source records attributed to K Gunnarsson.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Mammary tumour inhibition and subacute toxicity in rats of prednimustine and of its molecular components chlorambucil and prednisolone.

Prednimustine, a chlorambucil ester of pregnisolone, retarded growth of DMBA-induced mammary tumours in rats and reduced the number of tumours. A combination of chlorambucil and prednisolone (C + P) in the same proportion as in prednimustine, had similar effects, 8 and 26 mg per kg of the C + P combination being equipotnet to 16 and 64 mg per kg of prednimustine, respectively. The mortality figures suggested that prednimustine was considerably less toxic than equipotent doses of C + P. This toxicity difference was confirmed in a parallel investigation of the subacute toxicity in rats of prednimustine and C + P. This study showed that the mortality, reduction of lymphocytes and platelets, and bone marrow depression was much lower after pregnimustine than after equimolar amounts of the C + P combination. The results suggest that the low toxicity of prednimustine makes this drug a better cytostatic agent than the C + P combination treatment.

Animals↗

The course, costs and complications of oral versus intravenous penicillin therapy of erysipelas.

Oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy of severe erysipelas was compared in a controlled trial of 60 patients. No clinical benefit of intravenous therapy was found, as evaluated by fever duration, hospital stay and sick leave. Untoward reactions were comparable between the groups. No difference in recurrence was found. The difference in administration time and drug cost was considerable. It is therefore suggested that erysipelas without complications should be treated orally.

Administration, Oral↗

Reproductive toxicity of exemestane, an antitumoral aromatase inactivator, in rats and rabbits.

Exemestane is an orally active, irreversible inactivator of aromatase, structurally related to the natural substrate androstenedione, in clinical use at 25 mg daily for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The reproductive and developmental toxicity of exemestane was assessed in rats and rabbits with oral administration. Pivotal experiments included a fertility study (Segment I), in which female rats received exemestane doses of 4, 20, or 100 mg/kg/day from two weeks premating until GD 20 (cesarean-sectioned dams), or until GD 15 and then from D 1 to D 21 postpartum (dams allowed to deliver), and developmental toxicity studies (Segment II), in which rats and rabbits were treated from GD 6 through GD 17 (rats) or GD 18 (rabbits) at doses of 10, 50, 250, or 810 mg/kg/day and 30, 90, or 270 mg/kg/day, respectively. All rabbits and two-thirds of the rats were cesarean sectioned toward the end of pregnancy to determine litter parameters and examine structural abnormalities in the fetuses; the remaining one-third of the rats was allowed to litter and rear pups to weaning. No pivotal male fertility or peri- and postnatal studies were performed, taking into consideration the therapeutic use. Postnatal effects on the first generation offspring were assessed in both studies in rats, in the portion of dams allowed to deliver. Their F1 offspring were raised to adulthood, when they were evaluated for reproductive performance, and the F1 females were terminated on GD 20. The dosing schedule for the Segment I study in rats, which included a postnatal component, was established to exclude exposure before and during parturition (by withdrawing treatment from GD 16 until the end of parturition). This withdrawal of treatment was put in place because in a preliminary study with treatment including the peripartum period, doses from 5 to 200 mg/kg/day prolonged gestation and interfered with parturition.Overall, studies in rats showed that female fertility was not affected up to 100 mg/kg/day, but doses higher than 4 mg/kg/day, which is approximately the pharmacologically active dose (ED50 = 3.7 mg/kg), prolonged gestation and impaired parturition, leading to maternal deaths in labor and perinatal deaths of offspring. Rats killed on GD 20 showed nondose-related increases in resorptions at doses higher than 10 mg/kg/day, a reduction in fetal body weights at 20 and 100 mg/kg/day (fertility study) and 810 mg/kg/day (developmental toxicity study), and an increase in placental weights at all doses. Female fetuses exposed in utero until GD 20 at 100 mg/kg/day showed an increase in the anogenital distance, very likely related to an increase of the potent androgen DHT as a consequence of aromatase inhibition. Morphologic examinations in fetuses and born pups that were exposed in utero up to the end of the organogenesis period, as well as postnatal investigations on offspring up to adulthood, showed no treatment-related effects. In a developmental toxicity study in rabbits, treatment at 270 mg/kg/day affected maternal food intake and body weight gain, caused abortion or total resorption in about 30% of pregnant females, and reduced body weight and numbers of live fetuses, but did not affect fetal morphology. It was concluded that exemestane did not affect parturition in rats at 4 mg/kg/day or pregnancy in rabbits at 90 mg/kg/day (about 1.5 and 70 times the human dose, respectively, on a mg/m2 basis) and was not teratogenic in rats and rabbits. Exemestane is marketed for use only in postmenopausal women. Its labeling includes a contraindication to use in pregnant or lactating women.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

Tooth-implant supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study on implants combined with natural teeth was to investigate the implant survival rate and loss of marginal bone, as well as indications and complications pertinent to this form of implant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 185 implants in 111 patients from six different clinics in Sweden. Gathering of data, which were taken from patient records, followed a strict protocol. The registrations included indications for treatment, failure of implants, radiographs from baseline and follow-up, and information on complications. RESULTS: The cumulative implant survival was found to be 95.4% (standard error 4.5%) up to 3 years of follow-up. The marginal bone level at baseline was lower in the maxilla compared with the mandible (P = .015), but any further loss did not differ between the jaws. The most severe complication other than loss of osseointegration (6/185) or periimplant infections (4/183) was intrusion of the abutment teeth, which occurred in 5% of the cases. In all instances, the intrusion was seen in constructions with nonrigid forms of connection between the implants and teeth. CONCLUSION: The tooth-implant supported prosthesis using the Brånemark system is in the short term an equally predictable treatment as the completely implant-supported prosthesis concerning implant survival and loss of marginal bone. When combining implants and teeth, a rigid form of connection should be used to prevent tooth intrusion.

Aged↗