PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K H Lindner

Publications and source records attributed to K H Lindner.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Survival with full neurologic recovery and no cerebral pathology after prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation with vasopressin in pigs.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effects of vasopressin and saline placebo in comparison with epinephrine on neurologic recovery and possible cerebral pathology in an established porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether increased cerebral blood flow during CPR with vasopressin is beneficial with regard to neurologic recovery or detrimental owing to complications such as cerebral edema after return of spontaneous circulation. METHODS: After 4 min of cardiac arrest, followed by 3 min of basic life support CPR, 17 animals were randomly assigned to receive every 5 min either vasopressin (0.4, 0.4 and 0.8 U/kg; n = 6), epinephrine (45, 45 and 200 microg/kg; n = 6) or saline placebo (n = 5). The mean value +/- SEM of aortic diastolic pressure was significantly (p < 0.05) higher 90 s after each of three vasopressin versus epinephrine versus saline placebo injections (60 +/- 3 vs. 45 +/- 3 vs. 29 +/- 2 mm Hg; 49 +/- 5 vs. 27 +/- 3 vs. 23 +/- 1 mm Hg; and 50 +/- 6 vs. 21 +/- 3 vs. 16 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively). After 22 min of cardiac arrest, including 18 min of CPR, defibrillation was attempted to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. RESULTS: All the pigs that received epinephrine and saline placebo died, whereas all pigs on vasopressin survived (p < 0.05). Neurologic evaluation 24 h after successful resuscitation revealed only an unsteady gait in all vasopressin-treated animals; after 96 h, magnetic resonance imaging revealed no cerebral pathology. CONCLUSIONS: During prolonged CPR, repeated vasopressin administration, but not epinephrine or saline placebo, ensured long-term survival with full neurologic recovery and no cerebral pathology in this porcine CPR model.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Sevoflurane progressively prolongs the QT interval in unpremedicated female adults.

Thirty-six unpremedicated women due for gynaecological surgery were examined for time-dependent prolongation of the QT interval in the electrocardiogram (ECG) before and after induction of anaesthesia using either sevoflurane or propofol. The conventional inhalational technique to induce anaesthesia with sevoflurane. ECG recordings were taken before, 2, 5 and 10 min after drug administration. Sevoflurane significantly lengthened (P < 0.001) the heart rate corrected QT interval within 10 min from 434 +/- 5 ms to 459 +/- 6 ms (mean +/- SEM). Already after 2 min of sevoflurane application a trend towards prolongation was visible. The critical value of 440 ms in the rate-corrected QT interval was exceeded in four patients in the sevoflurane group (n = 18) but in only in one patient in the propofol group (n = 18). Rate-corrected QT interval prolongation caused by sevoflurane needs to be recognized early in order to prevent the critical ventricular tachycardia torsade de pointes.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Sevoflurane, but not propofol, significantly prolongs the Q-T interval.

UNLABELLED: Prolongation of the Q-T interval may be associated with polymorphic ventricular tachycardia known as torsade de pointes, syncope and sudden death. Existing data show that isoflurane prolongs the Q-T interval, whereas halothane shortens it. The aim of this study was to determine whether sevoflurane or propofol affects the Q-T interval. Thirty female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery were randomly assigned to two groups, one receiving inhaled induction with sevoflurane and the other receiving total IV anesthesia with propofol. Before and 20 min after the induction, a six-lead electrocardiogram was recorded, and blood pressure was measured. The Q-T interval and heart rate adjusted Q-T interval (Q-Tc interval) were significantly prolonged during the administration of anesthesia with sevoflurane, while the Q-T interval was significantly shortened, and the Q-Tc interval was statistically unaffected during propofol anesthesia administration. We conclude that, in otherwise healthy female patients, sevoflurane prolongs the Q-Tc. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we evaluated the effect of sevoflurane induction and anesthesia versus propofol induction and anesthesia on the Q-T interval. Sevoflurane significantly prolonged the Q-T interval and the heart rate adjusted Q-T interval, whereas propofol shortened the Q-T interval but not the heart rate adjusted Q-T interval.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during severe hypothermia in pigs: does epinephrine or vasopressin increase coronary perfusion pressure?

UNLABELLED: The American Heart Association does not recommend epinephrine for management of hypothermic cardiac arrest if body core temperature is below 30 degrees C. Furthermore, the effects of vasopressin administration during hypothermic cardiac arrest are totally unknown. This study was designed to assess the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine on coronary perfusion pressure in a porcine model during hypothermic cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pigs were surface-cooled until their body core temperature was 26 degrees C. After 30 min of untreated cardiac arrest, followed by 3 min of basic life support CPR, 15 animals were randomly assigned to receive, at 5-min intervals, either vasopressin (0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 U/kg; n = 5), epinephrine (45, 45, and 200 microg/kg; n = 5), or saline placebo (n = 5). Compared with epinephrine, mean +/- SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher (P < 0.05) 90 s and 5 min after the first (35+/-4 vs 22+/-3 mm Hg and 37+/-2 vs 16+/-2 mm Hg) and the second vasopressin administration (40+/-5 vs 26+/-5 mm Hg and 36+/-5 vs 18+/-2 mm Hg, respectively). After the third drug administration, coronary perfusion pressure in the epinephrine group increased dramatically and was comparable to vasopressin. In the saline placebo group, coronary perfusion pressure was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in the vasopressin and epinephrine groups. Six animals treated with epinephrine or vasopressin had transient return of spontaneous circulation, whereas all placebo animals died (P < 0.05). During CPR in severe hypothermia, administration of both vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in significant increases in coronary perfusion pressure when compared with placebo. IMPLICATIONS: Our study was designed to assess the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine in a porcine model simulating cardiac arrest during severe hypothermia. This study demonstrates that the administration of both emergency drugs results in an increased perfusion pressure in the heart.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Inert gas exchange during pneumoperitoneum at incremental values of positive end-expiratory pressure.

UNLABELLED: Laparoscopy is a surgical technique for a growing variety of abdominal operations. In patients undergoing this procedure, arterial blood oxygenation and hemodynamics are frequently depressed. This study evaluated the effect of different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during intraperitoneal CO(2) insufflation on the lung's ventilation-perfusion distribution in a porcine model. We studied 13 anesthetized pigs with an intraperitoneal pressure of 15 cm H(2)O applied at either incremental values of PEEP (5-20 cm H(2)O, increments of 5 cm H(2)O) or a constant PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O. The effects of CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on inert gas exchange and hemodynamics were examined with the multiple inert gas elimination technique. During pneumoperitoneum, gas exchange was most augmented by 15 and 20 cm H(2)O of PEEP. Although the differences in hemodynamics between the individual settings were insignificant, 10 cm H(2)O of PEEP provided the smallest impairment of hemodynamics. We conclude that PEEP of 15 H(2)O during pneumoperitoneum resulted in a modest hemodynamic depression but significant gas exchange augmentation in our experiment. IMPLICATIONS: Anesthetized pigs, with a pneumoperitoneum of 15 cm H(2)O, were treated either with incremental values of positive end-expiratory pressure (5-20 cm H(2)O, increments of 5 cm H(2)O) or with a constant positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H(2)O. Fifteen and 20 cm H(2)O resulted in significantly improved pulmonary gas exchange compared with 5 cm H(2)O.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

The effects of repeated doses of vasopressin or epinephrine on ventricular fibrillation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

This study evaluated ventricular fibrillation mean frequency and amplitude to predict defibrillation success in a porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) model using repeated administration of vasopressin or epinephrine. After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 3 min of CPR, 10 pigs were randomly assigned to receive either vasopressin (early vasopressin: 0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 units/kg, respectively, n = 5) or epinephrine (early epinephrine: 45, 45, and 200 microg/kg, respectively, n = 5). Another 11 animals were randomly allocated after 4 min of cardiac arrest and 8 min of CPR to receive every 5 min either vasopressin (late vasopressin: 0.4 and 0. 8 units/kg, respectively, n = 5) or epinephrine (late epinephrine: 45 and 200 microg/kg, n = 6). Ventricular fibrillation mean frequency and amplitude on defibrillation were significantly higher in the vasopressin groups than in the epinephrine groups, respectively. In vasopressin versus epinephrine animals, mean frequency immediately before defibrillation was 9.6 +/- 1.5 Hz vs 7. 0 +/- 0.7 Hz (P < 0.001), mean amplitude was 0.65 +/- 0.26 mV vs 0. 21 +/- 0.14 mV (P < 0.001, and coronary perfusion pressure was 27 +/- 9 mm Hg vs 8 +/- 4 mm Hg (P < 0.00001), respectively. In contrast to no epinephrine animals, all vasopressin animals were successfully defibrillated and survived 1 h (P < 0.05). Mean fibrillation frequency and amplitude predicted successful defibrillation and may serve as noninvasive markers to monitor continuing CPR efforts. Furthermore, vasopressin was superior to epinephrine in maintaining these variables above a threshold necessary for successful defibrillation.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Continuous positive airway pressure at 10 cm H(2)O during cardiopulmonary bypass improves postoperative gas exchange.

UNLABELLED: Postbypass pulmonary dysfunction including atelectasis and increased shunting is a common problem in the intensive care unit. Negative net fluid balance and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) have been used to reduce the adverse effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on the lung. To determine whether CPAP at 10 cm H(2)O during CPB results in improved postoperative gas exchange in comparison with deflated lungs during CPB, we examined 14 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. Seven patients received CPAP at 10 cm H(2)O during CPB, and in the other seven patients, the lungs were open to the atmosphere (control). Measurements were taken before and after CPB, after thoracic closure, and 4 h after CPB in the intensive care unit. CPAP at 10 cm H(2)O resulted in significantly more perfusion of lung areas with a normal ventilation/perfusion distribution (V(A)/Q) and significantly less shunt and low V(A)/Q perfusion 4 h after CPB in comparison with the control group. Consequently, arterial oxygen partial pressure was significantly higher and alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference was significantly smaller. We conclude that CPAP at 10 cm H(2)O during CPB is a simple maneuver that improves postoperative gas exchange. IMPLICATIONS: Inflation of the lungs at a pressure of 10 cm H(2)O as compared with leaving the lungs deflated during cardiopulmonary bypass was examined. Lung inflation during bypass resulted in significantly improved postoperative gas exchange.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Vasopressin improves survival after cardiac arrest in hypovolemic shock.

UNLABELLED: Survival after hypovolemic shock and cardiac arrest is dismal with current therapies. We evaluated the potential benefits of vasopressin versus large-dose epinephrine in hemorrhagic shock and cardiac arrest on vital organ perfusion, and the likelihood of resuscitation. In 18 pigs, 35% of the estimated blood volume was withdrawn over 15 min and ventricular fibrillation was induced 5 min later. After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 4 min of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a bolus dose of either 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 7), 0.8 unit/kg vasopressin (n = 7), or saline placebo (n = 4) was administered in a blinded, randomized manner. Defibrillation was attempted 2.5 min after drug administration, and all animals were subsequently observed for 1 h without further intervention. Spontaneous circulation was restored in 7 of 7 vasopressin animals, in 6 of 7 epinephrine pigs, and in 0 of 4 placebo swine. At 5 and 30 min after return of spontaneous circulation, median (minimum and maximum) renal blood flow after epinephrine was 2 (0-31), and 2 (0-48) mL. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively; and after vasopressin 96 (12-161), and 44 (16-105) mL. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively (P: <.01 between groups). Epinephrine animals developed a profound metabolic acidosis by 15 min after return of spontaneous circulation (mean arterial pH, 7.11 +/- 0.01), and by 60 min all epinephrine-treated animals had died. The vasopressin pigs had (P: = 0.015) less acidosis (pH = 7.26+/-0. 04) at corresponding time points, and all survived > or =55 min (P: < 0. 01). In conclusion, treatment of hypovolemic cardiac arrest with vasopressin, but not with large-dose epinephrine or saline placebo, resulted in sustained vital organ perfusion, less metabolic acidosis, and prolonged survival. Based on these findings, clinical evaluation of vasopressin during hypovolemic cardiac arrest may be warranted. IMPLICATIONS: The chances of surviving cardiac arrest in hemorrhagic shock are considered dismal without adequate fluid replacement. However, treatment of hypovolemic cardiac arrest with vasopressin, but not with large-dose epinephrine or saline placebo, resulted in sustained vital organ perfusion and prolonged survival in an animal model of suspended infusion therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Effects of vasopressin and epinephrine on splanchnic blood flow and renal function during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of vasopressin versus epinephrine on splanchnic blood flow during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and to evaluate the effects of these vasopressors on renal function in the postresuscitation phase. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine CPR model with instrumentation for continuous measurement of splanchnic and renal blood flow. SETTING: University hospital experimental laboratory. SUBJECTS: A total of 12 anesthetized, 12- to 16-wk-old domestic pigs weighing 30-35 kg. INTERVENTIONS: After 4 mins of cardiac arrest, and 3 mins of CPR, 12 pigs were randomly assigned to receive either 0.4 units/kg vasopressin (n = 6) or 45 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 6). Defibrillation was performed 5 mins after drug administration; all animals were observed for 6 hrs after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean +/- SEM superior mesenteric artery blood flow was significantly (p < .05) lower after vasopressin compared with epinephrine at 90 secs after drug administration (13+/-3 vs. 129+/-33 mL/min); at 5 mins after drug administration (31+/-18 vs. 155+/-39 mL/min); at 5 mins after ROSC (332+/-47 vs. 1087+/-166 mL/min); and at 15 mins after ROSC (450+/-106 vs. 1130+/-222 mL/min); respectively. Mean +/- SEM left renal and hepatic artery blood flow after ROSC was comparable in both groups ranging between 120-290 mL/min (renal blood flow), and 150-360 mL/min (hepatic blood flow), respectively. Median urine output after ROSC showed no difference between groups, and highest values (180-220 mL/hr) were observed in the first 60 mins after ROSC. Median calculated glomerular filtration rate showed no difference between groups with values ranging between 30 and 80 mL/min in the postresuscitation phase. Calculated fractional sodium excretion and osmolar relationship between urea and plasma indicated no evidence for renal tubular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In the early postresuscitation phase, superior mesenteric blood flow was temporarily impaired by vasopressin in comparison with epinephrine. With respect to renal blood flow and renal function after ROSC, there was no difference between either vasopressor given during CPR. Vasopressin given during CPR did not result in an antidiuretic state in the postresuscitation phase.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Vasopressin decreases endogenous catecholamine plasma concentrations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of vasopressin vs. saline placebo on catecholamine plasma concentrations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation by using an established porcine CPR model with instrumentation for measurement of hemodynamic variables, vital organ blood flow, and return of spontaneous circulation. SETTING: University hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS: Sixteen domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: After 15 mins of untreated cardiac arrest and 3 mins of CPR, 16 pigs were randomized to be treated with either 0.8 U/kg vasopressin (n = 8) or placebo (normal saline; n = 8). Arterial epinephrine and norepinephrine plasma concentrations were sampled at prearrest, after 1.5 mins of chest compressions, and at 1.5 mins and 5 mins after drug administration during CPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In comparison with placebo pigs at 1.5 and 5 mins after drug administration, animals resuscitated with vasopressin had significantly (p < .01) higher mean +/- SEM left ventricular myocardial (131+/-27 vs. 10+/-1 mL x mins(-1) x 100 g(-1) and 62+/-13 vs. 9+/-2 mL x mins(-1) x 100 g(-1)); total cerebral (90+/-8 vs. 14+/-3 mL x mins(-1) x 100 g(-1) and 51+/-4 vs. 12+/-2 mL x mins(-1) x 100 g(-1)); and adrenal gland perfusion (299+/-36 vs. 38+/-7 mL x mins(-1) x 100 g(-1) and 194+/-23 vs. 29+/-5 mL x mins(-1) x 100 g(-1)). Significantly lower mean +/- SEM epinephrine concentrations in the vasopressin pigs compared with the placebo group were measured 1.5 mins and 5 mins after drug administration, (24167+/-7919 vs. 80223+/-19391 pg/mL [p < .01] and 8346+/-1454 vs. 71345+/-10758 pg/mL [p < .01]). Mean +/- SEM norepinephrine plasma concentrations in the vasopressin animals in comparison with placebo were at 1.5 and 5 mins after drug administration significantly lower (41729+/-13918 vs. 82756+/-9904 pg/mL [p = .01] and 10642+/-3193 vs. 62170+/-8797 pg/mL [p < .01]). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of vasopressin during CPR resulted in significantly superior vital organ blood flow, but significantly decreased endogenous catecholamine plasma concentrations when compared with placebo.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Effect of phased chest and abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation on myocardial and cerebral blood flow in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the effects of a phased chest and abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) device, Lifestick, vs. standard CPR on vital organ blood flow in a porcine CPR model. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model with instrumentation for measurement of hemodynamic variables, vital organ blood flow, blood gases, and return of spontaneous circulation. SETTING: University hospital research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: After 4 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, either the Lifestick CPR device (n = 6) or standard CPR (n = 6) was started and maintained for an additional interval of 6 mins before attempting defibrillation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During CPR, but before epinephrine, use of the Lifestick CPR device resulted in significantly higher (p < .05) mean (+/- SD) coronary perfusion pressure (23+/-9 vs. 10+/-7 mm Hg), cerebral perfusion pressure (29+/-11 vs. 18+/-10 mm Hg), mean arterial pressure (49+/-10 vs. 36+/-13 mm Hg), end-tidal carbon dioxide (32+/-11 vs. 20+/-7 mm Hg), left ventricular myocardial blood flow (44+/-19 vs. 19+/-12 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)), and total cerebral blood flow (29+/-10 vs. 14+/-12 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)). After 45 microg/kg epinephrine, hemodynamic and vital organ blood flow variables increased to comparable levels in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard CPR, the Lifestick CPR device increased significantly hemodynamic variables and vital organ blood flow during CPR before epinephrine administration.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2000

Intraosseous blood gases during hypothermia: correlation with arterial, mixed venous, and sagittal sinus blood.

OBJECTIVE: Especially in pediatric patients with severe hypothermia, intraosseous access may be more readily available than intravascular access during an early phase of treatment and therefore, may be helpful to optimize management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraosseous blood gases are comparable with arterial, mixed venous, and sagittal sinus blood gases during different degrees of hypothermia. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive laboratory investigation using a porcine model. SETTING: University hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve anesthetized, 12- to 16-wk-old domestic pigs weighing 30-35 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Volume-controlled ventilated animals were instrumented with arterial, pulmonary artery, sagittal sinus, and 16-gauge intraosseous catheters. Blood samples were obtained from each site every 15 mins during surface cooling with crushed ice until mean +/- SEM core temperature decreased from 38.5+/-0.1 degrees C [101.3+/-0.2 degrees F] to 27+/-0.5 degrees C [80.5+/-0.9 degrees F] over 2 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraindividual correlation of Pco2 and pH values were determined as the difference (delta) between intraosseous and reference blood samples. With hypothermia, absolute values of Pco2 decreased and pH increased in samples from all sites. At 27 degrees C, intraosseous--arterial delta P(CO2) and delta pH (mean +/- 95% confidence intervals) were 2.6+/-10.6 torr [0.35+/-1.4 kPa] and -0.11+/-0.07 units; intraosseous - mixed venous were 0.4+/-12.2 torr [0.05+/-1.6 kPa] and -0.06+/-0.08 units; and intraosseous - sagittal sinus were -7.3+/-16 torr [-0.97+/-2.1 kPa] and 0.001+/-0.14 units, respectively. Intraosseous Pco2 was not comparable to end-tidal values (deltaP(CO2) 17.4+/-14.6 torr [2.3+/-1.9 kPa]), and intraosseous lactate did not correlate with arterial, mixed venous, or sagittal sinus values. CONCLUSIONS: During hypothermia, intraosseous P(CO2) values were predictable for mixed venous Pco2 and arterial P(CO2). Intraosseous pH values also correlated with mixed venous and sagittal sinus blood samples. Accordingly, interpretation of blood gas values obtained from bone marrow aspirates may be helpful to adjust ventilation and optimize fluid and drug therapy during the early treatment of patients with severe hypothermia.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Vasopressin-mediated adrenocorticotropin release increases plasma cortisol concentrations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE: Vasopressin is a possible stimulus for both adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) and endothelin-1 release. The aim of this study was to compare plasma concentrations of ACTH, cortisol, and endothelin-1 after epinephrine or vasopressin administration in an experimental animal model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled animal study. SETTING: A university research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Fourteen 12- to 14-wk-old domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: After 4 mins of cardiac arrest and 3 mins of external chest compression, the pigs were randomly assigned to receive either 0.045 mg/kg epinephrine (n = 7) or 0.4 units/kg vasopressin (n = 7). At 5 mins after drug administration, defibrillation was attempted. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Coronary perfusion pressure, ACTH, cortisol, and endothelin-1 were measured before cardiocirculatory arrest, during CPR before drug administration, and at 90 secs and 5 mins after drug administration. Coronary perfusion pressure was comparable between groups. All seven animals in the vasopressin group survived, but only one pig in the epinephrine group survived (p = .005). ACTH and cortisol concentrations remained unchanged in epinephrine-treated animals, but increased significantly after vasopressin administration and were significantly higher than in epinephrine-treated animals 5 mins after drug administration. Endothelin-1 concentrations remained unchanged during the study period and were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin is a potent stimulus for ACTH secretion, but does not trigger endothelin-1 release from vascular cells during cardiac arrest and CPR. The increased plasma cortisol concentrations caused by the enhanced ACTH release after vasopressin may be one factor contributing to the improved outcome repeatedly observed with vasopressin in animal models of CPR.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2000

Vasopressin and endothelin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Vital organ blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and neurologic recovery after CPR were significantly better in pigs treated with vasopressin compared with epinephrine. Furthermore, two clinical studies evaluating both out-of-hospital and inhospital cardiac arrest patients found higher 24-hr survival rates in patients who were resuscitated with vasopressin compared with epinephrine. Scientists at the Leopold Franzens University in Innsbruck, Austria, are currently coordinating a multicenter, randomized clinical trial under the aegis of the European Resuscitation Council to study the effects of vasopressin vs. epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Results of anticipated 1,500 enrolled patients may be available in 2001 and may help to determine the role of vasopressin during CPR. Another new, recently studied vasopressor for CPR is endothelin-1. To date, this vasopressor has only been studied as an intervention in animal CPR models, although plasma levels have been investigated in cardiac arrest patients. Initial reports found improved coronary perfusion pressure when combined with epinephrine. However, the CPR research group of the University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center found excessive vasoconstriction and worse survival than with epinephrine alone.

Advanced Cardiac Life Support↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in a pediatric porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the effects of vasopressin vs. epinephrine vs. the combination of epinephrine with vasopressin on vital organ blood flow and return of spontaneous circulation in a pediatric porcine model of asphyxial arrest. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model for measurement of hemodynamic variables, organ blood flow, blood gases, and return of spontaneous circulation. SETTING: University hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS: Eighteen piglets weighing 8-11 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Asphyxial cardiac arrest was induced by clamping the endotracheal tube. After 8 mins of cardiac arrest and 8 mins of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a bolus dose of either 0.8 units/kg vasopressin (n = 6), 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 6), or a combination of 45 microg/kg epinephrine with 0.8 units/kg vasopressin (n = 6) was administered in a randomized manner. Defibrillation was attempted 6 mins after drug administration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean +/- SEM coronary perfusion pressure, before and 2 mins after drug administration, was 13 +/- 2 and 23 +/- 6 mm Hg in the vasopressin group; 14 +/- 2 and 31 +/- 4 mm Hg in the epinephrine group; and 13 +/- 1 and 33 +/- 6 mm Hg in the epinephrine-vasopressin group, respectively (p = NS). At the same time points, mean +/- SEM left ventricular myocardial blood flow was 44 +/- 31 and 44 +/- 25 mL x min-(1) x 100 g(-1) in the vasopressin group; 30 +/- 18 and 233 +/- 61 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) in the epinephrine group; and 36 +/- 10 and 142 +/- 57 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) in the epinephrine-vasopressin group (p < .01 epinephrine vs. vasopressin; p < .02 epinephrine-vasopressin vs. vasopressin). Total cerebral blood flow trended toward higher values after epinephrine-vasopressin (60 +/- 19 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)) than after vasopressin (36 +/- 17 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)) or epinephrine alone (31 +/- 7 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1); p = .07, respectively). One of six vasopressin, six of six epinephrine, and four of six epinephrine-vasopressin-treated animals had return of spontaneous circulation (p < .01, vasopressin vs. epinephrine). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of epinephrine, either alone or in combination with vasopressin, significantly improved left ventricular myocardial blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Return of spontaneous circulation was significantly more likely in epinephrine-treated pigs than in animals resuscitated with vasopressin alone.

Adrenergic Agonists↗
PubMed2000

Survey of effects of anesthesia protocols on hemodynamic variables in porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitation laboratory models before induction of cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: An advantage of animal models in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) research is the possibility to control confounding variables that may be impossible to standardize in clinical trials. A neglected effect of the anesthesia protocol in porcine CPR studies may be its impact on hemodynamic variables before induction of cardiac arrest. Accordingly, the purpose of the study reported here was to evaluate published CPR reports with regard to their anesthesia protocol. METHODS: Of 100 articles that reported on laboratory models simulating cardiac arrest between 1987 and 1997 in peer-reviewed journals, 25 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed for values of coronary perfusion pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, temperature, and cardiac index before induction of cardiac arrest. Subsequently, mean values for all animals in a given report were calculated and corrected for group size; statistical analysis was not performed since this was a survey only. RESULTS: Different anesthesia protocols resulted in a widely distributed pattern of hemodynamic variables prior to induction of cardiac arrest. Ranges compared with reference values were: heart rate, 100 to 122 beats/min versus 105+/-11 beats/min; mean arterial pressure, 68 to 130 mm Hg versus 102+/-9 mm Hg; coronary perfusion pressure, 55 to 114 mm Hg (no reference value); cardiac index, 69 to 152 ml/kg/min versus 147+/-22 ml/kg/min; body temperature, 37 to 38.5 degrees C versus 38.5+/-0.7 degrees C. CONCLUSION: The anesthesia protocol may have an impact on hemodynamic variables before induction of cardiac arrest in CPR studies.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed1999

Repeated administration of vasopressin but not epinephrine maintains coronary perfusion pressure after early and late administration during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether repeated dosages of vasopressin or epinephrine given early or late during basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be able to increase coronary perfusion pressure above a threshold between 20 and 30 mm Hg that renders defibrillation successful. METHODS AND RESULTS: After 4 minutes of cardiac arrest, followed by 3 minutes of basic life support CPR, 12 animals were randomly assigned to receive, every 5 minutes, either vasopressin (early vasopressin: 0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 U/kg, respectively; n=6) or epinephrine (early epinephrine: 45, 45, and 200 microg/kg, respectively; n=6). Another 12 animals were randomly allocated after 4 minutes of cardiac arrest, followed by 8 minutes of basic life support CPR, to receive, every 5 minutes, either vasopressin (late vasopressin: 0.4 and 0.8 U/kg, respectively; n=6), or epinephrine (late epinephrine: 45 and 200 microg/kg, respectively; n=6). Defibrillation was attempted after 22 minutes of cardiac arrest. Mean+/-SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher 90 seconds after early vasopressin compared with early epinephrine (50+/-4 versus 34+/-3 mm Hg, P<0.02; 42+/-5 versus 15+/-3 mm Hg, P<0.0008; and 37+/-5 versus 11+/-3 mm Hg, P<0. 002, respectively). Mean+/-SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher 90 seconds after late vasopressin compared with late epinephrine (40+/-3 versus 22+/-4 mm Hg, P<0.004, and 32+/-4 versus 15+/-4 mm Hg, P<0.01, respectively). All vasopressin animals survived 60 minutes, whereas no epinephrine pig had return of spontaneous circulation (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated administration of vasopressin but only the first epinephrine dose given early and late during basic life support CPR maintained coronary perfusion pressure above the threshold that is needed for successful defibrillation.

Animals↗