PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Haddow

Publications and source records attributed to K Haddow.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of cold dissection versus bipolar diathermy dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bipolar dissection tonsillectomy is associated with a higher post-operative haemorrhage rate than cold dissection tonsillectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Otolaryngology department of a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-five patients undergoing elective tonsillectomy between July 2002 and November 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to either bipolar dissection or cold dissection (with bipolar haemostasis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-operative haemorrhage rates, management (conservative or surgical) and blood transfusion requirements were recorded. The grade of surgeon and history of quinsy were also recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients (58 per cent) were randomized to the bipolar dissection and 104 (42 per cent) to the cold dissection groups. Seventeen patients (12.1 per cent) in the bipolar dissection group and eight patients (7.7 per cent) in the cold dissection group suffered haemorrhage (p = 1.0; degrees of freedom (Df) 0.0; 95 per cent confidence intervals (CI) -0.1 to 0.0). The haemorrhage rates for procedures conducted by senior house officers, specialist registrars and consultants were 11.4 per cent, 10.3 per cent and 5.0 per cent, respectively. Two patients required surgical intervention, both from the bipolar dissection group. No patients required blood transfusion. A history of quinsy was not associated with an increased haemorrhage rate. CONCLUSION: The difference in haemorrhage rates between groups and surgeon grades did not reach statistical significance. Nonetheless the trend towards a greater incidence of haemorrhage in the bipolar group and in procedures conducted by more junior surgeons during the trial raised concerns. The results of the National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit and our interim results have led us to abandon the trial and disallow the use of bipolar dissection in tonsillectomies performed by junior staff members.

Adult↗

Consent--who, what, where, when?

OBJECTIVE: An investigation of current practise for obtaining and documenting informed consent in Scottish Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) departments. DESIGN: A telephone survey of junior representatives of each ENT department. Each junior was asked a series of questions regarding who discussed the operations with patients who signed the consent forms and whether any form of training was given. SETTING: May 1999. RESULTS: In 80% of cases the responsibility for taking written consent fell to the most junior members of staff. Consultants have a pre-operative discussion, with their patients most of the time but only rarely is this discussion documented. Training in the process of consent is given in only one of 15 departments. CONCLUSION: Despite increasing negligence claims and clear guidelines from the General Medical Council the responsibility for obtaining written consent from pre-operative patients still rests with the most junior medical staff of the ENT departments of Scotland. We suggest that this situation is neither prudent nor fair and have put forward two simple proposals to rectify the situation.

Consent Forms↗