PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Harding

Publications and source records attributed to K Harding.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Randomised trial of case finding and surveillance of elderly people at home.

Health screening for old people who live at home has been the subject of debate for 30 years or so. It has come to the fore again in the UK with the new emphasis on annual assessments by general practitioners (GPs) of those aged 75 or more. Screening in the elderly has implications for manpower. How can it best be done? We describe here a randomised, controlled study of case finding and surveillance in patients aged 65 and over in a general practice in South Wales. Problem identification was by a postal questionnaire, focusing on function, that was sent at random to 369 eligible patients with subsequent verification and intervention by a specially appointed nurse. The 356 controls had no questionnaires and no contact with that nurse. The study lasted 3 years, and end-points included mortality, self-ratings of quality of life, and health status, and use of all services (GP contacts, hospital admission, home help, and so on). Mortality was significantly lower in the intervention group (18%) than in the controls (24%) (difference 6.0% [95% CI 0.1-11.9%], p less than 0.05). Total number of hospital admissions did not differ between intervention and control groups, but duration of hospital stay of patients aged 65 to 74 years was significantly shorter in the intervention group (difference 4.6 days [95% CI 1.6-7.6], p less than 0.01). An increase in visits to a GP was largely offset by a lower number of home visits by a GP. Quality-of-life measures revealed no between-group differences, but self-rated health status was superior in the intervention group. We conclude that the use of a postal screening questionnaire with selective follow-up and intervention can favourably influence outcome and use of health care resources by elderly people living at home.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Fetal acidaemia, the cardiotocograph and the T/QRS ratio of the fetal ECG in labour.

OBJECTIVE: To relate the T/QRS ratio of the fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) to the cardiotocogram (CTG) and fetal pH during labour. DESIGN: Prospective data collection from selected monitored labours. SETTING: A postgraduate teaching hospital delivery suite. SUBJECTS: 113 women in labour at term. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of fetal T/QRS ratio values with pH values at the time of fetal blood sampling and at birth (umbilical artery blood). Comparison of the predictive values of raised T/QRS ratio and a pathological CTG for fetal acidemia. RESULTS: Complete data sufficient for analysis was available for 51 fetal scalp blood samples and 93 umbilical artery pH samples. The median (range) of T/QRS ratio values before birth of 88 babies not requiring admission to the neonatal unit was 0.13 (0.00-0.32) with a 97.5th centile value of 0.28. T/QRS ratios did not correlate with fetal scalp pH values. Fetal scalp acidaemia (pH less than 7.20) was detected with rates of 50 and 13% respectively by a pathological CTG and by a T/QRS ratio above 0.28, the positive predictive values being 40% and 50%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between increasing T/QRS ratio and falling pH. Detection rates (sensitivities) for umbilical artery acidaemia (pH less than 7.12) were 76% and 29% whereas positive predictive values were 38% and 71% respectively for a pathological CTG and a T/QRS ratio above 0.28. CONCLUSION: A raised T/QRS ratio (greater than 0.28) had a considerably lower detection rate for fetal acidaemia during labour than a pathological CTG.

Acidosis↗
PubMed1990

The current cost of nuclear medicine.

In the light of the control of expenditure and changes in radiopharmaceutical costs, changes in study protocols, new investigation procedures and inappropriate placing in Korner categories, the BNMS Council set up a working party to derive an agreed set of costings for Nuclear Medicine techniques. Using data from three hospitals with additional information from another nine, we have agreed the 1988 cost of individual nuclear medicine procedures in the UK. These figures include staffing (radiopharmacy, nursing, physics, medical including consultant), radiopharmaceuticals and other consumables, indirect costs (secretarial, administrative, portering), variable overheads (service contracts, stationery) and fixed overheads (rates, lighting, heating, building and engineering). Capital costs, equipment and buildings were not included. Because figures include salary and overhead costs they are difficult to compare with the majority of other previous nuclear medicine costings, apart from Bretland et al., or with data for other imaging modalities. Comparison of these costings with Korner schedules shows marked overlap between the Korner groups. Such groups therefore form a poor method of costing nuclear medicine procedures. We propose alternative groupings.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗