PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Hargarten

Publications and source records attributed to K Hargarten.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Prehospital prophylactic lidocaine does not favorably affect outcome in patients with chest pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to determine the morbidity and mortality in initially stable patients presenting to paramedics with chest pain; to examine possible beneficial effects of its use, including reduction of sudden death syndrome in the prehospital and emergency department setting; and to determine if prophylactic lidocaine is associated with adverse effects in this patient population. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized, prospective study using prophylactic lidocaine in patients complaining of chest pain who presented to our paramedic system between January 1984 and January 1988. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 18 years or older with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin who presented to paramedics during the study period were included. Excluded were patients presenting with warning arrhythmias, second- or third-degree heart block, bradycardias of less than 50, hypotension of less than 90 mm Hg systolic, or known allergy to lidocaine. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups, the lidocaine-treated group and the control group. An initial bolus of 1 mg/kg IV lidocaine was administered to the lidocaine-treated group. A simultaneous 2 mg/min IV drip was established. Ten minutes after the first dose of lidocaine, a second bolus of 0.5 mg/kg was administered. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period, 1,427 patients were entered; 704 received lidocaine, and 723 did not. Discharge diagnoses included acute myocardial infarction (31%), unstable angina (33%), other cardiac problems (7%), and noncardiac problems (29%); overall mortality rate was 7.4%. There was an equal distribution of deaths between the lidocaine-treated group (57) and the control group (48). Six patients had a cardiac arrest in the prehospital setting, and 15 had a cardiac arrest in the ED. Malignant ventricular arrhythmias as the precipitating arrest rhythm in patients with acute myocardial infarctions were similar for the lidocaine-treated and control groups. The incidence of adverse effects, including hypotension, bradycardias, second- or third-degree heart blocks, tinnitus, and altered mental status, was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: There are no benefits from the administration of prehospital prophylactic lidocaine in stable patients with chest pain; therefore, routine use in this setting appears unwarranted.

Chest Pain↗
PubMed1989

Electrocardiographic characteristics in EMD.

Little has been written concerning the initial electrocardiographic (EKG) characteristics and/or changes which occur as the result of treatment in the electromechanical dissociation (EMD) patient. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine predictive indicators of successful resuscitation in EMD by evaluating various EKG parameters. During 72 months, ending December 31st, 1985, there were 503 non-poisoned, prehospital adult cardiac arrest patients whose initial rhythm was EMD. All patients had their initial prehospital EKG rhythm strip evaluated for rhythm type, rate, the presence of P waves, QT interval and QRS interval. In successfully resuscitated patients, the prehospital initial rhythm analysis and the rhythm analysis on emergency department presentation were compared. Successfully resuscitated patients presenting with EMD had significantly faster initial rates, higher incidences of P waves and average QRS and QT intervals shorter than patients not responding to therapy. Furthermore, successfully resuscitated patients had significantly increased heart rates, developed new onset of P waves, and shortened QT intervals in response to treatment. Successfully resuscitated and save patients had average initial and final QRS complex lengths within normal limits. Organized atrial activity on the initial EKG was also correlated with successful resuscitation. No patient with an initial EKG rhythm of second or third degree AV block survived to hospital discharge. No patient who presented to the emergency department with atrial fibrillation survived to hospital discharge. Similarly, supraventricular tachycaydia following resuscitative efforts appeared to be associated with a negative outcome. Rate normalization following treatment was correlated with save rate. Wide complex rhythms without atrial activity were most highly associated with unsuccessful resuscitation. We believe these observed electrocardiographic characteristics and/or changes in response to treatment may have predictive value in evaluating patients with EMD.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1989

Defining electromechanical dissociation: morphologic presentation.

Electromechanical dissociation (EMD) is inconsistently defined in the literature. Our definition is the presence of discernible electrical complexes (excluding ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation) and the absence of palpable pulses. It has been noted that EMD may present with a variety of morphological complexes. It was the purpose of this study to categorize the electrical morphologic characteristics of patients presenting in EMD and to correlate morphology with patient outcome and response to therapy. From the 6-year period, January 1st, 1980 to December 31st, 1985, 503 evaluable adult patients presented to an urban paramedic system in non-traumatic, non-poisoned, cardiorespiratory arrest and were determined to be in EMD. The rhythm strips obtained from paramedics on all patients were retrospectively reviewed and were arbitrarily categorized in the following manner: Group 1, normal QRS width, isoelectric ST and normal appearing T-waves; Group 2A, atrial activity, widened QRS width (greater than or equal to 0.12 ms) or abnormal ST and/or T-waves (ST depression, elevation, slurring or T-wave inversion); Group 2B, same as Group 2A but without atrial activity; Group 3, essentially monophasic, slurred RST complexes. The respective initial distribution was Group 1, 147 (29%); Group 2A, 248 (49%); Group 2B, 60 (12%); Group 3, 48 (10%). The relative frequency of morphologies preceding the attainment of a pulse was as follows: Group 1, 30 (24%); Group 2A, 82 (65%); Group 2B, 8 (6%); Group 3, 6 (5%) (P less than or equal to 0.01 with no significant difference between Group 2B and 3).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Electrocardiography↗
PubMed1986

Bystander/first responder CPR: ten years experience in a paramedic system.

The effectiveness of bystander CPR recently has been challenged. We undertook a ten-year retrospective review of our prehospital experience with witnessed cardiorespiratory arrest to ascertain save rates in patients receiving and not receiving CPR before paramedic advanced life support (ALS). Traumatic and poisoning arrests and children less than 18 years old were excluded. A total of 1,905 patients presenting to a paramedic system from November 1, 1973, to October 31, 1983, were bystander-witnessed arrests and attempted paramedic resuscitations. Four hundred five paramedic-witnessed arrests were excluded. One hundred eighty-two of 1,248 (14.6%) who had CPR initiated before paramedic ALS arrival were saves, compared to 38 of 252 (15%) who had no CPR initiated until paramedic arrival (P = NS). A save was defined as a patient discharged from the hospital. The respective save rates for coarse ventricular fibrillation were 148 of 628 (23.6%) (CPR before paramedic arrival) vs 35 of 151 (CPR delayed until paramedic arrival) (23.2%); electromechanical dissociation (EMD), 11 of 209 (5.3%) vs 0 of 38; asystole, 19 of 401 (4.7%) vs 3 of 61 (4.9%); and ventricular tachycardia, four of ten (40%) vs 0 of two. In this prehospital system, bystander/first responder CPR was found not to improve hospital discharge rates except in patients with initially documented rhythm of EMD.

Adult↗