PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Hemenway

Publications and source records attributed to K Hemenway.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Parts and the basic level in natural categories and artificial stimuli: comments on Murphy (1991)

Natural taxonomies consist of categories that vary in level of abstraction. Categories at the basic level, such as chair and apple, are preferred in a broad range of situations (Rosch, Mervis, Gray, Johnson, & Boyes-Braem, 1976). Several studies have revealed qualitative differences between the basic level and other levels. For example, Tversky and Hemenway (1984) presented evidence that parts proliferative at the basic level; they proposed that parts link the appearance of category members with their functions. Although not taking issue with these findings, Murphy (1991) investigated whether parts are necessary or sufficient for a basic level. In an attempt to demonstrate that parts are not necessary, Murphy used artificial stimuli that did not capture the essential features of natural taxonomies. These discrepancies preclude any conclusions based on his studies. Murphy's data also do not support his claim that parts are not sufficient for a basic level. Finally, it is unlikely that pursuing questions of necessity or sufficiency will produce insights into human categorization.

Adult↗

Objects, parts, and categories.

Concepts may be organized into taxonomies varying in inclusiveness or abstraction, such as furniture, table, card table or animal, bird, robin. For taxonomies of common objects and organisms, the basic level, the level of table and bird, has been determined to be most informative (Rosch, Mervis, Gray, Johnson, & Boyes-Braem, 1976). Psychology, linguistics, and anthropology have produced a variety of measures of perception, behavior, and communication that converge on the basic level. Here, we present data showing that the basic level differs qualitatively from other levels in taxonomies of objects and of living things and present an explanation for why so many measures converge at that level. We have found that part terms proliferate in subjects' listings of attributes characterizing category members at the basic level, but are rarely listed at a general level. At a more specific level, fewer parts are listed, though more are judged to be true. Basic level objects are distinguished from one another by parts, but members of subordinate categories share parts and differ from one another on other attributes. Informants agree on the parts of objects, and also on relative "goodness" of the various parts. Perceptual salience and functional significance both appear to contribute to perceived part goodness. Names of parts frequently enjoy a duality not evident in names of other attributes; they refer at once to a particular appearance and to a particular function. We propose that part configuration underlies the various empirical operations of perception, behavior, and communication that converge at the basic level. Part configuration underlies the perceptual measures because it determines the shapes of objects to a large degree. Parts underlie the behavioral tasks because most of our behaviors is indirect toward parts of objects. Labeling appears to follow the natural breaks of perception and behavior; consequently, part configuration also underlies communication measures. Because elements of more abstract taxonomies, such as scenes and events, can also be decomposed into parts, this analysis provides a bridge to organization in other domains of knowledge. Knowledge organization by parts (partonomy) is contrasted to organization by kinds (taxonomy). Taxonomies serve to organize numerous classes of entities and to allow inference from larger sets to sets included in them. Partonomies serve to separate entities into their structural components and to organize knowledge of function by components of structure. The informativeness of the basic level may originate from the availability of inference from structure to function at that level.

Discrimination Learning↗

Organizational factors in perceived dimensionality.

The hypothesis that perceived dimensionality of projection drawings is influenced by perceived organization was tested in two experiments. Organization was biased by coloration: The drawings were (a) uncolored, (b) colored in ways that emphasized plausible three-dimensional parts of the represented objects, or (c) colored in ways that emphasized two-dimensional (2D) parts of the drawings themselves. In Experiment 1, subjective ratings of three-dimensionality (3D) were greater for the 3D-biased stimuli than for the unbiased stimuli, and ratings for the 2D-biased stimuli were lower than for the unbiased stimuli. Similar results were obtained in Experiment 2 in which latencies to perceive the drawings three-dimensionally were measured. The 3D-biased stimuli were seen in depth more quickly than the unbiased stimuli, and the 2D-biased stimuli were seen in depth more slowly than the unbiased stimuli. Additional results on the relation between ratings and latencies suggest that latencies are affected more strongly by object complexity than are ratings.

Color Perception↗

Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries.

Time to detect bilateral symmetry in different orientations was studied for closed polygons with single, double, quadruple, rotational, and near symmetry. In Experiment 1, the orientation of the axis of symmetry was varied. Detection was fastest for vertical symmetry, next fastest for horizontal, and slowest for left- and right-diagonal symmetries. For corresponding orientations, responses were faster to quadruple than double symmetries, and faster to double than single symmetries. Negative responses to nearly symmetric figures produced an orientation effect similar to that for single symmetries. Rotational symmetries showed no orientation effect and took longer to reject than near symmetries. In Experiment 2, subjects looked only for vertical symmetry. Responses were twice as fast as in comparable conditions of Experiment 1. The effect of multiple symmetries was still present, but rotational symmetries were rejected faster than near symmetries. The results are interpreted as supporting a dual process model for detecting symmetry in multiple orientation channels: Observers first select potential axes of symmetry defined by mirror-similar parts and then evaluate specific axes sequentially in a detailed comparison for mirror-identity.

Form Perception↗