Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to K Hiom.
Homologous recombination can be divided into three key steps: strand exchange, branch migration and resolution. The identification of a protein complex that catalyses branch migration and Holliday junction resolution argues that the mechanism of homologous recombination is conserved from bacteria to man.
In eukaryotic organisms, double-strand breaks in chromosomal DNA are repaired either by non-homologous end-joining, or by homologous recombination. How do cells choose which pathway to use?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins are known to initiate V(D)J recombination by making a double-strand break between the recombination signal sequence (RSS) and the neighboring coding DNA. We show that these proteins can also drive the coupled insertion of cleaved recombination signals into new DNA sites in a transpositional reaction. This RAG-mediated DNA transfer provides strong evidence for the evolution of the V(D)J recombination system from an ancient mobile DNA element and suggests that repeated transposition may have promoted the expansion of the antigen receptor loci. The inappropriate diversion of V(D)J rearrangement to a transpositional pathway may also help to explain certain types of DNA translocation associated with lymphatic tumors.
The 12/23 rule requires that V(D)J recombination only occurs between recombination signals with 12 and 23 base pair spacers. We show that the 12/23 rule is established prior to DNA cleavage, by the formation of a synaptic complex containing both 12-spacer and 23-spacer signals. The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, as well as the DNA bending protein HMG1, are needed for efficient formation of this complex. We show further that the synaptic complex is the functional complex for coupled cleavage. After cleavage, all four broken DNA ends remain associated with the RAG proteins in a postcleavage synaptic complex, whose existence helps to explain the known role of RAG1 and RAG2 in the subsequent end-joining events that complete V(D)J recombination.
V(D)J recombination requires a pair of signal sequences with spacer lengths of 12 and 23 bp between the conserved heptamer and nonamer elements. The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins initiate the reaction by making double-strand DNA breaks at both signals, and must thus be able to operate on these two different spatial arrangements. We show that the DNA-bending proteins HMG1 and HMG2 stimulate cleavage and RAG protein binding at the 23 bp spacer signal. These findings suggest that DNA bending is important for bridging the longer spacer, and explain how a similar array of RAG proteins could accommodate a signal with either a 12 or a 23 bp spacer. An additional effect of HMG proteins is to stimulate coupled cleavage greatly when both signal sequences are present, suggesting that these proteins also aid the formation of a synaptic complex.
The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins initiate V(D)J recombination by making specific double-strand DNA breaks at recombination signal sequences. We show here that RAG1 and RAG2 bind specifically to this sequence, forming a stable protein-DNA complex. The complex requires the conserved heptamer and nonamer motifs of the recombination signal as well as both the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins. This complex is able to either nick or form hairpins at the V(D)J signal sequence, depending on the divalent cation present. A complex trapped using Ca2+ is subsequently active when transferred to Mg2+ or Mn2+. After cleavage, the complex is destabilized and the RAG proteins dissociate. We term this early precursor in the V(D)J recombination reaction a "stable cleavage complex."
BACKGROUND: The Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins promote the branch migration of 4-way (Holliday) junctions during genetic recombination. The active complex is a tripartite structure in which RuvA protein is bound to the crossover and is sandwiched between two hexameric rings of RuvB. Branch migration requires ATP hydrolysis and occurs as the DNA passes through each RuvB ring. RESULTS: In this work, we have investigated the mechanism by which RuvAB catalyses the branch migration of a three-armed (Y) junction. Using synthetic DNA structures, we observed the formation of DNA products, a partial duplex DNA molecule and a single-stranded oligonucleotide, indicative of a branch migration reaction that occurred with unique polarity. Analysis of the RuvAB-junction complex by DNase footprinting showed that RuvA bound asymmetrically to the junction and targeted a single hexameric RuvB ring to one arm of DNA. CONCLUSION: Branch migration of a three-armed junction occurs in a unidirectional manner that is determined by the assembly of a single RuvB ring onto one arm of the DNA. The asymmetry of the complex and observed directionality of branch migration indicate that strand passage occurs as the DNA is pulled into the RuvB ring structure, a reaction likely to be coupled with DNA unwinding.
The Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins interact specifically with Holliday junctions to promote ATP-dependent branch migration during genetic recombination and DNA repair. In the work described here, glycerol gradient centrifugation was used to investigate the requirements for the formation of pre-branch migration complexes. Since gradient centrifugation provides a simple and gentle method to analyse relatively unstable protein-DNA complexes, we were able to detect RuvA- and RuvAB-Holliday junction complexes without the need for chemical fixation. Using 35S-labelled RuvA protein and 3H-labelled Holliday junctions, we show that RuvA acts as a helicase accessory factor that loads the RuvB helicase onto the Holliday junction by structure-specific interactions. The resulting complex contained both RuvA and RuvB, as detected by Western blotting using serum raised against RuvA and RuvB. The stoichiometry of binding was estimated to be approximately four RuvA tetramers per junction. Formation of the RuvAB-Holliday junction complex required the presence of divalent metal ions and occurred without the need for ATP. However, the stability of the complex was enhanced by the presence of ATP gamma S, a non-hydrolysable ATP analogue. The data support a model for branch migration in which structure-specific binding of Holliday junctions by RuvA targets the assembly of hexameric RuvB rings on DNA. Specific loading of the RuvB ring helicase by RuvA is likely to be the initial step towards ATP-dependent branch migration.
The RuvA and RuvB proteins of E. coli promote the branch migration or movement of Holliday junctions during genetic recombination and DNA repair. Using small synthetic Holliday junctions in which the crossover point is confined near one end of the DNA molecule, we show that RuvAB-mediated branch migration occurs with a defined polarity. The assembly of RuvA and RuvB on the Holliday junction has been investigated by sedimentation analysis and by DNase I footprinting. We find that RuvA protein binds and protects all four strands of DNA at the crossover point, whereas RuvB protein binds the DNA asymmetrically. The polarity of branch migration is defined by the asymmetric assembly of the RuvAB branch migration complex relative to the junction and is consistent with a model in which RuvAB drives branch migration by passing the DNA through the hexameric rings of RuvB.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The alleviation of DNA restriction during the SOS response in Escherichia coli has been further investigated. With the EcoK DNA restriction system UV irradiated wild-type cells show a 10(4)-fold increase in ability to plate non-modified lambda phage and a 3-4 fold increase in transformation by non-modified plasmid DNA. A role for the umuDC genes of E coli in the process of SOS-induced restriction alleviation was identified by showing that a umuC122::Tn5 mutant could alleviate EcoK restriction to only 5% that of wild-type levels. Although umuDC are better characterized for their pivotal role in SOS induced mutagenesis, it is demonstrated here that umu-dependent alleviation of EcoK restriction is a transient process in which umu-dependent mutagenesis plays little part. A second form of SOS induced alleviation of DNA restriction is described in this paper involving the McrA restriction system. The mcrA gene is shown to be encoded within a defective prophage called e14 situated at the 25 min region on the Escherichia coli genetic map. e14 is known to abortively excise from the chromosome after SOS induction and it is demonstrated in this report that mcrA is lost from the genome after SOS induction as part of e14. This results in co-ordinate decrease in the level of McrA restriction within a population of cells.
Escherichia coli has DNA restriction systems which are able to recognize and attack modified cytosine residues in the DNA of incoming bacteriophages and plasmids. The locus for the McrA/RglA system of modified cytosine restriction was located near the pin gene of the defective element, e14. Hence, loss of the e14 element through abortive induction after UV irradiation caused a permanent loss of McrA restriction activity. e14 DNA encoding McrA restriction was cloned and sequenced to reveal a single open reading frame of 831 bp with a predicted gene product of 31 kDa. Clones expressing the complete open reading frame conferred both McrA and RglA phenotypes; however, a deletion derivative was found which complemented RglA restriction against nonglucosylated T6gt phage but did not complement for McrA restriction of methylated plasmid DNA. Possible explanations for this activity and a comparison with the different organization of the McrB/RglB restriction system are discussed.