PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K J Holyoak

Publications and source records attributed to K J Holyoak.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition.

Several researchers have recently claimed that higher order types of learning, such as categorization and causal induction, can be reduced to lower order associative learning. These claims are based in part on reports of cue competition in higher order learning, apparently analogous to blocking in classical conditioning. Three experiments are reported in which subjects had to learn to respond on the basis of cues that were defined either as possible causes of a common effect (predictive learning) or as possible effects of a common cause (diagnostic learning). The results indicate that diagnostic and predictive reasoning, far from being identical as predicted by associationistic models, are not even symmetrical. Although cue competition occurs among multiple possible causes during predictive learning, multiple possible effects need not compete during diagnostic learning. The results favor a causal-model theory.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Mathematical problem solving by analogy.

We report the results of 2 experiments and a verbal protocol study examining the component processes of solving mathematical word problems by analogy. College students first studied a problem and its solution, which provided a potential source for analogical transfer. Then they attempted to solve several analogous problems. For some problems, subjects received one of a variety of hints designed to reduce or eliminate the difficulty of some of the major processes hypothesized to be involved in analogical transfer. Our studies yielded 4 major findings. First, the process of mapping the features of the source and target problems and the process of adapting the source solution procedure for use in solving the target problem were clearly distinguished: (a) Successful mapping was found to be insufficient for successful transfer and (b) adaptation was found to be a major source of transfer difficulty. Second, we obtained direct evidence that schema induction is a natural consequence of analogical transfer. The schema was found to co-exist with the problems from which it was induced, and both the schema and the individual problems facilitated later transfer. Third, for our multiple-solution problems, the relation between analogical transfer and solution accuracy was mediated by the degree of time pressure exerted for the test problems. Finally, mathematical expertise was a significant predictor of analogical transfer, but general analogical reasoning ability was not. The implications of the results for models of analogical transfer and for instruction were considered.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Learning subgoals and methods for solving probability problems.

We hypothesize that typical example problems used in quantitative domains such as algebra and probability can be represented in terms of subgoals and methods that these problems teach learners. The "quality" of these subgoals and methods can vary, depending on the features of the examples. In addition, the likelihood of these subgoal's being recognized in novel problems and the likelihood of learners' being able to modify an old method for a new problem may be functions of the training examples learners study. In Experiment 1, subjects who studied examples predicted to teach certain subgoals were often able to recognize those subgoals in nonisomorphic transfer problems. Subjects who studied examples demonstrating two methods rather than one exhibited no advantages in transfer. Experiment 2 demonstrated that if the conditions for applying a method are highlighted in examples, learners are more likely to appropriately adapt that method in a novel problem, perhaps because they recognize that the conditions do not fully match those required for any of the old methods. Overall, the results indicate that the subgoal/method representational scheme may be useful in predicting transfer performance.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure.

Previous research on how categories are learned from observation of exemplars has largely ignored the possible role of prior expectations concerning how exemplars will be distributed. The experiments reported here explored this issue by presenting subjects with category-learning tasks in which the distributions of exemplars defining the categories were varied. In Experiments 1 and 2 the distributional form of a category was found to affect speed of learning. Learning was faster when a category's distribution was normal than when it was multimodal. Also, subjects in the early stages of learning a multimodal category responded as if it were unimodal. These results suggested that subjects enter category-learning tasks with expectations of unimodal, possibly normal, distributions of exemplars. Experiments 3 and 4 attempted to manipulate subjects' prior expectations by varying the distribution of exemplars in the first of two consecutive category-learning tasks. Learning a multimodal category was influenced by the shape of a previously learned distribution and was facilitated when the earlier distribution was either multimodal or skewed, rather than normal. These results are interpreted as support for a dual-process model of category learning that incorporates the effects of prior expectations concerning exemplar distributions.

Adolescent↗