PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K J Lawson

Publications and source records attributed to K J Lawson.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating a new hemostatic agent for spinal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial comparing Proceed, a gelatin-based hemostatic sealant (treatment), with Gelfoam-thrombin (control) in stopping intraoperative bleeding during spinal surgery. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of Proceed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Proceed has been tested in animal models to determine its safety and effectiveness as a hemostatic agent. The current study was conducted under a Food and Drug Administration-approved Investigational Device Exemption to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Proceed in humans. METHODS: For this study, 127 patients undergoing spinal surgery were randomized into either the treatment or control group after standard surgical means to control bleeding had failed. The bleeding site was evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 10 minutes after the hemostatic agent was applied. The application was considered successful if the bleeding stopped within 10 minutes. Follow-up evaluation was performed at 12 to 36 hours, then at 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Proceed stopped bleeding in 98% of the patients (first bleeding site only) within 10 minutes, as compared with 90% of the control patients (P = 0.001). At 3 minutes, successful hemostasis had been achieved in 97% of the Proceed group, as compared with 71% of the control group (P = 0.0001). There was no difference in the adverse event profile between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly larger number of bleeding sites had achieved hemostasis with Proceed than with Gelfoam-thrombin at 1, 2, and 3 minutes after application. Proceed was as safe as Gelfoam-thrombin when used for hemostasis during spinal surgery procedures.

Administration, Topical↗

Effect of insertion torque on bone screw pullout strength.

The effect of insertion torque on the holding strength of 4.5-mm ASIF/AO cortical bone screws was studied in vitro. Screw holding strength was determined using an Instron materials testing machine (Bristol, United Kingdom) on 55 lamb femora and 30 human tibiocortical bone sections. Holding strength was defined as tensile stress at pullout with rapid loading to construct failure. Different insertion torques were tested, normalizing to the thickness of cortical bone specimen engaged. These represented low, intermediate, high, and thread-damaging insertion torque. All screws inserted with thread-damaging torque and single cortex engaging screws inserted to high torque tightening moments showed diminished holding strength. This loss of strength amounted to 40%-50% less than screws inserted with less torque.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

A randomized prospective study of posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcomes with and without pedicle screw instrumentation.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective evaluation of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 71 patients who underwent lumbar fusion, with or without transpedicular instrumentation. The patients completed a questionnaire that determined pain relief, medication use, return to work, and overall satisfaction with surgery. OBJECTIVES: To explore the effect, if any, of instrumentation on the outcome of lumbar fusion surgery, according to reports of the patients, and whether there is a correlation between the radiographic determination of a solid fusion and the same patient-reported outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature on this topic reports pseudarthrosis rates from 0% to 57% and good to excellent results from 56% to 95%. These studies provide no clear-cut recommendations concerning the effect of added lumbar instrumentation on patient-reported outcome in a prospective manner using concurrent control subjects. METHODS: The patients were randomized to groups with and without instrumentation after deciding to undergo a lumbar fusion and consenting to enter the study. Radiographs were obtained and questionnaires filled out at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in patient-reported outcome between the two groups. There was a slight nonsignificant trend toward increased radiographic fusion rate in the group with instrumentation that did not correlate with an increased patient-reported improvement rate. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not provide data that indicate a benefit in outcome from added instrumentation in elective lumbar fusions.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Lamina repair and replacement to control laminectomy membrane formation in dogs.

This study examined the efficacy of lamina repair by the use of various techniques to prevent postlaminectomy scar formation in a canine system. Five-level noncontiguous laminectomies were performed on six adult canines. The most caudal (Site 1) was left uncovered and served as the control. Exposed dura at each of the remaining four levels was covered with one of the following: Site 2, free autogenous laminar bone graft; Site 3, polymethylmethacrylate; Site 4, Teflon-Proplast composite; Site 5, collagen gel. The dogs used in the study were killed 16 weeks after surgery. Three specimens were examined by plain roentgenography and computerized tomography, two specimens were examined histologically, and the remaining four specimens were graded according to scar volume and scar adherence, as detected during gross dissection of the postlaminectomy scar. No repair technique interfered with roentgenography evaluation. The least scar and fewest adhesions were present under the free bone graft repair site. The Teflon-Proplast composite and polymethylmethacrylate both limited the amount and adherence of scar. Collagen gel and control sites were indistinguishable in this study. It is concluded that lamina repair with a solid material covering exposed dura significantly reduces the formation of postlaminectomy membrane and scar.

Aluminum Oxide↗

Vancomycin vs tobramycin elution from polymethylmethacrylate: an in vitro study.

We fabricated batches of cement containing 0.5 gm, 1.0 gm, and 2.0 gm vancomycin and one with 1.0 gm tobramycin and shaped them into cylinders. They were immersed into 0.5 L of normal saline and the fluid volume was changed daily. Samples of fluid were obtained on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28. All fluid samples had antibiotic assays performed to quantitate the amount of elution for vancomycin or tobramycin. Vancomycin elution from PMMA occurred under our study conditions in similar quantities to that measured for tobramycin controls. Vancomycin-loaded PMMA cement may have a clinical role in the treatment of musculoskeletal sepsis caused by gram-positive bacteria, particularly if organisms resistant to the usual antibiotic agents are identified.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗