PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Jamieson

Publications and source records attributed to K Jamieson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Pitfalls in the surgical management of cervical spine injuries.

Records of 69 cervical spine injury patients referred to the authors' institution over a 3-year period were reviewed. The senior author documented "definite" and "probable" pitfalls occurring in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative management. Diagnosis, traction, bracing, surgical timing, intraoperative technical errors, and incorrect surgical decisions were noted. Of the 69 patients, 39 (56%) suffered a pitfall of management. Twenty-seven patients (39%) accumulated 49 "definite" pitfalls between them and 12 patients (17%) suffered a total of 20 "probable" pitfalls. Of the 49 definite pitfalls, 7 (14%) were preoperative, 17 (34%) were those of surgical decision making, 21 (43%) were operative, and 4 (9%) postoperative. Diagnostic errors and incorrect bracing and traction led to neurological worsening. Intraoperatively, technical errors (30%), wrong timing of surgery (24%), and incorrect choice of operation (16%) were the common pitfalls. Postoperative pitfalls consisted of inappropriate bracing (17%). A Cervical Spine Research Society review (1989) rated complications of cervical spine surgery at 6.3% (63/992). In this study, a sizeable portion (56%) of cervical spine injury patients requiring surgery were at a risk of complications. Short of complications, there are areas of management where errors may have less well-documented undesirable effects or increase the potential for morbidity. An awareness of these pitfalls and increased use of non-operative treatment may eliminate up to 73% of the pitfalls and thereby decrease the morbidity associated with the management of cervical spine injuries.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Are there any differences between bipolar and unipolar melancholia?

Although it is now more than 30 years since Leohard originally proposed the distinction between bipolar and monopolar (unipolar) forms of affective disorder, there have been relatively few studies which have investigated clinical features which may differentiate the depressed phase of bipolar disorder from unipolar depression. In this study we examined the value of a new scale for rating depressive mental state signs (the 'core' score system), and a large series of symptoms and risk factors, in distinguishing between 27 age and sex-matched pairs of bipolar and unipolar patients diagnosed as melancholic on several diagnostic criteria. In general, we found a marked similarity between the groups on clinical features of the depressive episode when allowance was made for multiple tests. Bipolar patients, however, had shorter episodes of depression and were less likely to demonstrate 'slowed movements' than unipolar subjects. There were also consistent trends on other items for psychomotor retardation to be less common and agitation to be more likely in the bipolar patients. At the least, these findings suggest that the widely-held belief that bipolar depressed patients typically have psychomotor retardation is not as clear-cut as has been previously described.

Bipolar Disorder↗