Biomedical subjects

K K Brock

Publications and source records attributed to K K Brock.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration.

As more pretreatment imaging becomes integrated into the treatment planning process and full three-dimensional image-guidance becomes part of the treatment delivery the need for a deformable image registration technique becomes more apparent. A novel finite element model-based multiorgan deformable image registration method, MORFEUS, has been developed. The basis of this method is twofold: first, individual organ deformation can be accurately modeled by deforming the surface of the organ at one instance into the surface of the organ at another instance and assigning the material properties that allow the internal structures to be accurately deformed into the secondary position and second, multi-organ deformable alignment can be achieved by explicitly defining the deformation of a subset of organs and assigning surface interfaces between organs. The feasibility and accuracy of the method was tested on MR thoracic and abdominal images of healthy volunteers at inhale and exhale. For the thoracic cases, the lungs and external surface were explicitly deformed and the breasts were implicitly deformed based on its relation to the lung and external surface. For the abdominal cases, the liver, spleen, and external surface were explicitly deformed and the stomach and kidneys were implicitly deformed. The average accuracy (average absolute error) of the lung and liver deformation, determined by tracking visible bifurcations, was 0.19 (s.d.: 0.09), 0.28 (s.d.: 0.12) and 0.17 (s.d.: 0.07) cm, in the LR, AP, and IS directions, respectively. The average accuracy of implicitly deformed organs was 0.11 (s.d.: 0.11), 0.13 (s.d.: 0.12), and 0.08 (s.d.: 0.09) cm, in the LR, AP, and IS directions, respectively. The average vector magnitude of the accuracy was 0.44 (s.d.: 0.20) cm for the lung and liver deformation and 0.24 (s.d.: 0.18) cm for the implicitly deformed organs. The two main processes, explicit deformation of the selected organs and finite element analysis calculations, require less than 120 and 495 s, respectively. This platform can facilitate the integration of deformable image registration into online image guidance procedures, dose calculations, and tissue response monitoring as well as performing multi-modality image registration for purposes of treatment planning.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Inclusion of organ deformation in dose calculations.

A previously described system for modeling organ deformation using finite element analysis has been extended to permit dose calculation. Using this tool, the calculated dose to the liver during radiotherapy can be compared using a traditional static model (STATIC), a model including rigid body motion (RB), and finally a model that incorporates rigid body motion and deformation (RBD). A model of the liver, consisting of approximately 6000 tetrahedral finite elements distributed throughout the contoured volume, is created from the CT data obtained at exhale. A deformation map is then created to relate the liver in the exhale CT data to the liver in the inhale CT data. Six intermediate phase positions of each element are then calculated from their trajectories. The coordinates of the centroid of each element at each phase are used to determine the dose received. These intermediate dose values are then time weighted according to a population-modeled breathing pattern to determine the total dose to each element during treatment. This method has been tested on four patient datasets. The change in prescribed dose for each patient's actual tumor as well as a simulated tumor of the same size, located in the superior, intermediate, and inferior regions of the liver, was determined using a normal tissue complication model, maintaining a predicted probability of complications of 15%. The average change in prescribed dose from RBD to STATIC for simulated tumors in the superior, intermediate, and inferior regions are 4.0 (range 2.1 to 5.3), -3.6 (range -5.0 to -2.2), and -14.5 (range -27.0 to -10.0) Gy, respectively. The average change in prescribed dose for the patient's actual tumor was -0.4 Gy (range -4.1 to 1.7 Gy). The average change in prescribed dose from RBD to RB for simulated tumors in the superior, intermediate, and inferior regions are -0.04 (range -2.4 to 2.2), 0.2 (range -1.5 to 1.9), and 3.9 (range 0.8 to 7.3) Gy, respectively. The average change in the prescribed dose for the patient's actual tumor was 0.7 Gy (range 0.2 to 1.1 Gy). This patient sampling indicates the potential importance of including deformation in dose calculations.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2002

Technical note: creating a four-dimensional model of the liver using finite element analysis.

Finite element analysis and two liver CT scans were used to construct a four-dimensional (4D) model of the liver during breathing. A linear elastic, small deformation mechanical model was applied to one patient to obtain intermediate organ position and shape between exhale and inhale. Known transformations between anatomically defined subsections of the exhale and inhale liver surfaces were applied as constraints to the exhale CT liver model. Intermediate states were then calculated and time weighted to determine a 4D model of the liver as it deforms during the breathing cycle. This model can be used to calculate a more accurate dose distribution during radiotherapy.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2001

The reproducibility of organ position using active breathing control (ABC) during liver radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intrafraction and interfraction reproducibility of liver immobilization using active breathing control (ABC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable intrahepatic tumors who could comfortably hold their breath for at least 20 s were treated with focal liver radiation using ABC for liver immobilization. Fluoroscopy was used to measure any potential motion during ABC breath holds. Preceding each radiotherapy fraction, with the patient setup in the nominal treatment position using ABC, orthogonal radiographs were taken using room-mounted diagnostic X-ray tubes and a digital imager. The radiographs were compared to reference images using a 2D alignment tool. The treatment table was moved to produce acceptable setup, and repeat orthogonal verification images were obtained. The positions of the diaphragm and the liver (assessed by localization of implanted radiopaque intra-arterial microcoils) relative to the skeleton were subsequently analyzed. The intrafraction reproducibility (from repeat radiographs obtained within the time period of one fraction before treatment) and interfraction reproducibility (from comparisons of the first radiograph for each treatment with a reference radiograph) of the diaphragm and the hepatic microcoil positions relative to the skeleton with repeat breath holds using ABC were then measured. Caudal-cranial (CC), anterior-posterior (AP), and medial-lateral (ML) reproducibility of the hepatic microcoils relative to the skeleton were also determined from three-dimensional alignment of repeat CT scans obtained in the treatment position. RESULTS: A total of 262 fractions of radiation were delivered using ABC breath holds in 8 patients. No motion of the diaphragm or hepatic microcoils was observed on fluoroscopy during ABC breath holds. From analyses of 158 sets of positioning radiographs, the average intrafraction CC reproducibility (sigma) of the diaphragm and hepatic microcoil position relative to the skeleton using ABC repeat breath holds was 2.5 mm (range 1.8-3.7 mm) and 2.3 mm (range 1.2-3.7 mm) respectively. However, based on 262 sets of positioning radiographs, the average interfraction CC reproducibility (sigma) of the diaphragm and hepatic microcoils was 4.4 mm (range 3.0-6.1 mm) and 4.3 mm (range 3.1-5.7 mm), indicating a change of diaphragm and microcoil position relative to the skeleton over the course of treatment with repeat breath holds at the same phase of the respiratory cycle. The average population absolute intrafraction CC offset in diaphragm and microcoil position relative to skeleton was 2.4 mm and 2.1 mm respectively; the average absolute interfraction CC offset was 5.2 mm. Analyses of repeat CT scans demonstrated that the average intrafraction excursion of the hepatic microcoils relative to the skeleton in the CC, AP, and ML directions was 1.9 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.6 mm respectively and the average interfraction CC, AP, and ML excursion of the hepatic microcoils was 6.6 mm, 3.2 mm, and 3.3 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy using ABC for patients with intrahepatic cancer is feasible, with good intrafraction reproducibility of liver position using ABC. However, the interfraction reproducibility of organ position with ABC suggests the need for daily on-line imaging and repositioning if treatment margins smaller than those required for free breathing are a goal.

Humans↗

PubMed2001

Determination of ventilatory liver movement via radiographic evaluation of diaphragm position.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of estimation of liver movement inferred by observing diaphragm excursion on radiographic images. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight patients with focal liver cancer had platinum embolization microcoils implanted in their livers during catheterization of the hepatic artery for delivery of regional chemotherapy. These patients underwent fluoroscopy, during which normal breathing movement was recorded on videotape. Movies of breathing movement were digitized, and the relative projected positions of the diaphragm and coils were recorded. For 6 patients, daily radiographs were also acquired during treatment. Retrospective measurements of coil position were taken after the diaphragm was aligned with the superior portion of the liver on digitally reconstructed radiographs. RESULTS: Coil movement of 4.9 to 30.4 mm was observed during normal breathing. Diaphragm position tracked inferior-superior coil displacement accurately (population sigma 1.04 mm) throughout the breathing cycle. The range of coil movement was predicted by the range of diaphragm movement with an accuracy of 2.09 mm (sigma). The maximum error observed measuring coil movement using diaphragm position was 3.8 mm for a coil 9.8 cm inferior to the diaphragm. However, the distance of the coil from the top of the diaphragm did not correlate significantly with the error in predicting liver excursion. Analysis of daily radiographs showed that the error in predicting coil position using the diaphragm as an alignment landmark was 1.8 mm (sigma) in the inferior-superior direction and 2.2 mm in the left-right direction, similar in magnitude to the inherent uncertainty in alignment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the range of ventilatory movement of different locations within the liver is predicted by diaphragm position to an accuracy that matches or exceeds existing systems for ventilatory tracking. This suggests that the diaphragm is an acceptable anatomic landmark for radiographic estimation of liver movement in anterior-posterior projections for most patients.

Diaphragm↗

PubMed2000

A comparison of ventilatory prostate movement in four treatment positions.

PURPOSE: To ensure target coverage during radiotherapy, all sources of geometric uncertainty in target position must be considered. Movement of the prostate due to breathing has not traditionally been considered in prostate radiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to report the influence of patient orientation and immobilization on prostate movement due to breathing. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four patients had radiopaque markers implanted in the prostate. Fluoroscopy was performed in four different positions: prone in alpha cradle, prone with an aquaplast mold, supine on a flat table, and supine with a false table under the buttocks. Fluoroscopic movies were videotaped and digitized. Frames were analyzed using 2D-alignment software to determine the extent of movement of the prostate markers and the skeleton for each position during normal and deep breathing. RESULTS: During normal breathing, maximal movement of the prostate markers was seen in the prone position (cranial-caudal [CC] range: 0.9-5.1 mm; anterior-posterior [AP] range: up to 3.5 mm). In the supine position, prostate movement during normal breathing was less than 1 mm in all directions. Deep breathing resulted in CC movements of 3.8-10.5 mm in the prone position (with and without an aquaplast mold). This range was reduced to 2.0-7.3 mm in the supine position and 0.5-2.1 mm with the use of the false table top. Deep breathing resulted in AP skeletal movements of 2.7-13.1 mm in the prone position, whereas AP skeletal movements in the supine position were negligible. CONCLUSION: Ventilatory movement of the prostate is substantial in the prone position and is reduced in the supine position. The potential for breathing to influence prostate movement, and thus the dose delivered to the prostate and normal tissues, should be considered when positioning and planning patients for conformal irradiation.

Adenocarcinoma↗