PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K K Midha

Publications and source records attributed to K K Midha.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: isoniazid.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing isoniazid as the only active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are reviewed. Isoniazid's solubility and permeability characteristics according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), as well as its therapeutic use and therapeutic index, its pharmacokinetic properties, data related to the possibility of excipient interactions and reported BE/bioavailability (BA) problems were taken into consideration. Isoniazid is "highly soluble" but data on its oral absorption and permeability are inconclusive, suggesting this API to be on the borderline of BCS Class I and III. For a number of excipients, an interaction with the permeability is extreme unlikely, but lactose and other deoxidizing saccharides can form condensation products with isoniazid, which may be less permeable than the free API. A biowaiver is recommended for IR solid oral drug products containing isoniazid as the sole API, provided that the test product meets the WHO requirements for "very rapidly dissolving" and contains only the excipients commonly used in isoniazid products, as listed in this article. Lactose and/or other deoxidizing saccharides containing formulations should be subjected to an in vivo BE study.

Biological Availability↗
PubMed2007

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: prednisolone.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing prednisolone are reviewed. Data on its solubility, oral absorption, and permeability are not totally conclusive, but strongly suggest a BCS Class 1 classification. Prednisolone's therapeutic indications and therapeutic index, pharmacokinetics, and the possibility of excipient interactions were also taken into consideration. Available evidence indicates that a biowaiver for IR solid oral dosage forms formulated with the excipients tabulated in this article would be unlikely to expose patients to undue risks.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: acetaminophen (paracetamol).

Literature data are reviewed on the properties of acetaminophen (paracetamol) related to the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS). According to the current BCS criteria, acetaminophen is BCS Class III compound. Differences in composition seldom, if ever, have an effect on the extent of absorption. However, some studies show differences in rate of absorption between brands and formulations. In particular, sodium bicarbonate, present in some drug products, was reported to give an increase in the rate of absorption, probably caused by an effect on gastric emptying. In view of Marketing Authorizations (MAs) given in a number of countries to acetaminophen drug products with rapid onset of action, it is concluded that differences in rate of absorption were considered therapeutically not relevant by the Health Authorities. Moreover, in view of its therapeutic use, its wide therapeutic index and its uncomplicated pharmacokinetic properties, in vitro dissolution data collected according to the relevant Guidances can be safely used for declaring bioequivalence (BE) of two acetaminophen formulations. Therefore, accepting a biowaiver for immediate release (IR) acetaminophen solid oral drug products is considered scientifically justified, if the test product contains only those excipients reported in this paper in their usual amounts and the test product is rapidly dissolving, as well as the test product fulfils the criterion of similarity of dissolution profiles to the reference product.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2006

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: cimetidine.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing cimetidine are reviewed. According to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), cimetidine would be assigned to Class III. Cimetidine's therapeutic use and therapeutic index, its pharmacokinetic properties, data related to the possibility of excipient interactions, and reported BE/bioavailability (BA) problems were also taken into consideration. On the basis of the overall evidence, a biowaiver can be recommended for cimetidine IR products, provided that the test product contains only those excipients reported in this paper in their usual amounts, and that the test and the comparator drug products both are "rapidly dissolving" as per BCS.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) literature data: chloroquine phosphate, chloroquine sulfate, and chloroquine hydrochloride.

Literature data on the properties of chloroquine phosphate, chloroquine sulfate, and chloroquine hydrochloride related to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) are reviewed. The available information indicates that these chloroquine salts can be classified as highly soluble and highly permeable, i.e., BCS class I. The qualitative composition of immediate release (IR) tablets containing these Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) with a Marketing Authorization (MA) in Belgium (BE), Germany (DE), Finland (FI), and The Netherlands (NL) is provided. In view of these MA's and the critical therapeutic indication of chloroquine, it is assumed that the registration authorities had evidence that these formulations are bioequivalent to the innovator. It is concluded that IR tablets formulated with these excipients are candidates for a biowaiver.

Antimalarials↗
PubMed2005

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ranitidine hydrochloride.

Literature and experimental data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing ranitidine hydrochloride are reviewed. According to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), ranitidine hydrochloride should be assigned to Class III. However, based on its therapeutic and therapeutic index, pharmacokinetic properties and data related to the possibility of excipient interactions, a biowaiver can be recommended for IR solid oral dosage forms that are rapidly dissolving and contain only those excipients as reported in this study.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ibuprofen.

Literature data are reviewed on the properties of ibuprofen related to the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS). Ibuprofen was assessed to be a BCS class II drug. Differences in composition and/or manufacturing procedures were reported to have an effect on the rate, but not the extent of absorption; such differences are likely to be detectable by comparative in vitro dissolution tests. Also in view of its therapeutic use, its wide therapeutic index and uncomplicated pharmacokinetic properties, a biowaiver for immediate release (IR) ibuprofen solid oral drug products is scientifically justified, provided that the test product contains only those excipients reported in this paper in their usual amounts, the dosage form is rapidly dissolving (85% in 30 min or less) in buffer pH 6.8 and the test product also exhibits similar dissolution profiles to the reference product in buffer pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Exposure measures applied to the bioequivalence of two sustained release formulations of bupropion.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the exposure measures C(max) (peak exposure), AUC(E) (early exposure) and AUC (total exposure) on the bioequivalence of two sustained release formulations of bupropion (i) in the fasted state and (ii), after a high fat meal. The ratio C(max)/AUC (sensitive to rate of absorption) was also evaluated. METHODS: A two-formulation, two-sequence, four-period replicate design study was performed in 29 healthy men and women after an overnight fast. Similarly, a two-period study was performed in 20 healthy men and women after ingestion of a high fat breakfast. Plasma concentrations of bupropion were measured by HPLC/MS/MS and the data were analyzed (SAS PROC MIXED) by the Schuirmann-Sattersthwaite procedure (four-period study) and by the two one-sided test procedure (SAS PROC GLM) (two-period study). Standard bioequivalence limits of 80 - 125% were applied to all measures including AUC(E) and C(max)/AUC. RESULTS: In the fasting study, the mean plasma concentration vs. time curves from (including over the first 24 hours) following the two administrations of each formulation were similar although there was a significant difference in median t(max) between formulations. This may have contributed to a low estimate of geometric mean ratio (GMR) for AUC(E) (69%) which was judged to have failed bioequivalence. There was also rather low GMRs for Cmax (88%) and C(max)/AUC (89%) but these measure passed because the within-subject variabilities (WSV) were relatively low (19.6% and 11.2%, respectively). Total exposure (AUC(last)) met standard bioequivalence limits of 80 - 125% easily. The raw data from the two-period fed also showed differences in the shapes of the plasma concentration vs. time curves around C(max) although there was no difference in median t(max). The WSV at median t(max) was high (34%) as was the GMR (117%) for AUCE which failed, as did C(max) (GMR 112%). The WSV was very high at early time points before settling into a "plateau" at about 11%. DISCUSSION: There was no "spike" in the plasma concentration vs. time profiles up to median t(max) or beyond and therefore there was no evidence of dose dumping of the test formulation in either fasted or fed states. No bioequivalence limits have been set for AUC(E) but the application of standard BE limits of 80 to 125% meant that the fed study was clearly underpowered given the high WSV at early time points. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed on the interesting concept of early exposure. The WSV is often high at median t(max) which means that standard bioequivalence limits of 80 - 125% may be inappropriate. Despite the lack of dose dumping, application of AUC(E) to the fasting study, would have resulted in failure to declare bioequivalence since the GMR for this measure was only 69.5%. Application of a 90% confidence interval to AUC(E) to the fed study would have required powering to cope with the fact that this measure was highly variable.

Area Under Curve↗
PubMed2005

The bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products.

'Highly variable drugs' have been defined as those drugs for which the within-subject variability (WSV) equals or exceeds 30% of the maximum concentration (Cmax) and/or the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC). Despite the fact that highly variable drugs are generally safe with flat dose response curves, the bioequivalence of their formulations is a problem because the high variability means that large numbers of subjects are required to give adequate statistical power. Highly variable drug products are poor quality formulations where high within-formulation variability (e.g. tablet to tablet variability) poses a problem rather than high innate WSV of the drug itself. A further problem caused by high variability is that a subset of the population may respond differently to the two formulations producing a significant subject x formulation interaction. Practical examples are shown using replicate designs. The methods proposed to deal with the problems posed by highly variable drugs include: (i) Drug regulatory jurisdictions states that the 90% confidence interval (90% CI) around the test to reference geometric mean ratio (GMR) is required to fit with bioequivalence acceptance limits of 0.8 - 1.25 for both Cmax and AUC. The WSV for single point estimation of Cmax is often greater than that for AUC. One strategy therefore is not to require a 90% CI for Cmax of drugs that do not exhibit a toxicity associated with Cmax and merely require the GMR to fall within the acceptance limits. (ii) To arbitrarily broaden the bioequivalence acceptance limits. For example, to permit a sponsor to justify the use of wider limits e.g the 90% CI around the GMR of Cmax values might be required to fit within acceptance limits of 0.75 - 1.33 or even 0.70 - 1.42. (iii) A more systematic approach would be to broaden the acceptance limits by scaling to either the residual variance from a 2-period design or to the WSV of the reference product in a replicate design. Subsequent evaluations of scaling procedures have demonstrated that smaller numbers of subjects are required for bioequivalence studies on formulations of highly variable drugs. A disadvantage of scaling is that the method is less sensitive to differences between the means compared with unscaled treatment, such that the GMR may prove to be unacceptably low or high. This possibility has let to a suggestion that the GMR must fall within acceptance limits of 0.8 - 1.25 in scaled treatments. (iv) A similar method is to scale the metric rather than the acceptance limits. This method was proposed by the United States' Food and Drug Administration in the context of Individual bioequivalence, but may also be applied (v) to average bioequivalence. (vi) To carry out bioequivalence studies at steady state whenever a multiple dose regimen is ethically acceptable for healthy volunteers. This solution is based on the observation that high variability in a single dose study tends to be dampened at steady state, thus increasing statistical power. Drug regulators have not favored this approach on the grounds that bioequivalence testing should be based on the most discriminating test possible. (vii) Finally the use of metabolite data has been proposed since in many (but by no means all) cases, metabolite is less highly variable than that of the parent drug. This subject remains controversial except when the administered substance is a prodrug which converted by metabolism into the active drug.

Area Under Curve↗
PubMed2004

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) literature data: verapamil hydrochloride, propranolol hydrochloride, and atenolol.

Literature data related to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) are presented on verapamil hydrochloride, propranolol hydrochloride, and atenolol in the form of BCS-monographs. Data on the qualitative composition of immediate release (IR) tablets containing these active substances with a Marketing Authorization (MA) in the Netherlands (NL) are also provided; in view of these MA's the assumption was made that these tablets were bioequivalent to the innovator product. The development of a database with BCS-related data is announced by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP).

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Scaling or wider bioequivalence limits for highly variable drugs and for the special case of C(max).

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate that bioequivalence (BE) can be effectively evaluated for highly variable (HV) drugs and drug products and for the special case of C(max) by using average BE. To demonstrate that either scaling or wider regulatory limits need not result in large observed ratios of the geometric means (GMR) of the 2 drug products. METHODS: Two- and 4-period crossover BE investigations with 24 subjects were simulated. Variabilities of 15, 25 or 35% were assumed in special studies of C(max) and 40% in the general investigations of HV drugs. Acceptance of BE was analyzed in each study by various procedures and regulatory criteria. Under each condition, the percentage of simulated investigations accepting BE was recorded as the simulated GMR was gradually raised from 1.00. RESULTS: Scaled average BE for HV drugs (in both 2- and 4-period studies) and expanding limits for C(max) increased substantially, as expected, the proportion of investigations accepting BE. An additional secondary regulatory criterion constrained the simulated GMR to 1.25 and limited the possibility of large deviations between the mean metrics of the 2 formulations. Acceptance of BE by the composite regulatory expectation never exceeded the acceptances by the separate component criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The sample size required for the evaluation of BE for HV drugs and drug products can be substantially reduced by applying the approach of scaled average BE. The same conclusion is reached from the determination of BE for the C(max) metric by expanding the regulatory limits to 0.75 - 1.33 or even to 0.70 - 1.43. Concerns for observations of high GMR values can be eased by imposing constraints with a secondary regulatory criterion.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed2002

Absolute bioavailability and stereoselective pharmacokinetics of doxepin.

1. Commercial doxepin contains geometric isomers in the proportions Z:E = 15:85. Z-doxepin and its metabolite Z-N-desmethyldoxepin are both active antidepressants, whereas the corresponding E-isomers are less active therapeutically. 2. The present pharmacokinetic study was a balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover design in which 12 healthy male volunteers were given single doses of commercial doxepin intravenously and orally on two occasions separated by a washout period. 3. A two-compartment model with no lag time and first-order elimination fitted the plasma concentration-time curves after intravenous dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from the model were comparable with those estimated by non-compartmental methods. 4. All pharmacokinetic parameters displayed a wide between-subject variability. Both isomers of doxepin showed large volumes of distribution and relatively short half-lives in plasma, suggestive of extensive distribution and/or tissue binding. The mean fraction absorbed after oral administration was 0.29 for each isomer. Renal clearances of each isomer were very low after either oral or intravenous dosing, although all four analytes were quantifiable in the urine for prolonged periods. 5. After oral dosing, plasma concentrations of the doxepin isomers remained roughly in the ratio Z:E = 15:85, whereas those of N-desmethyldoxepin were closer to 1:1 in all but two outliers, who had high levels E-N-desmethyldoxepin.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the pharmacokinetics of d-methylphenidate (d-MPH) would be altered by food ingested before administration of an immediate release formulation (dl-MPH- IR) but not when food is ingested before a slow release formulation (dl-MPH-SR). METHODS: A randomized, four-phase, open label, crossover design was conducted in 24 healthy men who each received, on separate occasions, dl-MPH-IR and dl-MPH-SR taken after an overnight fast and 15 min after a standardized breakfast (20% protein, 21% fat, 59% carbohydrate). Plasma MPH levels were monitored by a validated, stereoselective. GLC-ECD method. RESULTS: For plasma d-MPH, there were significant differences (ANOVA) between dl-MPH-IR and dl-MPH-SR in tmax, Cmax (peak exposure), and Cmax/AUC (sensitive to rate of absorption). Dl-MPH-SR on average delayed tmax from 2.3 to 3.7 h and lowered Cmax 34%. There was no significant difference between the formulations in AUC (extent of absorption). For dl-MPH-IR, food significantly increased Cmax (23%) and AUC (15%) and for dl-MPH-SR the corresponding increases were Cmax (17%) and AUC (14%). After dl-MPH-IR, food delayed average tmax from 2.0 to 2.5 but had no effect on tmax after dl-MPH-SR. There was no effect of food on Cmax/AUC (rate of absorption). CONCLUSIONS: Food caused a significant increase in extent of absorption but had no effect on rate of absorption of d-MPH after either dl-MPHIR or dl-MPH-SR.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation of the bioequivalence of highly-variable drugs and drug products.

PURPOSE: To establish procedures for the effective evaluation of bioequivalence (BE) for highly-variable drugs and drug products (HVD/P). METHODS: 2- and 4-period crossover BE studies with 24 subjects were simulated which generally assumed within-subject coefficients of variation of 40%. The relationship between the fraction of studies in which BE was accepted (the statistical power) and the ratio of geometric means (GMR) of the two formulations was evaluated for various methods of analysis. These included, primarily, scaled average BE (ABE), the corresponding approach of expanding BE limits (BEL), and, for comparison, unscaled ABE and scaled individual BE (IBE). RESULTS: Scaled ABE and expanding BEL showed very similar properties in both 2- and 4-period studies. They had steeper power curves than scaled IBE. Unscaled ABE had very low statistical power. The acceptance of BE by unscaled and scaled ABE and expanding BEL was almost independent of subject-by-formulation interaction and the ratio of within-subject variations of the two formulations. By contrast, the conclusions reached by scaled IBE were strongly affected by these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Scaled ABE and expanding BEL evaluate BE effectively for HVD/P in both 2- and 4-period investigations. However, additional, useful information can be obtained from 4-period studies.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2000

Dose staggering as a strategy to reduce drug--drug interactions due to reversible enzyme inhibition between orally administered drugs with high first pass effect: a computer simulation study.

A physiological computer model was designed to simulate the metabolic drug-drug interactions between two orally co-administered drugs due to reversible enzyme inhibition using drug concentrations in the portal vein. The extent of interactions was compared at steady-state for the effects of a delay in time between the administration of the substrate and the inhibitor. It was demonstrated that the extent of the interactions can be strongly affected by a time interval between the two drug administrations. By delaying the administration of the inhibitor until after the absorption phase of the substrate, one can significantly reduce the extent of the drug--drug interactions. This is because drug concentrations in the portal vein and the liver are much higher than that in the systemic circulation during the absorption phase. The model also showed that interactions involving substrates with a high extraction ratio (E(H)), i.e., drugs with higher first-pass effect, can be more strongly affected by dose staggering. Substrates with a low absorption rate constant (k(a)) require a longer interval with the inhibitor in order to reduce the extent of the interactions. This observation suggests dose staggering as a simple and cost-effective way to reduce the extent of unwanted drug--drug interactions in clinical practice.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

False-positive exercise stress electrocardiogram due to accessory pathway in the absence of manifest preexcitation.

False-positive exercise testing in patients with an accessory pathway has been described only in patients with manifest preexcitation during exercise. We describe a patient in whom marked ST-segment changes were seen during an exercise test in the absence of any preexcitation of the QRS complexes. The role of the accessory pathway in producing the ST changes was reaffirmed by absence of this abnormality following catheter ablation of the accessory pathway.

Catheter Ablation↗