PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Kociss

Publications and source records attributed to K Kociss.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor immunomodulation in the rat cardiac transplantation model.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration decreases tumor necrosis factor(TNF) release, an important mechanism in allograft rejection. to study G-CSF's possible antirejection effects, 30 Lewis rats underwent heart transplantation using Brown-Norway donors and were assigned varying dosages of recombinant human G-CSF (0, 20, 100, 250 and 500 microgram/kg/day) for 14 days following the operation. Recipients receiving 250 microgram/kg/day experienced an improvement in graft survival (12.3+/-4 days vs. 7.0+/-0.6 days, P>0.05, Breslow). In a separate cohort, G-CSF-treated recipients (250 microgram/kg/day x 14) killed at 2,4,and 6 days after transplantation revealed improved serial allograft biopsy grading scores versus untreated controls (P<0.001 stratified Wilcoxon). Significant reduction in serum TNF levels was noted in the G-CSF-treated animals (P<0.025, analysis of variance). These data describe a moderate antirejection effect of G-CSF administration. Inhibition of circulating TNF in the G-CSF-treated recipients may describe a marker or possible mechanism of this antirejection effect.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after liver transplantation.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases the number of circulating granulocytes and decreases TNF production while improving survival in sepsis models. To study the effects of G-CSF administration on sepsis and rejection, 37 primary liver allograft recipients received intravenous recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF; 5-10 micrograms/kg/day) for the first 7-10 days following transplantation, targeting a blood absolute granulocyte count of between 10,000 and 20,000 cells/mm3. These recipients were monitored prospectively for sepsis and rejection, as were the previous 49 primary liver allograft recipients who did not receive G-CSF. Both groups utilized identical protocol immunosuppression and standardized diagnosis and treatment of sepsis and rejection. Univariate and logistic regression analysis of risk factors for sepsis and rejection revealed no difference between the two patient groups. G-CSF-treated patients developed an increased absolute granulocyte count over time (P < 0.0001, repeated-measures analysis of variance). G-CSF-treated patients had a decreased number of sepsis episodes per patient (0.92 +/- 1.5 vs. 2.18 +/- 2.8, P < 0.02, t test), and a lower percentage of sepsis-related deaths (8% vs. 22%, P < 0.04, chi-square test). The incidence of acute rejection was decreased in the G-CSF-treated group (22% vs. 51%, P < 0.01, chi-square test). These pilot data support further investigation into G-CSF's favorable effects on sepsis and rejection.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1992

The role of ultraviolet B-irradiated leukocyte transfusions and cyclosporine in intestinal transplantation.

To explore the efficacy of ultraviolet B-irradiated donor-specific leukocyte transfusions (UV-DSLT) with short-term cyclosporine to control intestinal allograft rejection, 75 adult Lewis (RT1l) rats underwent total small-intestinal transplantation from Brown-Norway (RT1n) donors. Recipients were randomly divided into ten treatment and control groups utilizing various combinations of donor-specific and third-party (Wistar-Furth, RT1u) leukocyte transfusions (TPLT), with or without transfusion UVB irradiation, and either alone or in combination with short-term cyclosporine administration (5 mg/kg intramuscularly on days -7, 0, 1, and 2 relative to transplantation). Leukocytes (10(8) cells) separated from a spleen cell suspension were infused on day -7. Certain transfused leukocytes were treated with 12,000 joules/m2 of UVB irradiation. Groups were monitored for mean survival time (MST) and cause of death. UV-DSLT alone (MST = 19.8 +/- 4.6) or in combination with cyclosporine (UV-DSLT+CsA, MST = 53.1 +/- 22.5) significantly (P less than 0.003-0.0002, Mantel-Cox) prolonged recipient survival when compared with appropriate controls (i.e., no treatment, MST = 11.2 +/- 3.4; CsA, MST = 17.2 +/- 9.0; UV-TPLT, MST = 12.4 +/- 4.0; and UV-TPLT+CsA, MST = 25.1 +/- 9.7) No significant increase in graft-versus-host disease occurred in any group, with 85% (64/75) of the recipients dying of acute rejection. Conversely, the UV-DSLT+CsA group had a significant increase (9/11; chi-square, P less than 0.0001) in chronic rejection. Because UV-DSLT+CsA improved survival as compared with third-party controls, a limited donor-specific unresponsiveness may have been induced. Furthermore, this treatment produces a consistent, chronic rejection rodent intestinal allograft model.

Animals↗