Biomedical subjects

K L Engle

Publications and source records attributed to K L Engle.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

A critical analysis of intraoperative time utilization in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Most of the expense of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is incurred while the patient is in the operation room; however, heretofore there has been no critical analysis of the time required to perform the various steps of the operation. An understanding of how operative time is used is the first step toward improving the efficiency of the procedure and decreasing costs while maintaining an acceptable standard of care. METHODS: Of 194 patients undergoing LC at a university hospital between 1994 and 1997, operational videotapes of 48 randomly chosen patients were reviewed. Three groups of patients were identified: those undergoing LC for chronic cholecystitis (n = 27), those undergoing LC for acute cholecystitis (n = 11), and those with common bile duct stones (CBDS), (n = 10) undergoing LC with transcystic common bile duct exploration. The procedure was divided into the following seven steps; trocar entry, laparoscopic ultrasound, dissection of the triangle of Calot, cholangiogram, dissection of the gallbladder, extraction of the gallbladder, and irrigation-aspiration with removal of ports. Time spent for camera cleaning, bleeding control, and insertion of the cholangiocatheter into the cystic duct was also calculated. The groups were compared in terms of time spent for each step using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD operating time was 66.5 +/- 20.5 min. The acute group had the longest operating time, followed by the CBDS and chronic groups. Dissection of the gallbladder, insertion of the cholangiocatheter, and irrigation-aspiration were longer steps in the acute group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). Dissection of the triangle of Calot took longer in acute cholecystitis than in chronic cholecystitis (p < 0.05). CBDS cases took longer (p < 0.05) than chronic cases because stone extraction added an average of 17.5 min to the time required for the cholangiogram in chronic cholecystitis. Laparoscopic ultrasound took longer in the CBDS group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). The mean +/- SD time spent for the cholangiogram and laparoscopic ultrasound in chronic cholecystitis was 7.5 +/- 4.3 and 4.8 +/- 1.9 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This time analysis study demonstrates that acute cholecystitis requires a longer operating time because most of the individual steps in the procedure take longer. In patients with choledocholithiasis, stone extraction was responsible for longer operating times. This study should serve as a basis for future studies focusing on time utilization in laparoscopic surgery.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Intraoperative thermal regulation in patients undergoing laparoscopic vs open surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: Although perioperative hypothermia is a well-known consequence of general anesthesia, it has been hypothesized that laparoscopic surgery exacerbates hypothermia to a greater extent than open surgery. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery does not represent an increased risk for hypothermia. METHODS: A case-controlled retrospective study was conducted on 45 patients, 25 undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 20 undergoing parathyroid surgery under endotracheal general anesthesia. Data were collected regarding age, sex, weight, height, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, length of surgery, and anesthesia. In addition, we analyzed the type of intraoperative intravenous fluids, anesthetics and perioperative drugs, and temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate recordings during anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ASA status, type or amount of intravenous fluids infused, length of anesthesia or surgery, changes in mean blood pressure, or heart rate. Core body temperatures in both groups decreased significantly over time (p 0.05). There was no difference between the groups in terms of maximum drop in temperature (lowest temperature recorded vs baseline temperature) (1.1 +/- 0.7 vs 1.0 +/- 0.7 degrees C, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients who undergo laparoscopic and open procedures of similar duration under endotracheal general anesthesia have similar profiles in terms of perioperative hypothermia.

Anesthesia, General↗

PubMed2000

Selective use of tube cholecystostomy with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

HYPOTHESIS: Tube cholecystostomy followed by interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a sale and efficacious treatment option in critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study within a 4 1/2%-year period. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Of 324 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 65 (20%) had acute cholecystitis; 15 of these 65 patients (mean age, 75 years) underwent tube cholecystostomy. INTERVENTION: Thirteen patients at high risk for general anesthesia because of underlying medical conditions underwent percutaneous tube cholecystostomy with local anesthesia. Laparoscopic tube cholecystostomy was performed on 2 patients during attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of severe inflammation. Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted after an average of 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technical details and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Prompt clinical response was observed in 13 (87%) of the patients after tube cholecystostomy. Twelve patients (80%) underwent interval cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 11 patients and was successful in 10 (91%), with 1 conversion to open cholecystectomy. One patient had interval open cholecystectomy during definitive operation for esophageal cancer and another had emergency open cholecystectomy due to tube dislodgment. Two patients (13%) had complications related to tube cholecystostomy and 2 patients died from sepsis before interval operation. One patient died from sepsis after combined esophagectomy and cholecystectomy. Postoperative minor complications developed in 2 patients. At a mean follow-up of 16.7 months (range, 0.5-53 months), all patients were free of biliary symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Tube cholecystostomy allowed for resolution of sepsis and delay of definitive surgery in selected patients. Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safely performed once sepsis and acute infection had resolved in this patient group at high risk for general anesthesia and conversion to open cholecystectomy. Just as catheter drainage of acute infection with interval appendectomy is accepted in patients with periappendiceal abscess, tube cholecystostomy with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy should have a role in the management of selected patients with acute cholecystitis.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Laparoscopic posterior adrenalectomy: technical considerations.

HYPOTHESIS: Although laparoscopic posterior adrenalectomy (LPA) offers a more direct access to the adrenal gland, it is not as popular as laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy, and the worldwide experience has been limited. We hypothesized that LPA is a safe and efficacious procedure that could best serve certain patients with adrenal tumors. DESIGN: Case series of patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a single institution. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Medical records of 31 patients with 33 tumors who underwent LPA were reviewed. Indications for operation included hormone secretion in 23 patients (74%), suspected or known malignant neoplasms in 7 patients (23%), and local symptoms in 1 patient (3%). INTERVENTION: The LPAs were performed with the patients in prone position. Preoperative ultrasonography localized the adrenal tumor and kidney to guide balloon trocar placement for the creation of a working retroperitoneal space. The LPAs were performed with three 10-mm trocars using laparoscopic ultrasound to localize the tumor and the harmonic scalpel to perform the dissection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic data, type and size of tumor, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: All operations were successfully completed without conversion. Excluding the bilateral cases, the mean +/- SD operative time was 176 +/- 104 minutes. Estimated blood loss averaged 32 mL (range, 10-200 mL). There were no intraoperative complications. The mean +/- SD tumor size was 3.2 +/- 1.8 cm (range, 0.8-7.0 cm). Pathological evaluation revealed benign tumors in 25 patients (81%) and malignant tumors in 6 patients. The average hospital stay was 1.4 days (range, 1-3 days). There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although technically more demanding, LPA should be considered in patients with tumors less than 6 cm, bilateral tumors, or extensive previous abdominal surgery.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

PubMed2000

Use of CT Hounsfield unit density to identify ablated tumor after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors.

BACKGROUND: When attempting to interpret CT scans after radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) of liver tumors, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish ablated from viable tumor tissue. Identification of the two types of tissue is specially problematic for lesions that are hypodense before ablation. The aim of this study was to determine whether quantitative Hounsfield unit (HU) density measurements can be used to document the lack of tumor perfusion and thereby identify ablated tissue. METHODS: Liver spiral CT scans of 13 patients with 51 lesions undergoing laparoscopic RFA for metastatic liver tumors within a 2-year time period were reviewed. HU density of the lesions as well as normal liver were measured pre- and postoperatively in each CT phase (noncontrast, arterial, portovenous). Statistical analyses were performed using Student's paired t-test and ANOVA. RESULTS: Normal liver parenchyma, which was used as a control, showed a similar increase with contrast injection in both pre- and postprocedure CT scans (56.4 +/- 2.4 vs 57.1 +/- 2.4 HU, respectively; p = 0.3). In contrast, ablated liver lesions showed a preablation increase of 45.7 +/- 3.4 HU but only a minimal postablation increase of 6.6 +/- 0.7 HU (p < 0.0001). This was true for highly vascular tumors (neuroendocrine) as well as hypovascular ones (adenocarcinoma). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to define quantitative radiological criteria using HU density for the evaluation of ablated tissues. A lack of increase in HU density with contrast injection indicates necrotic tissue, whereas perfused tissue shows an increase in HU density. This technique can be used in the evaluation of patients undergoing RFA.

Adenocarcinoma↗