PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K L Gall

Publications and source records attributed to K L Gall.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Molecular studies on the ecology of Listeria monocytogenes in the smoked fish processing industry.

We have applied molecular approaches, including PCR-based detection strategies and DNA fingerprinting methods, to study the ecology of Listeria monocytogenes in food processing environments. A total of 531 samples, including raw fish, fish during the cold-smoking process, finished product, and environmental samples, were collected from three smoked fish processing facilities during five visits to each facility. A total of 95 (17.9%) of the samples tested positive for L. monocytogenes using a commercial PCR system (BAX for Screening/Listeria monocytogenes), including 57 (27.7%) environmental samples (n = 206), 8 (7.8%) raw material samples (n = 102), 23 (18.1%) samples from fish in various stages of processing(n = 127), and 7 (7.3%) finished product samples (n = 96). L. monocytogenes was isolated from 85 samples (16.0%) using culture methods. Used in conjunction with a 48-h enrichment in Listeria Enrichment Broth, the PCR system had a sensitivity of 91.8% and a specificity of 96.2%. To track the origin and spread of L. monocytogenes, isolates were fingerprinted by automated ribotyping. Fifteen different ribotypes were identified among 85 isolates tested. Ribotyping data established possible contamination patterns, implicating raw materials and the processing environment as potential sources of finished product contamination. Analysis of the distribution of ribotypes revealed that each processing facility had a unique contamination pattern and that specific ribotypes persisted in the environments of two facilities over time (P < or = 0.0006). We conclude that application of molecular approaches can provide critical information on the ecology of different L. monocytogenes strains in food processing environments. This information can be used to develop practical recommendations for improved control of this important food-borne pathogen in the food industry.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Allograft heart valve viability and valve-processing variables.

BACKGROUND: The impact of allograft valve viability on valve durability remains controversial. Analyses of our clinical results have demonstrated the superiority of the cryopreserved valve viable at the time of implantation over the 4 degrees C stored valve nonviable at the time of implantation. In this study, we quantitatively assessed the effects on viability of current and past valve-processing protocols at The Prince Charles Hospital. METHODS: The viability of pulmonary valves was quantitatively analyzed by thin-layer autoradiography to assess the effects of donor type, antibiotics, and valve storage. RESULTS: Control valve segments obtained from beating-heart donor valves had a higher initial viability (0.92+/-0.02) than nonbeating-heart donor valves (0.66+/-0.03). Cryopreservation after low-dose antibiotic sterilization significantly reduced viability to 50% to 60% of the control, and in the presence of amphotericin B, viability dropped further to 10% to 36% of the control. After 7 days' storage at 4 degrees C, viability was reduced to 2% of control and to 0% viability after 21 days. CONCLUSIONS: For maximal preimplantation viability, valves should be procured as soon as possible after cessation of heart beat and should be cryopreserved if they are not to be clinically implanted within 1 to 2 days. Amphotericin B should not be used in conjunction with cryopreservation if viability is to be maximized.

Amphotericin B↗
PubMed1996

Human aortic valve allografts elicit a donor-specific immune response.

OBJECTIVE: The nature and magnitude of the immunologic response to implantation of human cryopreserved aortic valve allografts was investigated. METHODS: Twenty aortic valve allograft recipients were investigated for donor-specific antibody and T-cell-mediated responses with serial flow cytometric and microlymphocytotoxic crossmatch assays and one-way mixed lymphocyte cultures. RESULTS: Donor-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies to class I and II human leukocyte antigens were first detected in the serum of all aortic valve allograft recipients at 30 days after implantation and persisted in substantial amounts in all but one of the recipients at day 365. Recipient T-cell alloreactivity toward donor lymphocytes was significantly increased at day 30 compared with levels before and 10 days after operation. CONCLUSIONS: Cryopreserved aortic valve allografts elicit a substantial allogeneic response in recipients. This alloreactivity may contribute to the observed morphologic changes in aortic valve allografts and eventual long-term deterioration of allograft function.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Allograft aortic valve replacement: long-term follow-up.

Aortic valve replacement using an allograft aortic valve has been performed on 804 patients. From December 1969 to May 1975, 124 patients received a nonviable allograft valve sterilized by incubation with low-dose antibiotics and stored for weeks by refrigeration at 4 degrees C (series 1). From June 1975 to January 1994, 680 patients received viable allograft valves, now cryopreserved early within 2 hours of collection from transplant recipient donors, 6 hours for multiorgan donor valves and 23 hours (mean) for autopsy valves from donor death. The 30-day mortality was 8.9% +/- 5% (95% confidence limits) for series I and 2.8% +/- 1% (95% confidence limits) for series II. Actuarial patient survival including hospital mortality at 15 years was 56% +/- 5% for series I and 62% +/- 5% for series II. The probability of a thromboembolic event was low, freedom at 15 years being 95% +/- 1% for patients receiving allografts with or without associated coronary bypass procedures and 81% +/- 5% for patients having allografts with other associated procedures (eg, mitral valve operations). Actuarial freedom from endocarditis was similar for the two series, 91% +/- 3% (series I) and 94% +/- 2% (series II) at 15 years. The freedom from valve incompetence, from reoperation for all causes, and from structural deterioration demonstrated clearly the inferiority of the 4 degrees C stored allograft valves. For structural deterioration as identified clinically, at reoperation and at death, freedom from this event at 15 years was 45% +/- 6% for series I and 80% +/- 5% for series II (p value for the difference is 0).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1995

Root replacement for all allograft aortic valves: preferred technique or too radical?

From November 1985 to January 1994, 146 patients have received a viable cryopreserved allograft for aortic root replacement. The follow-up was complete, with all events included to March 1st, 1994. The median age of patients was 49 years; 83.6% were male. Valve dysfunction (91 patients), primary aortic wall disease (45 patients), and a combination of both (10 patients) were the indications for aortic root replacement. The current operative mortality is 1.7% (three deaths in 172 patients to July 1st, 1994). Four late deaths have occurred, with an 8-year actuarial survival of 85% +/- 8% (95% confidence limits). Endocarditis (two events) and thromboembolism (four events) had a low incidence. Structural deterioration (three events) and reoperation for all causes (nine events) have constituted low morbidity and are compared with the results after non-root allograft implantation techniques. The clinical and echocardiographic evidence indicates that the immediate results of valve function with root replacement are superior. But no statistical difference between aortic root replacement and non-root procedures is apparent at 8 years, indicating that a longer follow-up is required before the answer to the question "preferred technique or too radical" can be answered.

Adolescent↗