Biomedical subjects

K L Goa

Publications and source records attributed to K L Goa.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

Oxaliplatin: a review of its use in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED: Oxaliplatin is a cytotoxic agent which, like other platinum compounds, acts primarily by causing inter- and intra-strand cross-links in DNA, thereby inhibiting DNA synthesis. Oxaliplatin has a bulky carrier ligand which is thought to enhance cytotoxicity and abolish cross-resistance between oxaliplatin and other platinum compounds. Phase II and III clinical trials have found oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil/calcium folinate (leucovorin/folinic acid) to be an effective first- and second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. First-line triple therapy with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil/calcium folinate achieved significantly higher response rates than fluorouracil/calcium folinate alone in 2 phase III studies (objective response rates 59 vs 23% and 50.7 vs 22.3%). In addition, median progression-free survival was longer with triple therapy in both studies (8.9 vs 5.2 and 8.75 vs 6.0 months). However, there was no significant difference in median duration of survival between treatment groups, although this may be a consequence of the subsequent use of oxaliplatin and/or surgery in patients who relapsed during therapy with fluorouracil/calcium folinate alone. About 30 to 45% of patients (whose disease progressed during or after fluorouracil-based therapy) responded to second-line combination therapy with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil/calcium folinate. Median progression-free survival ranged from 7 to 10 months and the median duration of survival from 10 to 17 months. Objective responses were achieved in 20 and 24% of patients in 2 small trials of first-line oxaliplatin monotherapy and in about 10% of patients given the drug as a second-line option. Peripheral sensory neuropathy is the dose-limiting toxicity associated with oxaliplatin. Severe neurotoxicity has been estimated to occur in 10% of patients after 6 treatment cycles and in 50% after 9 cycles of an oxaliplatin dosage of 130 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. It is cumulative, but reversible on discontinuation of therapy. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea are common, but are usually mild to moderate. Myelosuppression is also observed, but is usually mild. CONCLUSION: oxaliplatin is a promising treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It appears to be particularly advantageous (in terms of response rate and duration of progression-free survival) when used in combination with fluorouracil/calcium folinate as both a first- and second-line option, although preliminary studies have failed to show any survival advantage over fluorouracil/calcium folinate alone. Promising results have been found in studies of the drug as monotherapy, and oxaliplatin may also prove useful in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with unresectable liver metastases; however, data are limited at present.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Lamifiban.

Lamifiban is an intravenously administered, selective, reversible, nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist which inhibits platelet aggregation and thrombus formation by preventing the binding of fibrinogen to platelets. In trials in patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina pectoris (PARAGON A and the Canadian Lamifiban Study), the incidence of clinical events at 30 days in patients receiving lamifiban (1 to 5 microg/min) was not significantly different from that in patients receiving aspirin plus heparin or aspirin alone. In PARAGON A, the incidence of clinical events at 6 months was significantly lower after lamifiban (with or without heparin) and aspirin therapy than after standard heparin and aspirin therapy. A large phase III trial (PARAGON B) is under way comparing lamifiban plus aspirin and heparin with standard aspirin and heparin therapy in patients with non-Q wave MI or unstable angina pectoris. In clinical trials, the most common adverse events associated with lamifiban were bleeding complications which were increased by the concomitant administration of heparin.

Acetates↗

PubMed1999

Sibrafiban.

Sibrafiban is the orally administered, nonpeptide, double-prodrug of Ro 44-3888 which is a selective glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist. It is currently undergoing clinical trials for secondary prevention of cardiac events in patients stabilised after acute coronary syndromes. In a phase II dose-finding study (TIMI 12) in patients stabilised after a myocardial infarction (MI) or an episode of unstable angina, there was a dose-dependent inhibition of platelet aggregation which correlated closely with the plasma concentration of the total active drug. An ongoing phase III study (SYMPHONY) compares the effects of sibrafiban on cardiac events with that of aspirin in patients stabilised after a Q wave MI or an episode of unstable angina. This large trial uses twice daily dosage regimens to produce the plasma concentrations which were associated with less bleeding in the earlier dose-ranging trial. A long term (minimum duration 12 months) phase III study (2nd SYMPHONY) is under way to compare the effects of sibrafiban on cardiac events with those of aspirin in patients stabilised after an MI or an episode of unstable angina. The most common adverse events associated with sibrafiban include bleeding, with minor haemorrhages occurring more often than with aspirin.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Eptifibatide: a review of its use in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

UNLABELLED: Eptifibatide, a cyclic peptide, is a highly specific, intravenously administered glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist. By preventing fibrinogen binding to the GP IIb/IIIa receptor, eptifibatide inhibits platelet aggregation and prevents thrombus formation. Clinically, the drug is used as an adjunct to heparin and aspirin. The PURSUIT trial, conducted in >10,000 patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), showed that eptifibatide (180 microg/kg bolus then 2 microg/kg/min infusion for < or =72 hours) reduces the 30-day risk of death or nonfatal MI, with this benefit apparent at 96 hours. The absolute reduction in this end-point of 1.5% persisted at 6 months. The drug is effective in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and, as shown in the North American subgroup, in patients in whom medical management is appropriate. Eptifibatide is also beneficial in patients undergoing PCI, whether or not they have unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI. In a dosage of 135 microg/kg then 0.5 microg/kg/min for 24 hours, eptifibatide reduced the 30-day risk of a combined end-point (death, nonfatal MI and urgent or emergency coronary interventions) by 2.5% (absolute reduction) in patients undergoing PCI in the IMPACT-II trial, when measured by per-protocol (patients treated), but not intent-to-treat, analysis. The drug also decreased the incidence of abrupt vessel closure and ischaemic cardiovascular complications in the first 24 hours (the period of greatest risk). Bleeding episodes are the most common adverse event associated with eptifibatide therapy. Although the incidence of major bleeding is increased with eptifibatide, most bleeding episodes are minor and occur at the vascular access site. The drug is not associated with an excess of intracranial bleeds, stroke or thrombocytopenia, does not appear to increase bleeding risk in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and does not cause antibody formation. Limited data suggest that eptifibatide may improve coronary flow when combined with alteplase in patients with acute Q-wave MI, but the possibility of increased bleeding with eptifibatide plus thrombolytics should be borne in mind. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous eptifibatide, when combined with aspirin and heparin, reduces the 30-day risk of ischaemic events in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave MI and decreases ischaemic cardiovascular complications at the time of greatest risk in patients undergoing PCI. With its acceptable tolerability profile eptifibatide is a suitable option as a short term adjunct in these clinical settings. Whether eptifibatide in combination with fibrolysis may improve outcome in patients with acute Q-wave MI has yet to be determined.

Angina, Unstable↗

PubMed1999

Finasteride: an update of its use in the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

UNLABELLED: Finasteride inhibits type 25alpha-reductase activity, significantly reducing dihydrotestosterone levels. Consequent reductions in prostate volume, increases in urinary flow rates and improvements in symptoms compared with placebo have been observed in trials of up to 4 years' duration and in noncomparative extensions (for up to 6 years). Results from the 4-year placebo-controlled PLESS trial show finasteride to significantly reduce the risk of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH)-related acute urinary retention and the requirement for surgical intervention. Finasteride has significantly greater efficacy in patients with a large prostate (> or = 40 ml) than in patients with a small prostate. However, the predictive value of prostate size has been questioned. Results of an earlier comparative 1-year trial show terazosin monotherapy and terazosin plus finasteride therapy to be significantly more effective than both finasteride monotherapy and placebo in reducing symptom scores and improving maximum urinary flow rates. Prostatic volume was significantly reduced by finasteride monotherapy and combination therapy only. The overall efficacy of finasteride in patients with mild to moderate symptomatic BPH tended to be greater than that of serenoa repens (Permixon) in a 6-month trial. A US cost analysis model indicates that finasteride and terazosin are less expensive than transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) during the first 2 years of initiation. Canadian cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses using decision analysis modelling have shown primary intervention with finasteride to provide more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at lesser cost than watchful waiting or TURP in patients with moderate symptoms who receive the drug for < or = 3 years and < or = 14 years, respectively, but fewer QALYs at a higher cost in patients with severe symptoms needing therapy for > or = 4 years. Confirmatory prospective economic studies are required. Finasteride appears to improve overall quality of life to a similar extent to serenoa repens; patient satisfaction appears similar with finasteride and TURP. Finasteride is generally well tolerated. Most commonly reported adverse effects are sexually related (1 to 2.1 %). Gynaecomastia has been reported in 0.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite modest improvements in maximum urinary flow rates and symptom scores, finasteride is a first-line treatment option in those with moderate uncomplicated BPH, especially in patients with a large prostate (> or = 40 ml). It is also an option in patients with more severe symptoms who are unable or unwilling to undergo surgery and in those awaiting surgery. Importantly, finasteride appears to reduce disease progression, significantly decreasing the incidence of acute urinary retention and the requirement for surgical intervention; to date, no other pharmacological agent has been shown to reduce these outcomes.

Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1999

Nebivolol in the management of essential hypertension: a review.

UNLABELLED: Nebivolol is a lipophilic beta1-blocker. It is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic or membrane stabilising activity but appears to have nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory effects. Nebivolol is administered as a racemic mixture of equal proportions of d- and l-enantiomers. The drug does not significantly influence glucose or plasma lipid metabolism and appears to have a protective effect on left ventricular function. At the recommended dosage (5 mg once daily) nebivolol reduces resting diastolic blood pressure as effectively as standard therapeutic dosages of atenolol, metoprolol, lisinopril and nifedipine, as shown in comparative trials. Nebivolol reduced blood pressure significantly more than enalapril 10 mg daily in the short but not the long term, although the enalapril dose may not have been optimal. Nebivolol has an additive effect in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Standing blood pressure and/or mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure is significantly and similarly reduced with nebivolol, atenolol or nifedipine. Nebivolol tended to prevent increases in early morning blood pressure better than nifedipine. Overall response rates to nebivolol therapy (a decrease in sitting/supine diastolic blood pressure to < or = 90 mm Hg or a 10% or > or = 10 mm Hg fall in diastolic blood pressure) ranged from 58 to 81% after 4 to 52 weeks' treatment. In comparative studies, response rates were greater in nebivolol than in enalapril or metoprolol recipients, but not significantly different from those in atenolol or nifedipine recipients. Nebivolol 5 mg once daily is well tolerated in patients with hypertension. Adverse events are infrequent, transient and mild to moderate. Those reported most often include headache, fatigue, paraesthesias and dizziness. Several studies reported no signs of orthostatic hypotension with nebivolol. Comparative trials revealed no significant differences between the frequency and severity of adverse events in patients receiving nebivolol, atenolol, enalapril or placebo; however, the overall incidence of adverse events was greater with nifedipine or metoprolol. Some atenolol or enalapril, but not nebivolol, recipients reported impotence or decreased libido during therapy. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that nebivolol 5 mg once daily is a well tolerated beta-blocker, which is as effective as once daily atenolol and other classes of antihypertensive agents. It may therefore be recommended as a useful alternative first-line treatment option for the management of patients with mild to moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Diclofenac-potassium in migraine: a review.

UNLABELLED: The NSAID diclofenac is a potent inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis and an established antipyretic and analgesic agent. Diclofenac-potassium was developed as an immediate-release tablet with the aim of providing rapid onset of action after oral administration. This formulation has been investigated in the acute treatment of migraine. Data from available placebo-controlled clinical trials indicate that diclofenac-potassium 50 or 100mg as an immediate-release tablet is more effective than placebo and as effective as oral sumatriptan 100mg and ergotamine plus caffeine at reducing pain intensity in patients with migraine 2 hours after initial administration. Duration of pain relief is similar for the 3 drugs but onset appears to be faster with diclofenac-potassium than with oral sumatriptan or ergotamine plus caffeine. Diclofenac-potassium appears to have favourable effects on some accompanying symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. The frequency of these symptoms was significantly lower with diclofenac-potassium than with sumatriptan in 1 study, although only a few patients had vomiting at baseline. Effects on phonophobia or photophobia did not differ between diclofenac-potassium, sumatriptan and ergotamine plus caffeine. The need for rescue medication is consistently less with diclofenac-potassium than with placebo. Data are inconsistent or scarce regarding the effects of diclofenac-potassium versus placebo on other measures such as headache recurrence and working ability. Diclofenac-potassium was generally well tolerated in clinical trials in patients with migraine. Adverse events reported most frequently (abdominal pain, tiredness and fatigue and nausea) were typically mild to moderate. CONCLUSION: Diclofenac-potassium provides rapid pain relief (within 60 to 90 minutes), is well tolerated and reduces the frequency of some of the accompanying symptoms in patients with migraine. Available trials indicate that diclofenac-potassium provides similar pain relief to sumatriptan and is at least as effective as ergotamine plus caffeine, but appears to have a greater effect on nausea and vomiting than sumatriptan and a faster onset of action than both drugs. Comparisons with other NSAIDs are lacking. Diclofenac-potassium is likely to find a role as a useful first-line option in the acute treatment of migraine.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed1999

Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other indications.

UNLABELLED: Tranexamic acid is a synthetic derivative of the amino acid lysine that exerts its antifibrinolytic effect through the reversible blockade of lysine binding sites on plasminogen molecules. Intravenously administered tranexamic acid (most commonly 10 mg/kg followed by infusion of 1 mg/kg/hour) caused reductions relative to placebo of 29 to 54% in postoperative blood losses in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), with statistically significant reductions in transfusion requirements in some studies. Tranexamic acid had similar efficacy to aprotinin 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibitory units (KIU) and was superior to dipyridamole in the reduction of postoperative blood losses. Transfusion requirements were reduced significantly by 43% with tranexamic acid and by 60% with aprotinin in 1 study. Meta-analysis of 60 trials showed tranexamic acid and aprotinin, unlike epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and desmopressin, to reduce significantly the number of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusions after cardiac surgery with CPB. Tranexamic acid was associated with reductions relative to placebo in mortality of 5 to 54% in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Meta-analysis indicated a reduction of 40%. Reductions of 34 to 57.9% versus placebo or control in mean menstrual blood loss occurred during tranexamic acid therapy in women with menorrhagia; the drug has also been used to good effect in placental bleeding, postpartum haemorrhage and conisation of the cervix. Tranexamic acid significantly reduced mean blood losses after oral surgery in patients with haemophilia and was effective as a mouthwash in dental patients receiving oral anticoagulants. Reductions in blood loss were also obtained with the use of the drug in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation or transurethral prostatic surgery, and rates of rebleeding were reduced in patients with traumatic hyphaema. Clinical benefit has also been reported with tranexamic acid in patients with hereditary angioneurotic oedema. Tranexamic acid is well tolerated; nausea and diarrhoea are the most common adverse events. Increased risk of thrombosis with the drug has not been demonstrated in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid is useful in a wide range of haemorrhagic conditions. The drug reduces postoperative blood losses and transfusion requirements in a number of types of surgery, with potential cost and tolerability advantages over aprotinin, and appears to reduce rates of mortality and urgent surgery in patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Tranexamic acid reduces menstrual blood loss and is a possible alternative to surgery in menorrhagia, and has been used successfully to control bleeding in pregnancy.

Antifibrinolytic Agents↗

PubMed1999

Capecitabine.

Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate used for the treatment of paclitaxel- or anthracycline-refractory breast cancer. Capecitabine is metabolised via a 3-step process to the active agent fluorouracil. The final step of this process occurs preferentially in malignant tissue. In patients with paclitaxel-refractory breast cancer receiving capecitabine (2510 mg/m2/day for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle) the objective tumour response rate was 20%. Disease progression occurred in 34% of patients and 40% had stable disease. In this trial, the median duration of response was 241 days. Disease progression or death occurred in 83% of patients, and median time to progression was 93 days. Median survival time was 384 days. In previously untreated patients with breast cancer, the response rate was higher and time to disease progression was longer after oral capecitabine (2510 mg/m2/day for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle) than after intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil therapy. In clinical trials, generally gastrointestinal or haematological adverse events were reported most frequently. Other commonly reported events included hand-and-foot syndrome, fatigue, hyperbilirubinaemia, dermatitis and anorexia.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Intranasal metoclopramide.

Intranasal metoclopramide is a new formulation of an established and effective antiemetic drug. Absorption after intranasal administration was lower than after oral or intravenous administration; otherwise the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of the intranasal and parenteral formulations were similar. Intranasal and intramuscular metoclopramide showed similar efficacy in the control of acute emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in 12 patients. Intranasal metoclopramide 80mg significantly reduced the frequency of acute vomiting in 43 patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. A pilot study suggested that intranasal metoclopramide, with or without dexamethasone, may reduce cisplatin-induced delayed emesis. In a randomised crossover trial in 40 patients, intranasal metoclopramide or oral metoclopramide, both with dexamethasone, were equally effective in the control of delayed emesis induced by moderately-emetogenic chemotherapy. One 30 patient study suggests that intranasal metoclopramide has similar efficacy to oral metoclopramide in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. A non-significant trend to reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting has been seen in two trials of intranasal metoclopramide. Intranasal metoclopramide caused minor irritation of the nasal membrane and unpleasant taste in some patients, but was otherwise well tolerated. None of the more serious extrapyramidal effects sometimes associated with metoclopramide were reported.

Administration, Intranasal↗

PubMed1999

Extended-release dipyridamole/aspirin.

The fixed-dose combination of extended-release dipyridamole/aspirin (Aggrenox/Asasantin Retard) combines 2 antiplatelet agents with different mechanisms of action. The combination reduced thrombus formation in human and animal models. Coadministration of extended-release dipyridamole and aspirin in healthy volunteers had no significant effects on the plasma concentrations of either agent. Twice-daily oral extended-release dipyridamole/aspirin (400/50 mg/day) was twice as effective as either agent alone in the secondary prevention of stroke in a large clinical trial involving patients with prior stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The rate of the combined end-point of stroke and death tended to be lower with the combination than with other treatments. The incidence of death was not significantly reduced by any treatment. Most adverse events with extended-release dipyridamole/aspirin were mild and similar to those with either agent alone. Bleeding was more common with the combination than with extended-release dipyridamole alone, as was headache when compared with aspirin alone. Limited pharmacoeconomic analyses suggest that treatment with extended-release dipyridamole/aspirin was cost saving and was cost effective compared with aspirin monotherapy for the secondary prevention of stroke.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Adefovir dipivoxil.

Adefovir dipivoxil is an ester prodrug of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor adefovir (PMEA), the prototype compound of the acyclic nucleoside phosphonates. It has better oral bioavailability than the parent compound. Adefovir dipivoxil 120mg once daily significantly reduced viral load compared with placebo when added to standard antiretroviral therapy in a 6-month, double-blind study in patients with HIV infection. Viral suppression was maintained during an additional 6-month nonblind extension phase. The drug was most effective in patients with baseline isolates containing the M184V lamivudine resistance mutation according to data from a virological substudy of a large placebo-controlled trial. Adefovir dipivoxil 60mg was as effective as 120mg (both once daily) after 20 weeks' treatment in a randomised double-blind study in antiretroviral-experienced (protease inhibitor-naive) patients. Viral suppression was generally maintained in patients who developed new reverse transcriptase mutations during adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy or combination therapy for up to 12 months. No clear pattern of particular clinical resistance mutations has emerged. GI disturbances, hepatic effects and delayed renal abnormalities are the principal adverse events seen with adefovir dipivoxil. Reductions in serum free carnitine levels may occur and coadministration of L-carnitine is recommended.

Adenine↗

PubMed1998

Raloxifene.

Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator which mimics the effects of estrogens on bone and blood lipid levels without stimulatory effects on the breast or uterus. Raloxifene inhibits estrogen-dependent proliferation of human breast cancer cells in vitro and development of induced mammary tumours in rats in vivo. Raloxifene inhibits bone resorption induced by estrogen deficiency in murine and human studies and lowers serum cholesterol levels. In clinical studies in postmenopausal women, raloxifene 60 mg/day for 2 years significantly increased bone mineral density compared with placebo. In comparative clinical studies, raloxifene 60 mg/day had more modest effects than conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg/day on bone resorption and formation parameters and appeared to be less effective in increasing bone mineral density. In older postmenopausal women with existing bone fractures, raloxifene 60 or 120 mg/day for 1 year produced modest increases in bone mineral density. The most common treatment-related adverse events in raloxifene recipients were hot flushes and leg cramps. The risk of venous thromboembolic events is increased during raloxifene therapy. In contrast with conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg/day, raloxifene 200 or 600 mg/day for 8 weeks or 150 mg/day for 1 year did not produce endometrial proliferation.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Bicalutamide in advanced prostate cancer. A review.

UNLABELLED: Bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen with a long elimination half-life (t1/2) that permits once-daily administration. When combined with a gonadorelin (gonadotrophin releasing hormone; GnRH) agonist in maximum androgen blockade (MAB) regimens, bicalutamide 50 mg once daily is at least as effective as flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily, as shown in a large randomised trial. Rate of treatment failure, the primary end-point, was significantly lower at 49 weeks with bicalutamide in this study, mainly because of a lower rate of withdrawal due to adverse events. Final results at a median follow-up of 160 weeks revealed longer median times to progression and death with bicalutamide than flutamide, but between-group differences were not significant overall. Although early trials demonstrated clinical benefits with bicalutamide 50 mg/day as monotherapy, the drug in this dosage is less effective than castration. Increasing the dosage to 150 mg/day has improved its efficacy in patients with non-metastatic disease: combined data from 2 trials demonstrate similar survival with bicalutamide in this dosage compared with castration. Accumulating evidence from these and other studies indicates that sexual interest appears to be better preserved with bicalutamide than with castration. The tolerability profile of bicalutamide is characteristic of antiandrogens, with breast pain and gynaecomastia occurring most often. Bicalutamide has not been causally associated with problems such as interstitial pneumonitis and difficulty with light/dark adaptation seen with nilutamide, and in a 50 mg/day dosage causes a lower incidence of diarrhoea than flutamide 750 mg/day. Changes in hepatic function are generally transient and resolve or improve during therapy or after bicalutamide treatment is withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: Bicalutamide, with its once-daily regimen and good tolerability, is an attractive option when combined with a GnRH agonist in patients with advanced prostate cancer who are suitable to receive MAB regimens. The role of bicalutamide as monotherapy in the management of this common malignancy is currently being assessed.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed1998

Risedronate.

Risedronate is a pyridinyl bisphosphonate that can be administered orally in lower dosages than other antiresorptive bisphosphonates. Like others of its class risedronate inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In experimental models of osteoporosis, risedronate inhibited bone loss and improved trabecular architecture. In patients with Paget's disease, pain diminished or disappeared and serum alkaline phosphatase levels decreased after treatment with oral risedronate 30 mg/day for < or = 3 months. Risedronate 30 mg/day orally for 2 months significantly reduced pain, whereas etidronate 400 mg/day orally for 6 months tended to reduce pain, in a randomised double-blind trial of patients with Paget's disease. Oral risedronate 5 mg/day for < or = 2 years increased bone mass in postmenopausal women with low or normal bone mass. Risedronate 2.5 mg/day prevented bone loss in postmenopausal women treated with glucocorticoids for rheumatoid arthritis. The incidence of gastrointestinal or other adverse events was similar in patients treated with risedronate or placebo in clinical trials.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Transdermal testosterone.

Nightly application of testosterone transdermal (TTD) system to nonscrotal sites in men with hypogonadism results in a 24-hour serum testosterone concentration profile which mimics the circadian pattern observed in healthy young men. The system also normalises dihydrotestosterone/testosterone and estradiol/testosterone ratios and reduces luteinising hormone levels towards the normal range. A multicentre, open-label study demonstrated that nocturnal erectile response and overall sexual function improved during 12 months' treatment with the TTD system (5 mg/day) in men with hypogonadism. Individual variables of sexual desire, arousal, frequency of sexual activity, orgasm and satisfaction also improved. The TTD system is well tolerated, with application site reactions such as pruritus, burn-like blisters and erythema being the most commonly reported events. Prostate-specific antigen levels and prostate volume remain in the normal range during long term treatment.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed1998

Zanamivir.

Zanamivir is the first of a new class of selective influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors. It inhibits both influenza A and influenza B virus replication in vitro. In the ferret model of influenza, zanamivir reduced viral replication and diminished pyrexia associated with the infection. Repeated passage of influenza virus in the presence of zanamivir could produce resistance in vitro. However, there have been no changes in sensitivity to zanamivir in any influenza virus isolates from patients receiving zanamivir in clinical trials. In experimental infection in humans, in which the virus replicates only in the nasal passages, intranasal zanamivir (3.6 to 16 mg) prevented infection with influenza virus. A combination of inhaled (10 mg) and intranasal (6.4 mg) zanamivir for 14 days was effective in preventing influenza in a nursing home setting during an influenza A virus outbreak. Inhaled zanamivir (10 mg) with or without intranasal zanamivir (6.4 mg) reduced the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms compared with placebo in patients with confirmed infection.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Triflusal.

Triflusal is an antiplatelet agent structurally related to the salicylate group of compounds, but it is not derived from aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Platelet antiaggregant properties of triflusal and its active 3-hydroxy-4-trifluoro-methylbenzoic acid metabolite are primarily mediated by specific inhibition of platelet arachidonic acid metabolism. Triflusal, compared with placebo for 6 months, significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina. In patients with peripheral arteriopathy, total and pain free walking distances were markedly improved in triflusal compared with placebo recipients. The cumulative event rate for stroke, ischemic cardiopathy and vascular death was lower, but not significantly different, in patients with atherothrombotic stroke who received triflusal than in aspirin recipients. Differences were significant, and favoured triflusal, in a subgroup of patients with > 70% carotid stenosis. Prophylaxis with triflusal for 6 months after aortocoronary vein grafting reduced the number of new distal anastomosis occlusions and the graft attrition rate more than aspirin or placebo. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in more than 500 patients undergoing hip surgery was similar for these 3 treatments. The amount of blood transfused was significantly reduced in triflusal compared with aspirin recipients who underwent hip surgery. Risk of haemorrhage was also reduced in ischemic stroke patients receiving triflusal versus aspirin.

Adult↗