Biomedical subjects

K L Macmillan

Publications and source records attributed to K L Macmillan.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Comparison of two doses of oestradiol benzoate administered at a resynchronised oestrus on reproductive performance of dairy cows.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two doses of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) administered as part of a treatment designed to resynchronise returns to oestrus on the reproductive performance of cows in a controlled breeding program. DESIGN: Cohort study. PROCEDURE: Lactating dairy cows on two farms were treated to synchronise three successive oestrous cycles. An intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP4) was used to synchronise the first oestrous cycle. The cows were then treated 15 days after the first treatment by reinsertion of an IVP4 that had been used to synchronise the first oestrus and administration of 1.0 mg of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) i.m. at device insertion. The IVP4 device was removed 8 days later and either 0.5 (n = 421) or 1.0 mg of ODB (n = 446) was administered 24 h later. Injections of (ODB) with or without the use of an IVP4 were used to synchronise the third oestrous cycle. Different synchronisation treatments were used to synchronise first and third oestrous cycles but differences were included in statistical models to account for variation in the data. This enabled examination of effects due to differences in the dose of ODB used to synchronise the second synchronised oestrus. RESULTS: The dose of ODB (0.5 or 1.0 mg) administered just before the second synchronised oestrus did not significantly (P > 0.10) affect the cumulative pregnancy rates over three successive rounds of artificial insemination, the mating start date to the conception intervals, the conception rates to the first or second insemination, the proportion of cows submitted for insemination at the second synchronised oestrus or the proportion of cows that were not pregnant yet failed to show signs of oestrous (phantom cows) identified within each herd. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in reproductive performance between cows receiving either 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg ODB after removal of used IVP4 devices that had been inserted to resynchronise them for a second insemination.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

PubMed2003

Role of the sensitivity of detection of oestrus in the submission rate of cows treated to resynchronise oestrus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if failure to detect oestrus in cows treated to resynchronise oestrus leads to fewer cows being inseminated than are truly in oestrus. PROCEDURE: Cows in three herds were enrolled in a controlled breeding program that involved synchronisation of oestrus for a first round of artificial insemination (AI) followed by resynchronisation for a second round of AI. Just before oestrus was expected at the second round of AI, aids for the detection of oestrus were fitted, which included pedometers, radiotelemetric transmitters (HeatWatch), tail-paint and heatmount detectors. Milk samples were collected at the second round of AI (day 33, herds A and B; day 35, herd C of the treatment program) and were used in combination with pregnancy testing to determine the number of cows that were in oestrus (milk progesterone < 2.0 ng/mL) and cows that were not in oestrus (milk progesterone > 2.0 ng/mL or pregnant at second round of AI) at the time samples were collected. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity of detection of oestrus at the resynchronised oestrus was 92.5% and did not differ significantly between herds (P = 0.19). A total of 75% (60/80) of cows that were retrospectively determined to be not pregnant at the time of the second round of AI were classified as having high (> or = 2.0 ng/mL) concentrations of progesterone in milk at that time. Pregnancy testing of cows about 35 days after AI suggested that early pregnancy loss also contributed to a reduction in submission rates at the resynchronised oestrus. CONCLUSION: Failure to submit cows for insemination at a resynchronised oestrus was mainly due to cows not being in oestrus rather than due to a failure to detect oestrus.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of four methods for detection of oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronised oestrous cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity and positive predictive value of four methods for detection of oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronised oestrous cycles. PROCEDURE: Oestrous cycles in cows in three herds were synchronised for a first round of artificial insemination (AI) and then resynchronised for a second round of AI. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of four aids (pedometers, radiotelemetric transmitters [HeatWatch; HW], tail-paint and heatmount detectors) that were used to detect the resynchronised oestrus were compared. Milk progesterone concentration and pregnancy testing at 12 weeks were used as the reference standard for cows being in oestrus. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting the resynchronised oestrus, for each aid that was used, was > 80%. Tail-paint was significantly more sensitive at detecting oestrus compared to heatmount detectors (P = 0.002), but not significantly more sensitive than pedometers (P = 0.07) or HW (P = 0.55) for detecting oestrus (91.3, 85.7; 81.4 and 88.4%, respectively). Positive predictive value of HW for detecting oestrus was greater than tail-paint (P = 0.014) and heatmount detectors (P = 0.024) but not pedometers (P = 0.25; 100, 91.7, 92.9 and 87.5%, respectively). Positive predictive value of heatmount detectors was greater than pedometers in herd C (93.4% vs 73.3%; P = 0.035) but not in herds A (95.0% vs 90.0%; P = 0.56) or B (90.8% vs 100%; P = 0.10). No other significant differences in sensitivity or positive predictive value of detection of oestrus were found between aids. CONCLUSION: Tail-paint, heatmount detectors, pedometers and HW provide a high sensitivity (> 80%) and positive predictive value (> 85%) of detecting oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronized oestrous cycles.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Invited review: Treatment of cows with an extended postpartum anestrous interval.

Cows with an extended interval from calving to first ovulation (PPI) have increased intervals from calving to conception and are more likely to be culled compared with cows with a short PPI. In year-round calving dairy herds, between 11 and 38% of cows are reported as anestrus by 50 or 60 d after calving. In seasonally calving dairy herds, between 13 and 48% of cows are diagnosed as anovulatory anestrus at the start of the breeding period. Ovulation and estrus after calving are delayed when the positive feedback effects of estradiol on release of LH from the pituitary, and circulating concentrations of metabolic hormones such as insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I, are reduced by a variety of environmental factors. The main factors are limited energy intake, lower body reserves, increased partitioning of energy to milk production, suckling, and peripartum disease. Treatment options for cows with an extended PPI include hormonal and management strategies. Hormonal treatments that include a period of progesterone supplementation result in the majority of treated animals displaying estrus with a subsequent luteal phase of normal duration and improved pregnancy rates compared with untreated controls. Hormonal interventions also tend to have more predictable outcomes compared with management changes, such as manipulating body condition or dietary intakes after calving, and usually have some estrous synchronization effect, thus facilitating the use of artificial insemination. However, responses to any treatment are variable and are related to those factors that influence duration of the PPI, such as body condition and parity.

Anestrus↗

PubMed2002

Plasma, milk and faecal progesterone concentrations during the oestrous cycle of lactating dairy cows with different milk yields.

The hypotheses tested in this study were that neither average progesterone (P4) concentrations in plasma and milk nor average progesterone metabolites concentrations in faeces would differ during an oestrous cycle in two groups of cows with differing daily milk yields. High producing (HP = 8) and low producing (LP = 8) dairy cows were selected randomly for the study. Their oestrous cycles were initially synchronised using P4 and prostaglandin F2alpha. Chromic oxide capsules were administered twice daily to measure total faecal output. Samples of blood, faeces and milk were taken daily throughout one oestrous cycle, plasma and milk P4, and faecal progesterone metabolites (FP4M) assayed. The average daily milk yields in the two groups were 30.8 and 21.9l per day, respectively (P < 0.0001), although daily faecal output was similar in both the groups (HP, 7.7 versus LP, 6.9 kg DM; P = 0.24). Mean plasma and milk P4 concentrations were similar in both the groups (plasma P4, 4.12 versus 4.05 ng/ml; P = 0.3; milk P4, 8.2 versus 8.3; P = 0.9) during dioestrus. Average daily excretion of P4 to the milk was greater in HP than LP cows (252 versus 185 microg, P = 0.04). Neither concentration nor the daily yield of FP4Ms was affected by level of milk yield (concentration: 12.2 versus 11.5 microg/g; daily yield: 89.1 versus 82.9 mg per day; P > 0.05). These data showed that the concentrations of P4 in plasma and milk, and the concentrations and daily yields of FP4M were not affected by the level of daily milk yields which differed by about 41% of the LP average of 21.9l.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Effects of level of feeding and progesterone dose on plasma and faecal progesterone in ovariectomised cows.

The effects of two levels of feeding and two doses of progesterone (P4) on plasma and faecal progesterone metabolites (FP4M) were studied using a total of 24 ovariectomised (OVX), non-lactating, Holstein-Friesian cows. Cows were grazed on improved ryegrass/white clover pastures and allowed ad libitum access to pasture or were restricted to grazing for a total of 4 h per day in two 2 h periods. Progesterone (P4) was administered as one or two, simultaneous, intravaginal progesterone devices (CIDR). The cows were adapted to their pasture supply for 2 weeks before the start of the progesterone treatments. The progesterone devices were administered for 11 days and the cows were dosed with slow release chromic oxide capsules during the P4 treatment to allow faecal output (FO) to be estimated. Daily blood samples for P4 assay and weekly samples for blood metabolite assay were collected. Faecal samples were collected per rectum daily and assayed for pregnanes containing a 20-oxo-, 20alpha- or a 20beta-OH group by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Daily FO was higher (P < 0.001) for ad libitum than pasture restricted cows (6.3 vs 4.1 kg DM) but was similar for both doses of P4. The average mass of P4 released from a CIDR device over a 11-day period was higher for cows allowed ad libitum pasture compared with those on restricted pasture (0.64 vs 0.60 g; P = 0.04). Plasma P4 concentrations, however, were higher in restricted than ad libitum fed cows (1x CIDR: 1.81 vs 1.41 ng/ml; 2x CIDR: 4.10 vs 3.46 ng/ml). Increasing the progesterone dose significantly (P < 0.001) increased both the concentrations and daily totals of the faecal pregnanes assayed and total FP4M. Restricted pasture cows had higher (P < 0.001) pregnanes and FP4M concentrations than cows fed ad libitum. Daily total faecal pregnane and FP4M did not differ between feeding levels except for faecal 20alpha-pregnane which was highest for ad libitum fed cows (P < 0.05). These results showed that the plasma concentrations of P4 in CIDR-treated OVX cows were negatively associated with the level of feeding. Level of feeding and dose of P4 affected the concentrations of FP4M, but the daily excretion rate of FP4M was not positively influenced by the level of feeding.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

PubMed2002

Progesterone clearance rate in lactating dairy cows with two levels of dry matter and metabolisable energy intakes.

The aim of these studies was to determine the effect of levels of dry matter (DM) and metabolisable energy (ME) intakes on clearance rate of progesterone (P4) in dairy cows. Thirty-two lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were selected for the study and were fed indoors in individual stalls for a period of 5 weeks. They were individually offered a diet of combinations of pasture, hay and pelleted cereal grain to achieve two different levels of DM and ME. In the first trial, 16 cows were allocated to two groups: (i) high DM (HDM), and (ii) low DM (LDM) intakes, while the amount of ME intake was constant. In the second trial, 16 cows were allocated to two groups: (i) high ME, and (ii) low ME intakes with similar amount of DM intake. A GnRH-agonist (deslorelin) was initially implanted in the ear of each cow to block endogenous P4 secretion. Then 3 weeks later, a CIDR device was inserted into the vagina of each cow and left in place for 11 days. Chromic oxide (Cr(2)O(3)) capsules were administered to allow daily faecal output (FO) to be estimated. Daily blood, faecal and milk samples were taken during the period of the experiment for P4 and faecal P4 metabolites analyses. Trial 1: The average milk yield was similar among cows in high and LDM intake groups (26.7 versus 25.0 l per day, P = 0.2). The average daily FO was 7.8 kg DM in the HDM and 5.7 in the LDM cows (P < 0.0001). Average daily DM intakes were 17.3 kg and 15.4 kg in the HDM and LDM groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The average plasma P4 concentrations were similar between the two groups (1.56 versus 1.60 ng/ml, P = 0.7) but milk P4 concentrations were higher in LDM cows (4.6 versus 3.6 ng/ml, P = 0.02). The average daily excretion rate of P4 into the milk was higher in LDM cows (122.3 versus 88.5 microg, P = 0.002). The concentrations of faecal P4 metabolites (FP4M) were not influenced by the level of daily DM intake (2.85 versus 2.90 microg/g, P = 0.6). The average daily yields of FP4M were higher among cows in the HDM group (23.2 versus 16.3mg, P = 0.01). Trial 2: The average milk yield was 31.2l per day in HME cows compared to 25.0l per day in LME cows (P < 0.0001). The average daily FO was 7.8 kg DM in LME and 5.8 kg DM in HME cows (P < 0.0001), and the average DM content of faeces was higher in LME cows (15.8 versus 12.7%, P = 0.01). The average daily ME intake was 213MJ per day in HME group compared to 183MJ per day in LME group (P<0.0001). The average plasma and milk P4 concentrations were similar between the two groups (plasma P4 = 1.54 versus 1.56 ng/ml, P = 0.4; milk P4: 3.7 versus 3.6 ng/ml, P = 0.6). The average daily excretion rate of P4 into the milk was higher in HME cows (114 versus 88.5 microg, P = 0.03). Concentrations of FP4M were not influenced by the level of daily ME intake (2.5 versus 2.85 micro g/g, P = 0.08). However, daily yields of FP4M were greater in the LME group (23.2 versus 14.4 mg, P = 0.01). In conclusion, this study was unable to establish a relationship between the level of DM and ME in the diet with the excretion rates of FP4M metabolites and plasma P4 concentrations.

Animal Feed↗

PubMed2002

Temporary suppression of pulsatile LH release following a single injection of a GnRH agonist (deslorelin) in ovariectomised Holstein dairy cows.

The objective of the experiment was to investigate the potential for using a single injection of the GnRH agonist [D-Trp(6), Pro(9)-des-Gly(10)-NH(2)] GnRH-ethylamide (deslorelin) to suppress LH secretion in ovariectomised Holstein cows. Each dose of 10, 100 and 1000 microg deslorelin was injected intravenously into each of four ovariectomised cows on day 0. Blood samples were collected hourly on day 0 to profile the induced LH release. Frequent serial blood samples were collected at 10min intervals over 4h on days -3, -1, +2, +4 and +6. The injection of deslorelin induced a surge-like release of LH that begun within 1h in all cows. There was no difference between deslorelin doses in terms of maximum LH concentration, area under the LH curve (AUC) or log(10)(AUC). The average interval from injection to maximum LH concentration was longer for cows receiving 1000 microg than in those receiving 10 microg (3.5 versus 1.5h; P<0.01), though no different to 100 microg (2.8h; P>0.1). This relationship was described by a logarithmic function of deslorelin dose in micrograms (R(2)=73.3%, P<0.01). Pre-treatment smoothed mean LH concentration was significantly correlated with peak LH concentration of the induced surge: max_LH=5.37+9.57 x pre-amplitude (R(2)=33.2%, P=0.05). Similarly, LH pulse amplitude pre-deslorelin was also correlated with peak LH of the induced surge max_LH=0.07+12.9 x pre-amplitude (R(2)=53.7%, P=0.07). Pulsatile release of LH was suppressed only with the 1000 microg dose on day +2. Suppression was characterised by a reduction in mean LH, smoothed mean LH and LH pulse amplitude. By day +4, LH parameters were no different to pre-treatment ones. Pulse frequency was not affected by the treatment, although a small non-significant reduction at day +2 for 1000 microg dose was observed (3.9 versus 2.8, P=0.14). In conclusion, temporary suppression of LH output for at least 48h occurred following a single intravenous injection of 1000 microg of deslorelin, even though there were similar peak LH concentrations were for the three doses.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Restoration of LH output and 17beta-oestradiol responsiveness in acutely ovariectomised holstein dairy cows pre-treated with a GnRH agonist (deslorelin) for 10 days.

The objectives of the study were firstly to identify the role of the ovary in maintaining plasma luteinising hormone (LH) concentrations in cows treated with an implant of a potent GnRH agonist (deslorelin), and secondly to characterise the changes in LH following ovariectomy (OVX) in the same animals. Oestrus was synchronised in mature Holstein dairy cows and deslorelin implants were inserted 17 days later into two-third of the cows. A further 10 days later (day 0) all cows had bilateral OVX performed. A control group (CON; n=4) received no treatment and had blood samples collected at 15-min intervals for 8h on the day prior to OVX (day -1) and similarly on days 4 and 10. One group (DES_IN; n=4) had implants in place for the duration of the study while another group had implants removed (DES_OUT; n=4) at the time of OVX. DES_IN cows were sampled hourly at each sampling session (days -1, +4 and +10), whereas DES_OUT cows were sampled similarly to CON except on day -1 when hourly samples were collected. Predictable post-operative increases in mean LH (0.61 ng/ml versus 1.79 ng/ml; P<0.01) and LH pulse amplitude (0.66 ng/ml versus 1.56 ng/ml; day -1 versus day +10; P<0.01) occurred after CON cows were ovariectomised. Smoothed LH means showed a delayed effect of time compared to arithmetic means. Pulse frequency was unchanged following OVX in CON cows. A comparison of all cows that had been treated with deslorelin from day -1 showed a significant elevation of smoothed mean LH compared to untreated cows (0.80 ng/ml versus 0.34 ng/ml; DES_IN and DES_OUT versus CON; P<0.05). DES_IN cows had a 54% reduction in mean LH from day -1 to +4 following OVX (1.05 ng/ml versus 0.48 ng/ml; P<0.01) indicating the probable involvement of the ovary in the maintenance of elevated basal LH. No further reduction was detected by day +10. The LH response to an intramuscular (IM) injection of 500 microg 17beta-oestradiol (E2) on day +11 varied significantly between treatment groups (P<0.01). CON cows showed a typical LH surge, reaching maximum concentrations (10.3 ng/ml) at 17.3h post-injection. Even though low amplitude LH pulsatility had been restored in DES_OUT cows by day +4, there was an inconsistent response to E2 on day +12; one cow had an apparently normal surge yet, others showed only attenuated responses. Pulse amplitude in DES_OUT cows was lower at days +4 and +10 compared to CON (P<0.05). DES_IN cows did not produce any surge after E2. Mean LH prior to OVX (day -1) remained unchanged following the 500 microg oestradiol injection (0.38 ng/ml versus 0.45 ng/ml pre-E2 versus post-E2 compared to 1.05 ng/ml pre-OVX). The results of this experiment implicated ovarian involvement in maintaining elevated basal LH output in cows that were chronically treated with a GnRH agonist. Individual cows varied in their LH surge response to exogenous E2 given 12 days after implant removal, even though LH pulse amplitude and frequency had been restored.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Reproductive responses of early postpartum dairy cattle to continuous treatment with a GnRH agonist (deslorelin) for 28 days to delay the resumption of ovulation.

An experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of chronic delivery of a potent GnRH agonist (deslorelin) via subcutaneous implants to delay the resumption of ovulatory cycles in postpartum dairy cattle. Cows received either a single deslorelin implant (n=40; DES) within 7 days of calving or were untreated (n=24; CON). Blood samples were collected thrice weekly during the period the implants were in place. Plasma concentrations of progesterone (P4) and 17beta-oestradiol (E2) were measured along with selected serum metabolites. Implants were removed after 28 days and cattle monitored daily for behavioral oestrus. Serial weekly blood samples were collected to detect the occurrence of ovulation. Cows were artificially inseminated as they were detected in oestrus from 30 days after implant removal. Pregnancy status was subsequently determined by manual palpation of uterine contents at strategic intervals. Insertion of implants induced ovulation in 3/40 cows as determined by a rise in progesterone 7 days later. Deslorelin implants delayed the onset of ovulatory cycles compared with untreated herdmates (mean 43.4+/-4.2 versus 57.3+/-1.6 days postpartum; P<0.001). A noticeable delay of at least 12 days was observed between implant removal and the first animals ovulating. Mean plasma E2 concentrations during the period the implants were in place were similar for DES and CON cows that experienced a prolonged spontaneous postpartum anoestrus (low P4 >60 days), although both groups had concentrations only 20% of CON cows that had ovulated prior to 30 days postpartum. The patterns of recovery following implant removal were highly variable. A number of DES cows showed a low and transient rise in plasma progesterone around 21 days after implant removal. Some cows displayed oestrus but did not appear to form a fully functional corpus luteum with this phenomenon being more prevalent among DES cows (7 of 37 versus 1 of 21; P<0.05). Overall, significantly more DES cows were detected in oestrus without ovulating compared to CON cows. Final pregnancy rates did not differ between DES and CON groups. The mean time to conception for DES cows was longer (21.2+/-5.6 versus 41.1+/-7.4 days, CON versus DES; P<0.01). This difference was not present if the time from first ovulation to conception was compared (50.5+/-5.3 versus 43.5+/-9.3 days, CON versus DES; P>0.05). Deslorelin implants provided a reliable method of inducing anoestrus when treatment was initiated prior to 3 days postpartum. A variable pattern of recovery was observed which delayed conception but did not ultimately reduce the final proportion pregnant at the completion of mating. The study demonstrates the potential of GnRH agonists to control postpartum reproductive function to manipulate the fertility of dairy cows.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Effect of treatment with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate on ovarian follicular turnover in postpartum anoestrous cows and cows which have resumed oestrous cycles.

Two experiments were carried out to determine the effect of a low dose of progesterone (P) with and without the addition of an injection of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) on ovarian follicle dynamics, oestradiol production and LH pulsatility in postpartum anoestrous cows, compared with cows which had resumed oestrous cycles (cycling cows). In the first experiment, anoestrous Jersey cows were treated with (AN+P, n=8) or without (AN-3, n=3) a previously used intravaginal progesterone releasing (CIDR) device for 10 days, commencing 3 or 4 days after emergence of a new dominant follicle (DF1) as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Contemporary cycling cows (CYC+P, n=8) were similarly treated with used CIDR devices and injected with prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF) at the time of device insertion. Follicle turnover was monitored by daily ultrasonography and pulsatile release of LH was measured on the ninth day after device insertion. During the period of CIDR device insertion, a second dominant follicle emerged in 4/8 of the CYC+P group and 7/8 of the AN+P group (P=0.14). Maximum diameter of DF1 was greater in cows in the CYC+P compared with the AN+P group (P=0.02), but did not differ between cows in the AN+P and AN-P groups (P>0.1). Frequency of LH pulses was greater in cows in the CYC+P than AN+P group (P=0.06), and in cows in the AN+P than AN-P group (P=0.02). In the second experiment, anoestrous (n=20) and cycling (n=11) Friesian cows were treated with a new CIDR device for 6 days commencing 3 days after emergence of a new dominant follicle (DF1). Cycling cows were also injected with PGF on the day of device insertion. Half of the cows in each group were injected with 2mg ODB on the day of device insertion. Daily ultrasonography was used to monitor follicular dynamics throughout the experimental period. Follicular turnover was increased by ODB in cycling (5/5 versus 1/6; P<0.05), but not anoestrous cows (5/9 versus 4/11). Persistence of DF1 was reduced by ODB treatment in both cycling and anoestrous cows (P<0.001). Maximum diameter of DF1 was influenced by ODB treatment and reproductive status (P<0.05). In anoestrous cows in which a second dominant follicle did not emerge during the period of device insertion, the interval from emergence of DF1 to emergence of a second dominant follicle was significantly delayed by treatment with ODB (P=0.04). In conclusion, P treatment of anoestrous cows increased pulsatile release of LH, but did not induce the development of persistent follicles. Injection of ODB in association with P treatment reduced the persistence of dominant follicles in both cycling and anoestrous cows, but delayed subsequent follicular development in a proportion of anoestrous cows.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

PubMed2002

Advances in bovine theriogenology in New Zealand. 1. Pregnancy, parturition and the postpartum period.

Unique systems of breeding and calving management have been developed to allow New Zealand cattle herd owners to maintain seasonally concentrated calving patterns. Improved pastures are used as the sole ration for most beef and dairy cows with limited conservation and no grain feeding. Patterns of calving are described in relation to herd Planned Start of Calving (PSC) dates, calculated as 282 days after the first date of insemination in the preceding seasonal artificial breeding (AB) programme. Corticosteroids have been systematically used in over 80% of New Zealand dairy herds to induce premature parturition (calving induction) during the third trimester of pregnancy for about 25 years, to condense calving patterns into periods of 6-12 weeks. Widespread use of calving induction has minimised the adverse effects of declining reproductive performance in dairy herds on the sustainability of seasonally concentrated calving. The use of calving induction is now discouraged on animal welfare grounds and due to possible consequences for the marketing of New Zealand dairy products. Recent declines in the reproductive performance of dairy herds are linked to increased prevalence of extended periods of postpartum anovulatory anoestrus (AA), which has become the major form of infertility in dairy herds in New Zealand and can be related to reliance on grazed pasture as the sole diet for cows of increasing genetic merit. The prevalence of AA is influenced by by parity, breed, recent genetic origin within a breed, body condition score, herd and year. management strategies such as once-daily milking, preferential grazing or feeding of silage, have not proven as successful as hormonal treatments. Although seasonal concentrated calving has remained a standard feature of the industry's low-cost, pasture-based system of management, continuing research will be required to economically maintain this pattern.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Advances in bovine theriogenology in New Zealand. 2. Breeding management and technologies for improved reproduction.

The importance of submission rates (SR) on conception patterns in dairy herds during a short artificial breeding (AB) programme was first reported in 1973. Subsequent research has focussed on achieving 3-week SRs of 90% through improved detection of oestrus utilising tailpainting and vasectomised bulls fitted with chin-ball harnesses. Despite nutritional limitations of spring pasture as a sole diet, conception rates to first insemination of 65% have been recorded in cycling cows in many trials. Anovulatory anoestrus (AA) has become a major factor compromising SRs as well as reducing average conception rates and herd in-calf rates by 4-7 weeks after the planned start of mating (PSM). Whole herd synchronisation programmes have been developed but not widely used on dairy cows and have had only limited use on dairy heifers, despite a focus on concentrated conception patterns. The related technologies have become most commonly used to increase the SR of AA cows. Extreme variation in the weekly demand for processed semen in seasonally-intensive AB programmes has been accommodated by the development of a unique semen diluent, Caprogen. Its use has allowed sperm to be temporarily stored without freezing and used at dose rates of 1 million sperm/insemination. Sire variation with this form of semen processing is lower than with deep frozen semen. The greater use of production genes derived from Holstein-Friesian sires of North American origin in most AB programmes has left progeny with reduced reproductive performance. This effect has been greater than that associated with the increased productivity of dairy cows achieved through continued use of semen from intensively selected groups of progeny tested sires.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

The effect of timing of administration of oestradiol benzoate on characteristics of oestrus, timing of ovulation and fertility in Bos indicus heifers synchronised with a progesterone releasing intravaginal insert.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the timing of onset of oestrus and ovulation, characteristics of oestrus, and fertility in Bos indicus heifers synchronised with a progesterone releasing intravaginal insert (IVP4) and administration of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) either at the time of removal of the insert or 24 h later. DESIGN: Cohort study. PROCEDURE: Bos indicus and Bos indicus cross heifers were treated on two farms (Farm A, n = 273; Farm B, n = 47) with an IVP4 for 8 days with 1.0 mg of ODB administered at the time of device insertion and 250 mg of cloprostenol at the time of device removal. Heifers in the ODB-0 group were administered 0.75 mg of ODB at the time of device removal while heifers in the ODB-24 group were administered the same dose of ODB 24 h after device removal. Heifers were inseminated once daily after detection of oestrus. Heifers not detected in oestrus by 72 h after removal of inserts were inseminated at that time. Oestrus was detected in heifers on Farm A using heatmount detectors while on Farm B oestrus in heifers was monitored using radiotelemetry of mounting pressure. Ovarian follicular development was monitored daily in 30 heifers on Farm B from the time of administration of inserts until ovulation to a maximum of 96 h after removal of inserts, and again 11 days after removal of inserts (Day 19). A blood sample was collected from all heifers on Farm B on Day 19 and analysed for plasma concentration of progesterone. Pregnancy was diagnosed 6 to 8 weeks after insemination. RESULTS: Administration of ODB at the time of removal of inserts shortened the time interval to oestrus and ovulation (P < 0.001), increased the number of mounts recorded during oestrus (P = 0.04) and reduced the odds of pregnancy (P = 0.03). The proportion of heifers ovulating on Farm B was 67% and was not affected by treatment group (P = 0.61). The mean diameter of the largest follicle measured in ovaries was greater at the time of removal of inserts (9.1 +/- 0.6 vs 10.7 +/- 0.4; P = 0.03) and at the expected time of the LH surge (8.1 +/- 0.4 vs 11.5 +/- 0.3 mm; P < 0.001) in heifers that ovulated compared to heifers that failed to ovulate, respectively. Emergence of a new follicular wave was not detected during the synchronisation treatment in heifers that failed to ovulate. Concentrations of progesterone in plasma on Day 19 were less in non-pregnant heifers (P = 0.05) compared to heifers subsequently diagnosed as pregnant to insemination and were affected by the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Administration of ODB at the time of removal of inserts can shorten the time interval to oestrus and ovulation and can reduce fertility when insemination is carried out once daily. Further work is needed to determine if prolonged suppression of follicular development, anovulatory oestrus and premature ovulation occuring in some heifers is associated with administration of ODB.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

PubMed2002

Synchronisation of oestrus and reproductive performance of dairy cows following administration of oestradiol benzoate or gonadotrophin releasing hormone during a synchronised pro-oestrus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB) administered following a synchronised pro-oestrus on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows and the submission rates of non-pregnant cows following resynchronisation. DESIGN: Cohort study. PROCEDURE: Lactating Holstein cows enrolled in a controlled breeding program were first treated with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP4) for 8 days, 2.0 mg of ODB intramuscular (i.m.) at device insertion (Day 0), an analogue of PGF2alpha at device removal and either 1.0 mg of ODB i.m., 24 h after device removal (ODB group, n = 242), or 0.25 mg of a GnRH agonist (GnRH group, n = 152) injected i.m. approximately 34 h after device removal. Every cow was artificially inseminated between 49 and 56 h after removal of its insert (Day 10). Cows detected in oestrus 1 day after artificial insemination (AI) that were not detected in oestrus on the previous day were re-inseminated on that day. All cows treated on Day 0 were resynchronised for reinsemination by insertion of a used IVP4 device on Day 23. Oestradiol benzoate at a dose of 1.0 mg was administered i.m. at the time of device insertion. Inserts were removed 8 days later (Day 31) and 1.0 mg of ODB was injected i.m. 24 h later. Those cows detected in oestrus between Days 31 and 35 were artificially inseminated. On Day 46 these cows were resynchronised for a third round of AI by insertion of an IVP4 device, used previously to synchronise cows for the first and second rounds of AI, and administration of 1.0 mg of ODB i.m.. Eight days later inserts were removed. Cows detected in oestrus between Days 54 and 58 were artificially inseminated. Bulls were run with the herd between rounds of AI and removed after 21 weeks of mating. RESULTS: Treatment with ODB or GnRH at the first synchronised pro-oestrus did not significantly alter the reproductive performance over three rounds of AI or over a 21-week breeding period. Treatment also did not alter submission rates at the second round of AI or the proportion of non-pregnant and non-return cows ('phantom' cows) detected and did not result in significant differences in concentrations of progesterone in plasma 10 and 18 days after removal of inserts at the first round of AI. Treatment with GnRH reduced the proportion of cows detected in oestrus at the first round of AI (36.2 vs 97.5%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administration of GnRH compared to ODB at a synchronised pro-oestrus results in similar reproductive performance. Treatment with GnRH reduced the proportion of cows detected in oestrus following treatment. This may offer advantages to the way AI is managed by enabling insemination at a fixed-time and removing the need for the detection of oestrus.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

PubMed2001

The effect of level of feed intake on progesterone clearance rate by measuring faecal progesterone metabolites in grazing dairy cows.

The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of level of feed intake of pasture on P4 clearance rates in dairy cows. Twelve non-lactating Holstein-Friesian cows aged 4-9 years were randomly allocated to a restricted or ad libitum group. The ad libitum group had unrestricted access to irrigated pasture, whereas the restricted group had access for only 2h per day. Each animal was drenched orally twice daily with a chromic oxide capsule to allow daily feed intake to be estimated from faecal output (FO). Endogenous progesterone (P4) production was eliminated by subcutanously implanting a capsule containing 6 mg of a potent GnRH-agonist (deslorelin) into the ear of each animal 3 weeks before inserting a CIDR device containing 1.9 g P4 into the vagina. Two luteolytic PGF2alpha were given 10 days later. Each device was removed after 11 days and residual P4 measured. Daily plasma samples were assayed for P4. Faecal samples were also taken daily and assayed for pregnanes (FP4M) containing a 20-oxo-, a 20alpha- or a 20beta-OH group with EIAs. The average daily dry matter (DM) intake of pasture was higher for cows in the ad libitum group (15.9 versus 6.3 kg DM, P=0.001). Their plasma P4 concentrations were lower (1.08 versus 1.71 ng/ml, P=0.05), even though the average residual P4 content of the used CIDR devices was not affected by feed intake (1.20 versus 1.25 g, P>0.05). The concentrations of FP4M were not affected by level of feed intake (20-oxo-: 3.3 versus 1.7, 20alpha-: 3.5 versus 3.7, 20beta-: 2.1 versus 3.2 microg/g DM). Daily excretion rates of 20-oxo- and 20alpha- were higher in ad libitum cows (20-oxo-: 17.8 versus 4.3mg per day, P=0.05; 20alpha-: 18.2 versus 8.9 mg per day, P=0.001), but daily yield of faecal 20beta- was not affected by feed intake (11.9 versus 8.6 mg per day, P=0.5). These results show that there was a negative relationship between feed intake and plasma P4 concentrations in these CIDR-treated GnRH-downregulated Holstein cows. Concentrations of FP4M were not affected by level of feed intake or FO, but daily excretion rate of FP4M was associated with the volume of faeces.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Progesterone metabolism in ovariectomised non-lactating Holstein-Friesian cows treated with progesterone with two levels of feed intake.

The goal of this study was to measure the effects of level of feeding and the form of progesterone (P4) administration on the concentrations and yields of faecal P4 metabolites relative to differences in plasma P4 concentrations in non-lactating cows. Six non-lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were ovariectomised (OVX) and allocated to two groups: (i) P4 by subcutaneous injection (P4-s.c., n=3); and (ii) P4 administration per vaginum (P4-p.v., n=3). Each cow in the P4-s.c. group was injected subcutaneously once daily with 200mg P4. Each cow in the P4-p.v. group had a CIDR device inserted for 11 days when it was removed and replaced with a second device for further 11 days. Cows were fed a ration containing lucerne (33%) and oaten (66%) chaff at a maintenance level (M) in two portions in the first period of the study, and at a half-maintenance (1/2M) level during the second period. Chromic oxide capsules (Cr(2)O(3)) were administered twice daily to allow faecal output (FO) to be estimated. Plasma P4 and faecal P4 metabolites (FP4M; 20-oxo-pregnanes, 20alpha- and 20beta-OH-pregnanes) were measured during the treatment period. Daily FO declined after reducing the M diet to 1/2M (4.77 versus 2.61kg; P<0.01), whereas plasma P4 concentrations increased in the P4-s.c. group (4.2 versus 6.2ng/ml; P<0.05), but not in the P4-p.v. group (0.9 versus 1.0ng/ml; P>0.2). The mass of P4 released from a CIDR device during each 11-day period (M or 1/2M) was similar (0.66 versus 0.63g). Faecal 20-oxo-pregnanes (20-oxo-) concentrations were not affected by day or level of feeding, whereas faecal 20alpha-OH (20alpha-) and 20beta-OH (20beta-) concentrations were increased with the 1/2M diet in the P4-s.c. group (4.3 versus 5.6 microg/gDM; 2.2 versus 5.6 microg/gDM, respectively; P<0.05), but not in the P4-p.v. group (2.3 versus 2.7 microg/gDM; 1.7 versus 3.04 microg/gDM P>0.05). These changes in concentration only partly compensated for the reduced FO with the 1/2M diets as daily yields of FP4M (20-oxo- and 20alpha-) were greater during the M diet period (20-oxo-: 6.9 versus 4.1 microg/gDM; 2.7 versus 1.5 microg/gDM, for P4-s.c. and P4-p.v. groups, respectively; P<0.05, 20alpha-: 19.9 versus 13.6 microg/gDM; 10.9 versus 6.6 microg/gDM for P4-s.c. and P4-p.v. groups, respectively; P<0.05). The level of feeding and the route of P4 administration had key roles in controlling P4 concentrations in blood and daily FP4M yield.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

PubMed2000

Hormonal and ovarian responses to a 5-day progesterone treatment in anoestrous dairy cows in the third week post-partum.

Primiparous cows with low body condition at calving have an extended anovulatory period. Induction of ovulation and oestrus is possible with progesterone treatment but the response to this treatment differs between Friesian and Jersey breeds. The objective of this study was to describe changes in pulsatile LH secretion and the synchrony of developing ovarian follicles that occur during a progesterone treatment period of 5 days in primiparous anovulatory cows. The experimental model compared the progesterone treatment with spontaneous post-partum changes as well as a breed comparison in a factorial design.Thirty-six cows (Jersey n=19 and Friesian n=17) were managed to calve with a low body condition score (BCS<4. 5). Daily changes in ovarian follicle size were observed with transrectal ultrasonography in each cow from 8 days post-partum. Thirty of these cows were diagnosed to be anovulatory at 12-18 days post-partum (day 0) and allocated to a treatment (n=16) or a control group (n=14), balanced for breed. Each treated cow had a progesterone-releasing controlled internal drug-releasing (CIDR) device inserted vaginally for 5 days while control cows were left untreated. Changes in plasma LH concentrations were measured with intensive blood sampling over 8 h on days -1, 1, and 4. Blood samples were also collected daily (06:00 h) for determination of plasma progesterone as well as oestradiol concentrations on days 6 and 8. Treatment with progesterone was associated with a transient initial decrease (day 1) in both LH pulse frequency and mean LH concentrations after device insertion, but both had returned to pre-treatment levels by day 4. Jersey cows had a greater pulse frequency, but there was no breed difference in mean LH concentrations. Patterns of ovarian follicle growth were affected by progesterone treatment with an increase in diameter of the dominant follicle (DF) identified after treatment initiation. This followed an earlier emergence of a new DF after device insertion. Follicular response to progesterone was dependent on the diameter of the DF present at treatment initiation. Those follicles >/=9 mm were replaced by a new DF during treatment such that the DF observed at the time of device removal was large (>/=9 mm) and growing in 13/16 cases.Progesterone was not effective for the induction of an LH surge, ovulation and oestrus in anovulatory cows with a low BCS. However, treatment was associated with synchronous development of a DF so that it was large and growing at the end of the treatment period in most cases. This synchronous development may be due to the transient suppression of LH and the presence of an LH-dependent DF.

Anestrus↗