PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K L Simonsen

Publications and source records attributed to K L Simonsen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Adding confidence to gene expression clustering.

It has been well established that gene expression data contain large amounts of random variation that affects both the analysis and the results of microarray experiments. Typically, microarray data are either tested for differential expression between conditions or grouped on the basis of profiles that are assessed temporally or across genetic or environmental conditions. While testing differential expression relies on levels of certainty to evaluate the relative worth of various analyses, cluster analysis is exploratory in nature and has not had the benefit of any judgment of statistical inference. By using a novel dissimilarity function to ascertain gene expression clusters and conditional randomization of the data space to illuminate distinctions between statistically significant clusters of gene expression patterns, we aim to provide a level of confidence to inferred clusters of gene expression data. We apply both permutation and convex hull approaches for randomization of the data space and show that both methods can provide an effective assessment of gene expression profiles whose coregulation is statistically different from that expected by random chance alone.

Cluster Analysis↗

Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association.

Advances in marker technology have made a dense marker map a reality. If each marker is considered separately, and separate tests for association with a disease gene are performed, then multiple testing becomes an issue. A common solution uses a Bonferroni correction to account for multiple tests performed. However, with dense marker maps, neighboring markers are tightly linked and may have associated alleles; thus tests at nearby marker loci may not be independent. When alleles at different marker loci are associated, the Bonferroni correction may lead to a conservative test, and hence a power loss. As an alternative, for tests of association that use family data, we propose a Monte Carlo procedure that provides a global assessment of significance. We examine the case of tightly linked markers with varying amounts of association between them. Using computer simulations, we study a family-based test for association (the transmission/disequilibrium test), and compare its power when either the Bonferroni or Monte Carlo procedure is used to determine significance. Our results show that when the alleles at different marker loci are not associated, using either procedure results in tests with similar power. However, when alleles at linked markers are associated, the test using the Monte Carlo procedure is more powerful than the test using the Bonferroni procedure. This proposed Monte Carlo procedure can be applied whenever it is suspected that markers examined have high amounts of association, or as a general approach to ensure appropriate significance levels and optimal power.

Alleles↗

A Monte Carlo permutation approach to choosing an affection status model for bipolar affective disorder.

A permutation test is proposed for assessing affection status models. The test uses marker data from regions with prior evidence of linkage to susceptibility genes, and three different test statistics are examined. We applied the test to the GAW10 data and found no evidence on chromosome 18 to reject the affection status model that groups individuals diagnosed with either bipolar I, bipolar II or unipolar. The chromosome 5 data gave similar results, and further suggested that individuals diagnosed with unipolar-single episode not be included as affected. A preliminary power study suggested that one of the proposed statistics, S, is to be preferred in certain circumstances.

Bipolar Disorder↗

Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data.

A class of statistical tests based on molecular polymorphism data is studied to determine size and power properties. The class includes Tajima's D statistic as well as the D* and F* tests proposed by Fu and Li. A new method of constructing critical values for these tests is described. Simulations indicate that Tajima's test is generally most powerful against the alternative hypotheses of selective sweep, population bottleneck, and population subdivision, among tests within this class. However, even Tajima's test can detect a selective sweep or bottleneck only if it has occurred within a specific interval of time in the recent past or population subdivision only when it has persisted for a very long time. For greatest power against the particular alternatives studied here, it is better to sequence more alleles than more sites.

Computer Simulation↗