K Lugger | PubMed Health

PubMed1998

Feature extraction for on-line EEG classification using principal components and linear discriminants.

The study focuses on the problems of dimensionality reduction by means of principal component analysis (PCA) in the context of single-trial EEG data classification (i.e. discriminating between imagined left- and right-hand movement). The principal components with the highest variance, however, do not necessarily carry the greatest information to enable a discrimination between classes. An EEG data set is presented where principal components with high variance cannot be used for discrimination. In addition, a method based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA), is introduced that detects principal components which can be used for discrimination, leading to data sets of reduced dimensionality but similar classification accuracy.

Brain Damage, Chronic↗

PubMed1998

Separability of EEG signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters.

Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings during right and left motor imagery can be used to move a cursor to a target on a computer screen. Such an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) can provide a new communication channel to replace an impaired motor function. It can be used by, e.g., patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to develop a simple binary response in order to reply to specific questions. Four subjects participated in a series of on-line sessions with an EEG-based cursor control. The EEG was recorded from electrodes overlying sensory-motor areas during left and right motor imagery. The EEG signals were analyzed in subject-specific frequency bands and classified on-line by a neural network. The network output was used as a feedback signal. The on-line error (100%-perfect classification) was between 10.0 and 38.1%. In addition, the single-trial data were also analyzed off-line by using an adaptive autoregressive (AAR) model of order 6. With a linear discriminant analysis the estimated parameters for left and right motor imagery were separated. The error rate obtained varied between 5.8 and 32.8% and was, on average, better than the on-line results. By using the AAR-model for on-line classification an improvement in the error rate can be expected, however, with a classification delay around 1 s.

Adult↗