Biomedical subjects

K M Cienkowski

Publications and source records attributed to K M Cienkowski.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new clinical assessment, the Dynamic Assessment of Hearing Aids (DAHA), for a large clinical population. Unlike traditional questionnaire methods, the DAHA has patients use an intuitive graphical computer interface to record visual analogue ratings of satisfaction with various features of their hearing aids (e.g. clarity, cost, appearance). Data were collected from 191 participants.A subset of participants returned for retest. The DAHA items assess satisfaction with hearing aids within four domains: communication, physical features, sound quality, and personal reactions. The concurrent validity was determined by comparing DAHA results to those obtained with the satisfaction with amplification in daily life (SADL). Ratings for personal reactions to hearing aids indicate the most satisfaction, and ratings for communication (especially group conversations and phone use) indicate the least satisfaction. The DAHA total score was found to have good test/retest and high internal consistency. Concurrent validity was supported by a strong correlation between total scores on the DAHA and the SADL. Results suggest the DAHA maybe an effective tool for clinical use.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2001

The hearing aid 'effect' revisited in young adults.

Hearing impairment is a common ailment in older adults. However, the acceptance of hearing aids by hearing-impaired individuals remains poor. The main reasons given by hearing-impaired individuals for not acquiring a hearing aid are primarily psychosocial in nature. Research suggests that individuals with hearing loss believe that wearing hearing aids will cause them to be perceived as old and/or less competent. The purpose of the present study was to determine the perceptions of young adults towards hearing loss and hearing aids and to compare them to the perceptions of older adults with hearing impairment. A version of the 'Attitudes Toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire' was administered to young adults and older adults with hearing loss. Results suggest that young adults do not associate hearing aids with ageing or diminished cognitive function, although findings suggest reticence towards wearing amplification. The implications of this study are discussed in terms of increasing public awareness of hearing loss.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Subjective vs. objective intelligibility of sentences in listeners with hearing loss.

The relation between rated intelligibility and correct key word repetitions of sentences was examined in listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. Ten lists of 10 CID sentences were arranged in two randomly ordered groups. Listeners were asked to complete two tasks: (1) rate the intelligibility of 50 sentences on a scale of 0 to 100%, and (2) repeat each of the 50 sentences, which were scored as the number of key words repeated correctly. Sentences were presented at five signal-to-noise ratios. The start level for sentence presentation was established using the method of adjustment and the Revised Speech Intelligibility Rating passages. Correlations of rated intelligibility and correct repetition were 0.85 for listeners with normal hearing and 0.86 for listeners with hearing loss. This study confirms the earlier work of Speaks, Parker, Harris, and Kuhl (1972), and the findings demonstrate that listeners with hearing loss preserve the ability to rate the intelligibility of speech.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Acclimatization to hearing aids.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate acclimatization to hearing aids. DESIGN: Forty-eight subjects took part in a study in which hearing aid benefit was measured four times over the initial 3 mos of participation. At the start, 24 subjects were experienced hearing aid users and 24 had never worn a hearing aid before. Subjects wore one of three models of hearing aid with one of six different configurations (combination of frequency response and method of output limiting). Hearing aid benefit was measured with CID W-1 spondees and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) test. Testing took place on Days 0 (day of fitting), 30, 60, and 90. Analyses of variance were used to determine whether hearing aid benefit changed over time as a function of hearing aid user status, hearing aid configuration, and hearing aid volume setting. RESULTS: There were small, nonsignificant changes in hearing aid benefit over the test sessions with both sets of test materials. There were no interactions between hearing aid benefit over time and hearing aid user status or hearing aid volume setting. There was an interaction between benefit over time and hearing aid configuration on one test measure only. CONCLUSIONS: The data showed little evidence of acclimatization over the 3 mo of hearing aid use. The test materials used here were low- to mid-frequency sensitive, and, therefore, it is concluded that if acclimatization did occur, it did so primarily at high frequencies. Because the HINT test has good face validity to everyday listening situations, it is suggested that the clinical ramifications of acclimatization are probably small.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the Attitudes Toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To refine and statistically validate the Attitudes Toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire (ALHQ) so that it will be appropriate for clinical application and to understand some of the personality attributes underlying attitudes toward hearing loss. DESIGN: An American-English version of an ALHQ, originally designed by Brooks (1989), was completed by 226 men; a subset of 80 also completed personality questionnaires. All subjects underwent pure-tone testing and speech audiometry. Factor analysis was used to extract scales from the ALHQ. Reliability analyses using Cronbach's alpha were carried out on each scale. Test-retest reliability was evaluated from questionnaires completed 6 to 18 mo after initial administration. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the audiometric and personality determinants of attitudes. RESULTS: Five reliable scales were extracted from a 24-question version of the ALHQ: 1) Social and Emotional Impact of Hearing Loss, 2) Acceptance/ Adjustment to Hearing Loss, 3) Perceived Support from Significant Others, 4) Hearing Aid Stigma, and 5) Awareness of Hearing Loss. Audiometric data explained little of the variance in attitude scores; age and other demographic factors did not correlate with attitudes either. The personality traits of extroversion, self-esteem, and anxiety/neuroticism played a larger role in determining attitude. CONCLUSIONS: The ALHQ is psychometrically acceptable and is a potentially useful clinical tool. It is quick and easy to complete and to score and could be used as a basis for counseling and for following attitude change in patients over time.

Adaptation, Psychological↗