Biomedical subjects

K M Denelsbeck

Publications and source records attributed to K M Denelsbeck.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1995

Interpretation time of serial chest CT examinations with stacked-metaphor workstation versus film alternator.

PURPOSE: Interpretation time of serial staging chest CT cases, which each contained current and previous examinations, with a simple prototype workstation called filmstack was experimentally compared with interpretation time with a film alternator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The filmstack displayed a "stack" of sections for each examination; user controls allowed rapid selection of preset attenuation windows and both synchronized and unsynchronized scrolling. Eight radiologists were timed as they used the filmstack and the film alternator to interpret four ergonomically complex serial CT cases. RESULTS: All reports dictated on the basis of findings with filmstack and film were of acceptable clinical accuracy. The time to examine a case with filmstack was significantly faster than the time with film, including the time to load and unload the alternator (99% confidence [P = .01]). There was no statistically significant difference in interpretation time between filmstack and prehung film. CONCLUSION: Use of a low-cost stacked CT workstation with a single 1,024 x 1,024 monitor is an effective means of interpreting cases that require comparison of multiple CT examinations.

Computer Systems↗

PubMed1994

How many screens does a CT workstation need?

A considerable number of prototype and commercial workstations have been developed during the last 10 years for electronic display of computed tomographic (CT) images during clinical interpretation. These CT workstations have varied widely in the number and size of monitors available for the display of the medical images ranging from a single 1,024 x 1,204-pixel monitor, to eight 2,500 x 2,000-pixel monitors. Image display times also have varied considerably, ranging from as fast as .11 seconds, to as slow as 26 seconds to fill a single monitor. No consensus has formed in the workstation community with regard to display area and response time requirements. To address this issue, we have constructed a time-motion model of CT interpretation. Model accuracy is experimentally verified with three workstations as well as with the film alternator. In general, CT interpretations with an electronic workstation become faster as display area increases and display time decreases. Results can be used by workstation designers and purchasers to roughly estimate differences in interpretation speeds among contending CT workstation designs.

Computer Peripherals↗

PubMed1994

Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.

An ergonomically simple prototype workstation with two 900 x 1,100-pixel monitors capable of displaying eight full-resolution computed tomography (CT) images in 0.2 seconds, was compared with film for interpretation of computed tomographic images of the chest and abdomen. The hardware platform for this workstation cost less than $11,500 in 1993. A repeated-measures experiment was used to generate average interpretation times of 6.17 minutes for the workstation and 6.03 minutes for the film, including loading and unloading films, with three of the four subjects averaging about a minute longer for each workstation interpretation. All dictated reports were of clinically acceptable accuracy. All radiologists stated that workstations based on this design would be an acceptable clinical tool. However, observation suggested human working-memory strain among infrequent CT readers that could indicate the need for additional training. These data suggest that low-cost workstations can have practical application in interpretation of digital medical images such as CT, with the possibility of small increases in interpretation time.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Eye movement during computed tomography interpretation: eyetracker results and image display-time implications.

Stacked displays hold the potential for accurate interpretation of multiple computed tomography (CT) studies on a low-cost workstation. But can such a display scroll as quickly as radiologists can move their eyes to the next image on a film? To address this question, eye-movement duration during CT chest interpretation was recorded using an electronic eye tracker. Adjacent eye movements (+/- 1 image in sequence) averaged 0.54 seconds. Time motion analysis indicates that a CT workstation using a stacked approach with a 0.2-second image display time and a simple interaction can display the next image in less than 0.4 seconds, so a stacked approach should allow a low-cost workstation to facilitate acceptable interpretation of multiple CT or magnetic resonance studies. However, nonadjacent eye movements is likely to take longer and radiologist behavior may be effected.

Data Display↗