PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K M Foley

Publications and source records attributed to K M Foley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Advances in cancer pain.

Advances in cancer pain research and management are an example of the advances that have occurred within the field of neuro-oncology, the medical discipline that includes the diagnosis and treatment of primary central nervous system neoplasms, metastatic and nonmetastatic neurological complications of cancer originating outside the nervous system, and pain associated with cancer. Progress in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, coupled with advances in our understanding of the anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, and psychology of pain perception, has led to improved care of the patient with pain of malignant origin. Currently, specialized methods of cancer diagnosis and treatment provide the most direct approach to treating cancer pain by treating the cause of the pain. Yet, before the introduction of successful antitumor therapy, when treatment of the cause of the pain has failed or when injury to bone, soft tissue, or nerve has occurred as a result of therapy, appropriate pain management is essential.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1998

Pain and the barriers to its relief at the end of life: a lesson for improving end of life health care.

Pain among cancer patients is a common distressing symptom that frequently affects physical functioning, social interaction, psychological status, and quality of life. Despite the extensive body of knowledge available regarding cancer pain assessment and management, it often remains untreated, thereby diminishing the quality of patient care at the end of life. Recommendations on how to remove these barriers, as well as to improve care of the dying in general, need to be implemented by the U.S. government.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1996

Guidelines in the care of the dying cancer patient.

The care of patients in the final stages of cancer requires a high level of clinical vigilance and skill to ensure that the passage from life to death is as free from suffering as possible. Patients who are dying have a right to adequate relief of physical and psychological symptoms, and they and their families have a right to adequate support. The care of patients and their families requires (1) interdisciplinary cooperation of a healthcare team incorporating physicians, nurses, social workers, and other auxiliary supports, and (2) a high level of clinical flexibility to address the evolving needs of the patient and family. Participation in this process challenges the clinician's emotional resources and medical skills. There is, however, the potential for professional satisfaction in helping to orchestrate a "good death," because the relief of suffering is at the very heart of medicine. Familiarity with guidelines in the care of the dying can reduce the potential for distress in this important clinical endeavor.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1996

Palliative medicine: providing care when cure is not possible. A roundtable discussion: Part I.

Palliative medicine describes the care of patients with advanced disease. When cure is no longer possible, the goal becomes control of pain, other symptoms, and psychological distress. In the United States, palliation has been pioneered by the hospice movement for patients with disseminated cancer and AIDS. Palliative care is also appropriate for patients with many of the chronic diseases of aging. For medical, humanitarian, financial, and legal reasons, physicians are being called on to provide palliative care when they make the diagnosis of all illness that is unresponsive to curative treatment.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1996

A peaceful death: how to manage pain and provide quality care. A roundtable discussion: Part 2.

One of the most important components of a peaceful death is adequate control of pain and other distressing symptoms, such as dyspnea, agitation, and restlessness. Pain is an important symptom in 75 to 80% of noncancer patients in the last year of life. Opioid analgesics are often the mainstay of pain treatment for dying patients. A primary care physician also needs to know about anesthetic and neurosurgical approaches, the use of cognitive behavioral approaches, and the availability of specialized pain experts. A sizeable minority of physicians receive requests for an assisted death, which should be seen as a cry for help. The most useful function of advance directives is that they open an avenue for discussion between the doctor and the patient about a difficult subject.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1995

Opioid pharmacotherapy in the management of cancer pain: a survey of strategies used by pain physicians for the selection of analgesic drugs and routes of administration.

BACKGROUND: This survey documents the strategies used by pain control physicians in the selection of opioid drugs and routes of administration in the management of inpatients referred to a cancer pain service. METHODS: The following approaches were prospectively evaluated during the treatment of 100 consecutive inpatients: 1) the influence of the evaluation of the goals of care on decision making, 2) selection of opioid drugs, 3) indications for changing opioid drugs and the frequency with which this strategy is used, and 4) selection of route of administration. RESULTS: Eighty of the 100 patients underwent a total of 182 changes in drug, route, or both drug and route before discharge or death. The major reasons for change were to improve the convenience of treatment regimen in the setting of adequate pain relief (31.4%), diminish side effects in the setting of controlled pain (25.0%), reduce the invasiveness of therapy in the setting of controlled pain (19.3%), and simultaneously improve pain control and reduce opioid toxicity (17.7%). When opioid toxicity was the reason for change, physicians changed the opioid drug in 71% of cases and the route in 29%. When convenience or invasiveness were targeted, the physicians changed the route in 61% of cases and the opioid in 39%. Forty-four patients required one or more change in the opioid, and 20 required 2 or more changes (range, 2-6 changes). At the time of discharge (n = 82), morphine was more commonly selected than hydromorphone or fentanyl (39% vs. 23% vs. 17%) and the routes of administration were oral (57%), transdermal (18%), intravenous (18%), subcutaneous (5%), and intraspinal (4%). Therapeutic changes were associated with improvement in physician-recorded pain intensity and a lower prevalence of cognitive impairment, hallucinations, nausea and vomiting, and myoclonus among patients who were discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate the application of strategies for selections of opioid drugs and their route of administration that are recommended in current guidelines for the management of cancer pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Misconceptions and controversies regarding the use of opioids in cancer pain.

The WHO has created a Cancer Pain Relief Programme and developed guidelines for the treatment of cancer pain. Implementation of the analgesic guidelines, assurance of drug availability (specifically opioids), education of healthcare professionals, and designating cancer pain as a priority for all national cancer control programmes are the major goals. Recent studies of medical students, physicians, nurses and state medical boards demonstrate a significant lack of knowledge with regard to the theoretical and practical understanding of the use of analgesic drugs, particularly opioids, in the management of cancer pain. Communication between physicians and patients about pain symptoms has also been shown to be problematic. Limited availability of opioids, their excessive regulation, and the lack of use of alternatives to systemic analgesics also prevent adequate management. Although analgesic drug therapy is the mainstay of treatment, opioid use remains a controversial issue. Some of the controversies include their role in the management of neuropathic pain, which has been suggested to be 'opioid-resistant', as well as the choice of opioid drug. A third controversy is the route of administration. The impetus for the development of novel routes has come from the goals of maximising analgesia, minimising side effects, and providing convenient dosing schedules for patients who require parenteral administration. Other important controversial issues are the development of tolerance and the relationship of pain management to patient requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1995

Pain and depression in patients with newly diagnosed pancreas cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of pain and depression, their correlation, and their effect on quality of life in patients with recently diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional pain and psychosocial distress were assessed using validated instruments, including the Memorial Pain Assessment Card (MPAC), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hopelessness Scale (BHS), and Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC). Patients were evaluated before their first operation for PC or first treatment with chemotherapy at a large tertiary-care cancer center. RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients with proven PC were studied: 83 before their operation and 47 before their first chemotherapy treatment. At the time of study entrance, 37% of patients had no pain and an additional 34% had pain that was mild or less severe. Only 29% of patients had moderate, strong, or severe pain. Chemotherapy patients reported significantly more intense pain than did preoperative patients (P = .02). Symptoms of depression were assessed using the BDI and BHS scales. A substantial minority of patients (38%) had BDI scores > or = 15, which suggests high levels of depressive symptoms. There was a significant correlation between increasing pain and depressive symptoms among those who experienced pain. Quality of life was assessed using the Weekly Activity Checklist (WAC) and the FLIC. Compared with patients who had no pain or mild pain, patients with moderate or greater pain had significantly impaired functional activity (P = .03) and poorer quality-of-life scores (P = .02) when compared with those with lesser degrees of pain. There were significant correlations between increasing pain and depression and between pain and depressive symptoms and impaired quality of life and function. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that moderate or severe pain and symptoms of depression are not as prevalent in recently diagnosed PC patients as is generally believed. However, one third have inadequate pain control despite the use of oral analgesics. These patients can be identified by the use of a simple self-report instrument (the MPAC card). Quality of life and function are adversely affected by moderate or greater levels of perceived pain intensity. A simple and rapid assessment is possible and can identify high-risk patients in need of intervention that may improve quality of life.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1995

Dextromethorphan shows efficacy in experimental pain (nociception) and opioid tolerance.

The oral antitussive dextromethorphan is a clinically available N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. Dextromethorphan has analgesic efficacy in the experimental formalin test, blocks the nociceptive activation of the immediate-early gene, c-fos proto-oncogene, and prevents and reverses the development of opiate analgesic tolerance in experimental models. These data suggest that dextromethorphan should be evaluated in a controlled clinical trial for analgesic efficacy in zoster-associated neuralgia.

Dextromethorphan↗
PubMed1994

Therapeutic and neurotoxic effects of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Despite expectations that 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) would prove active primarily in lymphoproliferative diseases, early reports suggested unexpected high activity of this drug in heavily pretreated children with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) at a maximally tolerated dose of 8.9 mg/m2/day for 5 days. In view of these findings, we conducted an escalating dose trial of 2-CdA in adult patients with relapsed or resistant AML. Thirty-six patients who had received extensive prior therapy were treated at 9 dose levels of 2-CdA at daily doses ranging from 5 to 21 mg/m2 for 5 days. 2-CdA eliminated leukemic blasts from the peripheral blood in 32 of 36 cases; however, bone marrow hypoplasia was seen only at daily dose levels > or = 15 mg/m2. We observed a total of 3 complete remissions: 1 at the 15 mg/m2/d dose level and 2 at the 21 mg/m2/d dose level; these responses persisted for 3, 2, and 3 months, respectively. Although prolonged myelosuppression would have been dose-limiting at 21 mg/m2/d for 5 days, the most important adverse effect was the development of a sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. This reaction, whose onset was substantially delayed after completion of drug treatment, was observed in 2 of 5 patients at the 19 mg/m2/d level and in 4 of 4 evaluable patients at the 21 mg/m2/d level. Pathologically, this process was characterized by axonal degeneration and secondary demyelination. Other side effects included reactivation of a posttransplant Epstein-Barr virus-related lymphoma in 1 patient and tumor lysis syndrome. We conclude that the maximally tolerable dose of 2-CdA in adult patients (17 mg/m2/d for 5 days) in approximately twofold in excess of that previously reported in children and that the limiting toxic effect is a degenerative neuropathic disorder. We confirm that this drug has definite activity in AML, but the magnitude of this effect needs to be determined in larger numbers of patients who have received less extensive therapy. This agent deserves further evaluation in patients with both AML and acute lymphoblastic leukemia at these higher doses and perhaps as part of a preparative regimen for patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Pain in ovarian cancer patients. Prevalence, characteristics, and associated symptoms.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence, characteristics, and impact of pain and other symptoms have not been studied systematically in women with ovarian cancer. Anecdotally, pain has been associated with the onset of the disease and is a common problem among those with advanced cancer; symptoms other than pain appear to be highly prevalent. Given the profound influence of pain and other symptoms on quality of life, the evaluation of these phenomena could provide data relevant to the clinical management of these patients and advance quality of life research in the area of symptom assessment. METHODS: Questionnaires were completed by 111 inpatients and 40 outpatients with ovarian cancer who were undergoing treatment at a cancer center. Measures included a comprehensive pain questionnaire; the Rand Mental Health Inventory, Functional Living Index--Cancer; and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. RESULTS: The sample (N = 151) represented 74% of the eligible patients. The median age was 55 years (range, 23-86), 82% had Stage III or IV disease at presentation, and 69% had active disease at the time of the survey. Pain, fatigue, and psychologic distress were the most prevalent symptoms. Sixty-two percent (N = 94) described a pain syndrome that preceded the onset or recurrence of the disease, and 42% (N = 63) reported "persistent or frequent pain" during the preceding 2 weeks. The latter pain had a median duration of 2 weeks (range, less than 1 to 756 weeks) and usually was in the abdominopelvic region (80%), frequent or almost constant (66%), and moderate to severe. Most patients reported moderate or greater pain-related interference with various aspects of function, particularly activity (68%), mood (62%), work (62%), and overall enjoyment of life (61%). Performance status, inpatient status, and unmarried status were significant predictors of pain presence or intensity, and both performance status and extent of tumor were significant predictors of pain interference with function. CONCLUSIONS: Among those with ovarian cancer, greater than 40% experienced pain that substantially undetermined function in one half to two thirds of these patients. Impaired performance status is associated most strongly with pain. The onset or recurrence of disease often is heralded by a stereotypic pain syndrome.

Adult↗