BACKGROUND: Numerous studies advocate the use of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) for abdominal trauma, but none have documented its ability to diagnose specific injuries. This study tests the hypothesis that DL can accurately identify all significant intra-abdominal injuries in trauma patients. METHODS: Of trauma patients requiring laparotomy for presumed injuries, 47 underwent DL followed by laparotomy. Injuries noted at laparoscopy were compared with those found at laparotomy. RESULTS: Of these, 14 patients had no significant injuries necessitating operative intervention noted at laparoscopy and celiotomy. The remaining 33 patients harbored 93 significant injuries at laparotomy, of which only 57.0% were found by DL. DL possessed poor sensitivity (<50%) for injuries to hollow viscera. Despite DL's poor performance in finding specific injuries, it possessed excellent sensitivity (96.2%), and specificity (100%) for determining the need for therapeutic celiotomy. CONCLUSIONS: DL offers no clear advantage over diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in blunt trauma. Its utility lies in assessment of the need for laparotomy in patients with penetrating wounds. Currently, DL cannot consistently identify all abdominal injuries, disqualifying it as a therapeutic tool in abdominal trauma.

Abdominal Injuries↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Hospitalk: an exploratory study to assess what is said and what is heard between physicians and nurses.

OBJECTIVE: Collaboration and effective communication between healthcare professionals has been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes and job satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to examine physician and nurse communication in a hospital setting during a time of very rapid change. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Full-time attending internal medicine physicians (n = 5), registered nurses (n = 18), and medical residents (n = 12) working on two adult medical units in a 325-bed tertiary-care hospital in the mid-Atlantic region from fall 1996 to summer 1997. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive survey and interview. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Each subject completed a written questionnaire, Physician-Nurse Communication Scale, and a structured interview with a trained social linguistics team. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Physicians and nurses shared similar perceptions regarding their roles in communication processes, such as giving orders, asking for information, and asking for and giving opinions. They differed significantly in the perceptions of the physician and nurse roles in giving information, orienting, and providing education. Generally, physicians perceived that nurses initiated certain types of communication significantly less often than did nurses. Both groups expressed an interest in more interaction; nurses particularly expressed the need to be "listened to" or respected more. Nurses were significantly more likely to express the need to change interactions with house staff than with attending physicians (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Interactions between physicians and nurses are perceived differently by the two groups, leading to misunderstanding of motive and meaning. Recommendations are made to improve communication between these two professional groups.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied