PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Nott

Publications and source records attributed to K Nott.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Imaging mixed lipid monolayers by dynamic atomic force microscopy.

Phase imaging with tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) and force modulation microscopy were used to probe the mechanical properties of phase-separated lipid monolayers made of a mixture (0.25:0.75) of the surface-active lipopeptide surfactin and of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC). The pi-A isotherms and the result of a molecular modeling study revealed a loose, 2-D liquid-like organization for the surfactin molecules and a closely packed, 2-D solid-like organization for DPPC molecules. This difference in molecular organization was responsible for a significant contrast in height, tapping mode phase and force modulation amplitude images. Phase imaging at light tapping, i.e., with a ratio of the set-point tapping amplitude with respect to the free amplitude A(sp)/A(0) approximately 0.9, showed larger phase shifts on the solid-like DPPC domains attributed to larger Young's modulus. However, contrast inversion was observed for A(sp)/A(0)<0.7, suggesting that at moderate and hard tapping the image contrast was dominated by the probe-sample contact area. Surprisingly, force modulation amplitude images showed larger stiffness for the liquid-like surfactin domains, suggesting that the contrast was dominated by contact area effects rather than by Young's modulus. These data emphasize the complex nature of the contrast mechanisms of dynamic AFM images recorded on mixed lipid monolayers.

1,2-Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine↗

The assessment of the emotional and immunological consequences of examination stress.

Sixteen final-year students and 14 nonstudents were recruited into a pilot study exploring the utility of the Merieux Multitest CMI in identifying stress-related immune impairment. The results of the investigation revealed that the examination group reported greater stress than the nonexamination group. The relationship between stress and immune impairment was explored using two widely held definitions of stress (i.e., stimulus and response). When stress was defined as the stimulus (i.e., examination versus nonexamination groups), reactions to the skin test were not significantly different. However, when stress was defined as the response (i.e., high stress versus low stress scores), the high-stress individuals were found to have poorer reactions to the skin test than the low-stress subjects. The results of the study highlight the need for greater precision in the definition of the term stress and, also, suggest that Multitest CMI can provide a rapid and reproducible means of assessing stress-related immune dysfunction.

Adult↗