PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Possinger

Publications and source records attributed to K Possinger.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Subacute encephalopathy after combination chemotherapy including moderate-dose methotrexate in a patient with gastric cancer.

An episode of subacute encephalopathy after the infusion of a moderate dose of methotrexate (1500 mg/m2) (MTX) is reported in a young adult with metastastic gastric cancer. Weakness of the right arm, focal seizures, lethargy and confusion appeared on day 10. High signal intensity in periventricular white matter was observed on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Symptoms resolved spontaneously and completely after 48 h. We believe that this represents an unusual case of moderate-dose MTX-induced neurotoxicity in a patient with gastric cancer, which has not previously been reported.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in stage IV breast cancer: a phase I study.

Gemcitabine is an effective agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The phosphorylation of gemcitabine into the active gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) is catalyzed by deoxycytidine kinase. This enzyme is saturated at plasma concentrations achieved after an infusion over 30 min. Therefore accumulation of higher intracellular dFdCTP concentrations, which may result in an enhanced antineoplastic activity, cannot be achieved by higher dosage, but only by prolonged infusion time. The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine given as a 6 h i.v. infusion. Patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with gemcitabine as a 6 h infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. The starting dose was 200 mg/m2 with an interindividual escalation in 50 mg/m2 increments. Sixteen patients received 196 doses through three dose levels. All patients were assessable for toxicity, 13 assessable for response. The MTD was 250 mg/m2. DLT was observed at 300 mg/m2 consisting of a reversible elevation of transaminases WHO grade 3 in two patients and cutaneous toxicity grade 3 in one patient. Most common non-hematologic toxicities were mild to moderate and rapidly reversible elevation of liver enzymes in all patients, nausea and vomiting (four patients grade 2, five patients grade 3), and mild alopecia. Hematologic toxicity was mild with neutropenia WHO grade 3 and 4 in only one patient each, and no grade 3 thrombocytopenia. One patient achieved a complete remission and another patient a partial response, for an overall response rate of 15% (two of 13). In addition, seven patients (54%) had stable disease and four (31%) failed to respond to the treatment. We conclude gemcitabine 250 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks can be safely administered as 6 h infusion. Toxicity, especially myelosuppression, is surprisingly mild. Based on this result a phase II study with 250 mg/m2 administered over 6 h was initiated to determine the efficacy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Phase II trial of gemcitabine as prolonged infusion in metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine is an active agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The phosphorylation of gemcitabine into the active gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) is catalyzed by deoxycytidine kinase. This enzyme is saturated at plasma concentrations achieved after an infusion over 30 min. Therefore accumulation of higher intracellular dFdCTP concentrations, which may result in an enhanced antineoplastic activity, cannot be achieved by higher dosage, but only by prolonged infusion time. In a previous phase I trial the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine given as a 6 h i.v. infusion was 250 mg/m2. The objective of this phase II trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine as prolonged infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Twenty patients [median age 50.4 years, range 35-63 years; performance status EORTC 0 (17 patients), 1 (two patients), 2 (one patient)] with metastatic breast cancer were treated with 250 mg/m2 gemcitabine as infusion over 6 h on days 1, 8 and 15 q3 weeks for up to six courses (median 3.9 courses). Treatment was first line for four patients, second line for five patients and third line or higher for 11 patients. Metastatic sites were liver in 14 patients, bone in 12 patients, lung in eight patients and lymph nodes in nine patients. Nine patients presented two metastatic sites, three patients three and five patients four. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. One patient (5%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and four patients (20%) a partial remission (PR) (one patient with CR of visceral metastases but stable bone metastases), for an overall response rate of 25% (five of 20). In addition, six patients (30%) had stable disease and nine (45%) failed to respond to the treatment. Time to progression ranged from 2 to 23 months with a median of 6.3 months. Hematologic toxicity was mild with leukopenia grade 3 in only three patients (15%) and no grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Moderate elevations of liver enzymes (three patients grade 3), nausea and vomiting (two patients grade 2), and mild alopecia were observed, but only one patient had to be withdrawn due to toxicity. In conclusion gemcitabine as prolonged infusion is an effective treatment in metastatic breast cancer. Toxicity, especially myelosuppression, is surprisingly mild. Therefore, gemcitabine seems to be ideal for combination therapies.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

CD99 positivity and EWS-FLI1 gene rearrangement identify a breast tumor in a 60-year-old patient with attributes of the Ewing family of neoplasms.

Rearrangements of the EWS gene with ETS transcription factor genes as a result of chromosomal translocation and high expression levels of CD99MIC2 characterize the Ewing family of tumors (EFT). This group of rather undifferentiated neoplasms affects bone and soft tissue in children and young adults mostly between 5 and 30 years of age (median, 15 years). This study reports a case of a CD99MIC2 positive small round cell tumor in the breast of a 60-year-old woman in whom a t(11;22)(q24;q12) chromosomal aberration was identified by cytogenetic analysis. Reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by sequence analysis revealed expression of a chimera transcript in which EWS exon 10 was fused to FLI1 exon 6. Previously, this gene fusion has been reported to occur in approximately 3% of EFT. The specific gene rearrangement of EWS intron 10 was confirmed on Southern blot of genomic DNA. This study further contributes to the growing list of unusual neoplasms in adults that carry genotypic and phenotypic traits of the EFT.

12E7 Antigen↗
PubMed1998

Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In phase II trials, irinotecan is active in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but the survival and clinical benefit of irinotecan compared with second-line fluorouracil by continuous infusion is not known. METHODS: 267 patients who had failed to respond to first-line fluorouracil, or whose disease had progressed after treatment with first-line fluorouracil were randomly allocated irinotecan 300-350 mg/m2 infused once every 3 weeks or fluorouracil by continuous infusion. Treatment was given until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or the patient refused to continue treatment. The primary endpoint was survival, while progression-free survival, response rate, symptom-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints. FINDINGS: 133 patients were randomly allocated irinotecan and 134 were allocated fluorouracil by continuous infusion. Patients treated with irinotecan lived for significantly longer than patients on fluorouracil (p=0.035). Survival at 1 year was increased from 32% in the fluorouracil group to 45% in the irinotecan group. Median survival was 10.8 months in the irinotecan group and 8.5 months in the fluorouracil group. Median progression-free survival was longer with irinotecan (4.2 vs 2.9 months for irinotecan vs fluorouracil, respectively; p=0.030). The median pain-free survival was 10.3 months and 8.5 months (p=0.06) for irinotecan and fluorouracil, respectively. Both treatments were equally well tolerated. QoL was similar in both groups. INTERPRETATION: Compared with fluorouracil by continuous infusion second-line irinotecan significantly improved survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Gemcitabine for palliative treatment in metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine is one of the recently developed drugs with a high efficacy in various malignant tumours and a mild toxicity profile. As monochemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer, gemcitabine yielded response rates up to 46% as first- and second-line treatment. Neutropenia is the clinically most relevant unwanted effect. Haematological and nonhaematological toxicities are mild, making dose reductions, delays of treatment or withdrawal from treatment very rare. The first phase I and phase II studies of gemcitabine in combination with anthracyclines have shown a good toxicity profile and promising remission rates. Phase I experiences with long-time infusion schedules reveal good feasibility and high patient acceptance.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1998

Gemcitabine plus dose-escalated epirubicin in advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

Gemcitabine has shown single-agent activity in metastatic breast cancer. Epirubicin is also widely used for the adjuvant and treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The toxicity profiles and modes of action are different which provides a good rationale for studying both drugs in combination. In a phase I study gemcitabine at a fixed dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle was combined with escalated weekly doses of epirubicin starting with an initial dose of 10 mg/m2. Patients had stage IV metastatic disease without previous chemotherapy except as adjuvant treatment. Nineteen patients were included in the study which defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin at 20 mg/m2. Myelosuppression was the dose limiting toxicity with leucopenia WHO grade 3 and 4 in 40.0% and 20.0%, neutropenia WHO grade 3 and 4 without neutropenic fever in 20.0% and 40.0% and thrombocytopenia WHO grade 4 in 20.0%. At the epirubicin 15 mg/m2 dose level, leucopenia (11.1% WHO grade 3) and neutropenia (12.5 and 37.5% WHO grade 3 and 4) were reported. Symptomatic toxicity was generally mild: nausea/vomiting in about 20% of patients (WHO grade 3 or 4) on both 15 and 20 mg/m2 epirubicin dose levels. Alopecia WHO grade 3 and 4 was seen in 2 patients at MTD. Four of 19 evaluable patients had a partial response. We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine and epirubicin is well tolerated and has promising activity. A phase II study is underway with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and epirubicin 15 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To compare raltitrexed (Tomudex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) a direct, specific thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor with fluorouracil (5-FU) plus high-dose leucovorin (LV) as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 495 patients were randomized to raltitrexed (3 mg/m2) once every 3 weeks or 5-FU (400 mg/m2) plus LV (200 mg/m2) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The randomized groups were well balanced demographically. With a minimum 17-month follow-up, median survival was comparable between groups (10.9 months raltitrexed v 12.3 months 5-FU/LV; hazards ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.42; P=.197), although time to progression was statistically significantly shorter in the raltitrexed group. Overall objective responses were comparable (19% raltitrexed v 18% 5-FU/LV), with more than 50% of patients in each group having stable disease. Significantly less World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 stomatitis (2% v 16%, P < .001) and a reduced incidence of leukopenia (6% v 13%) and diarrhea (10% v 19%) occurred in the raltitrexed group (particularly at cycle 1 ). This resulted in fewer dose reductions at cycle 2 (4% raltitrexed v 28% 5-FU/LV) and early quality-of-life (QoL) benefits for raltitrexed patients. Reversible, clinically insignificant increases in transaminases were reported in 13% of raltitrexed patients. Palliative benefits of weight gain, improved performance status, and reduced disease-related symptoms were evident in both groups. CONCLUSION: Raltitrexed is confirmed as an effective option in the first-line palliative management of ACC, with comparable efficacy to and tolerability advantages (in terms of reduced incidence of stomatitis, diarrhea, and leukopenia) over 5-FU/LV. Raltitrexed has the added convenience of an every 3 weeks dosing schedule.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Immunohistochemical detection of CD5 with monoclonal antibody 4C7 on paraffin sections.

CD5 is useful for the classification of low-grade B-cell lymphomas, because it is aberrantly expressed in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias/small lymphocytic lymphomas (B-CLLs/SLLs) and mantle cell lymphomas (MCLs), but not in the other well-described low-grade B-cell lymphomas. Therefore, we tested the utility of monoclonal antibody (MAb) 4C7 to detect CD5 on paraffin sections of 22 cases with low-grade B-cell lymphomas and 4 cases with high-grade B-cell lymphomas and compared the results with CD5 detection by analysis of fresh tissue with a fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS). After heat-induced epitope retrieval we could detect CD5 on paraffin sections in all MCLs and B-CLLs/SLLs, identical to the results of flow cytometry. Eleven of 12 cases that showed no CD5 expression by FACS analysis were also negative on paraffin sections. In only one case of a presumed blastoid MCL, CD5 was detectable by immunohistochemistry but not by FACS analysis. We conclude that MAb 4C7 against CD5 is a useful paraffin-reactive marker, especially to correctly identify MCLs on paraffin sections.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗