Benzodiazepines: tolerance and withdrawal: the clinician's point of view.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anti-Anxiety Agents↗
Biomedical subjects
K Rickels
Publications and source records attributed to K Rickels.
A placebo-controlled study of effects of oral progesterone on performance and mood.
1. Oral micronized progesterone (P) is proposed for the treatment of certain endocrine gynaecological disorders. To examine the effects of P on performance and mood, a randomized, placebo-controlled study of 24 healthy females ages 18-24 years on low-dose oral contraceptives was conducted. 2. Subjects were admitted to the Clinical Research Center on four occasions and received single doses of oral P (300, 600, 1200 mg) or placebo. Blood sampling, psychometric tests and mood scales were administered at baseline and at hourly intervals for 6 h. 3. P doses produced significant dose-related but highly variable increases in plasma P concentrations. Fatigue increased with P doses, although few subjects were objectively drowsy. Very high peak plasma P concentrations, achieved by some subjects at the 1200 mg dose, were associated with decreased information processing and verbal memory function as well as fatigue. 4. We conclude that oral P can safely be prescribed at higher than previously-reported doses, based on evidence of transient behavioural effects only at the highest doses in some subjects who achieved high plasma P concentrations.
Administration, Oral↗
Use of buspirone in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and coexisting depressive symptoms. A meta-analysis of eight randomized, controlled studies.
This report presents the results of a retrospective analysis of pooled efficacy data from eight studies in which buspirone was compared to placebo in 520 patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In addition to evaluating overall efficacy in the composite patient data base, four criteria were used to identify subsets of patients with GAD who had coexisting depressive symptoms of at least moderate intensity: (1) a score of > or = 2 on the Hamilton Anxiety (HAM-A) Rating Scale item 6 (depressed mood), (2) a score of > or = 2 on the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) Rating Scale item 1 (depressed mood), (3) a HAM-D total score of > or = 18, or (4) a HAM-D Retardation Factor value (items 1, 7, 8, and 14) greater than the median for the group. Overall, patients treated with buspirone demonstrated significant (p < or = 0.001) improvement over baseline in total HAM-A scores compared to patients who received placebo. Buspirone also produced significant (p < or = 0.001) global improvement compared to placebo as assessed by the attending physician. Of the GAD patients stratified according to the four criteria for coexisting depressive symptoms, a substantial percentage (44-64%) of the total patient sample exhibited significant depressive symptoms as part of their anxiety disorder. Patients with GAD and coexisting depressive symptoms of at least moderate intensity exhibited significantly greater improvement with buspirone compared to placebo treatment regardless of the stratification criterion used. They also responded at least as well or better to buspirone therapy as did those with GAD who had less intense depressive symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Adolescent↗
Course of premenstrual syndrome symptom severity after treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Patients from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of progesterone suppository treatment for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) were followed up to determine poststudy PMS symptom levels and medication use. METHOD: An average of 1 year after the end of the treatment study, 129 subjects were contacted for telephone interviews. All subjects met criteria for PMS before the progesterone suppository treatment, and their symptoms were confirmed by daily symptom reports throughout the study. The outcome measure at follow-up was the patient's global assessment of symptom severity, which was also rated by the subjects during the treatment study. The ratings at enrollment, end of study, and follow-up were compared. RESULTS: Only 27% of the subjects (N = 35) were taking medications for PMS at follow-up. Symptom severity at follow-up was less than at enrollment but greater than at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the improvement gained during treatment was maintained, but overall the subjects remained moderately symptomatic. Validation of the PMS condition, education, and support and caring may account for the symptom decreases during treatment, and the end of treatment and withdrawal of these conditions may account for the moderate return of symptoms.
Double-Blind Method↗
The first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a partial benzodiazepine agonist, abecarnil (ZK 112-119), in generalized anxiety disorder.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Paroxetine versus placebo: a double-blind comparison in depressed patients.
BACKGROUND: Paroxetine is a potent and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). The present study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine against placebo in depressed outpatients. METHOD: A double-blind, parallel-group study was undertaken in four stand-alone centers. Patients aged 18-65 years, meeting DSM-III criteria for major depression, and having a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score > or = 18 on the first 17 items of the HAM-D-21 were randomized to paroxetine or placebo for 6 weeks of treatment. Efficacy outcome variables included the HAM-D, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and the Covi Anxiety Scale. Tolerability was assessed by asking a non-leading question. Routine laboratory safety and vital sign data from all four centers were pooled. The primary analysis used the intention-to-treat sample and for efficacy variables the last-observation-carried-forward data set was employed. Statistical methods included one-way analysis of variance for parametric and Fisher exact test for nonparametric variables. RESULTS: Significant differences (p < or = .05) were found between paroxetine and placebo on the HAM-D and CGI by Week 2 and on all efficacy outcome variables by Week 4. Improvement on the HAM-D sleep factor occurred 2 weeks prior to that seen on the retardation factor. Similar results were obtained when an adequate treatment group (therapy for > or = 28 days) was considered. A full clinical response (CGI-severity of illness score 1 or 2) was seen in over 40% of subjects. Adverse events were more common for paroxetine compared with placebo (p < or = .01). Somnolence was twice more common than nervousness. Dropout due to adverse events was similar between therapies. Paroxetine had no clinically significant effect on laboratory safety data or vital signs. CONCLUSION: Paroxetine was an effective, well tolerated, and safe antidepressant. Side effects were typical of the SSRI class of drugs. Symptoms indicative of a nonalerting profile were more common than those associated with alerting effects.
Adolescent↗
The efficacy and safety of paroxetine compared with placebo in outpatients with major depression.
Paroxetine, a phenylpiperidine derivative, is an antidepressant that selectively inhibits serotonin reuptake. In this study 111 outpatients with major depression diagnosed by DSM-III criteria were treated with either paroxetine or placebo in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind study. Paroxetine was significantly superior to placebo on six of the seven major efficacy variables. Significant differences in favor of paroxetine were apparent by Week 2. Paroxetine was also well tolerated. These results support the efficacy and safety of paroxetine as a treatment for patients with major depression.
Adult↗
Carbamazepine treatment in patients discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine therapy. Effects on withdrawal severity and outcome.
Forty patients with a history of difficulty discontinuing long-term, daily benzodiazepine therapy were randomly assigned, under double-blind conditions, to treatment with carbamazepine (200 to 800 mg/d) or placebo. A gradual taper (25% per week reduction) off benzodiazepine therapy was then attempted. Five weeks after taper, significantly more patients who had received carbamazepine than placebo remained benzodiazepine free, this despite the fact that no statistically significant differences in withdrawal severity could be demonstrated. Patients receiving carbamazepine reported a larger reduction in withdrawal severity than patients receiving placebo, but only at a trend level, and only on the daily patient-rated withdrawal checklist. Eleven patients (28%) required antidepressant therapy for depression or panic when assessed at 12-weeks follow-up. The results of this pilot investigation suggest that carbamazepine might have promise as an adjunctive drug therapy for the benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome, particularly in patients receiving benzodiazepines in daily dosages of 20 mg/d or greater of diazepam equivalents.
Benzodiazepines↗
Adinazolam, diazepam, imipramine, and placebo in major depressive disorder: a controlled study.
In summary, the clinical results of this double-blind study clearly show that imipramine, as expected, demonstrated significant antidepressive properties in outpatients suffering from major depressive disorders. In contrast, adinazolam showed rather mild and weak antidepressive properties, and in no measures did its response differ significantly from that of diazepam. These findings are quite in contrast to those obtained by the authors in an earlier study with alprazolam (Rickels et al., 1987) in which alprazolam and imipramine produced rather similar results and both were significantly better than placebo, while diazepam was not. While the rather high dropout rate may well be considered a limitation of the study, the dropout rate is equally distributed between all four treatments. And since both decreasing sample size and endpoint analyses which include all patients with at least one week data, provide rather similar results, the findings can be considered as robust despite the high dropout rate. While the authors consider those findings the most robust in which endpoint and completer analyses results are rather similar, when high dropout rates occur, endpoint analyses should be given more weight than completer analyses as they are more representative of actual clinical practice. The present findings therefore suggest that adinazolam clearly possesses less antidepressive properties than imipramine and not more than diazepam and these findings are in agreement with other studies which found lack of significant antidepressant activity for such benzodiazepines as diazepam (Covi et al., 1974) and chlordiazepoxide (Lipman et al., 1986). The presence of only borderline antidepressive effects combined with rebound symptoms occurring already after only 6 weeks of therapy does not recommend adinazolam for use in depression.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Adult↗
Long-term benzodiazepine users 3 years after participation in a discontinuation program.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical status and use of benzodiazepines and other psychotropic drugs at follow-up were assessed in patients who had been chronically dependent on benzodiazepines and had been referred for participation in a discontinuation study. METHOD: Of 123 benzodiazepine-dependent patients screened for entry into a tapered discontinuation program, 48 had completed the program, 38 had not, and 37 had not undergone drug tapering. Follow-up information was obtained through a structured telephone interview and a mail questionnaire that included a global severity scale assessing anxiety and depression and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. The time to follow-up was 2.7-5.0 years, and the mean +/- SD interval between screening and follow-up was 2.9 +/- 0.9 years. RESULTS: Outcome at follow-up significantly favored the patients who had completed the discontinuation program; 73% were not using benzodiazepines, compared to 39% in the unsuccessful taper group and 14% in the no-taper group. Moderate or marked anxiety was still reported by 35% of the patients who were taking benzodiazepines and 25% of those who were not. At follow-up, 22% of the patients were being treated with nonbenzodiazepine psychotropic agents, primarily antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: The high percentage of patients who were benzodiazepine-free at follow-up and the continued anxiety and depression present in many patients suggest that some patients may have been taking benzodiazepines because of chronic or recurrent anxiety or depression, not physical dependence.
Anxiety Disorders↗
The first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a partial benzodiazepine agonist abecarnil (ZK 112-119) in generalized anxiety disorder.
This is the first reported controlled trial of a partial benzodiazepine agonist, abecarnil, utilized in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). It was a sequential dose-finding study comparing 15-30 mg/day, 7.5-15 mg/day, and 3-9 mg/day to placebo for 3 weeks of treatment followed by abrupt discontinuation through placebo substitution. Although the two higher dose groups had high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) sedative adverse effects, the 3-9 mg/day group tolerated the medication well with no dropouts. The 3-9 mg/day group, in comparison to the two higher doses and placebo, demonstrated efficacy in global improvement ratings and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) scores. At Week 3, 61 percent of the abecarnil 3-9 mg/day group was rated as at least 50 percent improved on the HAM-A, compared to 30 percent of the placebo group. With abrupt discontinuation there were mild to moderate withdrawal symptoms and loss of efficacy in the two higher dose groups. However, in the 3-9 mg/day abecarnil group, there were few withdrawal symptoms and almost no loss of efficacy following discontinuation.
Adult↗
Placebo-controlled trial of venlafaxine for the treatment of major depression.
Results are presented of the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a novel antidepressant venlafaxine, which preclinically has demonstrated serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine reuptake inhibiting effects. Sixty outpatients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depression were randomized to receive 6 weeks of treatment with one of three fixed doses of venlafaxine--25 mg three times a day, 75 mg three times a day, or 125 mg three times a day--or placebo. Significant improvement was observed in depression scores at all doses, with the high dose resulting in earlier improvement, by week 2. For the combined venlafaxine treatment groups, 68% achieved a moderate or marked improvement on the Clinical Global Impression scale, compared with only 31% for the placebo group. Venlafaxine was well tolerated, and nervousness, sweating, and nausea were the only adverse effects observed more frequently with drug compared with placebo.
Adult↗
Buspirone in major depression: a controlled study.
One hundred and fifty-five outpatients suffering from major depression with moderate anxiety entered a double-blind study comparing 8 weeks of treatment with buspirone or placebo. Thirty-four percent of buspirone and 41% of placebo patients discontinued treatment before 8 weeks. Results were consistent across all physician- and patient-completed outcome measures, with treatment response to buspirone significantly better than to placebo at treatment endpoint. Seventy percent of buspirone and 35% of placebo patients (p less than .01) were rated moderately or markedly improved after 8 weeks of therapy. Initial levels of anxiety and depression had no significant effect on treatment outcome. Buspirone was found to be safe and well tolerated at doses of up to 90 mg/day.
Adolescent↗
Ineffectiveness of progesterone suppository treatment for premenstrual syndrome.
Progesterone is the most widely used treatment for premenstrual syndrome. To answer definitely the question of whether progesterone suppositories are effective for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study of 168 women, receiving progesterone in doses of 400 and 800 mg or placebo, was carried out. Premenstrual symptoms were not significantly improved by progesterone compared with placebo in any measure used in the study, including daily symptom reports maintained throughout treatment, clinician evaluation of improvement, and patient global reports of symptoms severity, relief, and disruption of daily activity. No symptom cluster or individual symptom differed significantly between progesterone and placebo treatment. These treatment results were not significantly affected by fluctuations in response during the placebo washout period, pretreatment levels of depression or anxiety at either postmenstrual or premenstrual times, or any of 19 other background, medical history, or symptom variables examined individually as covariates with treatment.
Adult↗
Long-term therapeutic use of benzodiazepines. I. Effects of abrupt discontinuation.
We compared the effect of abrupt discontinuation of therapeutic doses of short half-life and long half-life benzodiazepines in 57 benzodiazepine-dependent patients (daily use, greater than 1 year). Despite the use of a mean daily dose of 14.1 mg of diazepam equivalents, there were notable residual symptoms of anxiety and depression present at intake (Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score, 17.0; Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score, 14.0). Benzodiazepine intake was stabilized for 3 weeks before double-blind assignment to placebo (n = 47), or continued benzodiazepine use (n = 10). Clinical assessments were performed daily, including benzodiazepine plasma levels. Depending on the outcome criteria used, anywhere from 58% to 100% of patients were judged to have experienced a withdrawal reaction, with a peak severity at 2 days for short half-life and 4 to 7 days for long half-life benzodiazepines. Relapse onto benzodiazepines occurred in 27% of patients who were receiving long half-life benzodiazepines and in 57% of patients who were receiving short half-life benzodiazepines. Baseline predictors of relapse were nonpanic diagnoses, a higher benzodiazepine dose, and a higher Eysenck neuroticism score. A short half-life and higher daily doses were associated with greater withdrawal severity, as were personality traits, such as dependency and neuroticism, less education and higher baseline levels of anxious and depressive symptoms. Patients who were able to remain free of benzodiazepines for at least 5 weeks obtained lower levels of anxiety than before benzodiazepine discontinuation. These results provide a detailed picture of the symptoms, time course, and multidimensional determinants of the benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome.
Ambulatory Care↗
Long-term therapeutic use of benzodiazepines. II. Effects of gradual taper.
We compared the effect on withdrawal severity and acute outcome of a 25% per week taper of short half-life vs long half-life benzodiazepines in 63 benzodiazepine-dependent patients. Patients unable to tolerate taper were permitted to slow the taper rate. Ninety percent of patients experienced a withdrawal reaction, but it was rarely more than mild to moderate. Nonetheless, 32% of long half-life and 42% of short half-life benzodiazepine-treated patients were unable to achieve a drug-free state. The most difficulty was experienced in the last half of taper. Baseline personality, high Eysenck neuroticism, female sex, and mild-to-moderate alcohol use were found to be more significant predictors of withdrawal severity than the daily benzodiazepine dose or benzodiazepine half-life. These findings suggest that personality factors contribute significantly to the patient's difficulties with gradual benzodiazepine discontinuation of therapeutic doses of benzodiazepines.
Adult↗
Evaluating antidepressants and anxiolytics.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anti-Anxiety Agents↗
Lorazepam vs. alprazolam in the treatment of panic disorder.
Sixty-seven patients with panic disorder were treated with single-blind placebo for one week before being randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with either lorazepam or alprazolam. Both drugs showed significant and comparable antipanic efficacy throughout the course of the study. With the exception of sedative effects, both drugs were well-tolerated at a mean daily dose of 7 mg for lorazepam and 3 mg for alprazolam. Lorazepam appeared to be as effective as alprazolam in the acute treatment of panic disorder.
Adult↗