PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

K Riko

Publications and source records attributed to K Riko.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Audiometric estimation error with the ABR in high risk infants.

Click ABR wave V thresholds in the first year were compared with follow-up behavioural pure-tone audiometry under earphones at age 3 to 6 years in 713 infants (yielding 1,367 ears) at risk for hearing loss. The observed accuracy of the ABR depends strongly on the precise definitions of the target disorder and the test abnormality criteria. For sensorineural hearing loss of more than 20 dB averaged at 2 kHz and 4 kHz, the click ABR provides an accurate test, with both false positive and false negative rates of less than 10%, using an ABR threshold criterion of 30 dB nHL. The false positive error rate can be at least halved by using a simple rule for wave V latency that discriminates conductive and sensorineural ABR threshold abnormalities. False negative errors may be explicable in terms of the lack of frequency specificity of the click stimulus.

Audiometry, Evoked Response

Audiometric accuracy of the click ABR in infants at risk for hearing loss.

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) to clicks is widely used for early detection of hearing loss in the child at risk for hearing dysfunction, but there is a lack of direct, large-sample estimates of test accuracy. In this report, results and preliminary analyses are presented that relate click ABR thresholds obtained at 3 to 12 months corrected age to detailed follow-up behavioral puretone audiometry at 3 to 8 years of age, for 1,367 ears in 713 children at risk for hearing loss. The data are analyzed in terms of conventional 2 x 2 decision matrices and associated parameters, using dichotomous (binary) measures of hearing loss and ABR test outcome. The accuracy of the ABR appears to depend strongly on the precise criteria that are chosen to define both hearing loss and ABR outcome. ABR accuracy is excellent for detecting average sensorineural hearing loss at 2 and 4 kHz in excess of 30 dB, and the overall results for a wide range of hearing loss and ABR abnormality criteria can be conveniently summarized in terms of relative operating characteristics (ROCs).

Audiometry, Evoked Response

Hearing aid usage in occupational hearing loss claimants.

Between 1980 and 1986, the Department of Otolaryngology at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, evaluated 3,509 occupational hearing loss claimants for the Workers' Compensation Board of Ontario. Detailed information about work, medical and audiologic findings for each claimant was entered into the departmental database system. The goals of this retrospective analysis were to examine some demographic characteristics and to describe the aural rehabilitation status of this population. Most claimants had bilateral mild or moderate hearing loss but all degrees and patterns of loss occurred. Of 2,657 first-time, reliable claimants, 881 (33.2%) arrived with a hearing aid, typically a monaural, behind-the-ear fitting. Twenty percent with bilateral mild loss owned an aid whereas 38% of claimants with bilateral severe loss did not have one. Ninety percent of aid owners reported that their device was of some help. This level of satisfaction was not affected by age, degree of loss, or speech discrimination ability. Substantial usage was reported for non-work situations. Hearing aids were especially helpful for TV and in small group situations. Ultimately, 81% of all claimants were determined to be hearing aid candidates.

Adult

Exaggerated hearing loss in compensation claimants.

Overestimation of hearing loss is a significant problem in the assessment of workers exposed to industrial noise. Audiometric and epidemiologic aspects of this problem are examined in 2,528 compensation claimants. Electric Response Audiometry (ERA) using the cortical Slow Vertex Response (SVR) is accurate and very useful for quantification of true hearing levels. Based on this technique, 8% of claimants were shown to have volunteered excessively high behavioral thresholds. Using the term "exaggerated hearing loss" (EHL) as an umbrella for this phenomenon, true thresholds of EHL and non-EHL groups were identical. Several demographic and occupational factors appear to be associated with EHL. The performance of various audiometric rules for EHL prediction was highly dependent on the criteria adopted; all rules were better than chance, though none was impressive. Clinical acumen and ERA both play a vital part in accurate assessment of the compensation claimant.

Audiometry, Evoked Response

Clinical evaluation of a two-channel amplitude compression hearing aid.

Twelve experienced hearing aid users with mild to moderate hearing loss used two new, commercially available behind-the-ear amplitude compression hearing aids for 1 month each. One aid was a single-channel device; the other was a two-channel aid. All subjects had used other compression aids for at least 1 year. Performance in real-life situations with the personal aid and the two trial aids was evaluated by the Hearing Performance Inventory (HPI). Another questionnaire probed subjective preference for the three aids and willingness to purchase each of the trial aids. The major HPI finding was an equal performance superiority for the two trial aids over the personal aid for half the subjects. The preference/purchase questionnaire results indicated that the two-channel aid had some sound quality advantages, but was unacceptable physically. The single-channel trial was clearly preferred over the personal and two-channel device.

Adult

Hearing loss in early infancy: incidence, detection and assessment.

Auditory evoked potential techniques have revitalized programs for early detection, quantification, and management of hearing loss. Some issues underlying the need for such programs, and their structure, are reviewed with reference to recently-published guidelines. The prevalence of hearing loss in infancy is poorly understood; estimates depend on the type and degree of loss, the tests used, and their timing. Evidence that significant hearing loss can escape early detection continues to accumulate; delays are attributable to many factors, including insufficient awareness and deficiencies in conventional tests. High-risk registers are valuable but imperfect tools, and should not be the sole avenue of early detection. Electrophysiologic tests, especially the auditory brain stem response, have a major role in early assessment. Attention to many technical and patient-related factors is required, and frequency-specific testing is feasible and informative.

Age Factors

Issues in early identification of hearing loss.

In a general hospital, an early detection research program based on a high risk register and brain stem electric response audiometry (BERA) using click and frequency-specific stimuli identified 631 at-risk neonates from the well baby nursery and the neonatal intensive care nursery (ICN). BERA tests were done before discharge and four months later; comparison of outcomes revealed substantial discrepancies. From the follow-up test, 51 cases of mild to severe hearing loss were identified. Experience from the research program has raised some issues relevant for establishment of service programs. Evaluation of all babies (general nursery and ICN) is justified on the basis of yield but is resource consuming; strategies for minimizing work load are discussed. Risk factor criterion levels affect case loading and yield. Frequency-specific BERA identifies cases which would not be detected by click stimuli and which raise management questions. Deferral of testing to four months is feasible and desirable.

Apgar Score

Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired adults.

Hearing loss produces a communication handicap which is not always predictable from audiometric results. Handicap questionnaires can be useful for identification of potential rehabilitation candidates. Hearing aids have been improved but cannot be expected to compensate for all the speech perception problems associated with sensorineural hearing loss. Other communication aids can be used to reduce hearing handicap. Effective use of devices often requires more instruction than is currently available. A comprehensive rehabilitation program takes into account individual circumstances and provides for a variety of services in addition to provision of aids.

Audiometry

Effect of recent hearing aid improvements on management of the hearing impaired.

Recent developments in hearing aid technology and earmold acoustics have improved the outlook for the hearing impaired. Advances involving the electric microphone, integrated circuit, and earmold/hearing aid coupling system have affected such features as compression amplification, filtering, and frequency characteristics of the amplified signal at the eardrum. The resulting changes in hearing aid fitting approaches are described, including factors which are considered in such fittings as in-the-ear, binaural, CROS and BICROS, with examples of difficult cases. Hearing aids are then discussed in the context of a broader rehabilitation strategy.

Acoustics

The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.

There is increasing evidence that hearing conservation programs based on hearing protective devices can be and are effective. Hearing conservation requires effort and all successful programs seem to be based on a mixture of engineering, monitoring, and personal protection.

Audiometry, Pure-Tone

A neonatal hearing screening research program using brainstem electric response audiometry.

Results of brainstem electric response audiometry (BERA) for intensive care nursery graduates and babies from the general nursery are described. At-risk babies received both screening and more detailed BERA before hospital discharge. The latter test was repeated after four months. From 2,597 risk assessments, 421 were at risk and 379 have been tested. The specificity of 40 dB click screening is good, but its sensitivity is only moderate. Follow-up BERA detected 25 cases of hearing loss, 12 having moderate loss in at least one ear. Discrepancies between predischarge and follow-up tests occurred, especially for mild losses. There was substantial resolution of hearing loss, but also some emergent mild loss. These changes support BERA at about four months as the determinant of habilitation, as opposed to predischarge testing. Differences between click and frequency-specific BERA were found, suggesting that click evaluations alone are insufficient.

Audiometry

An evaluation of BERA for hearing screening in high-risk neonates.

Brain stem electric response audiometry (BERA) is evaluated for early detection of hearing loss in high-risk newborns selected from a general hospital population. They receive screening BERA in the nursery and detailed frequency-specific BERA in the Audiology clinic, just before discharge. Three months later, testing is repeated and recommendations are made. From 1364 assessments, 321 at-risk babies were identified; 234 received predischarge tests, and 200 had follow-up tests. Screening BERA with 40 dB nHL clicks is appropriate in the nursery. Screening sensitivity is good, and only 8% of babies failed. Several of these had mild hearing loss, resolving in the first trimester. Follow-up BERA confirmed hearing loss in 8 babies. Parental compliance is high, and the program is well-accepted. In conjunction with the high-risk register, BERA is useful both for screening and for quantitative audiometry in the infant.

Audiometry

A review of current approaches to aural rehabilitation.

Degree of hearing impairment is not directly related to hearing handicap or disability. Since the 1940s measures of peripheral auditory function have been the basis of hearing aid selection even though they provide no direct information on psychosocial, vocational, or educational handicap or disability or on rehabilitation needs. Rehabilitation beyond provision of the hearing aid has been limited and demands new approaches. The evolution of aural rehabilitation is based on the notion of its being an ongoing process, of communication as a behaviour which relies on the integration of many types of information, and of the individual as a total person with multi-faceted hearing needs.

Acoustics

Hearing protectors: a review of recent observations.

Hearing protectors are the most widely used means of protecting hearing from the harmful effects of noise. Economic considerations make it unlikely that noise can be reduced at the source to acceptable levels in the immediate future and isolation of workers in sound-attenuating enclosures or reduction of an individual's exposure time is not always practical. Personal hearing protective devices are affordable and readily available. Despite many years of use, a number of theoretical and practical questions remain about their utility.

Ear Protective Devices

Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type.

This research investigated the effect of car protectors on the intelligibility of speech in noise. Listeners with normal hearing, high-frequency, and flat loss were tested. Half the subjects in each group were fluent in English and half-poorly conversant. Taped lists of 25 words were presented free field under conditions defined by the speech-to-noise ratio, spectrum of noise background, and presence of ear protection. The results showed that intelligibility decreased with speech-to-noise ratio and was poorer in crowd noise than in white noise. The protector had no effect for the normal listener, but caused a substantial decrement in those with impairment. In all groups nonfluency contributed an additional loss of 10% to 20%. Significant differences in performance were noted for different muff and plug types.

Adult

Speech intelligibility in noise with ear protectors.

Speech perception was tested in high level noise under controlled laboratory conditions in noise-exposed workmen and normal subjects, with and without a hearing protector. The group was further divided by age and English fluency, the latter group being included because of the high proportion of non-fluent English speakers in the Canadian workforce. In normal-hearing subjects the highest discrimination scores were found without background noise, they were lower with white noise as a masker, and even lower with crowd noise as a masker; wearing of a protector had no effect on intelligibility. The results for non-fluent English speakers were parallel with these results, but the scores were lower in all test conditions. In the presence of a high frequency hearing loss speech discrimination was lower than in the normals in quiet and in noise. The addition of a hearing protector dropped their discrimination score even further. In a flat hearing loss, wearing of a protector also worsened the speech discrimination score. The results are discussed.

Adult

The role of communication aids in the rehabilitation of hearing impairment.

The primary emphasis in rehabilitating the hearing impaired has involved fitting a hearing aid. There are patients however, who can be helped by communication aids in addition to, or in place of hearing aids. Communication aids include any device, other than a conventional hearing aid, which assists the hearing impaired in maintaining contact wiht the normally hearing. In Scandinavian countries a sophisticated system for rehabilitating the hearing impaired has evolved and communication aids are recommended extensively. Similar aids exist in North America, but clinicians have not yet developed a full awareness of how these devices can benefit their patients. This paper represents the results of a two year survey undertaken to identify and evaluate various devices available in Toronto. The contribution these aids can offer in rehabilitating patients is discussed.

Amplifiers, Electronic