PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Rodham

Publications and source records attributed to K Rodham.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Work stress: an exploratory study of the practices and perceptions of female junior healthcare managers.

AIM: This exploratory study set out to investigate the perceptions and practices of junior healthcare managers with regard to stress at work. BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cultural change is needed to accommodate a shift towards recognition of organizational responsibility for stress (Schulz et al. 1985). Logically, it can be argued that junior healthcare managers, as potential future senior managers, are best placed to facilitate this change. Junior healthcare managers' current thinking about stress had not yet been explored in depth. METHOD: A combination of critical incident diaries and semistructured interviews was conducted with six junior healthcare managers. The data were analysed and transcribed using a grounded theory approach. FINDINGS: The main themes to emerge were that junior healthcare managers were generally unaware of (a) potential work stressors and (b) the effect of work stressors on their own health and performance and that of their staff. CONCLUSIONS: The perceptions and practices of junior healthcare managers suggest that there is a culture of acceptance and expectation of work stress, combined with a lack of awareness to effectively and proactively manage it.

Female↗

Problematic or practical? Professional body occupational health guidelines.

This paper focuses upon conflict between professional and managerial values in an occupational health setting. Findings are presented which suggest that the guidelines issued by UK occupational health professional bodies (describing the duties and responsibilities of occupational health professionals), have been perceived by professionals as being impractical because they tend to focus on the theoretical role of the professional at the expense of the reality of the experienced role. The paper concludes that the problem does not actually lie with the guidelines, but with the perception of the guidelines. It is suggested that this problem can be addressed by empowering occupational health professionals to interpret and tailor the guidelines to suit their particular working environment. In addition, encouraging occupational health professionals to pro-actively market their role, will result in awareness raising amongst the managers for whom they work who often have inappropriate expectations of the occupational health professionals.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Manager or medic: the role of the occupational health professional.

Occupational health professionals originate from either the medical or the nursing professions (both traditional areas with their own established codes of practice) and work in an industrial setting alongside, for instance, managers, who also have an established, if different code of practice. Occupational health professionals are therefore confronted with the task of integrating their medical role within a managerial context. This paper aims to explore how occupational health professionals overcome the problems inherent in balancing medical with managerial values.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

The ouch! Factor: problems in conducting sensitive research.

Qualitative health research often slams into sensitive barriers in attempting to understand the phenomena under scrutiny. John D. Brewer pointed out that textbooks tend to view areas of sensitivity as purely ethical issues. However, research within sensitive areas requires practical solutions that are not always linked to ethical dilemmas. Practical difficulties abound and demand flexibility and tact on the researcher's part if valuable research is to be carried out. As qualitative researchers, the authors share personal trials and tribulations that have been successfully overcome and integrated into completed research projects. This article outlines some of the problems and pitfalls that may be encountered while conducting sensitive research and offers some ideas that may enable researchers to deal with the "ouch! factor" in a professional and confidential manner. Above all, the authors hold that a sense of humour is one of the essential ingredients for surviving the unexpected ouch! factor.

Confidentiality↗