PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Rowan

Publications and source records attributed to K Rowan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary artery catheterization was adopted about 30 years ago and widely disseminated without rigorous evaluation as to whether it benefited critically ill patients. The technique is used to measure cardiac output and pressures in the pulmonary circulation to guide diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians believe these data can improve patients' outcomes, even in the absence of consensus about the specific interpretation of the data. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of pulmonary artery catheterization on mortality and cost of care in adult intensive care patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006); MEDLINE (all records to April 2006); EMBASE (all records to April 2006); CINAHL (all records to April 2006) and reference lists of articles. We contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials in adults, comparing management with and without a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We screened the titles and abstracts of the electronic search results and obtained the full text of studies of possible relevance for independent review. We determined the final results of the literature search by consensus between the authors. We did not contact study authors for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 12 studies. Mortality was reported as hospital, 28-day, 30-day, or intensive care unit. We considered studies of high-risk surgery patients (eight studies) and general intensive care patients (four studies) separately for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio for the studies of general intensive care patients was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.26) and for the studies of high-risk surgery patients 0.99 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.24). Of the eight studies of high-risk surgery patients, five evaluated the effectiveness of pre-operative optimization but there was no difference in mortality when these studies were examined separately. Pulmonary artery catheterization did not affect intensive care unit (reported by 10 studies) or hospital (reported by nine studies) length of stay. Four studies, conducted in the United States, measured costs based on hospital charges billed to patients, which on average were higher in the PAC groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: To date, there have been two multi-centre trials of the effectiveness of PACs for managing critically ill patients admitted to intensive care, although only one was adequately powered. Efficacy studies are needed to determine optimal management protocols and patient groups who could benefit from management with a PAC.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

An evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in patient management in intensive care: a systematic review and a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of managing critically ill patients in adult, general intensive care with or without pulmonary artery catheters (PACs). DESIGN: An open, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation (cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis). SETTING: The setting was general (mixed medical/surgical) intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK admitting adults. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients in participating ICUs deemed by the responsible treating clinician to require management with a PAC. INTERVENTIONS: These were insertion of a PAC and subsequent clinical management, at the discretion of the responsible treating clinicians, using data derived from the PAC. The control group were managed without a PAC but with the option of using alternative cardiac output monitoring devices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay in the ICU, length of stay in an acute hospital and organ-days of support in the ICU. For the economic evaluation, the main outcome measure was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the secondary outcome measure was hospital mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-five ICUs in the UK participated. Of these, 43 (66%) used alternative cardiac output monitoring devices in control group patients. A total of 1263 patients were identified as being eligible for the trial. Of these, 1041 (82.4%) were randomised and allocated to management with (n = 519) or without (n = 522) a PAC. There were no losses to follow-up. However, 27 patients (13 in the PAC group and 14 in the control group) were withdrawn from the trial because either the patient withdrew consent on recovering mental competency or the relatives withdrew agreement following randomisation. Data on 1014 patients were included in the analysis. Participants in the two groups had similar baseline characteristics. There was no difference in hospital mortality for patients managed with (68.4%) or without (65.7%) a PAC. The adjusted hazard ratio (PAC versus no PAC) was 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.27]. There was no difference in the median length of stay in ICU, the median length of stay in an acute hospital or mean organ-days of support in ICU between the two groups. The economic evaluation found that the expected cost per QALY gained from the withdrawal of PAC was 2985 pounds. The expected cost per life gained from the withdrawal of PAC was 22,038 pounds. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical management of critically ill patients with a PAC, as currently practised in the UK, neither improves hospital survival for adult, general intensive care patients nor reduces length of stay in hospital. The lack of demonstrable benefit from a device previously believed to be beneficial could be explained by statistical chance, by misinterpretation of PAC-derived data, by ineffective treatment strategies based on data correctly interpreted using the current paradigm or by subsequent inaction following insertion of the device. It is also possible that detailed data on haemodynamics, however used, cannot modify the disease process sufficiently to influence disease outcome. The economic evaluation, using decision analysis techniques rather than conventional hypothesis testing, suggests that the withdrawal of the PAC from routine clinical practice in the NHS would be considered cost-effective in the current decision-making climate, and might result in lives or life-years being saved at modest cost. With the declining use of PACs in the UK and the findings of this report indicating no overall benefit from management with a PAC, it should now be possible to examine protocolised management with a PAC in selected groups of critically ill patients against appropriate controls, something that was difficult while PACs were the considered standard of care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Admissions to intensive care units from emergency departments: a descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the case mix, activity, and outcome for admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) from emergency departments (EDs). DESIGN: An observational study using data from a high quality clinical database, the Case Mix Programme Database, of intensive care admissions, coordinated at the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC). SETTING: 91 adult ICUs in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, 1996-99. SUBJECTS: 46,587 intensive care admissions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ultimate hospital mortality. RESULTS: Admissions from EDs constituted 26% of total admissions to ICU, 77% of which were direct admissions to ICU from EDs. Direct admissions from EDs, indirect admissions from EDs, and non-ED admissions presented to ICU with different conditions and severity of illness. Indirect admissions from EDs presented in the ICU with the more severe case mix (older age, more acute severity of illness, more likely to have a chronic illness) compared with direct admissions to ICU from EDs. Compared with ICU admissions not originating in EDs, unit and hospital mortality were higher for admissions from EDs, with indirect admissions experiencing the highest hospital (46.4%) mortality. For ICU survivors, indirect admissions stayed longest in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of admissions to ICU (26%) originate in EDs, and differ from those not originating in EDs in terms of both case mix and outcome. Additionally, those admitted directly to ICU from EDs differ from those admitted indirectly via a ward. The observed differences in outcome between different admission routes require further investigation and explanation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST).

BACKGROUND: Thoracic ultrasound (EFAST) has shown promise in inferring the presence of post-traumatic pneumothoraces (PTXs) and may have a particular value in identifying occult pneumothoraces (OPTXs) missed by the AP supine chest radiograph (CXR). However, the diagnostic utility of hand-held US has not been previously evaluated in this role. METHODS: Thoracic US examinations were performed during the initial resuscitation of injured patients at a provincial trauma referral center. A high frequency linear transducer and a 2.4 kg US attached to a video-recorder were used. Real-time EFAST examinations for PTXs were blindly compared with the subsequent results of CXRs, a composite standard (CXR, chest and abdominal CT scans, clinical course, and invasive interventions), and a CT gold standard (CT only). Charts were reviewed for in-hospital outcomes and follow-up. RESULTS: There were 225 eligible patients (207 blunt, 18 penetrating); 17 were excluded from the US examination because of battery failure or a lost probe. Sixty-five (65) PTXs were detected in 52 patients (22% of patients), 41 (63%) being occult to CXR in 33 patients (14.2% whole population, 24.6% of those with a CT). The US and CXR agreed in 186 (89.4%) of patients, EFAST was better in 16 (7.7%), and CXR better in 6 (2.9%). Compared with the composite standard, the sensitivity of EFAST was 58.9% with a likelihood ratio of a positive test (LR+) of 69.7 and a specificity of 99.1%. Comparing EFAST directly to CXR, by looking at each of 266 lung fields with the benefit of the CT gold standard, the EFAST showed higher sensitivity over CXR (48.8% versus 20.9%). Both exams had a very high specificity (99.6% and 98.7%), and very predictive LR+ (46.7 and 36.3). CONCLUSION: EFAST has comparable specificity to CXR but is more sensitive for the detection of OPTXs after trauma. Positive EFAST findings should be addressed either clinically or with CT depending on hemodynamic stability. CT should be used if detection of all PTXs is desired.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

[Factors associated with hospital mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit in Colombia].

OBJECTIVES: To describe the demographic features, reasons for hospital admission and factors associated with hospital mortality in patients admitted to intensive care in Colombia. METHOD: A cohort study of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Of 89 ICUs identified in Colombia, 20 in ten cities were invited to gather information on 200 consecutive patients admitted to each ICU. RESULTS: Three thousand sixty-six patient cases were available for analysis. The mean age was 53 years and 43% were women (men vs. women, p < 0.001). The most frequent cause of admission was medical (63.9%), acute myocardial infarction patients (7.1%) comprising the largest group. Severity of disease measured as APACHE II and III was a mean 14.0 (SD 6.9) and 48.3 (SD 23.5), respectively. Multivariate analysis, independent of adjustment for severity (APACHE II or III), showed that the factors associated with hospital death were the need for mechanical ventilation, pupillary response, transfer from a medical ward, and management by the ICU team prior to admission (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The most common reason for admission to an ICU in Colombia was myocardial infarction. Besides severity of disease, other variables related to medical care in Colombia are associated with hospital mortality, such as invasive ventilation. Although these variables may be artifacts related to disease severity, they are more likely to be related to quality of care.

APACHE↗
PubMed2002

Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the case mix and outcomes of male and female patients admitted to intensive care units for a wide range of conditions. DESIGN: Cross sectional study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme. PARTICIPANTS: 46 587 admissions to 91 units across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. MAIN RESULTS: No gender differences were found in case mix on admission or in mortality for five conditions (cardiac arrhythmia, chronic obstructive airways disease, asthma, self poisoning, and seizures). There was some evidence of horizontal and vertical inequity for female patients with myocardial infarction and with neurological bleeding. Vertical equity was not achieved for male pneumonia and ventricular failure patients and for women with primary brain injury. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated, for the first time, possible inequitable use of intensive care for patients with certain conditions. This may be secondary to gender bias and can result in either over-treatment in the favoured group, or under-treatment in the neglected group. It would therefore be pertinent to re-examine these findings using other databases, and to further investigate the causative factors, including gender bias.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed2001

Development and testing of a hierarchical method to code the reason for admission to intensive care units: the ICNARC Coding Method. Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre.

A computer-based hierarchical method was developed to code conditions leading to admission to intensive care in the UK. The hierarchy had five tiers: surgical status, body system, anatomical site, physiological or pathological process and medical condition. The hierarchy was populated initially using the free-text descriptions of the reason for admission from 10,806 admissions recorded as part of the Intensive Care Society's UK APACHE II study. After refinement and error-checking, a prospective evaluation was undertaken on 22,059 admissions to 62 UK intensive care units. Individual units coded between 60 and 1610 (mean 356) admissions. All but 50 (0.2%) of the admissions could be coded and 38 units coded every admission. Fifty admissions (0.2%) could not be coded within 24 h of admission but were coded subsequently when more information became available. Of the admissions, 96.1% were coded at all levels of the hierarchy in the coding method. Six hundred and thirty-seven of the 741 unique conditions (85.9%) were used in one of the five reasons for admission and 564 (76.1%) in the primary reason for admission. Five conditions account for 19.4% of all primary reasons for admission. This is the first method to be developed empirically for coding the reason for intensive care admission.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗
PubMed2001

Variation in intensive care unit outcomes: a search for the evidence on organizational factors.

This study was undertaken to determine the extent of empirical evidence on the role of organizational factors in the critical care literature and to categorize these factors. Studies evaluating organizational factors were identified through electronic and hand searching of the critical care literature. Sixty-three publications relating to 54 different studies were identified. The studies were grouped into eight main categories: staffing, teamwork, volume and pressure of work, protocols, admission to intensive care, technology, structure, and error. Studies evaluating organizational factors exist in the critical care literature, and there is evidence that the number is increasing each year. Results indicate that organizational factors may have an impact on mortality after case mix adjustment. Some areas have been investigated more thoroughly than others and are ripe for systematic review. Variation in case mix adjusted hospital mortality after intensive care is an old theme. This study has shown that emerging data will help us understand mortality differences and deliver better outcomes for patients.

Critical Care↗
PubMed2001

The development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of chronic foot pain: the ROwan Foot Pain Assessment Questionnaire (ROFPAQ).

The development and validation of the ROwan Foot Pain Assessment Questionnaire (ROFPAQ) is described. This is the first attempt to develop a multi-dimensional measure of chronic foot pain, and recognizes pain as having sensory, affective and cognitive dimensions. The ROFPAQ was developed from themes that emerged from running focus groups and semi-structured interviews with people with chronic foot pain. Following piloting and selection of appropriate items by both psychometric and semantic means, the scale was found to meet the accepted criteria for validity and reliability. The final scale demonstrates better than standard readability, has a short completion time and a simple scoring method. The scale allows clinicians to determine which dimension(s) of foot pain are the most relevant to the subject, thereby aiding decisions regarding appropriate treatment. Topics for further work on the ROFPAQ are highlighted.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2001

Use of albumin in intensive care units in the United kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To review the use of intravenous albumin solutions in intensive care units in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to the clinical directors of all intensive care units in the United Kingdom (n = 292) asking about their use and indications for intravenous albumin solutions. RESULTS: Responses were received from 261 (89.4%) intensive care units (ICUs). The units were classified as general ICUs (n = 198), paediatric ICUs (n = 22) and combined intensive care/coronary care units (ICU/CCUs) (n = 41). Of the 261 units that replied, 181 (69.3%) reported using intravenous albumin, although the indications varied between units particularly in paediatric intensive care units. The alternatives to albumin also varied between the units. The general ICUs favoured hydroxyethyl starch (n = 129, 65.2%) and/or gelatin solutions (n = 87, 43.9%), as did the combined ICU/CCUs (n = 28, 68.3% and/or n = 23, 56.1% respectively). However, of the paediatric ICUs that used an alternative to albumin solutions (n = 21/22), 12 favoured crystalloid solutions (54.5%) and 9 favoured gelatin solutions (40.9%). We also assessed the impact of the recent review by the Cochrane Injuries Group Reviewers on the use of albumin and found that the respondents of 131 units (50.2%) reported that this study influenced their use of intravenous albumin. Of the 80 units that did not use albumin solutions, 33 units reported that they had ceased using intravenous albumin following the review from the Cochrane Injuries Group Reviewers. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two-thirds of intensive care units in the United kingdom reported using intravenous albumin, although the indications varied between units. In many of these units the use of intravenous albumin had been influenced by the recent review by the Cochrane Injuries Group Reviewers on the use of albumin.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Carbacyclic peptide mimetics as VCAM-VLA-4 antagonists.

Substitution of carbon for sulfur in a potent 13-membered cyclic disulfide containing peptide was accomplished via an intramolecular Wittig reaction and resulted in a series of 'carba' analogues. Potency in the VCAM-VLA-4 assay was sensitive to ring size and lower than that of the parent disulfide.

Integrin alpha4beta1↗
PubMed2000

Cyclic thioether peptide mimetics as VCAM-VLA-4 antagonists.

Selective substitution of a sulfur atom by carbon in a highly potent 13-membered cyclic disulfide was accomplished by intramolecular displacement of a bromide. The potency of the resulting thioethers in the VCAM/VLA-4 assay was dependent on ring size and the position of the sulfur atom.

Integrin alpha4beta1↗
PubMed2000

N-benzylpyroglutamyl-L-phenylalanine derivatives as VCAM/VLA-4 antagonists.

A series of N-(N-benzylpyroglutamyl)-4-substituted-L-phenylalanine derivatives was prepared as VLA-4/VCAM antagonists. Analogues substituted by electron deficient benzoylamino groups bearing bulky ortho substituents had low-nM potency in an ELISA assay and low-microM activity in a cell based assay.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2000

Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care.

OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of using a nominal group technique to establish clinical and health services research priorities in critical care and to test the representativeness of the group's views. DESIGN: Generation of topics by means of a national survey; a nominal group technique to establish the level of consensus; a survey to test the representativeness of the results. SETTING: United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. SUBJECTS: Nominal group composed of 10 doctors (8 consultants, 2 trainees) and 2 nurses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Level of support (median) and level of agreement (mean absolute deviation from the median) derived from a 9 point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the 325 intensive care units approached, 187 (58%) responded, providing about 1000 suggestions for research. Of the 106 most frequently suggested topics considered by the nominal group, 37 attracted strong support, 48 moderate support and 21 weak support. There was more agreement after the group had met-overall mean of the mean absolute deviations from the median fell from 1.41 to 1.26. The group's views represented the views of the wider community of critical care staff (r=0.73, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the views of staff from teaching or from non-teaching hospitals. Of the 37 topics that attracted the strongest support, 24 were concerned with organisational aspects of critical care and only 13 with technology assessment or clinical research. CONCLUSIONS: A nominal group technique is feasible and reliable for determining research priorities among clinicians. This approach is more democratic and transparent than the traditional methods used by research funding bodies. The results suggest that clinicians perceive research into the best ways of delivering and organising services as a high priority.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗