PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K S Glassman

Publications and source records attributed to K S Glassman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Facilitating care management through computerized clinical pathways.

The development and implementation of clinical pathways at New York University Medical Center and the transition to a computerized multidisciplinary documentation system took place between 1995 and 1998. Both the computerized system and the pathway program evolved simultaneously over this 3-year period. The article describes the process of creating the clinical pathways and the automated documentation system to support the clinical pathways. Migration from the paper pathway to the automated system required the efforts of an interdisciplinary team, which focused on issues such as translation of written pathway detail into language that could be loaded into the automated system. The advantages, pitfalls, and lessons learned in this integration experience are also described.

Automation↗

Self-administration of medication by patients and family members during hospitalization.

The current trend of shorter hospital stays has heightened concern about the adequacy of preparation of patients and their families to understand and follow prescribed medication regimens properly following discharge. Cooperative Care, an education-intensive unit incorporating a living-in family member or friend acting as a 'care partner,' has had a self-administration of medication program (SAM) for the past 16 years. This paper describes SAM and reports on two studies of its effectiveness. The first was a 1-week survey of all patients (151) admitted to the unit. 126 (83.4%) were taking a mean of five medications, with a range of one to 17. Of those, 102 (80.9%) were able to participate in SAM independently, and 11 (8.7%) were on SAM with supervision by their care partners. The second study reviewed medication administration errors within Cooperative Care and the traditional nursing units of Tisch Hospital over a 4-year period (1991-1994). Cooperative Care accounted for 19.4% of discharges (22,164/114,206) and 10.3% of patient days (97,037/944,230), but only 4.6% of medication errors (80/1723). The medication error rate per 1000 discharges was 3.6 for Cooperative Care, and 17.8 for the traditional units. Comparative error rates per 10,000 medication orders were 3.06 at Cooperative Care and 4.01 on the traditional units. 74.8% of Cooperative Care patients were on SAM, but only 30% of the errors were attributed to patients or care partners. The other errors were attributed to nursing staff (50%), equipment defects (12.5%) or pharmacists (5%). Our data indicate that SAM during hospitalization is a safe and effective modality of care.

Adult↗

New York University Medical Center's Cooperative Care Unit: patient education and family participation during hospitalization--the first ten years.

The New York University Medical Center Cooperative Care (CC) program is a model of a delivery system of acute inpatient hospital care characterized by a live-in family member or friend acting as a "care partner". It has an emphasis on education in order to encourage full patient and family involvement in care during the acute hospitalization, thereby preparing both parties for management at home after discharge. The education-intensive experience of CC provides an alternative to traditional inpatient hospital care with the expected outcome of CC being to increase patient and family knowledge and satisfaction, adherence to the medical regimen, and appropriate self-management. The functioning ability of the patient-care partner team should be improved on discharge, which may result in decreased subsequent utilization of high cost healthcare resources such as rehospitalization. This paper describes the structure of the CC form of inpatient care, the types of patients appropriate for such care, and the experience of its first ten years of operation, with its implications as a replicable model for other institutions.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Bedside terminals and quality of nursing documentation.

In this article, the authors report on part one of a three-part investigation studying the impact of bedside terminals at New York University Medical Center, New York, NY. Using a before-after parallel control-group design, the quality of computerized nursing documentation was studied before and after adding computers to patient rooms. The quality of documentation was defined by timeliness and completeness of data. The study hypothesis, which predicted a positive relationship between the presence of bedside terminals and the quality of nursing documentation, was not supported. Study results showed a minimal use of the computer terminals located in patient rooms. A surprising result was the use of terminals located in rooms other than that of the patient for which documentation was made.

Computer Terminals↗