PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K S Zier

Publications and source records attributed to K S Zier.

41 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Secondary cell-mediated lympholysis: importance of H-2 LD and SD factors.

Lymphocytes stimulated in mixed leukocyte cultures and left for 13-17 days, i.e. beyond their peak proliferative and cytotoxic reactivities, can be restimulated to give a secondary-type rapid and strong proliferative and cytotoxic response when confronted with cells of the original sensitizing cell donor. We have concerned ourselves primarily with the requirements of restimulation for the presence of LD and/or SD stimuli on the restimulating cells. (a) The low level cell-mediated lympholysis (CML) associated with LD differences in a primary CML can be restimulated to give a secondary-type response by those same LD antigens. (b) If the original sensitizing cells differ from the responding cells by both LD and SD antigens, restimulation with only the LD antigens, or third-party cells presumably carrying cross-reactive LD antigens, can restimulate the secondary CML responses directed against the SD antigens on the original sensitizing cells. (c) The presence of SD antigens on the restimulating cells that are cross-reactive with the primary sensitizing SD antigens (as determined in a primary CML) leads to the preferential activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes reactive to those antigens although maximum cytotoxicity is still directed at cells carrying the original sensitizing SD antigens. A model to explain these results is presented.

Animals↗

Secondary responses of human lymphocytes to alloantigens in vitro.

The secondary response of human lymphocytes following restimulation with alloantigens has been studied. If fresh stimulating cells are added to a mixed leukocyte culture (MLC) at a time when the peak of proliferative and cytotoxic activity has passed, a rapid reactivation occurs. The secondary response in MLC demonstrates specificity such that restimulation with the original sensitizing cell (or one presumably sharing the LD genetic determinants responsible for triggering MLC) induces a greater proliferative response than a third-party cell. On the other hand, the secondary cytotoxic response is directed towards the SD antigens of the original sensitizing cell regardless of which cell is used for restimulation. Possible mechanisms of cellular interactions are considered to explain these results.

Animals↗

Cell mediated immunity: separation of cells involved in recognitive and destructive phases.

The mixed leukocyte culture (MLC) and the cell mediated lympholysis (CML) assays are used as in vitro models of the afferent, or recognitive, and efferent, or destructive, phases of the homograft reaction. Activity in both of these tests has been related to differences at the major histocompatibility complex, HL-A in man and H-2 in mouse. Recent evidence suggests that the presumed cell surface differences which lead to cell proliferation in MLC are different from those which act as a target for CML. Data are presented providing further support for this hypothesis; in addition separate cell populations may respond to the differences which activate cells in MLC and to the differences which serve as targets for CML. There thus appears to be a dichotomy both for genetic control of, and cell populations involved in, the recognitive and destructive phases of cell mediated immunity.

Animals↗