PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Thaller

Publications and source records attributed to K Thaller.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Input and distractor modality effects upon the release from proactive interference in children.

Build-up of proactive interference (PI) with visual-picture and auditory-verbal input modalities and the subsequent release from Pi following a change in modality was investigated in three experiments with boys and girls, as follows: Experiment I (n=64) at two mean age levels, 7-6 and 10-5; Experiment II (n=64) at mean age 7-6; and Experiment III (n=48) at age 11-4. PI build-up occurred in both modalities for all ages tested. Release from PI occurred following a change from auditory to visual input by not from PI occurred following a change from auditory shift. In the final experiment, this asymmetrical improvement in performance was dependent upon an interaction between the modality of the input and distractor task on the final or release trial; changing to visual input produced a release effect regardless of the distractor task modality, while auditory input was associated with improvement in recall if a visual distractor task was employed whether or not a shift in input modality had occurred. This improvement was hypothesized to represent a decrease in retroactive interference rather than a release from proactive interference.

Child↗

Acquisition and retention of a passive-avoidance task as a function of age in mice.

In Experiment I groups of mice between 16 to 100 days of age were tested for retention of a passive-avoidance response between 1 min and 96 hr following a single training trial at 2 shock intensities. In general, although almost all age groups displayed reliable retention at all retest intervals, some retention losses were found among the youngest age groups at the longer retention intervals. Higher shock intensity resulted in longer retest latencies, primarily among the youngest mice. In Experiment II mice 16, 25, and 100 days of age were trained to criterion on the passive-avoidance task and retested on a single trial following retention intervals of 24, 96, 192, and 384 hr. Young mice exhibited severe retention losses relative to 100-day-old mice at the longer intervals, even though they did not show deficiencies in acquisition. Neurological maturity at the time of original training appears to account for the age-related memory differences.

Age Factors↗