PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K VijayRaghavan

Publications and source records attributed to K VijayRaghavan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Shaping leg muscles in Drosophila: role of ladybird, a conserved regulator of appendicular myogenesis.

Legs are locomotor appendages used by a variety of evolutionarily distant vertebrates and invertebrates. The primary biological leg function, locomotion, requires the formation of a specialised appendicular musculature. Here we report evidence that ladybird, an orthologue of the Lbx1 gene recognised as a hallmark of appendicular myogenesis in vertebrates, is expressed in leg myoblasts, and regulates the shape, ultrastructure and functional properties of leg muscles in Drosophila. Ladybird expression is progressively activated in myoblasts associated with the imaginal leg disc and precedes that of the founder cell marker dumbfounded. The RNAi-mediated attenuation of ladybird expression alters properties of developing myotubes, impairing their ability to grow and interact with the internal tendons and epithelial attachment sites. It also affects sarcomeric ultrastructure, resulting in reduced leg muscle performance and impaired mobility in surviving flies. The over-expression of ladybird also results in an abnormal pattern of dorsally located leg muscles, indicating different requirements for ladybird in dorsal versus ventral muscles. This differential effect is consistent with the higher level of Ladybird in ventrally located myoblasts and with positive ladybird regulation by extrinsic Wingless signalling from the ventral epithelium. In addition, ladybird expression correlates with that of FGF receptor Heartless and the read-out of FGF signalling downstream of FGF. FGF signals regulate the number of leg disc associated myoblasts and are able to accelerate myogenic differentiation by activating ladybird, leading to ectopic muscle fibre formation. A key role for ladybird in leg myogenesis is further supported by its capacity to repress vestigial and to down-regulate the vestigial-governed flight muscle developmental programme. Thus in Drosophila like in vertebrates, appendicular muscles develop from a specialised pool of myoblasts expressing ladybird/Lbx1. The ladybird/Lbx1 gene family appears as a part of an ancient genetic circuitry determining leg-specific properties of myoblasts and making an appendage adapted for locomotion.

Animals↗

Genetic regulation of patterned tubular branching in Drosophila.

A common theme in organogenesis is the branching of epithelial tubes, for example in the lung, liver, or kidney. The later morphogenesis of these branched epithelia dictates the final form and function of the mature tissue. Epithelial branching requires the specification of branch cells, the eversion process itself, and, frequently, patterned morphogenesis to produce branches of specific shape and orientation. Using the branching of renal tubule primordia from the hindgut in Drosophila, we show that these aspects are coordinately regulated. Cell specification depends on Wnt signaling along the tubular gut and results in the spatially restricted coexpression of two transcription factors, Krüppel and Cut, in the hindgut, whose activity drives cells toward renal tubule fate. Significantly, these transcription factors also confer the competence to respond to a second signal; TGF-beta induces branching to form the four renal tubule buds. Differential activation of the TGF-beta pathway also patterns the tubules, resulting in the asymmetry in size and positioning that is characteristic of the two tubule pairs. High levels of TGF-beta promote the expression of Dorsocross1-3 and anterior tubule growth, whereas low levels allow the expression of the transcriptional repressor, Brinker, and thus promote posterior tubule identity. We show that patterning of the tubule primordium into two distinct pairs is critical for the eversion of tubule branches, as well as for their asymmetric morphogenesis.

Animals↗

Founder myoblasts and fibre number during adult myogenesis in Drosophila.

We have examined the mechanisms underlying the setting of myotubes and choice of myotube number in adult Drosophila. We find that the pattern of adult myotubes is prefigured by a pattern of duf-lacZ-expressing myoblasts at appropriate locations. Selective expression of duf-lacZ in single myoblasts emerges from generalized, low-level expression in all adult myoblasts during the third larval instar. The number of founders, thus chosen, corresponds to the number of fibres in a muscle. In contrast to the embryo, the selection of individual adult founder cells during myogenesis does not depend on Notch-mediated lateral inhibition. Our results suggest a general mechanism by which multi-fibre muscles can be patterned.

Animals↗

Prepattern genes and signaling molecules regulate stripe expression to specify Drosophila flight muscle attachment sites.

In Drosophila, muscles attach to epidermal tendon cells specified by the gene stripe (sr). Flight muscle attachment sites are prefigured on the wing imaginal disc by sr expression in discrete domains. We describe the mechanisms underlying the specification of these domains of sr expression. We show that the concerted activities of the wingless (wg), decapentaplegic (dpp) and Notch (N) signaling pathways, and the prepattern genes pannier (pnr) and u-shaped (ush) establish domains of sr expression. N is required for initiation of sr expression. pnr is a positive regulator of sr, and is inhibited by ush in this function. The Wg signal differentially influences the formation of different sr domains. These results identify the multiple regulatory elements involved in the positioning of Drosophila flight muscle attachment sites.

Alleles↗

Myoblast diversification and ectodermal signaling in Drosophila.

The flight muscles of Drosophila derive from myoblasts found on the third instar disc. We demonstrate that these myoblasts already show distinctive properties and examine how this diversity is generated. In the late larva, Vestigial and low levels of Cut are expressed in myoblasts that will contribute to the indirect flight muscles. Other myoblasts, which express high levels of Cut but no Vestigial, are required for the formation of the direct flight muscles. Vestigial and Cut expression are stabilized by a mutually repressive feedback loop. Vestigial expression begins in the embryo in a subset of adult myoblasts, and Wingless signaling is required later to maintain this expression. Thus, myoblasts are divided into identifiable populations, consistent with their allocation to different muscles, and ectodermal signals act to maintain these differences.

Animals↗

Protein phosphatase 1beta is required for the maintenance of muscle attachments.

Type 1 serine/threonine protein phosphatases (PP1) are important regulators of many cellular and developmental processes, including glycogen metabolism, muscle contraction, and the cell cycle [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Drosophila and humans both have multiple genes encoding PP1 isoforms [3] [6] [7]; each has one beta and several alpha isoform genes (alpha(1), alpha(2), alpha(3) in flies, alpha and gamma in humans; mammalian PP1beta is also known as PP1delta). The alpha/beta subtype differences are highly conserved between flies and mammals [6]. Though all these proteins are >85% identical to each other and have indistinguishable activities in vitro, we show here that the Drosophila beta isoform has a distinct biological role. We show that PP1beta9C corresponds to flapwing (flw), previously identified mutants of which are viable but flightless because of defects in indirect flight muscles (IFMs) [8]. We have isolated a new, semi-lethal flw allele that shows a range of defects, especially in muscles, which break away from their attachment sites and degenerate.

Alleles↗

Apterous mediates development of direct flight muscles autonomously and indirect flight muscles through epidermal cues.

Two physiologically distinct types of muscles, the direct and indirect flight muscles, develop from myoblasts associated with the Drosophila wing disc. We show that the direct flight muscles are specified by the expression of Apterous, a Lim homeodomain protein, in groups of myoblasts. This suggests a mechanism of cell-fate specification by labelling groups of fusion competent myoblasts, in contrast to mechanisms in the embryo, where muscle cell fate is specified by single founder myoblasts. In addition, Apterous is expressed in the developing adult epidermal muscle attachment sites. Here, it functions to regulate the expression of stripe, a gene that is an important element of early patterning of muscle fibres, from the epidermis. Our results, which may have broad implications, suggest novel mechanisms of muscle patterning in the adult, in contrast to embryonic myogenesis.

Animals↗

Muscle pattern diversification in Drosophila: the story of imaginal myogenesis.

There are two phases of somatic muscle formation in Drosophila. During embryonic development, one phase of myogenesis generates larval muscle elements that mediate the relatively simple behavioural repertoire of the larva. During pupal metamorphosis, a diverse pattern of muscle fibres are assembled, and these facilitate the more elaborate behavioural patterns of the adult fly. In this review, we discuss the current status of understanding of the cellular, genetic, and molecular mechanisms of pattern formation during the second phase, imaginal muscle development. We briefly compare aspects of embryonic and adult myogenesis in Drosophila and muscle development in vertebrates and highlight conserved themes and disparities between these diverse myogenic programmes.

Animals↗

scalloped functions in a regulatory loop with vestigial and wingless to pattern the Drosophila wing.

The development of the Drosophila wing involves progressive patterning events. In the second larval instar, cells of the wing disc are allotted wing or notum fates by a wingless-mediated process and dorsal or ventral fates by the action of apterous and wingless. Notch-mediated signalling is required for the expression of the genes vestigial and scalloped in the presumptive wing blade. Later, wingless, Notch and cut are involved in cell fate specification along the wing margin. The function of scalloped in this process is not well understood and is the focus of this study. We show that patterning downstream of Notch and wingless pathways is altered in scalloped mutants. Reduction in scalloped expression results in a loss of expression of wing blade- and margin-specific markers. Misexpression of scalloped in the presumptive wing causes misexpression of scalloped, vestigial and wingless reporter genes. However, high levels of scalloped expression have a negative influence on wingless, vestigial and its own expression. Our results demonstrate that scalloped functions in a level-dependent manner in the presumptive wing blade in a loop that involves vestigial and itself. We suggest that wing development requires the regulated expression of scalloped together with vestigial-the "wing formation" effects of Vestigial in other imaginal discs are probably due to its interaction with the scalloped gene product normally expressed in these discs.

Animals↗

even-skipped determines the dorsal growth of motor axons in Drosophila.

Axon pathfinding and target choice are governed by cell type-specific responses to external cues. Here, we show that in the Drosophila embryo, motorneurons with targets in the dorsal muscle field express the homeobox gene even-skipped and that this expression is necessary and sufficient to direct motor axons into the dorsal muscle field. Previously, it was shown that motorneurons projecting to ventral targets express the LIM homeobox gene islet, which is sufficient to direct axons to the ventral muscle field. Thus, even-skipped complements the function of islet, and together these two genes constitute a bimodal switch regulating axonal growth and directing motor axons to ventral or to dorsal regions of the muscle field.

Animals↗

Patterning muscles using organizers: larval muscle templates and adult myoblasts actively interact to pattern the dorsal longitudinal flight muscles of Drosophila.

Pattern formation in muscle development is often mediated by special cells called muscle organizers. During metamorphosis in Drosophila, a set of larval muscles function as organizers and provide scaffolding for the development of the dorsal longitudinal flight muscles. These organizers undergo defined morphological changes and dramatically split into templates as adult fibers differentiate during pupation. We have investigated the cellular mechanisms involved in the use of larval fibers as templates. Using molecular markers that label myoblasts and the larval muscles themselves, we show that splitting of the larval muscles is concomitant with invasion by imaginal myoblasts and the onset of differentiation. We show that the Erect wing protein, an early marker of muscle differentiation, is not only expressed in myoblasts just before and after fusion, but also in remnant larval nuclei during muscle differentiation. We also show that interaction between imaginal myoblasts and larval muscles is necessary for transformation of the larval fibers. In the absence of imaginal myoblasts, the earliest steps in metamorphosis, such as the escape of larval muscles from histolysis and changes in their innervation, are normal. However, subsequent events, such as the splitting of these muscles, fail to progress. Finally, we show that in a mutant combination, null for Erect wing function in the mesoderm, the splitting of the larval muscles is aborted. These studies provide a genetic and molecular handle for the understanding of mechanisms underlying the use of muscle organizers in muscle patterning. Since the use of such organizers is a common theme in myogenesis in several organisms, it is likely that many of the processes that we describe are conserved.

Actins↗

Twist and Notch negatively regulate adult muscle differentiation in Drosophila.

Twist is required in Drosophila embryogenesis for mesodermal specification and cell-fate choice. We have examined the role of Twist and Notch during adult indirect flight muscle development. Reduction in levels of Twist leads to abnormal myogenesis. Notch reduction causes a similar mutant phenotype and reduces Twist levels. Conversely, persistent expression, in myoblasts, of activated Notch causes continued twist expression and failure of differentiation as assayed by myosin expression. The gain-of-function phenotype of Notch is very similar to that seen upon persistent twist expression. These results point to a relationship between Notch function and twist regulation during indirect flight muscle development and show that decline in Twist levels is a requirement for the differentiation of these muscles, unlike the somatic muscles of the embryo.

Animals↗

Muscles in the Drosophila second thoracic segment are patterned independently of autonomous homeotic gene function.

BACKGROUND: In Drosophila, segment-specific muscle pattern is thought to be determined by the autonomous function of homeotic selector genes in the mesoderm in combination with inductive cues from the developing epidermis and nervous system. Here, we have examined the roles of homeotic genes in the patterning of the somatic muscles of the thoracic segments of Drosophila. RESULTS: We determined the expression patterns of homeoproteins in the mesoderm of the thoracic segments during embryonic and adult development. We found that, unlike the mesoderm of the first and third thoracic segments which express Sex combs reduced and Antennapedia (Antp), respectively, the mesoderm of the second thoracic segment does not express any known homeotic selector gene of the Antp or bithorax complex. In animals homozygous for Antp null mutations, the muscles of the second thoracic segment were affected in the embryo, probably as an indirect consequence of its requirement in the ectoderm. Animals that specifically lacked Antp function in the mesoderm, but expressed the gene in the epidermis, developed with a normal muscle pattern in the second thoracic segment. Furthermore, specific ectopic expression of Antp and other homeotic selector genes in the mesoderm of the second thoracic segment respecified its muscle pattern, indicating that these genes are not required autonomously during muscle development in this segment. Finally, we showed that Antp continues to be expressed in the mesoderm of the homeotically transformed third thoracic segment in the 'four-winged fly', and suggest that this is a likely reason for the failure of flight muscle development in the transformed segment. CONCLUSIONS: We present a model for muscle development in the second thoracic segment whereby mesodermal properties are specified entirely by induction, in contrast to muscle development in other segments, where autonomous function for homeotic selector genes is also required.

Animals↗

Homeotic genes and the regulation of myoblast migration, fusion, and fibre-specific gene expression during adult myogenesis in Drosophila.

We have investigated the roles of homeotic selector genes in the migration and fusion of myoblasts, and in the differentiation of adult muscle fibres of Drosophila. Altering intrinsic homeotic identities of myoblasts does not affect their segment-specific migration patterns. By transplanting meso - and metathoracic myoblasts into the abdomen, we demonstrate that the fusion abilities of myoblasts are independent of their segmental identities. However, transplanted thoracic myoblast nuclei are 'entrained' by those of the host abdominal muscles to which they fuse and are unable to 'switch on' a thoracic muscle-specific reporter gene. This process is likely to be mediated by homeotic repression because mis-expression of an abdominal muscle-specific homeotic gene, Ultrabithorax, in the thoracic muscles results in the repression of the thoracic muscle-specific reporter gene. Finally, we show that removal of Ultrabithorax function specifically from muscle cells of the first abdominal segment, results in the expression of thoracic muscle properties. Many of these functions of homeotic genes in muscle patterning in Drosophila could be conserved during myogenesis in other organisms.

Animals↗

Development of the indirect flight muscle attachment sites in Drosophila: role of the PS integrins and the stripe gene.

Using markers that are expressed at muscle attachment sites, we have examined the early pupal development (first 36 hr) of Indirect Flight Muscle (IFM) attachments in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Expression of the Drosophila homologs of vertebrate integrins, the Position-Specific (PS) antigens, is known to differentially mark epidermal (PS1alpha) and muscle (PS2alpha) components of the developing IFM attachment sites. During myogenesis, PS2alpha is detected transiently in imaginal myoblasts that fuse with persistent larval muscles to give rise to the Dorsal Longitudinal Muscles (DLMs), but not in myoblasts that fuse de novo to give rise to the Dorso Ventral Muscles. The integrins are not expressed at attachment sites when the muscle fibers first make their appearance (12-20 hr). Following muscle-epidermal contact, PS1 and PS2 are detected at muscle attachment sites. PS1 expression is at the muscle ends and also in the long epidermal processes that connect the developing muscle fibers to their sites of attachment in the epidermis, while PS2 expression is restricted to the muscle ends. Epidermal cells that will contribute to the adult attachment sites are defined as early as the third larval instar. Both anterior and posterior sites of attachment of the IFMs are marked by the expression of reporter beta-galactosidase activity in a P-element line B14.0, which is an insertion at the stripe locus. B14.0 (stripe) is seen in distinct domains in the wing and leg imaginal discs which give rise to the thoracic cuticle. The expression is maintained during pupal development. The B14.0 (stripe) expressing epidermal cells contact the developing muscle fibers, leading to the formation of the myotendon junction. We show that the dorsal and ventral attachment sites of one group of IFMs, the DVMs arise from two different imaginal discs (wing and leg, respectively), which may explain the differential effect of mutations such as bendless on these muscles. Attachment sites for the other group of IFMs, the DLMs, on the other hand, arise from one imaginal disc (wing). B14.0 (stripe) expression defines epidermal cells of the adult attachment sites and is likely to function during early events leading to the formation of muscle-epithelial contacts. The PS integrins are detected at later stages, suggesting a role in the stabilization and maturation of the muscle-epidermal contacts into myotendon junctions.

Animals↗

ERECT WING, the Drosophila member of a family of DNA binding proteins is required in imaginal myoblasts for flight muscle development.

The erect wing locus of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster encodes a protein, EWG, that shares extensive homology with the P3A2 DNA binding protein of sea urchin and a recently identified mammalian transcription factor. Loss-of-function erect wing alleles result in embryonic lethality. Viable alleles of erect wing cause severe abnormalities of the indirect flight muscles. We have analyzed the spatial pattern of erect wing expression in the developing indirect flight muscles during postembryonic development. EWG is detected, 10 hours after puparium formation, in myoblasts that will form the indirect flight muscles. The early events of muscle development are normal in ewg mutants. However, a few hours after the onset of erect wing expression in myoblasts, defects are seen in the developing indirect flight muscles which subsequently degenerate. We present results that show that the normal development of the indirect flight muscles requires erect wing expression in the progenitor myoblasts themselves. Finally, we examine the role of target muscles in the arborization of motor axons by studying the developing innervation to the flight muscle in erect wing mutants. Our study demonstrates, for the first time, a role for a regulatory gene expressed in imaginal myoblasts in Drosophila.

Animals↗

Identification of a Drosophila muscle development gene with structural homology to mammalian early growth response transcription factors.

In Drosophila, stripe (sr) gene function is required for normal muscle development. Some mutations disrupt embryonic muscle development and are lethal. Other mutations cause total loss of only a single muscle in the adult. Molecular analysis shows that sr encodes a predicted protein containing a zinc finger motif. This motif is homologous to the DNA binding domains encoded by members of the early growth response (egr) gene family. In mammals, expression of egr genes is induced by intercellular signals, and there is evidence for their role in many developmental events. The identification of sr as an egr gene and its pattern of expression suggest that it functions in muscle development via intercellular communication.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Synaptic vesicle recycling intermediates revealed.

Neurotransmitter release takes place by the exocytosis of loaded synaptic vesicles. The vesicles then fuse to the presynaptic membrane and are recycled by an endocytotic mechanism. A quantitative optical assay that detects uptake and release of a fluorescent dye during presynaptic activity was recently developed and used on the frog neauromuscular junction. I discuss a report that demonstrates the effective application of this method to a Drosophila preparation. The authors use the shibire mutation and a spider venom to identify two intermediates in vesicle recycling. Their report, along with other recent studies, demonstrates the power and promise of the genetic approach for the understanding of mechanisms of synapse function and development.

Animals↗