Biomedical subjects

Kai Uus

Publications and source records attributed to Kai Uus.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening.

BACKGROUND: Children with congenital hearing impairment benefit from early detection and management of their hearing loss. These and related considerations led to the recommendation of universal newborn hearing screening. In 2001 the first phase of a national Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) was implemented in England. Objective of this study was to assess costs and effectiveness for hospital and community-based newborn hearing screening systems in England based on data from this first phase with regard to the effects of alterations to parameter values. METHODS DESIGN: Clinical effectiveness analysis using a Markov Model. OUTCOME MEASURE: quality weighted detected child months (QCM). RESULTS: Both hospital and community programmes yielded 794 QCM at the age of 6 months with total costs of 3,690,000 pound sterling per 100,000 screened children in hospital and 3,340,000 pound sterling in community. Simulated costs would be lower in hospital in 48% of the trials. Any statistically significant difference between hospital and community in prevalence, test sensitivity, test specificity and costs would result in significant differences in cost-effectiveness between hospital and community. CONCLUSION: This modelling exercise informs decision makers by a quantitative projection of available data and the explicit and transparent statements about assumptions and the degree of uncertainty. Further evaluation of the cost-effectiveness should focus on the potential differences in test parameters and prevalence in these two settings.

Community Health Services↗

PubMed2006

Maternal anxiety following newborn hearing screening: the moderating role of knowledge.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact upon maternal anxiety of newborn hearing screening and examine the Possible moderating role of knowledge. METHODS: Questionnaires assessing maternal state anxiety, worry and certainty about the baby's hearing, and knowledge about screening, were sent to four groups of mothers three weeks after screening: Group 1 consisted of mothers whose babies had clear responses on a first or second screening test (n=103); Group 2 consisted of mothers whose babies had clear responses on the third screening test (n=81); Group 3 consisted of mothers whose babies did not have clear responses in one ear at the third screening test and were referred for audiological assessment (n=105); and Group 4 consisted of mothers whose babies did not have clear responses in either ear at the third hearing test and were referred for audiological assessment (n=55). RESULTS: Although mean anxiety levels were in the normal range, there was a significant trend for anxiety to rise as testing increased (F(1,327)=4.280, P<0.05). Worry increased significantly (F(1,337)=70.432, P<0.001) and certainty decreased significantly (F(1,339)=27.474, P=0.001) as the number of tests increased. Although total knowledge did not significantly moderate anxiety (R(2)=0.016, P=0.096), there was a significant interaction between mothers' group and one knowledge item, understanding that receipt of no clear responses was unlikely to mean that the baby had a hearing loss: mothers in Group 4 who understood this had lower anxiety (F(3,323)=4.791, P<0.01) and lower worry (F(3,332)=3.565, P<0.01) compared with mothers who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the meaning of being recalled following screening may avoid some of the anxiety associated with this.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness in routine practice of the first phase of a national population-based newborn hearing screening and follow-up program that seeks to identify infants with bilateral permanent hearing loss of > or =40-dB hearing loss. METHODS: The study was a part of the independent evaluation of the 23 first phase sites (annual birth population approximately 120,000) of the national newborn hearing screening program in England. For each infant identified with the defined hearing loss, the measures of interest were degree and type of hearing loss, presence of risk factors, age of first audiologic assessment, age of identification of hearing loss, age of enrollment in an early support program, and age of hearing aid fitting. Data collection took place over the first 2 years of the program. RESULTS: Data were provided on 169 infants with permanent bilateral moderate or greater hearing loss identified through screening 169487 infants. Fifty-four percent of all cases were from an "at-risk" population. Three fourths of these "at-risk" infants spent > or =48 hours in the NICU. For the whole sample, the median age at first audiologic assessment was 5 weeks; the median age of identification of the hearing loss and of enrollment in early support program was 10 weeks irrespective of the degree of hearing loss; and the median age at hearing aid fitting was 16 weeks. Infants with moderate hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids significantly later than those with severe and profound hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Properly implemented, a newborn hearing screening program based on whole populations and routine service provision can deliver satisfactory outcomes in terms of age of referral, identification, and intervention. The distribution of degree and type of hearing loss and proportion with risk factors was similar to that expected. The numbers identified were such as to suggest that very few cases were missed by the screening program.

Deafness↗

PubMed2005

Readiness of paediatric audiology services for newborn hearing screening: findings and implications from the programme in England.

As well as evaluating the newborn hearing screen itself, the government-funded evaluation of the implementation of a Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) in England is assessing the impact of the screen on follow-up services. In the UK context, these are principally paediatric audiology, education, and social services. This article presents results from a mixed method research study involving paediatric audiology services specifically. Results demonstrate significant variety in current practice with regard to routine tests and procedures, considerable variability in number of current referrals and time allocated to caseloads, and considerable variability in expectations of how the numbers will change following newborn screening implementation. The challenges of and opportunities afforded by NHSP which were identified by respondents, highlight the urgent need for further training. The study has implications for paediatric audiology services that are yet to start NHSP in the UK, as well as for services and professionals in other countries.

Audiology↗

PubMed2005

Maternal anxiety and satisfaction following infant hearing screening: a comparison of the health visitor distraction test and newborn hearing screening.

BACKGROUND: Newborn hearing screening is currently replacing the health visitor distraction test (HVDT) conducted at eight months. Our previous research indicates that recall for further tests following newborn hearing screening can have a negative impact on the emotional well being of mothers, but it is not known if this is greater than that caused by recall following the distraction test. OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact on maternal anxiety and satisfaction of recall following newborn hearing screening and the HVDT. METHODS: Four groups participated: 27 mothers of babies receiving a satisfactory result and 21 mothers of babies recalled after the HVDT 26 mothers of babies receiving a satisfactory result and 16 mothers of babies recalled after newborn hearing screening. Questionnaires assessing maternal anxiety, worry and certainty about the babies' hearing, satisfaction with and attitudes towards the screening test were sent to mothers three weeks and six months following screening. RESULTS: Comparison of the effects of receipt of different results showed no significant differences in maternal anxiety, worry and certainty between the two tests. Those mothers whose babies had a newborn hearing screening test were significantly more satisfied, regardless of the result received. Those who received a satisfactory result on the newborn hearing screening programme also had more positive attitudes towards that screening test than those receiving a satisfactory result following the HVDT. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that newborn hearing screening does not have a more negative emotional impact than the HVDT.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Screening for hearing loss in childhood: issues, evidence and current approaches in the UK.

Until recently, screening for childhood hearing loss in the UK was based on two universal (i.e. whole population) screens: the infant distraction test screen at age eight months and the school entry hearing screen at age four to five years. Evidence reviewed in the 1990s indicated that the infant distraction test screen was seriously underperforming, but that (based on technology that had become available in the 1980s and 1990s) universal newborn hearing screening could be efficacious. At the same time, evidence was emerging on the importance and value of very early identification and intervention for permanent congenital childhood hearing loss. This led to the decision to implement a national newborn hearing screening programme (NHSP) in England and to phase out the distraction test at eight months. The initial implementation of the programme will be completed in 2005, and we summarize the evidence on the effectiveness of the first phase of the programme here. A number of important issues concerning childhood hearing loss and its management remain unresolved: the burden of late-onset and temporary childhood hearing losses, the most effective approaches to intervention and management, the case for screening for mild and/or unilateral hearing loss, and the role of the School entry screen. Some of the current research efforts to address these are outlined.

Audiology↗

PubMed2004

Increasing knowledge about a screening test: preliminary evaluation of a structured, chart-based, screener presentation.

The provision and understanding of good quality information is one of the key characteristics of an informed choice. However, written materials alone often fail to achieve good understanding of screening tests. The present study describes the preliminary evaluation of a structured, chart-directed presentation, aimed at increasing knowledge of a screening test. Forty mothers of babies undergoing a newborn hearing test received either a standard, or a standard plus structured, presentation of the screening test. Standard presentation was a leaflet and short verbal explanation of the test. Structured presentation comprised an illustrated chart explaining the process and possible outcomes of screening, followed by screeners checking mothers understanding of key points and, if necessary, giving further explanation. After screening, maternal knowledge of the test was assessed using seven multiple choice items. Overall knowledge was high. For women with lower levels of education, the structured presentation resulted in significantly higher levels of knowledge than the standard presentation only.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

To what extent do the characteristics of the object of evaluation influence the choice of epistemological framework? The case of universal newborn hearing screening.

In this article, the authors explore the role that characteristics and circumstances attendant on the object of an evaluation might play in the choice of epistemological framework underpinning research design. They consider examples from the consumer-focused evaluation of the introduction of universal newborn hearing screening in England. In particular, they look at how screen- and program-specific issues exerted influence at the levels of epistemology and method, arguing that these choices are not simply a product of values and questions that underpinned one kind of approach to knowledge production in comparison with another.

Choice Behavior↗