PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Kamila Hawthorne

Publications and source records attributed to Kamila Hawthorne.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Learning to mark: a qualitative study of the experiences and concerns of medical markers.

BACKGROUND: Although there is published research on the methods markers use in marking various types of assessment, there is relatively little information on the processes markers use in approaching a marking exercise. This qualitative paper describes the preparation and experiences of general practice (GP) teachers who undertake marking a written assessment in an undergraduate medical course. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven of the 16 GP tutors on an undergraduate course. The purposive sample comprised two new markers, two who had marked for a couple of years and three experienced markers. Each respondent was interviewed twice, once following a formative assessment of a written case study, and again after a summative assessment. All interviews were audio-taped and analysed for emerging themes. A respondent validation exercise was conducted with all 16 GP tutors. RESULTS: Markers had internal concerns about their ability to mark fairly and made considerable efforts to calibrate their marking. They needed guidance and coaching when marking for the first time and adopted a variety of marking styles, reaching a decision through a number of routes. Dealing with pass/fail borderline scripts and the consequences of the mark on the student were particular concerns. Even experienced markers felt the need to calibrate their marks both internally and externally CONCLUSION: Previous experience of marking appears to improve markers' confidence and is a factor in determining the role which markers adopt. Confidence can be improved by giving clear instructions, along with examples of marking. The authors propose that one method of providing this support and coaching could be by a process of peer review of a selection of papers prior to the main marking. New markers in particular would benefit from further guidance, however they are influenced by others early on in their marking career and course organisers should be mindful of this when arranging double marking.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Putting double marking to the test: a framework to assess if it is worth the trouble.

BACKGROUND: It is a challenge to assign a mark that accurately measures the quality of students' work in essay-type assessments that require an element of judgement and fairness by the markers. Double marking such assessments has been seen as a way of improving the reliability of the mark. The analysis approach often taken is to look for absolute agreement between markers instead of looking at all aspects of reliability. AIM: To develop an analytic process that will examine the components and meanings of reliability calculations that can be used for assessing the value of double marking a piece of work. METHODS: An undergraduate case study assessment in General Practice was used as an illustration. Datasets of double marking were collected retrospectively for 1999-2000, and prospectively for 2002-03. An assessment of intermarker agreement and its effect on the reliability of the final mark for students was made, using methods dependent on the type of data collected and Generalisability Theory. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The data were used to illustrate how to interpret the results of Bland and Altman plots, anova tables and Cohen's kappa calculations. Generalisability Theory was used to show that, while there was reasonable agreement between markers, the reliability of the mark for the student was still only moderate, probably due to unexplained variability elsewhere in the process. Possible reasons for this variability are discussed. A flowchart of the decisions and actions needed to judge whether a piece of work should be double marked has been constructed.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗
PubMed2003

Working with Bangladeshi patients in Britain: perspectives from Primary Health Care.

BACKGROUND: The difficulties of ethnic minority communities in accessing appropriate primary care are well documented, but little is known about the experiences of Primary Health Care Teams (PHCTs) serving these communities, or their strategies to help patients overcome these difficulties. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to explore the PHCT perspective of working with Bangladeshi patients. METHODS: Qualitative group discussions with PHCTs were set up by four health centres in the Grangetown area of Cardiff, where a large proportion of the Bangladeshi community lives. Experiences of and attitudes to working with Bangladeshi patients were explored. Discussions were taped and transcribed for independent analysis by two researchers. Comparisons within and between PHCTs were made. RESULTS: PHCTs largely entered into full and frank discussions. Health visitors had made significantly more effort than others to get to know their Bangladeshi patients. This had costs in terms of time and effort, with no reduction in caseload. Cutting across this difference were common themes such as communication and cultural differences, and patients' difficulties in using NHS services appropriately, which caused disruption and frustration. While there was an awareness of the reasons for these difficulties, PHCTs generally were not able to allow for them because of the inflexibility of their workload and systems of working. CONCLUSIONS: Group discussions are a useful way to encourage PHCTs to reflect on their practice and share experiences. PHCTs are aware of their patients' needs and keen to explore racial awareness training and new ways of looking at how they work. However, the grind of heavy workloads makes this process unlikely without outside facilitation.

Bangladesh↗