Biomedical subjects

Karen E Lunn

Publications and source records attributed to Karen E Lunn.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Data-guided brain deformation modeling: evaluation of a 3-D adjoint inversion method in porcine studies.

Biomechanical models of brain deformation are useful tools for estimating parenchymal shift that results during open cranial procedures. Intraoperative data is likely to improve model estimates, but incorporation of such data into the model is not trivial. This study tests the adjoint equations method (AEM) for data assimilation as a viable approach for integrating displacement data into a brain deformation model. AEM was applied to two porcine experiments. AEM-based estimates were compared both to measured displacement data [from computed tomography (CT) scans] and to model solutions obtained without the guidance of sparse data, which we term the best prior estimate (BPE). Additionally, the sensitivity of the AEM solution to inverse parameter selection was investigated. The results suggest that it is most important to estimate the size of the variance in the measurement error correctly, make the correlation length long and estimate displacement (over stress) boundary conditions. Application of AEM shows an average 33% improvement over BPE. This paper represents the first evidence of successful use of the AEM technique in three dimensions with experimental data validation. The guidelines established for selection of model parameters are starting points for further optimization of the method under clinical conditions.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Assimilating intraoperative data with brain shift modeling using the adjoint equations.

Biomechanical models of brain deformation are increasingly being used to nonrigidly register preoperative MR (pMR) images of the brain to the surgical scene. These model estimates can potentially be improved by incorporating sparse displacement data available in the operating room (OR), but integrating the intraoperative information with model calculations is a nontrivial problem. We present an inverse method to estimate the unknown boundary and volumetric forces necessary to achieve a least-squares fit between the model and the data that is formulated in terms of the adjoint equations, which are solved directly by the method of representers. The scheme is illustrated in a 2D simulation and in a 2D approximation based on a patient case using actual OR data.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Stereopsis-guided brain shift compensation.

Brain deformation models have proven to be a powerful tool in compensating for soft tissue deformation during image-guided neurosurgery. The accuracy of these models can be improved by incorporating intraoperative measurements of brain motion. We have designed and implemented a passive intraoperative stereo vision system capable of estimating the three-dimensional shape of the surgical scene in near real-time. This intraoperative shape is compared with the cortical surface in the co-registered preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) volume for the estimation of the cortical motion resulting from the open cranial surgery. The estimated cortical motion is then used to guide a full brain model, which updates a preoperative MR volume. We have found that the stereo vision system is accurate to within approximately 1 mm. Based on data from two representative clinical cases, we show that stereopsis guidance improves the accuracy of brain shift compensation both at and below the cortical surface.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Displacement estimation with co-registered ultrasound for image guided neurosurgery: a quantitative in vivo porcine study.

Brain shift during open cranial surgery presents a challenge for maintaining registration with image-guidance systems. Ultrasound (US) is a convenient intraoperative imaging modality that may be a useful tool in detecting tissue shift and updating preoperative images based on intraoperative measurements of brain deformation. We have quantitatively evaluated the ability of spatially tracked freehand US to detect displacement of implanted markers in a series of three in vivo porcine experiments, where both US and computed tomography (CT) image acquisitions were obtained before and after deforming the brain. Marker displacements ranged from 0.5 to 8.5 mm. Comparisons between CT and US measurements showed a mean target localization error of 1.5 mm, and a mean vector error for displacement of 1.1 mm. Mean error in the magnitude of displacement was 0.6 mm. For one of the animals studied, the US data was used in conjunction with a biomechanical model to nonrigidly re-register a baseline CT to the deformed brain. The mean error between the actual and deformed CT's was found to be on average 1.2 and 1.9 mm at the marker locations depending on the extent of the deformation induced. These findings indicate the potential accuracy in coregistered freehand US displacement tracking in brain tissue and suggest that the resulting information can be used to drive a modeling re-registration strategy to comparable levels of agreement.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

In vivo quantification of retraction deformation modeling for updated image-guidance during neurosurgery.

The use of coregistered preoperative anatomical scans to provide navigational information in the operating room has greatly benefited the field of neurosurgery. Nonetheless, it has been widely acknowledged that significant errors between the operating field and the preoperative images are generated as surgery progresses. Quantification of tissue shift can be accomplished with volumetric intraoperative imaging; however, more functional, lower cost alternative solutions to this challenge are desirable. We are developing the strategy of exploiting a computational model driven by sparse data obtained from intraoperative ultrasound and cortical surface tracking to warp preoperative images to reflect the current state of the operating field. This paper presents an initial quantification of the predictive capability of the current model to computationally capture tissue deformation during retraction in the porcine brain. Performance validation is achieved through comparisons of displacement and pressure predictions to experimental measurements obtained from computed tomographic images and pressure sensor recordings. Group results are based upon a generalized set of boundary conditions for four subjects that, on average, account for at least 75% of tissue motion generated during interhemispheric retraction. Individualized boundary conditions can improve the degree of data-model match by 10% or more but warrant further study. Overall, the level of quantitative agreement achieved in these experiments is encouraging for updating preoperative images to reflect tissue deformation resulting from retraction, especially since model improvements are likely as a result of the intraoperative constraints that can be applied through sparse data collection.

Animals↗