Physical examination before initiating hormonal contraception: what is necessary?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal↗
Biomedical subjects
Karen R Meckstroth
Publications and source records attributed to Karen R Meckstroth.
Misoprostol administered by epithelial routes: Drug absorption and uterine response.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare serum levels and uterine effects following vaginal (dry), vaginal (moistened), buccal, and rectal misoprostol administration. METHODS: Forty women seeking elective abortion between 6 and 12 6/7 weeks were randomly assigned to receive 400 mug of misoprostol by one of four routes. A 2.5-mm pressure monitoring catheter was placed through the cervix to the uterine fundus to record uterine tone and activity during the 5-hour observation period. Serum levels of misoprostol acid were measured at 15 and 30 minutes, then every 30 minutes. RESULTS: The four groups were similar in age, race or ethnicity, body mass index, parity, and gestation. Serum levels after vaginal, vaginal moistened and buccal administration rose gradually, peaked between 15 and 120 minutes and fell slowly. Vaginal and vaginal moistened routes produced higher peak serum levels than buccal and rectal (445.9 and 427.1 compared with 264.8 and 202.2 pg/mL; P = .03) and higher serum concentration area under the curve at 5 hours (1,025.0 and 1279.4 compared with 519.6 and 312.5 pg-hr/mL; P < .001). Uterine tone and activity, however, were similar for buccal and the two vaginal routes. After rectal administration, serum levels peaked earlier (P < .001) then dropped more abruptly, and peak uterine tone (P < .001) and total activity (P = .04) were lower than after the other routes. CONCLUSION: Although serum levels were lower for buccal compared with the vaginal routes, the three routes produced similar uterine tone and activity. Rectal administration produced lower uterine tone and activity. Vaginal serum levels were two to three and a half times higher than those observed in prior misoprostol pharmacokinetic studies.
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
Misoprostol compared with laminaria before early second-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized trial.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and acceptability of same-day misoprostol and overnight laminaria for cervical ripening before early second-trimester surgical abortion. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial comparing 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol, given 3-4 hours preoperatively, with overnight laminaria before early second-trimester surgical abortion among women at 13.0-16.0 weeks of gestation (n = 84). The primary outcome was procedure time, and the sample size was based on 95% power to detect a difference of 4.5 minutes between groups. Secondary outcomes included completion of the procedure on the first attempt, procedural difficulty, and patients' pain scores and preferences. RESULTS: The average gestational duration was 14 weeks 6 days. Procedures performed after laminaria were significantly faster than those after misoprostol (median 3.4 versus 7.2 minutes, respectively, P = .01). Laminaria patients had significantly greater dilation than misoprostol patients at abortion (mean 43 versus 33 French, P < .001), and more misoprostol patients required additional dilation (85% versus 21%, P < .001). Physicians rated 27% of the misoprostol procedures as moderate-markedly difficult versus 5% of laminaria procedures (P = .01). Differences in efficacy were pronounced among nulliparous patients. There were no significant differences in ability to complete the procedure on the first attempt or patients' intraoperative pain scores. More women in the misoprostol group would choose their assigned method again (93% versus 62%, P < .01), and 82% of all subjects preferred a 1-day procedure. CONCLUSION: Early second-trimester abortions take longer and are technically more challenging after cervical ripening with same-day misoprostol than with overnight laminaria, but patients prefer same-day misoprostol.
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
Prostaglandins for first-trimester termination.
Since the 1980s, when mifepristone combined with a prostaglandin was found to be safe and effective for early abortion, many studies have refined the regimens and investigated alternatives such as methotrexate plus misoprostol, and misoprostol alone. Evidence now demonstrates that more than 200 mg of mifepristone provides no additional benefit, that vaginal misoprostol is superior to oral, especially between 7 and 9 weeks' gestation, and that misoprostol may be safely self-administered at home. Buccal and sublingual routes of administration of misoprostol also are promising. Absolute contraindications to medical abortion arise infrequently. Gastrointestinal and other side-effects occur in about one-third of women, primarily after administration of the prostaglandin. Careful assessment before and after medical abortion is essential and can be accomplished in various ways, depending on the skills of the clinician.
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
Misoprostol in gynecology.
Misoprostol is an important medication for gynecologic practice; however, it is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for any gynecologic indication. Evidence-based practice must guide our use of this important drug. Its use for medical abortion in conjunction with mifepristone or methotrexate is supported by a large body of high-quality evidence. There is also a rapidly growing amount of literature on the use of misoprostol for the management of miscarriage; however, more research is needed to optimize use. Solid evidence supports the efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening before first-trimester suction curettage abortion, and good evidence supports its use before hysteroscopy in premenopausal women; however, complications are rare with these procedures, making it difficult to assess any impact on complication rates. Most studies have not demonstrated a benefit for using misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent in postmenopausal women.
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy.
BACKGROUND: Vaginal misoprostol has been shown to be an effective single agent for medical abortion. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial compared a regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone for termination of early pregnancy. METHODS: 250 women with gestations < or = 56 days were randomized by a random number table to receive either 200 mg mifepristone orally or placebo followed 48 h later by 800 microg vaginal misoprostol. Administration of misoprostol was repeated every 24 h up to three doses if abortion failed to occur. Abortion success was defined as complete abortion without the use of surgical aspiration. RESULTS: Successful medical abortions occurred in 114 out of 119 subjects (95.7%) after mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol. In all, 110 out of 125 subjects (88.0%) successfully aborted after placebo and vaginal misoprostol. The higher success rate of complete abortion with the mifepristone and misoprostol regimen was statistically significant compared with the placebo and misoprostol regimen (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol was significantly more effective for termination of pregnancies < or = 56 days than misoprostol alone. The 88% efficacy obtained with vaginal misoprostol alone may be clinically acceptable when mifepristone is not available.
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗