PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Karin Rosenkranz

Publications and source records attributed to Karin Rosenkranz.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Transcallosal sensorimotor integration: effects of sensory input on cortical projections to the contralateral hand.

OBJECTIVE: Low amplitude vibration of forearm or hand muscles predominantly activates proprioceptive inputs that influence corticospinal projections in a focal manner, increasing output to the stimulated muscle while reducing output to neighbouring muscles. Modulation of contralateral forearm muscles by vibration has also been reported on one occasion. The aim of the current investigation was to investigate the effects of proprioceptive input from a hand muscle on corticospinal excitability, intracortical inhibition (SICI) and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) targeting the homologous contralateral muscle. METHODS: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was delivered to the left cortical hand area of 10 healthy subjects and surface electromyography (EMG) recordings taken from the right First Dorsal Interosseus (FDI) and Abductor Digiti Minimi (ADM). The effect of low amplitude vibration of the left FDI on MEP amplitudes, SICI and IHI targeting the right hand was assessed. RESULTS: Vibration of the left FDI caused a significant reduction in MEP amplitudes in the homologous right FDI but not in the right ADM. SICI and IHI targeting both muscles were also significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that proprioceptive input from a hand muscle reduces the corticospinal excitability of the contralateral homologous muscle. The increases in SICI and IHI suggest that at least some of this effect occurs in the cortex ipsilateral to the stimulus and this may be mediated via transcallosal fibres. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that sensory input can modulate excitability in both motor cortices simultaneously, as well as the relationship between them. Interventions which modulate this transcallosal relationship may become useful in disorders where abnormal IHI is a potential therapeutic target.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Differences between the effects of three plasticity inducing protocols on the organization of the human motor cortex.

Several experimental protocols induce lasting changes in the excitability of motor cortex. Some involve direct cortical stimulation, others activate the somatosensory system and some combine motor and sensory stimulation. The effects usually are measured as changes in amplitude of the motor-evoked-potential (MEP) or short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) elicited by a single or paired pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Recent work has also tested sensorimotor organization within the motor cortex by recording MEPs and SICI during short periods of vibration applied to single intrinsic hand muscles. Here sensorimotor organization is focal: MEPs increase and SICI decreases in the vibrated muscle, whilst the opposite occurs in neighbouring muscles. In six volunteers we compared the after effects of three protocols that lead to lasting changes in cortical excitability: (i) paired associative stimulation (PAS) between a TMS pulse and an electrical stimulus to the median nerve; (ii) motor practice of rapid thumb abduction; and (iii) sensory input produced by semicontinuous muscle vibration, on MEPs and SICI at rest and on the sensorimotor organization. PAS increased MEP amplitudes, whereas vibration changed sensorimotor organization. Motor practice had a dual effect and increased MEPs as well as affecting sensorimotor organization. The implication is that different protocols target different sets of cortical circuits. We speculate that protocols that involve repeated activation of motor cortical output lead to lasting changes in efficacy of synaptic connections in output circuits, whereas protocols that emphasize sensory inputs affect the strength of sensory inputs to motor circuits.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Spatial attention affects sensorimotor reorganisation in human motor cortex.

It is well known that the somatotopic representation of sensory and motor cortices reorganises in response to sustained changes in sensory input. It is also clear that the extent of the effect depends on whether or not subjects pay attention during the procedure. Here we show that the pattern of reorganisation produced by sustained sensory input depends not only on the subjects' attention but also on the spatial focus of their attention on the body surface. Maximal effects are observed only when subjects pay attention to the site of the input; if they attend to an adjacent body part then the effects are reduced. These results may be relevant to rehabilitation procedures commonly used in patients after stroke.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Pathophysiological differences between musician's dystonia and writer's cramp.

Focal hand dystonia (FHD) has been suggested to be a maladaptive response of the brain to repetitive performance of stereotyped and attentionally demanding hand movements. However, not all patients with FHD have a strict history of excessive hand use; for example, patients with musician's dystonia (MD) spend many hours per day with their attention focused on instrumental practice, whereas many patients with writer's cramp (WC) have a history of average hand use. The present experiments test whether seven MD and six WC patients have different pathophysiological deficits by examining the spatial pattern of sensorimotor organization in the motor cortex. Two control groups were used, eight healthy non-musicians and eight healthy musicians. The latter served to control for physiological adaptation of the brain to musical training. We used focal vibration of a single hand muscle to produce sensory input whilst the excitability of corticospinal outputs to the vibrated and other hand muscles was evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. In healthy non-musicians, vibration increases the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials and decreases the short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the vibrated muscle, whilst having the opposite effect on the non-vibrated hand muscles. The pattern of sensorimotor interaction was abnormal in both patient groups. However, the nature of the deficit differed between them. While vibration had little effect on cortical excitability in WC, it strongly reduced SICI in all hand muscles irrespective of spatial organization in MD. In the healthy musicians we found an organization intermediate between that of healthy non-musicians and MD. The data are consistent with a model in which musical practice in healthy musicians leads to beneficial changes in organization of the motor cortex, but in MD these progress too far and begin to interfere with movement rather than assist it. The fact that sensory input had no effect on motor output in patients with WC suggests that sensory information from the hand may play a smaller role in provoking pathological changes in WC than in MD.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex.

Sensory input can remodel representations in the sensory cortex, and this effect is heavily influenced by attention to the stimulus. Here we ask whether pure sensory input can also influence the spatial distribution of sensory effects on motor cortical hand area (sensorimotor organization) and whether this is modulated by attention. Sensorimotor organization was tested by applying short (1.5 s) periods of low amplitude vibration to single intrinsic hand muscles and measuring motor cortex excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In healthy subjects, sensorimotor organization in the hand is focal, with input from one hand muscle increasing motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), decreasing short and increasing long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI) in the vibrated muscle ('homotopic' effects) and having opposite effects on neighbouring muscles ('heterotopic' effects). Here we show that a 15 min intervention of vibration applied simultaneously to two hand muscles can lead to long-term (> 30 min) changes in the spatial pattern of sensorimotor interaction. The amount and direction of the effects depended on the subject's attention during the intervention: if subjects attended to both muscles when they were receiving simultaneous vibration, subsequent short-term vibration applied to one of them produced 'homotopic' effects on both muscles. 'Heterotopic' effects on a muscle not vibrated during the intervention were unaffected. If subjects did not attend to simultaneous vibration, subsequent short-term vibration of the muscles involved in the intervention no longer had any effect on them although the 'heterotopic' effects on a muscle not involved in the intervention were unchanged. We conclude that a 15 min period of pure sensory input can remodel the way that subsequent sensory inputs interact with motor output, that the effects are specific for the motor output to muscles involved in the intervention and that they are modulated by the subject's attention.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is essential in time reproduction: an investigation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

This study used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to investigate the roles of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and supplementary motor area (SMA) in short (500 ms) and long (2 s) interval timing. The results were compared with rTMS over the leg area of motor cortex, an area not thought to be involved with time estimation. rTMS was delivered during one of two phases of a time reproduction task: at the onset of the Estimation Phase (presentation of the interval to be timed) and at the onset of the Reproduction Phase (subjects' reproduction of the timed interval). There was a significant main effect of Site (SMA vs. right DLPFC vs. leg motor area) due to the fact that rTMS over the right DLPFC caused subjects to underestimate time intervals compared with rTMS over the leg motor area. There was also a significant three-way interaction between Site, Duration and Phase (Estimation Phase vs. Reproduction Phase) that post hoc analyses showed was due to underestimation of long intervals when rTMS was given over the right DLPFC at the start of the Reproduction Phase. There was no effect of rTMS over the right DLPFC or SMA in the short interval task. This is consistent with previous studies showing that the right DLPFC is important in estimating time intervals in the seconds-range. In addition, we suggest that the selectivity of the rTMS effect for the Reproduction Phase indicates that the right DLPFC plays a particular role in memory processes.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Memory for fingertip forces: passive hand muscle vibration interferes with predictive grip force scaling.

When subjects repetitively lift an object, the grip force they select is influenced by the mechanical object properties of the preceding lift. Similar effects on grip force scaling are observed whether the subsequent lift is performed with the same hand or the hand contralateral to the preceding lift. Here we demonstrate that passive vibration of the hand muscles involved in the generation of grip force in the interval between two blocks of lifting trials interferes with predictive grip force scaling. Following ten trials in which subjects lifted an object with constant mechanical properties with the dominant hand, muscle vibration was given to the first interosseus and adductor pollicis muscles of the dominant hand during a 10-min rest period. Compared with the last lift preceding vibration, peak rates of grip force increase and peak grip forces were scaled too high during the first lift following vibration whether the lift was made with the dominant or non-dominant hand. Subjects scaled grip force accurately to the object properties within three lifts following vibration. If subjects rested for 10 min after the first ten trials and received no vibration, then there was no significant difference in the peak grip force or its rate of increase between the last lift preceding rest and the first lift following it. We suggest that vibration impairs the memory processes responsible for predictive grip force scaling. Our data are consistent with the recent suggestion that these memory processes are neither specific for a certain motor action nor do they reflect internal representations of mechanical object properties.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans.

Low amplitude muscle vibration (0.5 ms; 80 Hz; duration 1.5 s) was applied in turn to each of three different intrinsic hand muscles (first dorsal interosseus, FDI; abductor pollicis brevis, APB; and abductor digiti minimi, ADM) in order to test its effect on the EMG responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Recordings were also taken from flexor and extensor carpi radialis (FCR and ECR, respectively). We evaluated the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by a single TMS pulse, short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation (SICI and ICF) and long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). TMS pulses were applied 1 s after the start of vibration with subjects relaxed throughout. Vibration increased the amplitude of MEPs evoked in the vibrated muscle (162 +/- 6 % of MEP with no vibration; mean +/- S.E.M.), but suppressed MEPs in the two non-vibrated hand muscles (72 +/- 9 %). Compared with no vibration (test response reduced to 51 +/- 5 % of control), there was less SICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 92 +/- 28 % of control) and more in the non-vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 27 +/- 5 % of control). The opposite occurred for LICI: compared with the no vibration condition (test response reduced to 33 +/- 6 % control), there was more LICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 17 +/- 3 % control) than in the non-vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 80 +/- 11 % control) even when the intensity of the test stimulus was adjusted to compensate for the changes in baseline MEP. There was no effect on ICF. Cutaneous stimulation of the index finger (80 Hz, 1.5 s duration, twice sensory threshold) had no consistent differential effect on any of the parameters. We conclude that vibratory input from muscle can differentially modulate excitability in motor cortical circuits.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Focal reduction of intracortical inhibition in the motor cortex by selective proprioceptive stimulation.

The influence of proprioception on motorcortical excitability was assessed by muscle vibration (MV; 80 Hz, 0.5 mm amplitude) of the flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR) and compared to voluntary contraction and relaxation conditions. Motor thresholds, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and the intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF) after paired magnetic stimuli were studied. A control experiment using TMS inducing posteriorly directed current was performed. MEPs were recorded simultaneously from the FCR, the extensor carpi radialis, the abductor pollicis brevis and the first dorsal interosseus. In the FCR, MV led to an increase of excitability shown by a decrease of motor threshold, a facilitation of MEPs in response to single-pulse TMS, a reduction of ICI and an increase of ICF. Since especially the ICI and ICF remain unchanged in other recorded muscles, this increase of excitability is specific for the vibrated muscle. With posteriorly directed current the ICI in the FCR was reduced as well, showing an involvement of later I-waves. We suggest that MV induces a focused motorcortical activation which relies on a reduced activity of intracortical inhibitory interneuronal circuits targeting selectively the motorcortical representation of the vibrated muscle.

Adult↗