Biomedical subjects

Katharina Wenzel-Seifert

Publications and source records attributed to Katharina Wenzel-Seifert.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

The human formyl peptide receptor as model system for constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors.

According to the two-state model of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation, GPCRs isomerize from an inactive (R) state to an active (R*) state. In the R* state, GPCRs activate G-proteins. Agonist-independent R/R* isomerization is referred to as constitutive activity and results in an increase in basal G-protein activity, i.e. GDP/GTP exchange. Agonists stabilize the R* state and further increase, whereas inverse agonists stabilize the R state and decrease, basal G-protein activity. Constitutive activity is observed in numerous wild-type GPCRs and disease-causing GPCR mutants with increased constitutive activity. The human formyl peptide receptor (FPR) exists in several isoforms (FPR-26, FPR-98 and FPR-G6) and activates chemotaxis and cytotoxic cell functions of phagocytes through G(i)-proteins. Studies in HL-60 leukemia cell membranes demonstrated inhibitory effects of Na(+) and pertussis toxin on basal G(i)-protein activity, suggesting that the FPR is constitutively active. However, since HL-60 cells express several constitutively active chemoattractant receptors, analysis of constitutive FPR activity was difficult. Sf9 insect cells do not express chemoattractant receptors and G(i)-proteins and provide a sensitive reconstitution system for FPR/G(i)-protein coupling. Such expression studies showed that FPR-26 is much more constitutively active than FPR-98 and FPR-G6 as assessed by the relative inhibitory effects of Na(+) and of the inverse agonist cyclosporin H on basal G(i)-protein activity. Site-directed mutagenesis studies suggest that the E346A exchange in the C-terminus critically determines dimerization and constitutive activity of FPR. Moreover, N-glycosylation of the N-terminus seems to be important for constitutive FPR activity. Finally, we discuss some future directions of research.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

Functional differences between human formyl peptide receptor isoforms 26, 98, and G6.

The formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is expressed in neutrophils, couples to G(i)-proteins and activates phospholipase C, chemotaxis and cytotoxic cell functions. FPR isoforms 26, 98, and G6 differ from each other in amino acids 101, 192 and 346 (FPR-26: V101, N192, E346; FPR-98: L101, N192, A346; FPR-G6: V101, K192, A346), but the functional significance of those structural differences is unknown. In order to address this question, we analyzed FPR-26, FPR-98 and FPR-G6 by co-expressing recombinant FLAG epitope-tagged FPRs with the G-protein G(i)alpha(2)beta(1)gamma(2) in Sf9 insect cells and measured high-affinity agonist binding and guanosine 5'- O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding. The B(max) values of high-affinity agonist binding with FPR-98 and FPR-G6 were much lower than with FPR-26. FPR-98 and FPR-G6 activated considerably fewer G(i)-proteins, and were much less constitutively active, than FPR-26. Whereas FPR-26 migrated as a monomer in SDS polyacrylamide electrophoresis, FPR-98 and FPR-G6 migrated as dimers and tetramers. In terms of immunoreactivity, FRP-98 and FPR-G6 were expressed at higher levels than FPR-26. Single amino acid exchanges at positions 101 (V-->L), 192 (N-->K) and 346 (E-->A) in FPR-26 revealed that E346 accounts for FPR-26 migrating as a monomer and the high constitutive activity of FPR-26. The V101L, N192K and E346A exchanges all reduced high-affinity agonist binding and the number of G(i)-proteins activated by FPR-26. We conclude that (i) FPR isoforms 98 and G6 exhibit a partial G(i)-protein coupling defect relative to FPR-26 and that (ii) E346 critically determines constitutive activity, G(i)-protein coupling and physical state of FPR-26.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

Multiple differences in agonist and antagonist pharmacology between human and guinea pig histamine H1-receptor.

Species isoforms of histamine H2-, H3-, and H4-receptors differ in their pharmacological properties. The study aim was to dissect differences between the human H1R (hH1R) and guinea pig H1R (ghH1R). We coexpressed hH1R and gpH1R with regulators of G-protein signaling in Sf9 insect cells and analyzed the GTPase activity of Gq-proteins. Small H1R agonists showed similar effects at hH1R and gpH1R, whereas bulkier 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were up to approximately 10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. Most 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were more efficacious at gpH1R than at hH1R. Several first-generation H1R antagonists were approximately 2-fold, and arpromidine-type H1R antagonists up to approximately 10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. [3H]Mepyramine competition binding studies confirmed the potency differences of the GTPase studies. Phe-153-->Leu-153 or Ile-433-->Val-433 exchange in hH1R (hH1R-->gpH1R) resulted in poor receptor expression, low [3H]mepyramine affinity, and functional inactivity. The Phe-153-->Leu-153/Ile-433-->Val-433 double mutant expressed excellently but only partially changed the pharmacological properties of hH1R. Small H1R agonists and 2-phenylhistamines interacted differentially with human and guinea pig H2R in terms of potency and efficacy, respectively. Our data show the following: 1) there are differences in agonist- and antagonist-pharmacology of hH1R and gpH1R encompassing diverse classes of bulky ligands. These differences may be explained by higher conformational flexibility of gpH1R relative to hH1R; 2) Phe-153 and Ile-433 are critical for proper folding and expression of hH1R; and 3) H2R species isoforms distinguish between H1R agonists.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

Critical role of N-terminal N-glycosylation for proper folding of the human formyl peptide receptor.

The human formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is N-glycosylated and activates phagocytes via G(i)-proteins. The FPR expressed with G(i)alpha(2)beta(1)gamma(2) in Sf9 insect cells exhibits high constitutive activity as assessed by strong inhibitory effects of an inverse agonist and Na(+) on basal guanosine 5(')-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding. The aim of our study was to analyze the role of N-glycosylation in FPR function. Site-directed mutagenesis of extracellular Asn residues prevented FPR glycosylation but not FPR expression in Sf9 membranes. However, in terms of high-affinity agonist binding, kinetics of GTPgammaS binding, number of G(i)-proteins activated, and constitutive activity, non-glycosylated FPR was much less active than native FPR. FPR-Asn4Gln/Asn10Gln/Asn179Gln and FPR-Asn4Gln/Asn10/Gln exhibited similar defects. Our data indicate that N-glycosylation of N-terminal Asn4 and Asn10 but not of Asn179 in the second extracellular loop is essential for proper folding and, hence, function of FPR. FPR deglycosylation by bacterial glycosidases could be a mechanism by which bacteria compromise host defense.

Asparagine↗

PubMed2003

Properties of Arg389-beta1-adrenoceptor-Gsalpha fusion proteins: comparison with Gly389-beta1-adrenoceptor-Gsalpha fusion proteins.

The human beta1-adrenoceptor (beta1AR) exists in several isoforms and activates adenylyl cyclase (AC) via Gs-proteins. The Arg389-isoform of the beta1AR (beta1AR-R389) expressed in CHW cells is much more efficient than the Gly389 isoform of the beta1AR (beta1AR-G389) at stabilizing the ternary complex and activating AC (Mason et al. 1999). The beta1AR-G389 fused to the Gsalpha splice variants GsalphaL or GsalphaS is efficient at stabilizing the ternary complex and activating AC (Wenzel-Seifert et al. 2002). Here, we show that beta1AR-R389-Gsalpha fusion proteins and beta1AR-G389-Gsalpha fusion proteins are similarly efficient at stabilizing the ternary complex and activating AC. In terms of agonist efficacies and agonist potencies in the [35S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) binding assay, beta1AR-R389-Gsalpha fusion proteins and beta1AR-G389-Gsalpha fusion proteins are similar, too. Our present data fit to an increasing number of clinical studies that failed to detect physiology- or pathology-related functional differences between beta1AR-R389 and beta1AR-G389.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

PubMed2002

GDP affinity and order state of the catalytic site are critical for function of xanthine nucleotide-selective Galphas proteins.

Xanthine nucleotide-selective small GTP-binding proteins with an Asp/Asn mutation are valuable for the analysis of individual GTP-binding proteins in complex systems. Similar applications can be devised for heterotrimeric G-proteins. However, Asp/Asn mutants of Galpha(o), Galpha(11), and Galpha(16) were inactive. An additional Gln/Leu mutation in the catalytic site, reducing GTPase activity and increasing GDP affinity, was required to generate xanthine nucleotide-selective unspecified G-protein alpha-subunit (Galpha). Our study aim was to generate xanthine nucleotide-selective mutants of Galpha(s), the stimulatory G-protein of adenylyl cyclase. The short splice variant of Galpha(s) (Galpha(sS)) possesses higher GDP affinity than the long splice variant (Galpha(sL)). Nucleoside 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphates (NTPgammaSs) and nucleoside 5'-[beta,gamma-imido]triphosphates effectively activated a Galpha(sS) mutant with a D280N exchange (Galpha(sS)-N280), whereas nucleotides activated a Galpha(sL) mutant with a D295N exchange (Galpha(sL)-N295) only weakly. The Gln/Leu mutation enhanced Galpha(sL)-N295 activity. NTPgammaSs activated Galpha(sS)-N280 and a Galpha(sL) mutant with a Q227L and D295N exchange (Galpha(sL)-L227/N295) with similar potencies, whereas xanthosine 5'-triphosphate and xanthosine 5'-[beta,gamma-imido]triphosphate were more potent than GTP and guanosine 5'-[beta,gamma-imido]triphosphate, respectively. Galpha(sS)-N280 interacted with the beta(2)-adrenoreceptor and exhibited high-affinity XTPase activity. Collectively, (i) Galpha(sS)-N280 is the first functional xanthine nucleotide-selective Galpha with the Asp/Asn mutation alone; (ii) sufficiently high GDP affinity is crucial for Galpha Asp/Asn mutant function; (iii) with nucleoside 5'-triphosphates and nucleoside 5'-[beta,gamma-imido]triphosphates, Galpha(s)-N280 and Galpha(sL)-L227/N295 exhibit xanthine nucleotide selectivity, whereas NTPgammaSs sterically perturb the catalytic site of Galpha and annihilate xanthine selectivity.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Efficient adenylyl cyclase activation by a beta2-adrenoceptor-G(i)alpha2 fusion protein.

The G-protein G(i)alpha can activate adenylyl cyclase (AC), but the relevance of this AC activation is unknown. We used receptor-G protein co-expression and receptor-G protein fusion proteins to investigate G(i)alpha(2) regulation of AC in Sf9 cells. G(i)alpha(2) was fused to the beta(2)-adrenoceptor (beta(2)AR), a preferentially G(s)-coupled receptor, or the formyl peptide receptor (FPR), a G(i)-coupled receptor. The FPR co-expressed with, or fused to, G(i)alpha(2), reduced AC activity. In contrast, the beta(2)AR fused to G(i)alpha(2) was a highly efficient AC activator, while the beta(2)AR co-expressed with G(i)alpha(2) was not. Agonist efficiently stimulated incorporation of [alpha-32P]GTP azidoanilide into beta(2)AR-G(i)alpha(2). We explain AC activation by beta(2)AR-G(i)alpha(2) by a model in which there is interaction of the beta(2)AR and AC, preventing tethered G(i)alpha(2) from interacting with the inhibitory G(i)alpha site of AC. The postulated beta(2)AR/AC interaction brings G(i)alpha(2) into close proximity of the G(s)alpha site of AC, enabling G(i)alpha(2) to activate AC.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

PubMed2002

Constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors: cause of disease and common property of wild-type receptors.

The aim of this review is to provide a systematic overview on constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a rapidly evolving area in signal transduction research. We will discuss mechanisms, pharmacological tools and methodological approaches to analyze constitutive activity. The two-state model defines constitutive activity as the ability of a GPCR to undergo agonist-independent isomerization from an inactive (R) state to an active (R*) state. While the two-state model explains basic concepts of constitutive GPCR activity and inverse agonism, there is increasing evidence for multiple active GPCR conformations with distinct biological activities. As a result of constitutive GPCR activity, basal G-protein activity increases. Until now, constitutive activity has been observed for more than 60 wild-type GPCRs from the families 1-3 and from different species including humans and commonly used laboratory animal species. Additionally, several naturally occurring and disease-causing GPCR mutants with increased constitutive activity relative to wild-type GPCRs have been identified. Alternative splicing, RNA editing, polymorphisms within a given species, species variants and coupling to specific G-proteins all modulate the constitutive activity of GPCRs, providing multiple regulatory switches to fine-tune basal cellular activities. The most important pharmacological tools to analyze constitutive activity are inverse agonists and Na(+) that stabilize the R state, and pertussis toxin that uncouples GPCRs from G(i)/G(o)-proteins. Constitutive activity is observed at low and high GPCR expression levels, in native systems and in recombinant systems, and has been reported for GPCRs coupled to G(s)-, G(i)- and G(q)-proteins. Constitutive activity of neurotransmitter GPCRs may provide a tonic support for basal neuronal activity. For the majority of GPCRs known to be constitutively active, inverse agonists have already been identified. Inverse agonists may be useful in the treatment of neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular diseases and of diseases caused by constitutively active GPCR mutants.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Similarities and differences in the coupling of human beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptors to Gs(alpha) splice variants.

The human beta1-adrenoceptor (beta1AR) and beta2-adrenoceptor (beta2AR) couple to Gs-proteins to activate adenylyl cyclase (AC). There are differences in desensitization between the beta2AR and the originally cloned Gly389-beta1AR, but with respect to ternary complex formation, constitutive activity, and AC activation the picture is unclear. To learn more about the similarities and differences between the beta1AR and beta2AR, we analyzed coupling of the Gly389-beta1AR to the G(s(alpha)) splice variants Gs(alpha)L and Gs(alpha)S using beta1AR-Gs(alpha) fusion proteins expressed in Sf9 cells and compared the data with previously published data on beta2AR-Gs(alpha) fusion proteins (Seifert et al., J Biol Chem 1998;273:5109-16). Fusion ensures defined receptor/G-protein stoichiometry and efficient coupling. The agonist (-)-isoproterenol stabilized the ternary complex at beta1AR-Gs(alpha)S, beta1AR-Gs(alpha)L, beta2AR-Gs(alpha)S, and beta2AR-Gs(alpha)L with similar efficiency. beta1AR-Gs(alpha)L but not beta1AR-Gs(alpha)S showed the hallmarks of constitutive activity as assessed by increased potencies and efficacies of partial agonists and AC activation by the agonist-free receptor. Similar differences were observed previously for beta2AR-Gs(alpha)S and beta2AR-Gs(alpha)L. beta1AR-Gs(alpha)S and beta2AR-Gs(alpha)S were similarly efficient at activating AC, but beta1AR-Gs(alpha)L was approximately 4-fold more efficient at activating AC than beta2AR-Gs(alpha)L. Our data show that (i) the beta1AR and beta2AR are similarly efficient at stabilizing the ternary complex with Gs(alpha) splice variants, (ii) Gs(alpha)L confers constitutive activity to the beta1AR and beta2AR, and (iii) the beta1AR coupled to Gs(alpha)L is more efficient at activating AC than the beta2AR coupled to Gs(alpha)L. These data help us understand some of the discrepancies regarding similarities and differences between the beta1AR and beta2AR.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

PubMed2002

The human histamine H2-receptor couples more efficiently to Sf9 insect cell Gs-proteins than to insect cell Gq-proteins: limitations of Sf9 cells for the analysis of receptor/Gq-protein coupling.

The human histamine H2-receptor (hH2R) couples to Gs-proteins to activate adenylyl cyclase and to Gq-proteins to activate phospholipase C, but phospholipase C activation has not consistently been observed. The aim of this study was to compare coupling of hH2R to insect and mammalian Gs- and Gq-proteins in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells. Interaction of hH2R with mammalian G proteins was assessed with coexpressed proteins or receptor-Galpha fusion proteins that enhance coupling efficiency. hH2R efficiently coupled to insect Gs-proteins to activate adenylyl cyclase. However, hH2R poorly coupled to insect Gq-proteins as assessed by the lack of enhancement of histamine-stimulated steady-state GTP hydrolysis by regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins). In contrast, RGS-proteins efficiently enhanced GTP hydrolysis stimulated by the human platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) and the histamine H1-receptor (H1R) from man and guinea pig. The measurement of intracellular free Ca2+ concentration was not useful for studying receptor/Gq-protein coupling. hH2R also efficiently interacted with mammalian Gs-proteins, specifically with fused Gsalpha as assessed by guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS)-sensitive high-affinity agonist binding, agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding and adenylyl cyclase activation. In contrast, coupling of hH2R to coexpressed and fused mammalian Gqalpha was poor. However, our inability to reconstitute efficient coupling of PAFR and H1R to mammalian Gqalpha indicated that a large portion of the expressed G protein was functionally inactive. Taken together, our data show that hH2R couples more efficiently to insect cell Gs-proteins than to insect cell Gq-proteins. Unfortunately, there are significant limitations in the usefulness of Sf9 cells for comparing the coupling of receptors to mammalian Gs- and Gq-proteins and assessing Gq-mediated activation of effector systems.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗