PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Katherine R Jones

Publications and source records attributed to Katherine R Jones.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Nursing home resident barriers to effective pain management: why nursing home residents may not seek pain medication.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple barriers to effective pain management are present in the nursing home setting. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the extent to which residents in pain declined to request pain medication from the staff, and the reasons provided by the residents to explain this behavior. DESIGN: Every 3 months, a 20% sample of residents in 12 nursing homes was administered a short pain interview, then observed for pain indicators. Medical records were reviewed at the same time for documentation about pain and its treatment. All residents were asked if they had pain (or a similar word) now or in the past 24 hours. They were also asked if they had pain but did not request pain medication. If affirmative, the resident was asked to provide up to three reasons for not requesting medication. SETTING: The study was conducted in 12 Colorado nursing homes, located in both urban and rural settings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2033 nursing home residents completed pain interviews and/or were observed for pain indicators by trained research assistants. These interviews took place before, during, and after implementation of an intervention to improve pain practices. MEASUREMENTS: A cognitive organizing structure was used to categorize resident responses into a coherent classification. Individual responses were assigned by team members to the appropriate category using a consensus process. The final classification scheme consisted of 10 categories of reasons why residents do not request pain medication. RESULTS: More than one-half of residents (59.5%) reporting pain in the past 24 hours did not request medication for that pain. Subjects in pain were most likely to state medication concerns or stoicism as the reasons for not requesting pain medication. Concerns about staff reactions to a request or perceptions that the staff was too busy were also mentioned frequently by the residents. Subgroup analyses suggested that residents in pain but not requesting pain medication were significantly more likely to be in rural rather than urban nursing homes (67.9% vs. 52.9%, P < or = .01), and white as compared to nonwhite ethnicity (60.6% vs. 52.1%, P < or = .05). They also tended to be older on average (80.4 +/- 12.1 years vs. 77.9 +/- 12.7 years, P < or = .01) than residents who did request pain medication. Finally, residents in pain but not requesting pain medication were significantly more likely to report having both continuous (c) and intermittent (i) pain (71.8% [c + i] vs. 61% [c] or 56.5% [i], P < or = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Interventions to reduce pain in nursing home residents need to be responsive to the concerns of the residents. It must be acknowledged that resident preferences and beliefs may lead to declined pain interventions regardless of the staff's motivation to make the resident more comfortable. Staff nurses also need to make a more concerted effort to systematically assess pain and offer pain medication to residents rather than rely on resident requests.

Journal Article↗

Assessing the appropriateness of pain medication prescribing practices in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVES: To test a tool for screening the quality of nursing home (NH) pain medication prescribing. DESIGN: Validity and reliability of measurement tool developed for a pre/postintervention with untreated comparison group. SETTING: Six treatment NHs and six comparison NHs in rural and urban Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: NH staff, physicians, and repeated 20% random sample of each home's residents (N = 2,031). INTERVENTION: Nurse and physician education; NH internal pain team to champion better pain management using a pain vital sign, consultations, and rounds. MEASUREMENTS: An expert panel reviewed the Pain Medication Appropriateness Scale (PMAS) for content validity. Research assistants interviewed NH residents, assessed them for pain using standardized instruments, and reviewed their medical records for prescriptions and use of pain and adjuvant medication. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the PMAS of residents in pain with the PMAS of those not in pain and comparing scores in homes in which the intervention was more effective with those in which it was less effective, using the Fisher exact and Student t tests. Interrater and test-retest reliability were measured. RESULTS: The mean total PMAS was 64% of optimal. Fewer than half of residents with predictably recurrent pain were prescribed scheduled pain medication; 23% received at least one high-risk medication. PMAS scores were better for residents not in pain (68% vs 60%, P = .004) and in homes where nurses' knowledge of pain assessment and management improved or stayed the same during the intervention (69% vs 61%, P = .03). CONCLUSION: The PMAS is useful for assessing pain medication prescribing in NHs and elucidates why so many residents have poorly controlled pain.

Adult↗

Measuring pain intensity in nursing home residents.

Assessing pain intensity in nursing home residents remains a challenge. As part of a multifaceted intervention study to improve pain practices in nursing homes, quarterly pain assessments were conducted in 12 Colorado nursing homes. Residents who reported pain or discomfort of any kind in the past 24 hours were asked to choose one of three pain intensity scales to quantify their current and highest level of pain intensity. They were also observed for pain behaviors using Feldt's Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators. Residents preferred the Verbal Descriptor Scale almost 2:1 over the 11-point Verbal Numeric Rating Scale and the Faces Pain Scale. Sex and ethnicity were associated with differences in scale preference. More than one-half of residents reporting pain had an observable pain indicator. There was a monotonic relationship between reported pain intensity and number of observed pain indicators. To improve pain assessment and management in nursing homes, residents should be given a choice of pain intensity scales and observed for possible pain behaviors.

Aged, 80 and over↗

From research to daily clinical practice: what are the challenges in "translation"?

BACKGROUND: Translating research findings into sustainable improvements in clinical and patient outcomes remains a substantial obstacle to improving the quality and safety of care. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality funded two initiatives to assess strategies for improvements--Translating Research into Practice (TRIP). The TRIP II initiative supported 13 quality improvement projects. SURVEYING THE TRIP II STUDIES: The principal investigators (PIs) of the 13 projects were surveyed regarding encountered barriers to implementation at 6 months and 18 months (when they were also asked about solutions). RESULTS: Seven of the 13 PIs responded to the survey at both times--6 and 18 months. For each project stage--Select a TRIP focus and develop intervention strategies (Stage 1), Conduct the intervention (Stage 2), and Measure the Impact (Stage 3)--barriers were described, and field-tested solutions were provided. For example, for Stage 2, if the target audience lacked buy-in and would not participate, solutions would be to get up-front buy-in from all staff, not just leaders; address root causes of problems; use opinion leaders and incentives; plan interventions ahead and provide make-up videos; and accept that targets vary in their readiness to change. DISCUSSION: The framework and examples provided should help overcome challenges in any work in which research findings are applied to clinical practice.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

Improving nursing home staff knowledge and attitudes about pain.

PURPOSE: Effective pain management remains a serious problem in the nursing home setting. Barriers to achieving optimal pain practices include staff knowledge deficits, biases, and attitudes that influence assessment and management of the residents' pain. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve nursing homes participated in this intervention study: six treatment homes and six control homes, divided evenly between urban and rural locations. Three hundred licensed and unlicensed nursing home staff members completed written knowledge and attitude surveys at baseline, and 378 staff members completed the surveys after intervention implementation. RESULTS: Baseline results revealed notable knowledge deficits in the areas of pharmacology, drug addiction and dependence, side effect management, and nonpharmacologic management-strategy effectiveness. Significant differences were noted by job title (registered nurse/licensed practical nurse/certified nursing assistant). Case studies displayed a knowledge application problem, with nurses often filtering resident pain reports through observed resident behaviors. The intervention led to significant improvement in knowledge scores in some, but not all, the treatment homes. Perceived barriers to effective pain management showed a significant decline across all study nursing homes. IMPLICATIONS: Knowledge deficits related to pain management persist in nursing homes. An interactive multifaceted educational program was only partially successful in improving knowledge across settings and job categories. Attitudes and beliefs appear more difficult to change, whereas environmental and contextual factors appeared to be reducing perceived barriers to effective pain management across all participating nursing homes.

Adult↗

Translation research in long-term care: improving pain management in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: Pain prevalence in nursing homes remains high, with multiple resident, staff, and physician barriers presenting serious challenges to its improvement. AIMS: The study aims were to (1) develop and test a multifaceted, culturally competent intervention to improve nursing home pain practices; (2) improve staff, resident, and physician knowledge and attitudes about pain and its management; (3) improve actual pain practices in nursing homes; and (4) improve nursing home policies and procedures related to pain. METHODS: A multifaceted, culturally competent intervention was developed and tested in six Colorado nursing homes, with another six nursing homes serving as control sites. Both educational and behavioral change strategies were employed. FINDINGS: The intervention was successful in improving the percentage of residents reporting constant pain in the treatment homes. Contextual factors (implementation of Medicare's Nursing Home Compare report card) appeared to exert a positive influence on pain documentation. There was no reduction in the percentage of residents reporting pain or reporting moderate/severe pain. DISCUSSION: Multiple challenges to quality improvement exist in nursing homes. Turnover of nursing staff reduced actual exposure to the intervention, and turnover of directors of nursing influenced constancy of message and overall facility stability. Residents often failed to report their pain, and physicians were reluctant to alter their prescribing practices. IMPLICATIONS: Any intervention to improve pain management in nursing homes must target explicitly the residents, nursing home staff, and primary care physicians. Implementation strategies need to accommodate the high turnover rates among staff, as well as the changes among the nursing home leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is a complex problem in the nursing home setting. Multiple factors must be considered in both the design and implementation of interventions to improve pain practices and reduce pain prevalence in nursing homes.

Aged↗

Nursing home resident barriers to effective pain management: why nursing home residents may not seek pain medication.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple barriers to effective pain management are present in the nursing home setting. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the extent to which residents in pain declined to request pain medication from the staff, and the reasons provided by the residents to explain this behavior. DESIGN: Every 3 months, a 20% sample of residents in 12 nursing homes was administered a short pain interview, then observed for pain indicators. Medical records were reviewed at the same time for documentation about pain and its treatment. All residents were asked if they had pain (or a similar word) now or in the past 24 hours. They were also asked if they had pain but did not request pain medication. If affirmative, the resident was asked to provide up to three reasons for not requesting medication. SETTING: The study was conducted in 12 Colorado nursing homes, located in both urban and rural settings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2033 nursing home residents completed pain interviews and/or were observed for pain indicators by trained research assistants. These interviews took place before, during, and after implementation of an intervention to improve pain practices. MEASUREMENTS: A cognitive organizing structure was used to categorize resident responses into a coherent classification. Individual responses were assigned by team members to the appropriate category using a consensus process. The final classification scheme consisted of 10 categories of reasons why residents do not request pain medication. RESULTS: More than one-half of residents (59.5%) reporting pain in the past 24 hours did not request medication for that pain. Subjects in pain were most likely to state medication concerns or stoicism as the reasons for not requesting pain medication. Concerns about staff reactions to a request or perceptions that the staff was too busy were also mentioned frequently by the residents. Subgroup analyses suggested that residents in pain but not requesting pain medication were significantly more likely to be in rural rather than urban nursing homes (67.9% vs. 52.9%, P < or = .01), and white as compared to nonwhite ethnicity (60.6% vs. 52.1%, P < or = .05). They also tended to be older on average (80.4 +/- 12.1 years vs. 77.9 +/- 12.7 years, P < or = .01) than residents who did request pain medication. Finally, residents in pain but not requesting pain medication were significantly more likely to report having both continuous (c) and intermittent (i) pain (71.8% [c + i] vs. 61% [c] or 56.5% [i], P < or = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Interventions to reduce pain in nursing home residents need to be responsive to the concerns of the residents. It must be acknowledged that resident preferences and beliefs may lead to declined pain interventions regardless of the staff's motivation to make the resident more comfortable. Staff nurses also need to make a more concerted effort to systematically assess pain and offer pain medication to residents rather than rely on resident requests.

Aged↗

Outcomes research: an interdisciplinary perspective.

Outcomes achieved by healthcare providers are a function of patient clinical and demographic characteristics, baseline health status, delivered treatments and interventions, and setting characteristics. This article describes a prospective, interdisciplinary study of the outcomes of selected surgeries using both generic and condition-specific data collection instruments. The results of several different analyses are discussed, which illustrate the usefulness of such an effort for patients, nurses and physicians, the institution, and the respective disciplines in general.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

Outcomes research: an interdisciplinary perspective.

Outcomes achieved by healthcare providers are a function of patient clinical and demographic characteristics, baseline health status, delivered treatments and interventions, and setting characteristics. This article describes a prospective, interdisciplinary study of the outcomes of selected surgeries using both generic and condition-specific data collection instruments. The results of several different analyses are discussed, which illustrate the usefulness of such an effort for patients, nurses and physicians, the institution, and the respective disciplines in general.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗